Professional Documents
Culture Documents
fINAL Report of Gita Devi Sodari PDF
fINAL Report of Gita Devi Sodari PDF
Report on
Structural Report
Of
Gita Devi Sodari Residential Building
Prepared By:
Jeetendra Shrestha
NEC Regd. No.- 6034 Civil “A”
Structure Engineer
Date: 2077 Shrawan
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This report summarizes the structural analysis and design of "The Proposed Residential
Building of “Gita Devi Sodari” at Bharatpur Metropolitan City Ward No.-16, Nepal. The
analysis and design has been based on the prevailing codes that are in practice in Nepal, the
National Building code of Nepal and the IS code where applicable. This report consists of the
design procedures adopted, the assumptions made, the inputs made in the design and the design
output. The basic aim of the structural design is to build a structure, which is safe, fulfilling the
intended purpose during its estimated life span, economical in terms of initial and maintenance
cost, durable and also maintaining a good aesthetic appearance. A building is considered to be
structurally sound, if the individual elements and the building as a whole satisfy the criteria for
strength, stability and serviceability and in seismic areas additional criteria for ductility and
energy absorption capabilities. The overall building must be strong enough to transfer all loads
through the structure to the ground without collapsing or losing structural integrity by rupture
of the material at the critical sections, by transformation of the whole or parts into mechanisms
or by instability. Failure of one structural element (e.g., due of explosions or collisions) should
not cause progressive collapse of the entire structure. Such a building will normally have
alternate load paths or mechanisms to transfer loads safely to the foundation.
Nepal is located in the boundary of two colliding tectonic plates, namely, the Indian Plate
(Indo-Australian Plate) and the Tibetan Plate (Eurasian Plate). The Indian Plate is constantly
moving under the Tibetan Plate causing many minor and major earthquakes in this region. As
a result, Nepal has witnessed many major as well as minor earthquakes during the past. Records
show that around 19 major earthquakes have shaken Nepal since then. The 1833 A.D.
earthquake, 1934 A.D Bihar-Nepal earthquake and 2015 Gorkha Earthquake were the most
destructive ones in the history of Nepal.
Dead Loads
Live loads
Floor 2.0 KN/m2
Stairs 3.0 KN/m2
Corridors 3.0 KN/m2
balcony 3 KN/m2
Roof Live Accessible 1.5 KN/m2
Roof Live In Accessible 0.75 KN/m^2
Seismic Loads
Seismic coefficient Method was adopted to analyze the building for Earthquake loads
Design Base Shear VB = Cd*W [10.1, NBC 105-1994]
Where,
Cd = Design horizontal seismic coefficient as per NBC 105-1994
= CZIK = 0.08
Z= Zone Factor = 1
I= Importance Factor = 1 Table 8.1 NBC105
K= Structural Performance Factor = 1 for DMRF Table 8.2
NBC105
C= Basic Seismic coefficient on the basis of time period, T
of the structure [Fig.8.1 NBC 105-1994] =0.08
T. = 0.06h0.75 (7.3, NBC105-1994]. For Concrete frames = 0.52 seconds
h= Height of building (m) above ground level =18 m
W = Seismic Weight of Building, that includes total Dead load
plus appropriate amount of live load. [Table 6.1, NBC105-
1994].
• The live load on roof need not be considered for calculating the
seismic weight of the building. [Table 6.1, NBC 105-1994].
For the purpose of analysis, seismic forces are applied in the model of the building in
ETABS. Hence, the manual calculations of seismic weight, base shear and the seismic forces
have not been shown. However, the ETABS output for the Seismic Weight, Base Shear and
Seismic Forces in each storey diaphragm are as follows.
Story Drift
In order to control deflection of structural elements, the criteria given in clause 23.2 of
IS: 456:2000 is proposed to be used.
To control overall deformation due to earthquake load, the criteria given in clause 7.11 of IS
1893:2002 is applied. The story drift in any story due to the minimum specified design lateral
force, with partial load factor of 1.0 shall not exceed 0.004 times the story height.
Due to EQx
Due to EQy
Displacements Drift, Check Check for
Floors Drift(mm)
(mm) ratio Drift Displacements
II. Analysis
The loads calculated are applied in the modeled building. Besides from the dead and live loads,
the probable seismic loads are also taken care of as Nepal is categorized amongst seismically
active zones. Moreover the building itself carries high importance and the seismic force
consideration is of topmost priority. The Building is three storied and hence, the static analysis
is enough to ensure its safety against earthquake but the dynamic analysis is also carried out
and checked in some respect considering the maximum safety requirement in this type of
building. Through consideration is given in analysis of the building following standard theories
of structures and relevant codes of practice.
A three dimensional linear static analysis has been carried out using the standard software
ETAB 2016.2.The Structure is assumed to be fixed at the Plinth level. The brick wall is
considered as the filler wall only. The beams are modeled as rectangular beams. The flange
effect of the beams has been neglected. Center to center dimension of the structure has been
considered in the analysis. The rigid end effect has also been considered in the analysis.
Following load cases and combinations were used for the analysis of the structural components
of the building.
Load Cases
Following loads have been considered in the analysis of the building as per IS 456-
2000 and IS1893-2002.
1. Dead Load (DL)
2. Live load (LL)
3. Earthquake load in +ve X-direction (EQPX)
4. Earthquake load in –ve X-direction (EQNX)
5. Earthquake load in +ve Y-direction (EQPY)
6. Earthquake load in –ve Y-direction (EQNY)
LOAD COMBINATIONS
Following load combinations have been adopted as per NBC 105-1994.
1.5(DL+LL)
DL+1.3LL±1.25EL/WL
0.9DL±1.25EL/WL
DL+1.3SL±1.25EL/WL Where, DL= Dead load SL= Snow Load LL
=Imposed (Live load) WL= Wind Load
Seismic Loads
Seismic coefficient Method was adopted to analyze the building for Earthquake loads
Design Base Shear VB = Cd*W [10.1, NBC 105-1994]
Where,
Cd = Design horizontal seismic coefficient as per NBC 105-1994
= CZIK = 0.08
Z= Zone Factor = 1
I= Importance Factor = 1.0 Table 8.1 NBC105
K= Structural Performance Factor = 1 for DMRF Table 8.2
NBC105
C= Basic Seismic coefficient on the basis of time period, T
of the structure [Fig.8.1 NBC 105-1994]=0.08
T. = 0.06h0.75 (7.3, NBC105-1994]. For Concrete frames = 0.52 seconds
h= Height of building (m) above ground level =18 m
W = Seismic Weight of Building, that includes total Dead load
plus appropriate amount of live load. [Table 6.1, NBC105-
1994].
• The live load on roof need not be considered for calculating the
seismic weight of the building. [Table 6.1, NBC 105-1994].
For the purpose of analysis, seismic forces are applied in the model of the building in
ETABS. Hence, the manual calculations of seismic weight, base shear and the seismic forces
have not been shown. However, the ETABS output for the Seismic Weight, Base Shear and
Seismic Forces in each storey diaphragm are as follows.
COLUMN OUTPUT
NOTE:
Beam Detailing
Beam Detailing
Note
1. The shear reinforcement in the L/4 of beam span measured from
supports face should be 8mm ф provided @ 4” c/c and can be placed
@ 6” c/c in remaining span.
2. The shear reinforcement in the main beam in which secondary beams
are tied should be 8mm ф provided @ 3” c/c throughout.
3. The shear reinforcement in the lapping zone should be also provided
@ 6” c/c
4. The shear reinforcement in the circular beam should be provided @
4” c/c.
DESIGN OF FOUNDATIONS
The design of all structural elements is done using ‘Limit State Method’. All relevant
Limit State must be considered in design to ensure adequate safety and serviceability.
The structural elements are designed for the worst combination of the loads. Designs of
foundations have been done with respect to the joint reactions given in the table above for the
Load combination 1.5(DL+LL).
1. STRAP BEAM
a. STRAP BEAM BETWEEN (SB1) – (1-10-31), (12-13-32),
b. STRAP BEAM BETWEEN (SB2) – (18-19-36), (15-16-35)
FOOTING REINFORCEMENT IN
S. TYP FOOTING SIZE DEPTH FOOTINGS STRAP DETAIL
N. ES Y- Asc(
ECENTRIC SYMMETRI DIRECTI (Hs X Botto Spacin
(Bf X L1) C (Bf X L2) D te X-DIRECTION ON Bs) Ast (Top) m) g (Sv)
1-16+4- 4-16
12 mm 8mm ф
8 12 mm dia @ dia @ 6” 26” x
20 mm @ 150
1. SB1 9’-0” X 7’-0” 9’-0” X 6’-0” 1’-10” ” 6” c/c c/c 14” mmф ф mm c/c
3-16
12 mm 8mm ф
8 12 mm dia @ dia @ 6”
5-16 mm @ 125
2. SB2 MAT MAT 2’-2” ” 6” c/c c/c 26” x 14” mm ф ф mm c/c
SLAB REINFORCEMENT
SLAB THICKNESS – 5”
Main bar 10 mm and extra bar 8 mm @ 6” C/C .
Staircase Bar:
Use 12mm dia bar as main bar @ 6” C/C .and 10 mm as
distribution bar @ 8” C/C .
WAIST SLAB THICKNESS – 5”