PSYCHOLOGY DEPARTMENT

[PEER EVALUATION FORM]

T E R M 3, A C A D E M I C Y E A R 2 0 1 7 - 2 0 18)

REMINDERS FOR SUBMITTING THE

PEER EVALUATION FORM
▪ The Peer Evaluation Form (PEF) is for each member to evaluate his (her)
performance and those of the other members of the group. The Peer Evaluation
Form will be accomplished and submitted to the Thesis Mentor twice (1) Start of the
Term up to the Midterm (2) Midterm up to the Finals.

▪ Each member of the thesis group will have to complete one Peer Evaluation Form.
The member has indicate the names of the three other members of the group on the
designated columns.

▪ Members of the thesis group should remember to:

▪ Indicate your complete name and the complete name of the other members of the
group, the name of the thesis mentor, and the title of your study. Sign the form,
place it inside a long white envelope and seal it.

▪ LABEL THE SEALED LONG WHITE ENVELOPE WITH “YOUR COMPLETE NAME
(LAST NAME, FIRST NAME, MIDDLE NAME), THSPSMA (PEER EVALUATION: START
OF THE TERM UP TO THE MIDTERM”

▪ Please submit your accomplished Peer Evaluation Form to your

THESIS MENTOR.

▪ Your Thesis Mentor will use this as a guide in determining the contribution of each
member of the group in the completion of the THS1PSM output. The points presented
in this form could influence the grade that the Thesis Mentor will give each member
of the group.

THS1PSM PEER EVALUATION FORM TERM 3, ACADEMIC YEAR 2017-2018

 PSYCHOLOGY DEPARTMENT
[PEER EVALUATION FORM]
T E R M 3, A C A D E M I C Y E A R 2 0 1 7 - 2 0 18)

RATING PER MEMBER

PERCENTAGE
YOUR NAME GROUPMATE 1 GROUPMATE 2 GROUPMATE 3

ALLOTMENT
PEER EVALUATION ITEMS AMOROSO, ARRIANE CASTILLO, ANDREA CUETO, DANICA SANTIAGO, DIANA
MARIE SANCHEZ REMEDIOS, LIWAG GWYNETH, SALAMERO MAE, FERNANDO

Was able to work harmoniously with

1
other group members 15 15 15 15 15
Showed enthusiasm and interest in the
2
group activities 10 10 10 10 10
Present in group meetings and
3
consultations 10 10 10 10 8
Demonstrated knowledge in research,
4 particularly in the group’s area of 10 10 10 10 10
interest
Assumed responsibility over assigned
5 task/s and completed them correctly and 15 15 15 15 15
on time
6 Worked without being told or pressured 10 10 10 10 10

7 Work output was of good quality 10 10 10 10 10

8 Exercised leadership and organization 10 10 10 10 10

Contributions to resources: supplies,
9
materials, and finances 10 10 10 10 10
TOTAL SUM OF
PERCENTAGES
EQUIVALENT
GRAE
SUM OF
PERCENTAGES
EQUIVALENT
GRAE
SUM OF
PERCENTAGES
EQUIVALENT
GRAE
SUM OF
PERCENTAGES
EQUIVALENT
GRAE
▪ Please add the percentages for all of the 9
items. Indicate the sum of the percentages 100 %
▪ Indicate the equivalent grade (refer to the 100 4 100 4 100 4 98 4
conversion form)

INDICATE SURNAME, FIRST NAME, MIDDLE NAME

COMPLETE NAME AND
SIGNATURE OF
THE EVALUATOR
AMOROSO, ARRIANE MARIE, SANCHEZ

RATING PER MEMBER

PERCENTAGE ALLOTMENT

YOUR NAME GROUPMATE 1 GROUPMATE 2 GROUPMATE 3

SURNAME, SURNAME, SURNAME, SURNAME,
PEER EVALUATION FIRST NAME, FIRST NAME, FIRST NAME, FIRST NAME,
ITEMS MIDDLE NAME MIDDLE NAME MIDDLE NAME MIDDLE NAME

THS1PSM PEER EVALUATION FORM TERM 3, ACADEMIC YEAR 2017-2018

 PSYCHOLOGY DEPARTMENT
[PEER EVALUATION FORM]
T E R M 3, A C A D E M I C Y E A R 2 0 1 7 - 2 0 18)

▪ Helped in ▪ Even
proofread though
ing the
Chapter 1 unexpect
for ed injury,
cohesion she was
▪ Contribut still able
ed in the to
constructi execute
on of the and help
Review of ▪ Showed with the
Related responsib constructi
▪ Showed
Literature ility and on of the
competen
particular accomplis paper,
ce in the
ly on the hed all Chapter 2
constructi
parts of necessar ▪ Was
on of
Online y easily
both
dating, revisions reached
Chapter 1
Self- for both online
and 2 of
presentat chapter 1 during
the paper
QUALITATIVE EVALUATION ion, and and group
▪ Please describe the contributions of each member of the ▪ Was chapter 2
Self- discussio
group. easily of the
▪ Please provide a detailed description of the tasks that he presentat ns and
attainabl paper.
(she) has completed and how well he (she) work with other ion in meetings.
members of the group e in
▪ Online ▪ was ▪ proof-
If the space is not enough, the student may opt to submit
dating person
a separate sheet of paper with his (her) comments easily read the
and
plus the reliable paper for
online
definition in person cohesion.
during
of terms. and ▪ provided
group
▪ Easily online in a
discussio
made group validator
ns and
herself meetings for the
consultati
available and interview
ons
in all of discussio questions
the ns. of the
groups paper.
queries
and
discussion
.

THS1PSM PEER EVALUATION FORM TERM 3, ACADEMIC YEAR 2017-2018

 PSYCHOLOGY DEPARTMENT
[PEER EVALUATION FORM]
T E R M 3, A C A D E M I C Y E A R 2 0 1 7 - 2 0 18)

INDICATE SURNAME, FIRST NAME, MIDDLE NAME

COMPLETE NAME AND
SIGNATURE OF AMOROSO, ARRIANE MARIE, SANCHEZ
THE EVALUATOR

THS1PSM PEER EVALUATION FORM TERM 3, ACADEMIC YEAR 2017-2018

 PSYCHOLOGY DEPARTMENT
[PEER EVALUATION FORM]
T E R M 3, A C A D E M I C Y E A R 2 0 1 7 - 2 0 18)

PEER EVALUATION GRADE CONVERSION

PLEASE USE THE FOLLOWING CONVERSION CHART TO DETERMINE THE EQUIVALENT GRADE.

TOTAL SCORE EQUIVALENT GRADE

96-100 4.0
90-95 3.75
84-89 3.5
78-83 3.25
72-77 3.0
66-71 2.75
60-65 2.5
54-59 2.25
48-53 2.0
42-47 1.75
36-41 1.5
30-35 1.25
24-29 1.0

THS1PSM PEER EVALUATION FORM TERM 3, ACADEMIC YEAR 2017-2018