You are on page 1of 21

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I-III, SPET I-IV, Special Science Teacher

I-III, ALS
Name of Employee: LUNA FE T. ESLER Name of Rater: MARIA VANESSA A. TEVES
Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division/School: Date of Review:
Rating Period: SY 2022-2023

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION


Performance Indicators
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Rating Score
per KRA Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Results
QET
5 4 3 2 1 Q E T Ave

Basic 1. Content 1. Applied SY 2022- 7.00% Quality Demonstrated Level 7 in Demonstrated Level 6 in Demonstrated Level 5 in Demonstrated Level 4 in Demonstrated
objective 1 as show in objective 1 as show in objective 1 as show in objective 1 as show in Level 3 in
Education Knowledge knowledge of 2023
COT rating sheets / inter- COT rating sheets / inter- COT rating sheets / inter- COT rating sheets / inter- objective 1 as
Services and Pedagogy content within and observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms show in COT
across curriculum rating sheets /
teaching areas inter-observer
agreement
(PPST 1.1.2)
forms

or

No acceptable
evidence was
shown
#DIV/0! #DIV/0!

Efficiency Objective was met within Objective was met but No acceptable
the alloted time instruction exceeded the evidence was
allotted time shown

Timeliness

SY 2022-2023 sdobaishrds
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I-III, SPET I-IV, Special Science Teacher I-III, ALS
Name of Employee: LUNA FE T. ESLER Name of Rater: MARIA VANESSA A. TEVES
Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division/School: Date of Review:
Rating Period: SY 2022-2023

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION


Performance Indicators
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Rating Score
per KRA Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Results
QET
5 4 3 2 1 Q E T Ave
Basic 1. Content 2. Used a range of SY 2022- 7.00% Quality Demonstrated Level 7 in Demonstrated Level 6 in Demonstrated Level 5 in Demonstrated Level 4 in Demonstrated
objective 2 as show in objective 2 as show in objective 2 as show in objective 2 as show in Level 3 in
Education Knowledge teaching strategies 2023
COT rating sheets / inter- COT rating sheets / inter- COT rating sheets / inter- COT rating sheets / inter- objective 2 as
Services and Pedagogy that enhance observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms show in COT
learner rating sheets /
achievement in inter-observer
agreement
literacy and
forms
numeracy skills
(PPST 1.4.2) or

No acceptable
evidence was
shown

#DIV/0! #DIV/0!

Efficiency Objective was met within Objective was met but No acceptable
the alloted time instruction exceeded the evidence was
allotted time shown

Timeliness

SY 2022-2023 sdobaishrds
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I-III, SPET I-IV, Special Science Teacher I-III, ALS
Name of Employee: LUNA FE T. ESLER Name of Rater: MARIA VANESSA A. TEVES
Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division/School: Date of Review:
Rating Period: SY 2022-2023

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION


Performance Indicators
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Rating Score
per KRA Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Results
QET
5 4 3 2 1 Q E T Ave
Basic 1. Content 3. Applied a range SY 2022- 7.00% Quality Demonstrated Level 7 in Demonstrated Level 6 in Demonstrated Level 5 in Demonstrated Level 4 in Demonstrated
objective 3 as show in objective 3 as show in objective 3 as show in objective 3 as show in Level 3 in
Education Knowledge of teaching 2023
COT rating sheets / inter- COT rating sheets / inter- COT rating sheets / inter- COT rating sheets / inter- objective 3 as
Services and Pedagogy strategies to observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms show in COT
develop critical and rating sheets /
creative thinking, inter-observer
agreement
as well as other
forms
higher-order
thinking skills or
(PPST 1.5.2)
No acceptable
evidence was
shown
#DIV/0! #DIV/0!

Efficiency Objective was met within Objective was met but No acceptable
the alloted time instruction exceeded the evidence was
allotted time shown

Timeliness

SY 2022-2023 sdobaishrds
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I-III, SPET I-IV, Special Science Teacher I-III, ALS
Name of Employee: LUNA FE T. ESLER Name of Rater: MARIA VANESSA A. TEVES
Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division/School: Date of Review:
Rating Period: SY 2022-2023

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION


Performance Indicators
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Rating Score
per KRA Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Results
QET
5 4 3 2 1 Q E T Ave
Basic 2. Learning 4. Managed SY 2022- 7.00% Quality Demonstrated Level 7 in Demonstrated Level 6 in Demonstrated Level 5 in Demonstrated Level 4 in Demonstrated
objective 4 as show in objective 4 as show in objective 4 as show in objective 4 as show in Level 3 in
Education Environment & classroom 2023
COT rating sheets / inter- COT rating sheets / inter- COT rating sheets / inter- COT rating sheets / inter- objective 4 as
Services Diversity of structure to observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms show in COT
Learners engage learners, rating sheets /
individually or in inter-observer
agreement
groups, in
forms
meaningful
exploration, or
discovery and
No acceptable
hands-on activities
evidence was
within a range of shown
physical learning
environments. #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
(PPST 2.3.2)

Efficiency Objective was met within Objective was met but No acceptable
the alloted time instruction exceeded the evidence was
allotted time shown

Timeliness

SY 2022-2023 sdobaishrds
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I-III, SPET I-IV, Special Science Teacher I-III, ALS
Name of Employee: LUNA FE T. ESLER Name of Rater: MARIA VANESSA A. TEVES
Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division/School: Date of Review:
Rating Period: SY 2022-2023

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION


Performance Indicators
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Rating Score
per KRA Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Results
QET
5 4 3 2 1 Q E T Ave
Basic 2. Learning 5. Managed SY 2022- 7.00% Quality Demonstrated Level 7 in Demonstrated Level 6 in Demonstrated Level 5 in Demonstrated Level 4 in Demonstrated
objective 5 as show in objective 5 as show in objective 5 as show in objective 5 as show in Level 3 in
Education Environment & learner behavior 2023
COT rating sheets / inter- COT rating sheets / inter- COT rating sheets / inter- COT rating sheets / inter- objective 5 as
Services Diversity of constructively by observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms show in COT
Learners applying positive rating sheets /
and non-violent inter-observer
agreement
discipline to ensure
forms
learning-focused
environments. or
(PPST 2.6.2)
No acceptable
evidence was
shown
#DIV/0! #DIV/0!

Efficiency Objective was met within Objective was met but No acceptable
the alloted time instruction exceeded the evidence was
allotted time shown

Timeliness

SY 2022-2023 sdobaishrds
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I-III, SPET I-IV, Special Science Teacher I-III, ALS
Name of Employee: LUNA FE T. ESLER Name of Rater: MARIA VANESSA A. TEVES
Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division/School: Date of Review:
Rating Period: SY 2022-2023

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION


Performance Indicators
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Rating Score
per KRA Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Results
QET
5 4 3 2 1 Q E T Ave
Basic 2. Learning 6. Used SY 2022- 7.00% Quality Demonstrated Level 7 in Demonstrated Level 6 in Demonstrated Level 5 in Demonstrated Level 4 in Demonstrated
objective 6 as show in objective 6 as show in objective 6 as show in objective 6 as show in Level 3 in
Education Environment & differentiated 2023
COT rating sheets / inter- COT rating sheets / inter- COT rating sheets / inter- COT rating sheets / inter- objective 6 as
Services Diversity of developmentally observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms show in COT
Learners appropriate rating sheets /
learning inter-observer
agreement
experiences to
forms
address learners'
gender, needs, or
strengths, interests
No acceptable
and experiences
evidence was
(PPST 3.1.2) shown

#DIV/0! #DIV/0!

Efficiency Objective was met within Objective was met but No acceptable
the alloted time instruction exceeded the evidence was
allotted time shown

Timeliness

SY 2022-2023 sdobaishrds
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I-III, SPET I-IV, Special Science Teacher I-III, ALS
Name of Employee: LUNA FE T. ESLER Name of Rater: MARIA VANESSA A. TEVES
Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division/School: Date of Review:
Rating Period: SY 2022-2023

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION


Performance Indicators
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Rating Score
per KRA Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Results
QET
5 4 3 2 1 Q E T Ave
Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, SY 2022- 7.00% Quality Demonstrated Level 7 in Demonstrated Level 6 in Demonstrated Level 5 in Demonstrated Level 4 in Demonstrated
objective 7 as show in objective 7 as show in objective 7 as show in objective 7 as show in Level 3 in
Education and Planning managed and 2023
COT rating sheets / inter- COT rating sheets / inter- COT rating sheets / inter- COT rating sheets / inter- objective 7 as
Services implemented observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms show in COT
developmentally rating sheets /
sequenced inter-observer
agreement
teaching and
forms
learning processes
to meet curriculum or
requirements and #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
No acceptable
varied teaching
evidence was
contexts. (PPST shown
4.1.2)

Efficiency Objective was met within Objective was met but No acceptable
the alloted time instruction exceeded the evidence was
allotted time shown

Timeliness

SY 2022-2023 sdobaishrds
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I-III, SPET I-IV, Special Science Teacher I-III, ALS
Name of Employee: LUNA FE T. ESLER Name of Rater: MARIA VANESSA A. TEVES
Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division/School: Date of Review:
Rating Period: SY 2022-2023

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION


Performance Indicators
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Rating Score
per KRA Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Results
QET
5 4 3 2 1 Q E T Ave
Basic 3. Curriculum 8. Participated in SY 2022- 7.00% Quality Planned for enriched Reflected on practices Shared practices, teachers Attended LAC sessions / No acceptable
teaching practice based on during LAC sessions / and learner feedback FGDs / meetings / other evidence was
Education and Planning collegial 2023
LAC sessions / FGDs / FGDs / meetings / other during LAC sessions / collegial discussions that shown
Services discussions that meetings / other collegial collegial discussions tto FGDs / meetings / other discuss teacher / learner
use teacher and discussions attended, as plan, facilitate, and enrich collegial discussions to feedback to enrich
learner feedback to shown in MOV 3 teaching practice, as plan, facilitate, and enrich instruction, as shown in
shown in MOV 3 teaching practice, as MOV 1
enrich teaching
shown in MOV 2
practice. (PPST
#DIV/0! #DIV/0!
4.4.2)

Efficiency

Timeliness Participated in collegial Participated in collegial Participated in collegial Participated in collegial No acceptable
discussions that discuss discussions that discuss discussions that discuss discussions that discuss evidence was
teacher and learner teacher and learner teacher and learner teacher and learner shown
feedback across 4 quarters feedback across 3 quarters feedback across 2 quarters feedback across in only 1
quarter

SY 2022-2023 sdobaishrds
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I-III, SPET I-IV, Special Science Teacher I-III, ALS
Name of Employee: LUNA FE T. ESLER Name of Rater: MARIA VANESSA A. TEVES
Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division/School: Date of Review:
Rating Period: SY 2022-2023

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION


Performance Indicators
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Rating Score
per KRA Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Results
QET
5 4 3 2 1 Q E T Ave
Basic 3. Curriculum 9. Selected, SY 2022- 7.00% Quality Demonstrated Level 7 in Demonstrated Level 6 in Demonstrated Level 5 in Demonstrated Level 4 in Demonstrated
objective 9 as show in objective 9 as show in objective 9 as show in objective 9 as show in Level 3 in
Education and Planning developed, 2023
COT rating sheets / inter- COT rating sheets / inter- COT rating sheets / inter- COT rating sheets / inter- objective 9 as
Services organized and observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms show in COT
used appropriate rating sheets /
teaching and inter-observer
agreement
learning resources,
forms
including ICT, to
address learning or #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
goals. (PPST
No acceptable
4.5.2)
evidence was
shown

Efficiency Objective was met within Objective was met but No acceptable
the alloted time instruction exceeded the evidence was
allotted time shown

Timeliness

SY 2022-2023 sdobaishrds
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I-III, SPET I-IV, Special Science Teacher I-III, ALS
Name of Employee: LUNA FE T. ESLER Name of Rater: MARIA VANESSA A. TEVES
Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division/School: Date of Review:
Rating Period: SY 2022-2023

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION


Performance Indicators
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Rating Score
per KRA Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Results
QET
5 4 3 2 1 Q E T Ave
Basic 4. Assessment 10. Designed, SY 2022- 7.00% Quality Demonstrated Level 7 in Demonstrated Level 6 in Demonstrated Level 5 in Demonstrated Level 4 in Demonstrated
objective 10 as show in objective 10 as show in objective 10 as show in objective 10 as show in Level 3 in
Education and Reporting selected, 2023
COT rating sheets / inter- COT rating sheets / inter- COT rating sheets / inter- COT rating sheets / inter- objective 10 as
Services organized and observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms show in COT
used diagnostic, rating sheets /
formative and inter-observer
agreement
summative
forms
assessment #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
strategies or
consistent with
No acceptable
curriculum
evidence was
requirements. shown
(PPST 5.1.2)

Efficiency Objective was met within Objective was met but No acceptable
the alloted time instruction exceeded the evidence was
allotted time shown

Timeliness

SY 2022-2023 sdobaishrds
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I-III, SPET I-IV, Special Science Teacher I-III, ALS
Name of Employee: LUNA FE T. ESLER Name of Rater: MARIA VANESSA A. TEVES
Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division/School: Date of Review:
Rating Period: SY 2022-2023

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION


Performance Indicators
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Rating Score
per KRA Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Results
QET
5 4 3 2 1 Q E T Ave
Basic 4. Assessment 11. Monitored and SY 2022- 7.00% Quality Involved learner/s in Monitored and evaluated Monitored and evaluated Monitored and evaluated
monitoring and evaluation learner progress and learner progress and learner progress and
Education and Reporting evaluated learner 2023
of their own progress and achievement based on achievement based on achievement based on an
Services progress and achievement attainment data from an class attainment data existing grade level /
achievement using individual learner department / learning area
learner attainment report
data. (PPST 5.2.2) #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

Efficiency

Timeliness Sumbitted MOV/s show/s Sumbitted MOV/s show/s Sumbitted MOV/s show/s Sumbitted MOV/s show/s No acceptable
monitoring and evaluation monitoring and evaluation monitoring and evaluation monitoring and evaluation evidence was
done across 4 quarters done across 3 quarters done across 2 quarters done in only 1 quarter shown

SY 2022-2023 sdobaishrds
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I-III, SPET I-IV, Special Science Teacher I-III, ALS
Name of Employee: LUNA FE T. ESLER Name of Rater: MARIA VANESSA A. TEVES
Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division/School: Date of Review:
Rating Period: SY 2022-2023

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION


Performance Indicators
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Rating Score
per KRA Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Results
QET
5 4 3 2 1 Q E T Ave
Basic 4. Assessment 12. Communicated SY 2022- 7.00% Quality Sustained engagement Communicated promptly Communicated promptly Communicated learners' No acceptable
through regular and clearly using various and clearly using only one needs, progress and evidence was
Education and Reporting promptly and 2023
communication of learners' tools and strategies (1) strategy learners' achievement to key shown
Services clearly the needs, progress and learners' needs, progress needs, progress and stakeholders, including
learners' needs, achievement to key and achievement to key achievement to key parents/guardians, but not
progress and stakeholders, including stakeholders, including stakeholders, including regularly as shown in the
parents/guardians, as parents/guardians, as parents/guardians, as MOV submitted
achievement to
shown in the MOV shown in the MOV shown in the MOV
key stakeholders, submitted submitted submitted #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
including
parents/guardians.
(PPST 5.4.2)

Efficiency

Timeliness Showed prompt Showed prompt Showed prompt Showed prompt No acceptable
communication of learners' communication of learners' communication of learners' communication of learners' evidence was
needs, progress and needs, progress and needs, progress and needs, progress and shown
achievement across 4 achievement across 3 achievement across 2 achievement across in only
quarters quarters quarters 1 quarter

SY 2022-2023 sdobaishrds
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I-III, SPET I-IV, Special Science Teacher I-III, ALS
Name of Employee: LUNA FE T. ESLER Name of Rater: MARIA VANESSA A. TEVES
Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division/School: Date of Review:
Rating Period: SY 2022-2023

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION


Performance Indicators
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Rating Score
per KRA Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Results
QET
5 4 3 2 1 Q E T Ave
Basic 5. Personal 13. Applied a SY 2022- 7.00% Quality Submitted MOV that Submitted MOV that Submitted MOV that Submitted MOV that No acceptable
details the consistent reflects involvement of shows application of a indicates a personal evidence was
Education Growth and personal 2023
involvement of learners in learners in the teaching- personal philosophy of philosophy of teaching that shown
Services Professional philosophy of the teaching-learning learning process resulting teaching that is learner- is not learner-centered
Development teaching that is process resulting from the from the application of a centered
learner-centered. application of a personal personal philosophy of
philosophy of teaching that teaching that is learner-
(PPST 7.1.2)
is learner-centered centered
#DIV/0! #DIV/0!

Efficiency
Timeliness Applied a personal Applied a personal Applied a personal Applied a personal No acceptable
philosophy of teaching that philosophy of teaching that philosophy of teaching that philosophy of teaching that evidence was
is learner-centered across is learner-centered across is learner-centered across is learner-centered across shown
4 quarters 3 quarters 2 quarters in only 1 quarter

SY 2022-2023 sdobaishrds
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I-III, SPET I-IV, Special Science Teacher I-III, ALS
Name of Employee: LUNA FE T. ESLER Name of Rater: MARIA VANESSA A. TEVES
Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division/School: Date of Review:
Rating Period: SY 2022-2023

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION


Performance Indicators
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Rating Score
per KRA Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Results
QET
5 4 3 2 1 Q E T Ave
Basic 5. Personal 14. Set SY 2022- 7.00% Quality Updated professional Discussed progress on Set professional Accomplished the e-SAT No acceptable
development goals during professional development development goals based at the beginning of the evidence was
Education Growth and professional 2023
Phase II of the RPMS goals with the rater during on e-SAT results as school year as evidenced shown
Services Professional development goals Cycle as evidenced by the Midyear Review as evidenced by MOV 2 by MOV 1
Development based on the MOV 4 evidenced by MOV 3
Philippine #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Professional
Standards for
Teachers. (PPST
7.5.2)

Efficiency Submitted 4 acceptable Submitted 3 acceptable Submitted 2 acceptable Submitted 1 acceptable No acceptable
MOVs MOVs MOVs MOVs evidence was
shown

Timeliness All four (4) submitted Three (3) submitted MOVs Two (2) submitted MOVs Only one (1) submitted No acceptable
MOVs were accomplished were accomplished within were accomplished within MOVs were accomplished evidence was
within the prescribed the prescribed RPMS the prescribed RPMS within the prescribed shown
RPMS Phase Phase Phase RPMS Phase

SY 2022-2023 sdobaishrds
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I-III, SPET I-IV, Special Science Teacher I-III, ALS
Name of Employee: LUNA FE T. ESLER Name of Rater: MARIA VANESSA A. TEVES
Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division/School: Date of Review:
Rating Period: SY 2022-2023

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION


Performance Indicators
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Rating Score
per KRA Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Results
QET
5 4 3 2 1 Q E T Ave
Basic Plus Factor 15. Performed SY 2022- 2.00% Quality Performed at least 1 Performed at least 1 Performed at least 1 Performed at least 1 No acceptable
related work / activity that related work / activity that related work / activity that related work / activity that evidence was
Education various related 2023
contributed to the teaching- contributed to the teaching- contributed to the teaching- contributed to the teaching- shown
Services works/ activities learning process beyond learning process within the learning process within the learning process within the
that contribute to the school / community school / community learning area / department class as evidenced by
the teaching- learning center (CLC) as learning center (CLC) as as evidenced by submitted submitted MOV #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
evidenced by submitted evidenced by submitted MOV
learning process
MOV MOV

Efficiency Submitted MOV that Submitted MOV that Submitted MOV that Submitted MOV that No acceptable
details the achieved details the perceived shows reasonable interlap shows considerable evidence was
positive contribution to the positive contribution to the with the actual teaching- overlap with, hence shown
teaching-learning process, teaching-learning process, learning process, as significantly affecting the
as evidenced by the as evidenced by the evidenced by the performance of the actual
annotation provided annotation provided annotation provided teaching-learning process.

Timeliness Siubmitted MOVs were Siubmitted MOVs were Siubmitted MOVs were Siubmitted MOVs were No acceptable
distributed across 4 distributed across 3 distributed across 2 distributed across only 1 evidence was
quarters quarters quarters quarter shown

RATING FOR OVERALL ACCOMPLISHMENTS #DIV/0! #DIV/0!


ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCES
RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500 – 5.000 Outstanding
3.500 – 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500 – 3.499 Satisfactory
1.500 – 2.499 Unsatisfactory
below 1.499 Poor

LUNA FE T. ESLER MARIA VANESSA A. TEVES


SY 2022-2023 sdobaishrds
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I-III, SPET I-IV, Special Science Teacher I-III, ALS
Name of Employee: LUNA FE T. ESLER Name of Rater: MARIA VANESSA A. TEVES
Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division/School: Date of Review:
Rating Period: SY 2022-2023

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION


Performance Indicators
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Rating Score
per KRA Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Results
QET
5 4 3 2 1 Q E T Ave
Ratee Rater Approving Authority

SY 2022-2023 sdobaishrds
PART II: COMPETENCIES
Instructions: Please indicate the number of competency indicators that you demonstrated during the performance cycte.
CORE BEHAVIORAL COMPETENCIES
Self-Management Teamwork
1 Sets personal goals and direction, needs and development 1 Willingly does his/her share of responsibility.
2 Undertakes personal actions and behaviors that are clear and purposive and 2 Promotes collaboration and remove barriers to teamwork and goal
takes into account personal goals and values congruent to that of the organization. accomplishment across the organization.

3 Displays emotional maturity and enthusiasm for and its challenged by higher goals. 3 Applies negotiation principles in arriving at win-win agreements. 4
4 Prioritize work tasks and schedules (through Gantt Charts, checklists, etc.) to 4 Drives concensus and team ownership of decisions.
achieve goals.
5 Works constructively and collaboratively with others and across organizations
5 Sets high quality, challenging, realistic goals for self and others. to accomplish organizational goals and objectives.
Professionalism and Ethics Service Orientation

1 Demonstrates the values and behavior enshrined in the Norms of Conduct and 1 Can explain and articulate organizational directions, issues and problems.
Ethical Standards for public officials and employees (RA 6713).
2 Takes personal responsibility for dealing with and/or correcting customer
2 Practices ethical and professional behavior and conduct taking into account the service issues and concerns.
impact of his/her actions and decisions.
3 Initiates activities that promotes advocacy for men and women empowerment.
3 Maintains a professional image: being trustworthy, regularity of attendance and
punctuality, good grooming and communication. 4 Participates in updating of office vision, mission, mandates and strategies
based on DepEd strategies and directions.
4 Makes personal sacrifices to meet the organization's needs.
5 Develops and adopts service improvement programs through simplified
5 Acts with a sense of urgency and responsibility to meet the organization's needs, procedures that will further enhance service delivery.
improve systems and help others improve their effectiveness.
Result Focus Innovation

1 Achieves results with optimal use of time and resources most of the time. 1 Examines the root cause of problems and suggests effective solutions.
Fosters new ideas, processes, and suggests better ways to do things (cost
2 Avoids rework, mistakes and wastage through effective work methods by and/or operational efficiency).
placing organizational needs before personal needs.
2 Demonstrates an ability to think "beyond the box". Continuously focuses on
3 Delivers error-free outputs most of the time by conforming to standard operating improving personal productivity to create higher value and results.
procedures correctly and consistently. Able to produce very satisfactory quality of
work in terms of usefulness/acceptability and completeness with no supervision 3 Promotes a creative climate and inspires co-workers to develop original ideas
required. or solutions.

4 Express a desire to do better and may express frustration at waste or inefficiency. 4 Translates creative thinking into tangible changes and solutions that improve
May focus on new or more precise ways of meeting goals set. the work unit and organization.

5 Makes specific changes in the system or in own work methods to improve 5 Uses ingenious methods to accomplish responsibilities. Demonstrate
performance. Examples may include doing something better, faster, at a lower cost, resourcefulness and ability to succeed with minimal resources.
more efficiently; or improving quality, customer satisfaction, morale, without
setting any specific goal

Note: The assessment in the demonstration of competencies shall not be reflected in the final rating. These competencies are monitored to inform professional development plans (DepEd Order No. 2, s. 2015, p. 9).

LUNA FE T. ESLER MARIA VANESSA A. TEVES


Ratee Rater

SY 2022-2023 sdobaishrds
SY 2022-2023 sdobaishrds
PART III: SUMMARY OF RATINGS FOR DISCUSSION

Final Performance Results Rating Adjectival Rating

Accomplishment of KRAs and Objectives

Employee-Superior Agreement

The signatures below confirm that the employee and his/her superior have agreed to the contents of the performance as captured in this form.

Name of Employee: LUNA FE T. ESLER Name of Superior: MARIA VANESSA A. TEVES

Signature: Signature:

Date: Date:

SY 2022-2023 sdobaishrds
PART IV: DEVELOPMENT PLANS
NOTE:
This sheet shall be accomplished during: i) Phase I: Performance Planning and Commitment, based on the results of e-SAT; and ii) Phase II: Performance Monitoring and Coaching, based on the
agreements on the Performance Monitoring and Coaching Form and Mid-year Review Form; and iii) Phase IV: Performance Rewarding and Development Planning, based on the actual results
of IPCRF.
 
The Ratee can modify the cell (i.e., add rows) to reflect his/her development needs and strengths.

Action Plan
Strengths Development Needs (Recommended Developmental Intervention) Timeline Resources Needed
Learning Objectives Intervention
A. Functional Competencies

B. Core Behavioral Competencies

Feedback:

LUNA FE T. ESLER MARIA VANESSA A. TEVES 0

SY 2022-2023 sdobaishrds
RATEE RATER APPROVING AUTHORITY

SY 2022-2023 sdobaishrds

You might also like