You are on page 1of 10

Republic of the Philippines

Department of Education
Region IX
Division of Sarangani
BONGO INTEGRATED SCHOOL

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)


Name of Employee: EUGENE LOUIE G. IBARRA Name of Rater: MATEO L. GULAC
Position: TEACHER I Position: HT-III/School Head
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: BONGO INTEGRATED SCHOOL Date of Review: February 8, 2023
Rating Period: SY 2022-2023
TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Actual Results Score
KRA
Poor
QET Outstanding (5) Very Satisfactory (4) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Q E T Ave
(1)

Basic 1. Content 1. Applied August 7.00% Quality Demonstrated Demonstrated Level Demonstrated Demonstrated Level 4 Demonstrated
Education Knowledge and knowledge of 2022 to July Level 7 in Objective 6 in Objective 1 as Level 5 in Objective in Objective 1 as Level 3 in
5 4 4.5 0.315
Services Pedagogy content within and 2023 1 as shown in COT shown in COT rating 1 as shown in COT shown in COT rating Objective 1 as
across curriculum rating sheets/ inter- sheets/ inter- rating sheets/ inter- sheets/ inter-observer shown in COT
teaching areas. observer observer agreement observer agreement forms rating sheets/
agreement forms forms agreement forms inter-observer 5
agreement forms

or
no
acceptable
evidence was
Efficiency Objective was met Objective was met No
within the alloted but instruction acceptable
time exceeded the evidence was 5
alloted time shown

Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Poor Actual Results Score
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Very Satisfactory (4) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Q E T Ave
(1)
Basic 2. Used a range of August 7.00% Quality Demonstrated Demonstrated Level Demonstrated Demonstrated Level 4 Demonstrated
Education teaching strategies 2022 to July Level 7 in Objective 6 in Objective 2 as Level 5 in Objective in Objective 2 as Level 3 in
5 5 5 0.35
Services that enhance learner 2023 2 as shown in COT shown in COT rating 2 as shown in COT shown in COT rating Objective 2 as
achievement in rating sheets/ inter- sheets/ inter- rating sheets/ inter- sheets/ inter-observer shown in COT
literacy and observer observer agreement observer agreement forms rating sheets/
numeracy skills. agreement forms forms agreement forms inter-observer
agreement forms 5

or
no
acceptable
evidence was
shown
Efficiency Objective was met Objective was met No
within the alloted but instruction acceptable
time exceeded the evidence was 5
alloted time shown
Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Poor Actual Results Score
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Very Satisfactory (4) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Q E T Ave
(1)

Basic 3. Applied a range of August 7.00% Quality Demonstrated Demonstrated Level Demonstrated Demonstrated Level 4 Demonstrated
Education teaching strategies 2022 to July Level 7 in Objective 6 in Objective 3 as Level 5 in Objective in Objective 3 as Level 3 in
5 5 5 0.35
Services to develop critical 2023 3 as shown in COT shown in COT rating 3 as shown in COT shown in COT rating Objective 3 as
and creative rating sheets/ inter- sheets/ inter- rating sheets/ inter- sheets/ inter-observer shown in COT
thinking, as well as observer observer agreement observer agreement forms rating sheets/
other higher- order agreement forms forms agreement forms inter-observer
thinking skills. agreement forms 5

or
no
acceptable
evidence was
shown
Efficiency Objective was met Objective was met No
within the alloted but instruction acceptable
time exceeded the evidence was 5
alloted time shown

Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Poor Actual Results Score
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Very Satisfactory (4) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Q E T Ave
(1)
Basic 2. Learning 4. Managed August 7.00% Quality Demonstrated
Level 7 in Objective
Demonstrated Level
6 in Objective 4 as
Demonstrated
Level 5 in Objective
Demonstrated Level 4
in Objective 4 as
Demonstrated
Level 3 in
5 5 5 0.35
Education Environment classroom 2022 to
Services and Diversity structure to July 2023 4 as shown in COT shown in COT rating 4 as shown in COT shown in COT rating Objective 4 as
rating sheets/ inter- sheets/ inter- rating sheets/ inter- sheets/ inter-observer shown in COT
of Learners engage learners,
observer observer agreement observer agreement forms rating sheets/
individually or in agreement forms forms agreement forms inter-observer
groups, in agreement forms 5
meaningful
exploration, or
discovery and no
hands-on activities acceptable
within a range of evidence was
physical learning Objective was met Objective was met shown
No
Efficiency
environments. within the alloted but instruction acceptable
time exceeded the evidence was 5
alloted time shown

Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Poor Actual Results Score
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Very Satisfactory (4) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Q E T Ave
(1)

7.00% Quality Demonstrated Demonstrated Level Demonstrated Demonstrated Level 4 Demonstrated


Basic 5. Managed August
Level 7 in Objective 6 in Objective 5 as Level 5 in Objective in Objective 5 as Level 3 in
5 5 5 0.35
Education learner behavior 2022 to
Services constructively by July 2023 5 as shown in COT shown in COT rating 5 as shown in COT shown in COT rating Objective 5 as
rating sheets/ inter- sheets/ inter- rating sheets/ inter- sheets/ inter-observer shown in COT
applying positive
observer observer agreement observer agreement forms rating sheets/
and non-violent agreement forms forms agreement forms inter-observer
discipline to agreement forms 5
ensure learning-
focused or
environments. no
acceptable
evidence was
shown

Efficiency Objective was met Objective was met No


within the alloted but instruction acceptable
time exceeded the evidence was 5
alloted time shown

Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Poor Actual Results Score
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Very Satisfactory (4) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Q E T Ave
(1)
7.00% Quality Demonstrated Demonstrated Level Demonstrated Demonstrated Level 4 Demonstrated
Basic 6. Used August
Level 7 in Objective 6 in Objective 6 as Level 5 in Objective in Objective 6 as Level 3 in
5 5 5 0.35
Education differentiated, 2022 to
Services developmentally July 2023 6 as shown in COT shown in COT rating 6 as shown in COT shown in COT rating Objective 6 as
rating sheets/ inter- sheets/ inter- rating sheets/ inter- sheets/ inter-observer shown in COT
appropriate
observer observer agreement observer agreement forms rating sheets/ 5
learning agreement forms forms agreement forms inter-observer
experiences to agreement forms
address learners’
gender, needs, or
strengths, interests no
and experiences. Efficiency Objective was met Objective was met No
within the alloted but instruction acceptable
time exceeded the evidence was 5
alloted time shown

Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Poor Actual Results Score
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Very Satisfactory (4) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Q E T Ave
(1)

Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, August 7.00% Quality Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Level Demonstrated 5 5 5 0.35
Education and Planning managed and 2022 to Level 7 in Level 6 in Level 5 in 4 in Objective 7 as Level 3 in
Services implemented July 2023 Objective 7 as Objective 7 as Objective 7 as shown in COT rating Objective 7 as
developmentally shown in COT shown in COT shown in COT sheets/ inter- shown in COT
sequenced rating sheets/ rating sheets/ rating sheets/ observer agreement rating sheets/ 5
teaching and inter-observer inter-observer inter-observer forms. inter-observer
learning processes agreement forms. agreement forms. agreement forms. agreement
to meet curriculum forms.
requirements and
varied teaching Efficiency Objective was Objective was No acceptable
contexts. met within the met but evidence was
alloted time. instruction shown 5
exceeded the
alloted time.
Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Poor Actual Results Score
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Very Satisfactory (4) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Q E T Ave
(1)
Basic 8. Participated in August 7.00% Quality Planned for Reflected on Shared practices, Attended LAC No acceptable 5 5 5 0.35
Education collegial 2022 to enriched practices during teacher and sessions/FGDs/meet evidence was
Services discussions that July 2023 teaching practice LAC sessions/ learner feedback ings/other collegial shown
use teacher and based on LAC FGDs/ meetings/ during LAC discussions that
learner feedback sessions/ other collegial sessions/FGDs/m discuss
to enrich teaching FGDs/meetings/o discussions to eetings/other teacher/learner 5
practice. ther collegial plan, facilitate, collegial feedback to enrich
discussions and enrich discussions to instruction, as
attended, as teaching practice, plan, facilitate, shown in MOV 1.
shown in MOV 3. as shown in MOV and enrich
3 teaching practice,
Efficiency
Timeliness Participated in Participated in Participated in Participated in No acceptable 5
collegial collegial collegial collegial discussions evidence was
discussions that discussions that discussions that that discuss teacher shown
discuss teacher discuss teacher discuss teacher and learner
and learner and learner and learner feedback in only 1
feedback across feedback across 3 feedback across quarters.
4 quarters quarters 2 quarters

Performance Indicators Rating


Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Poor Actual Results Score
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Very Satisfactory (4) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Q E T Ave
(1)

Basic 9. Selected, August 7.00% Quality Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Level No acceptable 5 5 5 0.35
Education developed, 2022 to Level 7 in Level 6 in Level 5 in 4 in Objective 9 as evidence was
Services organized and July 2023 Objective 9 as Objective 9 as Objective 9 as shown in COT rating shown
used appropriate shown in COT shown in COT shown in COT sheets/ inter-
teaching and rating sheets/ rating sheets/ rating sheets/ observer agreement 5
learning inter-observer inter-observer inter-observer forms.
resources, agreement forms. agreement forms. agreement forms.
including ICT, to
address learning
goals. Efficiency Objective was Objective was No acceptable
met within the met but evidence was
alloted time. instruction shown 5
exceeded the
alloted time.

Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Poor Actual Results Score
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Very Satisfactory (4) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Q E T Ave
(1)
Basic 4. 10. Designed, August 7.00% Quality Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated 5 5 5 0.35
Education Assessment selected, 2022 to Level 7 in Level 6 in Level 5 in Level 4 in Level 3 in
Services and organized and July 2023 Objective 10 as Objective 10 as Objective 10 as Objective 10 as Objective 10 as
Reporting used diagnostic, shown in COT shown in COT shown in COT shown in COT
formative and rating sheets / rating sheets / rating sheets / rating sheets / shown in COT
summative inter-observer inter-observer inter-observer inter-observer rating sheets /
assessment agreement forms agreement forms agreement forms agreement forms inter-observer 5
strategies agreement
consistent with forms
curriculum or
requirements. No acceptable
evidence was
shown

Efficiency Objective was Objective was No acceptable


met within the met but evidence was
allotted time instruction shown 5
exceeded the
allotted time

Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Poor Actual Results Score
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Very Satisfactory (4) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Q E T Ave
(1)

Basic 11. Monitored and August 7.00% Quality Involved learner/s Monitored and Monitored and Monitored and No acceptable 5 4 4.5 0.315
Education evaluated learner 2022 to in monitoring evaluated learner evaluated learner evaluated learner evidence was
Services progress and July 2023 and progress and progress and progress and shown
achievement using evaluation of achievement achievement achievement
learner attainment their own based on based on the based on an
data. progress and attainment data class attainment existing grade 5
achievement from an data level / department /
individual learner learning area
report

Efficiency
Timeliness Submitted MOV/s Submitted MOV/s Submitted MOV/s Submitted MOV/s No acceptable
show/s show/s monitoring show/s show/s monitoring evidence was
monitoring and and evaluation monitoring and and evaluation shown 5
evaluation done across 3 evaluation done in only 1
done across 4 quarters done across 2 quarter
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Poor Actual Results Score
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Very Satisfactory (4) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Q E T Ave
(1)
Basic 12. Communicated August 7.00% Quality Sustained Communicated Communicated Communicated No acceptable 5 5 5 0.35
Education promptly and 2022 to engagement promptly and promptly and learners’ needs, evidence was
Services clearly the July 2023 through regular clearly using clearly using progress and shown
learners’ needs, communication of various tools only one (1) achievement to
progress and learners’ needs, and strategies strategy learners’ key stakeholders,
achievement to progress and learners’ needs, needs, progress including
key stakeholders, achievement to progress and and achievement parents/guardians
including key stakeholders, achievement to to key , but not
parents/guardians. including key stakeholders, stakeholders, regularly as 5
parents/ including including shown in the MOV
guardians , as parents/guardians parents/ submitted
shown in the , as shown in the guardians , as
MOV submitted MOV submitted shown in the
MOV submitted

Efficiency
Timeliness Showed prompt Showed prompt Showed prompt Showed prompt No acceptable
communication of communication of communication of communication of evidence was
learners’ needs, learners’ needs, learners’ needs, learners’ needs, shown
progress and progress and progress and progress and
achievement achievement achievement achievement in 5
across 4 across 3 across 2 only 1 quarter
quarters quarters quarters

Performance Indicators Rating


Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Poor Actual Results Score
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Very Satisfactory (4) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Q E T Ave
(1)
Basic 5. Personal 13. Applied a August 7.00% Quality Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV that No acceptable 5 5 5 0.35
Education Growth and personal 2022 to that details the that reflects that shows the indicates of personal evidence was
Services Professional philosophy of July 2023 consistent involvement of application of a philosophy of shown
Development teaching that is involvement of learners in the personal teaching that is not
learner-centered. learners in the teaching-learning philosophy of learner-centered.
teaching-learning process resulting teaching that is
process resulting from the learner-centered.
from the application of
5
application of personal
personal philosophy of
philosophy of teaching that is
teaching that is learner-centered.
learner-centered.

Efficiency
Timeliness Applied personal Applied personal Applied personal Applied personal No acceptable
philosophy of philosophy of philosophy of philosophy of evidence was
teaching that is teaching that is teaching that is teaching that is shown
learner-centered learner-centered learner-centered learner-centered 5
across 4 quarters across 3 quarters across 2 quarters across 1 quarters

Performance Indicators Rating


Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Poor Actual Results Score
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Very Satisfactory (4) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Q E T Ave
(1)

Basic 14. Set August 7.00% Quality Updated Discussed Set professional Accomplished e- No acceptable 5 5 4 4.6667 0.32667
Education professional 2022 to professional progress on development SAT at the evidence was
Services development goals July 2023 development professional goals based on e- beginning of school shown
based on the goals during development SAT results as year as evidencesd
Philippine Phase II of the goals with rater evidenced by by MOV 1.
5
Professional RPMS Cycle as during the mid- MOV 2.
Standards for evidenced by year review as
Teachers. MOV 4. evidenced by
MOV 3.

Efficiency Submitted 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable


acceptable MOVs acceptable MOVs acceptable MOVs acceptable MOVs evidence was 5
shown

Timeliness All four (4) Three (3)of the Two (2) of the Only one (1)of the No acceptable
submitted MOVs submitted MOVs submitted MOVs submitted MOVs evidence was
were were were were accomplished shown 5
accomplished accomplished accomplished within the prescribed
within the within the within the RPMS Phase
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Poor Actual Results Score
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Very Satisfactory (4) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Q E T Ave
(1)
Basic Plus Factor 15, Performed August 2.00% Quality Performed at Performed at least Performed at Performed at least No acceptable 5 5 5 4 0.08
Education various related 2022 to least one (1) one (1) related least one (1) one (1) related evidence was
Services works / activities July 2023 related work / work / activity that related work / work / activity that shown
that contribute to activity that contributed to the activity that contributed to the
the teaching- contributed to the teaching-learning contributed to the teaching-learning
learning process. teaching-learning process within the teaching-learning process within the
process beyond school/community process within class as evidenced
the Learning Center the learning by the submitted 5
school/communit (CLC) as area/department MOV.
y Learning evidenced by the as evidenced by
Center (CLC) as submitted MOV. the submitted
evidenced by the MOV.
submitted MOV.

Efficiency Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV that No acceptable
that details the that details the that shows shows conisderable evidence was
achieved positive perceived positive reasonable overlap with, hence shown
contribution to contribution to the interlap with the significantly affecting
the teaching- teaching-learning teaching-learning the performance of
learning process, process, as process, as actual teaching-
as evidenced by evidenced by the evidenced by the learning process. 5
the annotation annotation annotation
provided. provided. provided.

Timeliness Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted any 1


were distributed were distributed were distributed of the given MOV
across 4 quarters across 3 quarters across 2 quarters 5

RATING FOR OVERALL ACCOMPLISHMENTS 4.887


ADJECTIVAL RATING Outstanding
ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCES
RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500 -5.000 Outstanding
3.500- 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.500 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory EUGENE LOUIE G. IBARRA MATEO L. GULAC, HT-III GILDO G. MOSQUEDA, CEO VI

Below 1.499 Poor Ratee Rater Aproving Authority


Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region XII
Division of Sarangani
BONGO INTEGRATED SCHOOL
Amsipit, Maasim, Sarangani Province

PERFORMANCE MONITORING AND COACHING FORM


DATE CRITICAL INCIDENCE DESCRIPTION OUTPUT IMPACT ON JOB/ACTION PLAN SIGNATURE (RATER/RATEE)

TO BE ABLE TO KNOW MORE AND


PERFORMED DEMONSTRATION TEACHING CONDUCTED FIRST DEMONSTRATION TEACHING
SHARE MY KNOWLEDGE ABOUT
FOR COT1 DURING LAC SESSION
INTEGRATION IN TEACHING
February 10, 2023

TO BE ABLE TO KNOW MORE AND


ATTENDED PEDAGOGICAL AND CONTENT- TO DEVELOP TEACHING STYLES, METHODS AND
SHARE MY KNOWLEDGE ABOUT
RELATED SEMINARS AND TRAININGS STRATEGIES
INTEGRATION IN TEACHING
February 10, 2023
TO ELEVATE EFFECTIVE
CONDUCTED QUARTERLY REMEDIAL
TO IMPROVE THEIR LEVEL OF PROFICEINCY IN TRANSFER OF LEARNING AND
INSTRUCTIOIN FOR THE LEAST LEARNED
LITERACY AND NUMERACY PROGESS TOWARDS THE
COMPETENCIES
February 10, 2023 LEARNERS

EUGENE LOUIE G. IBARRA MATEO L. GULAC,HT-III


RATEE RATER APPROVING AUTHORITY

You might also like