1

Brown Content Module: Uppercase Letters

https://browncontentmodule.weebly.com/

Summative Evaluation

Jessica Brown

FRIT 7235 Spring 2020

 2

I. Instructional Objectives

Objective (Cognitive Domain):

After hearing uppercase letters out of order, the prekindergarten students will correctly identify

21 out of 26 uppercase letters.

II. Assessment Description

An authentic assessment was done during the create portion of the lessons. This

authentic assessment had the students taking pictures of their playdough or sand letters. A rubric

was included on the website. The results of this rubric are summarized in the additional data

section of this evaluation. Two summative assessments were given after all uppercase letters

were taught. The first summative assessment was an online multiple-choice quiz of all

uppercase letters out of order on Quizizz. For each question, an audio recording told a letter.

The students selected the correct letter. The second summative assessment was a fill in the blank

quiz on alphabetical order on Edcite. There were five questions where the students had to put the

letters in alphabetical order.

III. Data

Assessment 1 Letter Recognition (Quizizz)

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6

Letter A Letter W Letter P Letter B Letter C Letter H

Student 1 A W P B C H
Student 2 A W P V C H
Student 3 A M P B C H
Student 4 A W P B C H
Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12

Letter O Letter L Letter T Letter U Letter M Letter D

Student 1 O L T U M D
Student 2 O R T U M D
Student 3 O L T U M D
 3

Students 4 O L T U M D
Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18

Letter V Letter F Letter K Letter Q Letter S Letter J

Student 1 V F K Q S J
Student 2 V F K Q S J
Student 3 V F K Q S J
Students 4 V F K Q S J
Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24

Letter N Letter G Letter I Letter E Letter R Letter Z

Student 1 N G I E R Z
Student 2 N G I E R Z
Student 3 N G I D R Z
Students 4 N G I E R Z
Question 25 Question 26
Score
Letter X Letter Y
Student 1 X Y 100%
Student 2 X Y 92%
Student 3 X Y 92%
Students 4 X Y 100%

Assessment 2 Letter Order (Edcite)

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Score

6 letters 6 letters 6 letters 8 letters 26 letters

Student 1 6 6 6 8 26 100%
Student 2 6 4 6 6 26 92%
Student 3 4 6 5 8 24 90%
Student 4 6 6 6 8 25 98%

IV. Analysis of Data

The first quiz consisted of 26 multiple choice questions. Each question had a voice

recording saying the letter. All the students did well on the first quiz. The highest score was

100%, and the lowest score was 92%. The mean of the scores was 96%. No two students

missed the same question. The second quiz consisted of five short answer questions. The first
 4

three questions had six letters to put in order. The fourth question had eight letters to put in

order. The fifth question had all 26 letters to put in order. The students did well on the quiz.

The highest score was 100%, and the lowest score was 90%. The mean of the scores was 95%.

No two students missed the same letter sequence. The students’ uppercase letter recognition

improved greatly after taking this unit. Before the unit, all four students knew less than ten

letters. After the unit, two students know all 26 uppercase letters, and two students know 24

uppercase letters.

V. Field Notes

This unit was meant to be given in my classroom where I could observe the students

while they complete it. Due to the shelter in place order, I had to rely on parents to allow the

four students to complete the unit activities and assessments. Three of the students completed

the assignments on time every day. One student fell behind on the assignments but finished

them all by the end of the 10th day. After they were finished with the unit, I had them complete a

short survey to let me know how the completion of the unit went. All the students found it fun

and average in difficulty. They all said that the lessons helped them learn their letters. Their

favorite parts of the unit were the letter songs, ABC Mouse activities, and the playdough letters.

One student said that her least favorite part was writing the letters. They all agreed that they had

enough time to complete the quizzes. The assignments took between 15 to 45 minutes to

complete; depending on the letter. The students said that they would not change anything.

VI. Evaluation Rubric from Peer

Content Module Review for Jessica Brown

Peer Reviewer: Dayna Halloran Review Date: 4/9/2020
Unacceptable (1 Point) Acceptable (2 Points) Target (3 Points) Points

Content curation tool is linked to
Module 4
the online course. OR
 Content curation tool
selected from the article
“17 of the Best Content
Curation Tools” and links
Curated Resources
to a minimum of 4 unique
web resources. OR
 Many duplicate web sites
included. OR
 Tool selected was not from
the content curation list.
OR
 Resources do not match
the instructional objectives.
OR
 Most resources are not
age-appropriate. OR
 More than one link is not
active. OR
 Annotations are
missing/incomplete.
Online Module does not include
any social media. OR
Module 5
 Social media is not
effectively integrated. OR
 Social media links are not
active. OR
 Course does not contain
Communication – Social Media and Discussions
sufficient discussions. OR
 Discussions do not match
course objectives.
Course rubric does
not contain sufficient levels. OR
Module 6
 Course rubric does not
contain criteria that align
with content. OR
 Quiz does not measure the
Assessment – Rubrics and Quizzes
stated objectives. OR
 Quiz contains grammatical
and/or spelling errors. OR
 Quiz is not created using
an online tool (ie. Quizlet
or Google Forms).
1. Content curation tool is
embedded (not linked) in the
online course. AND
2. Content curation tool selected
from the article “17 of the Best
Content Curation Tools” and
links to a minimum of 6 unique
web resources.
BUT Also…
 One duplicate web site
included. OR
Resources do not exactly
match the instructional
objectives. OR
 Some resources are not
age-appropriate. OR
 One of the links is not
active. OR
 Annotations are complete
but some simply provide a
content summary.
1.Online Module contains at
least two different social media
apps. AND
2. All links to social media are
active. AND
3. Social media is integrated into
the course content in a
meaningful way. AND
4. Course contains at least two
discussions. AND
5. Discussions match content.
AND
6. At least one discussion post
is created using a social media
format.
1.Course rubrics
contain levels that are well
defined. AND
2.Course rubric
contains at least two levels of
student performance. AND
3.Rubric criterion align
with overall content. AND
4.Quiz questions
match instructional objectives.
AND
5.Quizzes are
grammatically correct and do
not contain any misspellings.
AND
6.Quiz is created using an
online tool such as Quizlet or
Google Forms.
5
Must have all of these criteria:
1. Content curation is embedded 3
(not linked) in the online course.
2. Content curation tool selected
from the article “17 of the Best
Content Curation Tools” and links
to a minimum of 8 unique web
resources (do not select more
than one from a single domain
name.)
3. Resources match the
instructional objectives, are high-
quality and age appropriate.
4. ALL links are active.
5. Annotations are descriptive and
qualitative.
6. Annotations are age-
appropriate to guide learners to
use of the resources.
Must have all of these criteria:
1.Online Module contains 2 or 3
more different social media apps.
2.All links to social media are
active.
3.Social media is effectively
integrated into the course content
in a meaningful way.
4. Course contains multiple (>2)
discussions.
5. Clear match between the
discussion question and the
instructional objectives.
6. Discussion focuses on higher
level thinking.
7. At least two discussions are
posted using a social media
format (ie. Facebook, Pinterest,
Twitter, etc).
Must have all of these criteria:
1.Course rubric 3
contains levels that are well
defined and fit the learning target.
2. Course rubric
contains 3 or more levels to
distinguish between student
performance.
3. Rubric criteria directly
align with the activity it is intended
to assess.
4. Quiz questions match
instructional objectives.
5. All multiple choice
questions have at least 3-4
response options; No True/False
questions.
6. Quizzes are
grammatically correct and do not
contain any misspellings.
7.Quizzes are created using an
online tool such as Quizlet or
Google Forms.

1.Online Module does not show
Module 8
evidence or has limited
evidence of meeting the needs
of diverse learners.
Diversity and Accessibility
Content and 1. Much of the instructional
Organization content I needed to
complete the content
module was missing. OR
2. I couldn’t access the site
on the first try. OR
3. I had to request access on
3 or more embedded
content and/or links. OR
4. Navigating through the
course was confusing OR
it was hard to find things
OR there is a lot of
extraneous content on the
site. OR
5. The text on the site is hard
to read. OR
6. There are multiple
grammatical, punctuation
or spelling errors.
Peer Reviewer Comments:
Jessica’s online module looks great! I appreciate the ease of it, as a Kindergarten teacher. It seems like students could easily
navigate through the module with an introductory lesson, which she provided on her homepage. I enjoyed the age-appropriate
resources, from a wide variety of places. I think her learns will have no problem mastering the skills of their uppercase letters
after completing!
1.Online Module utilizes 3+
elements of Universal Design for
Learning. AND
2. Online Module offers some
evidence of Differentiated
Instruction. AND
3. Online Module shows
evidence of some accessibility
adaptations. AND
4. Links to (2+) assistive
technology resources provided.
1. Most of the instructional
content I needed to
complete the content
module was present. AND
2. I could access the site on
the first try. I had to request
access on no more than 2
embedded content and/or
links. AND
3. It was easy for work
through the course most of
the time. AND
4. There is some extraneous
content on the site, but it
wasn’t distracting or
confusing. AND
5. The site is well designed
and visually appealing. All
text is legible. AND
6. There are one or two
grammatical, punctuation
or spelling errors.
6
Must have all of these criteria:
3
1. Online Module clearly utilizes
Universal Design for
Learning (6+ checkpoints).
2. Online Module utilizes
Differentiated Instruction as
evidenced by differentiated
assignments.
3. Online Module includes
specific accessibility and/or
assistive technology
resources.
4. Multiple (4+) assistive
technology resources are
linked to.
Must have all of these criteria:
3
1. All of the instructional
content I needed to complete
the content module was
present.
2. I could access the site and
all embedded content and
links on the first try.
3. It was easy to work through
the course. I knew what to
do next.
4. There is no extraneous or
placeholder content on the
site.
5. The site is well designed and
visually appealing. All text is
legible.
6. There were no grammatical,
punctuation or spelling
errors.
Total Score
15
 7

VII. Additional Data

Creating Playdough or Sand Letters

Total Number of Total Number of Total Number of Total Number of

Advanced Proficient In Progress Not Yet

Student 1 22 4 0 0
Student 2 13 11 2 0
Student 3 14 11 1 0
Student 4 12 12 2 0
Total 61 38 5 0

The students did well at forming each of the letters. Most of the letters created were rated

as advanced or proficient. Only five letters were rated in progress, and no letters were rated not

yet. The letters that were rated in progress looked too much like other letters. For example, a D

looked like an O.

VIII. Evaluation Rubric of Peer’s Module

Content Module Review for Heather Hagood

Peer Reviewer: Jessica Brown Review Date: 4/6/2020
Unacceptable (1 Point) Acceptable (2 Points) Target (3 Points) Points
Content curation tool is linked to the 1. Content curation tool is Must have all of these criteria: 3
online course. OR embedded (not linked) in the online 1. Content curation is embedded (not
Module 4

 Content curation tool selected
from the article “17 of the Best
Content Curation Tools” and
links to a minimum of 4 unique
Curated Resources
course. AND
2. Content curation tool selected
from the article “17 of the Best
Content Curation Tools” and links to
a minimum of 6 unique web
linked) in the online course.
2. Content curation tool selected from
the article “17 of the Best Content
Curation Tools” and links to a
minimum of 8 unique web resources

web resources. OR
 Many duplicate web sites
included. OR
 Tool selected was not from the
content curation list. OR
 Resources do not match the
instructional objectives. OR
 Most resources are not age-
appropriate. OR
 More than one link is not
active. OR
 Annotations are
missing/incomplete.
resources.
BUT Also…
 One duplicate web site included.
OR
Resources do not exactly
match the instructional
objectives. OR
 Some resources are not age-
appropriate. OR
 One of the links is not active.
OR
 Annotations are complete but
some simply provide a content
summary.
(do not select more than one from a
single domain name.)
3. Resources match the instructional
objectives, are high-quality and age
appropriate.
4. ALL links are active.
5. Annotations are descriptive and
qualitative.
6. Annotations are age-appropriate to
guide learners to use of the
resources.

Online Module does not include any 1.Online Module contains at least Must have all of these criteria: 3
social media. OR two different social media apps. 1.Online Module contains 2 or
Module 5

 Social media is not effectively AND more different social media apps.

integrated. OR 2. All links to social media are 2.All links to social media are active.
 Social media links are not active. AND 3.Social media is effectively integrated
and Discussions

active. OR
 Course does not contain
sufficient discussions. OR
 Discussions do not match
course objectives.
Course rubric does not
contain sufficient levels. OR
Module 6
 Course rubric does not contain
criteria that align with content.
OR
 Quiz does not measure the
Assessment – Rubrics and Quizzes
stated objectives. OR
 Quiz contains grammatical
and/or spelling errors. OR
 Quiz is not created using an
online tool (ie. Quizlet or
Google Forms).
1.Online Module does not show
Module 8
evidence or has limited evidence of
meeting the needs of diverse
learners.
Diversity and Accessibility
Content and 7. Much of the instructional
Organization content I needed to complete
the content module was
missing. OR
8. I couldn’t access the site on
the first try. OR
9. I had to request access on 3 or
more embedded content
and/or links. OR
10. Navigating through the course
was confusing OR it was hard
to find things OR there is a lot
of extraneous content on the
site. OR
11. The text on the site is hard to
read. OR
12. There are multiple
grammatical, punctuation or
spelling errors.
3. Social media is integrated into the
course content in a meaningful way.
AND
4. Course contains at least two
discussions. AND
5. Discussions match content. AND
6. At least one discussion post is
created using a social media format.
1.Course rubrics contain
levels that are well defined. AND
2.Course rubric contains
at least two levels of student
performance. AND
3.Rubric criterion align
with overall content. AND
4.Quiz questions match
instructional objectives. AND
5.Quizzes are
grammatically correct and do not
contain any misspellings. AND
6.Quiz is created using an online
tool such as Quizlet or Google
Forms.
1.Online Module utilizes 3+
elements of Universal Design for
Learning. AND
2. Online Module offers some
evidence of Differentiated
Instruction. AND
3. Online Module shows evidence of
some accessibility adaptations. AND
4. Links to (2+) assistive technology
resources provided.
7. Most of the instructional
content I needed to complete
the content module was
present. AND
8. I could access the site on the
first try. I had to request access
on no more than 2 embedded
content and/or links. AND
9. It was easy for work through
the course most of the time.
AND
10. There is some extraneous
content on the site, but it
wasn’t distracting or confusing.
AND
11. The site is well designed and
visually appealing. All text is
legible. AND
12. There are one or two
grammatical, punctuation or
spelling errors.
8
into the course content in a
meaningful way.
4. Course contains multiple (>2)
discussions.
5. Clear match between the
discussion question and the
instructional objectives.
6. Discussion focuses on higher level
thinking.
7. At least two discussions are posted
using a social media format (ie.
Facebook, Pinterest, Twitter, etc).
Must have all of these criteria: 3
1.Course rubric contains
levels that are well defined and fit the
learning target.
2. Course rubric contains 3
or more levels to distinguish between
student performance.
3. Rubric criteria directly
align with the activity it is intended to
assess.
4. Quiz questions match
instructional objectives.
5. All multiple choice
questions have at least 3-4 response
options; No True/False questions.
6. Quizzes are
grammatically correct and do not
contain any misspellings.
7.Quizzes are created using an online
tool such as Quizlet or Google Forms.
Must have all of these criteria: 3
5. Online Module clearly utilizes
Universal Design for Learning
(6+ checkpoints).
6. Online Module utilizes
Differentiated Instruction as
evidenced by differentiated
assignments.
7. Online Module includes specific
accessibility and/or assistive
technology resources.
8. Multiple (4+) assistive
technology resources are linked
to.
Must have all of these criteria: 3
7. All of the instructional content I
needed to complete the content
module was present.
8. I could access the site and all
embedded content and links on
the first try.
9. It was easy to work through the
course. I knew what to do next.
10. There is no extraneous or
placeholder content on the site.
11. The site is well designed and
visually appealing. All text is
legible.
12. There were no grammatical,
punctuation or spelling errors.
Total Score 15
 9

Peer Reviewer Comments:

Great unit. It was easy to follow and interesting. All of the links worked and were appropriate for the material. The discussion question on
Flipgrid only allows you to record. You cannot write a paragraph. My main suggestion would be to add a link for Google Classroom. I like the
mixture of multiple choice, word problems, and fill in the blank questions on the assessments.