Professional Documents
Culture Documents
View Journal
PCCP
Accepted Manuscript
This article can be cited before page numbers have been issued, to do this please use: A. Comas-Vives,
Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2016, DOI: 10.1039/C6CP00602G.
www.rsc.org/pccp
Page 1 of 9 Please do not adjust margins
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
ARTICLE
generally ranges from flexible 12-membered rings to strained Isolated Vicinal and geminal
a) Types of silanols b) OH density
4-member Si-O rings and the distribution of such siloxane rings a) Types a) of
a)silanols
Types
Typesof ofsilanols
silanols c) Siloxaneb)
c)c) bridges
Siloxane
Siloxane
3
bridges
bridges
O OOH O OO OO
O OO
O
OO O
O
O O O O OO OO O OO O OH O O O
Si Si
found; they can be classified as isolated, geminal, vicinal O and
O
O O
Si
O O OO
Si O Si
O O O
Si
O
Si Si O
O
Si O O Si O
1.5
Si O
Si
a) Types of silanols a) Types 3747of
ν = 3747
Ocmsilanols
cm νν ==3747
O
3750-3740 cm c)O O
H-donor,acceptor
O 3750 Siloxane bridges
3750-3740 c) O Siloxane
cm -1
-1Si
O-1-1 Obridges
-1
O -1 OO -1
-1
cm3650 cm 3530, - 3740 cm
interacting silanols, which show distinct IR signatures H (see 3747cm 3650 cm 3750 1 Si
Si -1-1-1 -1-1
3650
3720 cm
cm OH 3750- -3740
3740cm cm O OH
OH
Si Si SiSi OO SiSi
IsolatedH H Isolated
HIsolated H H and
Vicinal HVicinal
geminal
Vicinaland OH Geminal
andgeminal
geminal O 0.5
8-10 ν O= 3747 cm Isolated O cm Vicinal Interacting
-1
OSi -O3740 cm
-1 O -1 O
Figure 1). Isolated and geminal silanols appear as sharp OH b)
SiIsolated
O 3650 νO = 3747 cm
Si Si Vicinal
b)b) Si O
3750
OH H -O
and geminal Si
O O cm O 3650 cm H O O3750
3740
Si Si O
Si
Si
Si Si
OH
0
-1
O O
Si Si Si
Si -1 -1
3747 cm-1 O
–2 / nm–2
Si Si
OH
2 SiSi SiSi
O O
appear in the IR spectrum being significantly b) red-shifted for OO OO
Θ
1
ΘOH / nmΘ
11 Si Si
1.5 SiSi Si n SiSi SiSi
b) 1.5 O O O nn
Si O Si O O O O
11 -1 0.5 3 0.5
0.5
the case of a hydrogen-donor silanols. . Using fumed 1 Aerosil- 0 3650 cm010 O O Si
3 = 3747 cm -1 3750 - 3740 cm -1 O= 909 - Si O Si
SiO O
νOH -1
Si O Siν n =Si909 - 889
Si νν cm = 909O -889
Si 889cmcm Si
O SiOSi SiOSi
SiOSi
-1-1
SiO Si SiO Si Si
2 -1 2.5 Isolated
0.5 2.5 200 Vicinal400 and
600 200geminal
800 Si Si O Si Si O n
200 (200 m g ) as an example, the decrease of surface silanol
200 400
400 600 600 800
800
0.5 ν = 909 - 889 cm -1
T / °C SiOSi -1
TT/ °C
/ °C = 909 - 889 cm
b) 2 0 2 ν SiOSi
ΘOH / nm–2
ΘOH / nm–2
0.5 0.5
νSiOSi = 909 - 889 cm-1 νSiOSi = 909 - 889 cm-1
1.5
0 0 of silica partially dehydroxylated at O200 °C O and 700
O °C (SiO2-(200) and SiO2-(700)). d)
200 400 600 800 200 400 600 800 Si Si
O 3O
1
T / °C
Siloxane Rings. Adapted from Wischert, et. al.
T / °C Si Si Si
n
0.5
νSiOSi = 909 - 889 cm-1
0
200 400 600 800
T / °C
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2015, 00, 1-3 | 1
Highly dehydroxylated silica is commonly used as a support for signatures of the related surfaces are in good agreement with
View Article Online
15, 16
the grafting of catalysts on the silica surface, for the experiment. Hence, the proposed models can serve us basis to
DOI: 10.1039/C6CP00602G
17-20
generation of single-site catalysts or the deposition of evaluate catalytic processes occurring on silica surfaces with
21, 22 3, 6, 12
metallic nanoparticles. different degrees of hydroxylation.
The main difficulty for the modelling of SiO2 surfaces arises
dehydroxylated silica surfaces. Obvious alternatives to cluster This structure was optimized at DFT level (vide infra) and the
23, 31-35
models are periodic models. Parrinello and co-workers final configuration is shown in the ESI (Figure S1).
constructed an amorphous fully dehydroxylated SiO2 surface Subsequently, the 001 plane of the SiO2 was taken by cleaving
33
based on molecular dynamics simulations containing highly 10 Å of the silica bulk material in this direction. This surface
strained two membered (2MR) Si-O rings. Tielens and co- termination was taken because it is the simplest choice among
workers constructed an amorphous model containing 26 SiO2 the low indices terminations of silica. It allows taking a thicker
36 32
units, which was terminated with OH groups, having an OH layer of SiO2 at lower computational cost than for the 101 and
2
density equal to 5.8 OH/nm and a thickness of 5-8 Å. Ugliengo 111 terminations. The selection of only one of the three
et. al. constructed models of amorphous SiO2 surfaces with a surface terminations is justified for the case of an amorphous
2 35
broad range of silanol density from 7.2 to 1.5 OH/nm . model of silica, whereas it is more critical for the ideal
Removal of molecules of water by condensing adjacent silanol 39
terminations of β-cristobalite. For the latter, the fully
pairs gave surfaces containing silanol densities as low as 1.5 ≡ hydroxylated 001 101 and 111 terminations give rise to very
-2.
Si-OH nm . More recently, Ewing et. al. constructed clear and distinct silanol patterns which are different to each
amorphous models of silica with a silanol coverage as low as other, containing only germinal, vicinal and isolated silanols,
2 34
2.0 OH/nm . Also, “crystalline” periodic models based on respectively (see Figures S7-S9 from the ESI). Analogously to
37
different terminations of β−cristobalite have been used in the 001 termination, the 101 and 111 terminations of the
38
order to create dehydroxylated SiO2 surfaces, which included amorphous SiO2 bulk structure were also constructed and
direct condensation of silanols and reconstructions of the silica optimized (see Figures S5 and S6 of the ESI). In contrast to the
39
surface. ideal terminations of β-cristobalite, the three terminations of
Therefore, although several ab initio models have been the amorphous SiO2 bulk model contain all kinds of silanols,
proposed in the literature, they still present some limitations. and thus the differences among them are less significant (see
From one side, cluster models are generally too ideal in the Figures S4-S6)
sense that since they have not boundary constraints and they For all the terminations, the dangling Si and O bonds on both
are more relaxed, i. e. they contain less strain, than partially sides of the surface were saturated with OH and H atoms, and
and highly dehydroxylated amorphous silica. In addition, the for the case of the 001 a surface as thick as 13.7 Å was
ab initio based periodic models either crystalline or obtained. Then, a vacuum slab of ca. 20 Å was added with a
amorphous are not heterogeneous enough mostly due to their final unit cell in the z direction equal to 34.2 Å, large enough to
limitation in size. All these aspects might be crucial when avoid interactions between images in the z direction. The
modelling single-site catalysts grafted on highly resulting surface had a unit cell equal to 21.39 x 21.39 Å x 34.2
dehydroxylated silica. In this contribution, amorphous SiO2 Å. This fully hydroxylated SiO2 surface (SiO2-1 model)
models of 2.1 x 2.1 nm and silanol densities between 7.2-1.1 contained 402 atoms with a silanol density equal to 7.2
2
OH/nm are obtained via direct desorption of water molecules 2
OH/nm on both the top and the bottom layers. A top and site
and silica reconstruction steps. Such reconstructions are view of this silica surface is given in Figure 2. Also a smaller
necessary in order to reach silanol coverages as low as ca. 1.0 silica surface was constructed with dimensions 14.32x 14.32 x
2
OH/nm and the resulting model can be used to simulate the 34.78 Å in order to evaluate the effect of decreasing the cell
SiO2-700°C surface, a widely used system in catalysis, for which size (see Figure S2 for the corresponding bulk structure).
a realistic model has not been proposed yet. In addition, the All the calculations reported in this study were performed by
dehydroxylation process described on this contribution is means of the CP2K code with the revised version of the PBE
significantly more favoured energetically than for previously functional,
42, 43
using GTH pseudopotentials,
44, 45
plane waves
35
proposed amorphous models. and Gaussian basis sets. The DZVP basis set was used for Si, O
By using ab initio atomistic thermodynamics the most surface 46
and H atoms, and an energy cutoff equal to 300 Ry was
as a function of the temperature and the PH2O is obtained. Both selected.
the predicted coverage at given conditions and the IR
2 | Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2015, 00, 1-3 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
a) b)
applied in order to obtain the spectra. In order to
Viewdistinguish
Article Online
the O-H stretching modes of the top of DOI:
the 10.1039/C6CP00602G
SiO2 surface from
the ones of the bottom layer, deuterium atoms were used for
the later.
with the increment used to construct the hessian with finite every step, average distance of the two new Si-O bonds created upon formation
difference method set to 0.001 bohr. Gaussian broadening was of the siloxane bridges (in Å) the relative reaction energy (ΔEr) per water
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2015, 00, 1-3 | 3
300
250
!3H2O& 200
y = 3117.37x -5140.15
∆E (kJ.mol )
-1
150 r2 = 0.913
100
1& 2& 50
!3H2O&
c)& d)&
0
!3H2O&
2& 1
Figure 4. Relationship between the energetic cost (ΔE, in kJ.mol- ) of dehydration
and the average distance of the two new Si-O bonds, which are created upon
formation of a new siloxane bridge in each dehydration step.
4 | Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2015, 00, 1-3 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
(Scheme 2). In the first type of reconstruction, formally one The migration of one silica unit to close a silanol nest of three
SiO2 unit (formally from the silica bulk unit cell) is formally silanol groups is expected to be more feasible when the three
added to three Si-OH groups in a process that releases one siloxane groups are disposed in a symmetrical way, e. g. having
water molecule (Scheme 2a). distance between the oxygen atoms forming the silanol nest
equidistant to each other, since the resulting silica atom upon
Scheme 2. Dehydroxylation of the SiO2 surface via the migration of one (a) or reconstruction having three siloxane and one silanol groups
two (b) SiO2 groups. The involved atoms in the surface migration reaction are
depicted in blue. would have less strain. This condition is better fulfilled for the
a) silanol nest selected for the formation of the SiO2-5 surface
O O
SiO2
OH from the SiO2-4 surface with respect to another possibility (see
O Si O O Si O
OH Si OH Figure S11 from the ESI). This reconstruction step (Equation 1)
Si OH HO O Si O O
O HO Si O Si
-H2O O O -1
O Si OHHO O O Si OHHO O has an energetic cost equal to 43 kJ.mol and releases one
O O
O O water molecule. The same type of reconstruction (Equation 2)
b) is also possible on the SiO2-5 surface since a group of three
O OH
O silanols are close to each other to form the SiO2-6 surface.
O Si O 2SiO2 Si O Si However, for this case the reconstruction is more energy
OH O O O OH
Si OH HO OH Si O -1
O Si
O -H2O O Si
O Si demanding: 157 kJ.mol . For the case of the SiO2-6 surface,
O O O
HO HO O OH HO there are not three silanol groups close to each other in a
Si OH Si OH
O O
O
triangular shape. Conversely, in one area of the silica surface
O
there are four silanol units in pairs, forming a rectangular
pattern (see Figure S12). This pattern is the one where a
An example of how this reconstruction can take place on the migration of two SiO2 units is possible and hence it was
silica surface is depicted in Scheme 3. When a -Si(OH)3 unit is considered to further dehydroxylate the surface. This last step
formed upon addition of three water molecules, this unit can releases one water molecule (Equation 3) and it is
-1
freely rotate and upon further condensations and one final endothermic by only 27 kJ.mol .
water-assisted siloxane rupture, the silanol nest with three
silanols can be converted to a Si(OH)(OSi)3 unit. Formally, a 2
Table 2. Density of OH per nm , total number of water molecules released for
migration of one SiO2 group and the net release of one water -1
every step, the relative reaction energy (ΔEr) per water molecule (in kJ.mol )
molecule. This approach, allows closing silanol nests without and the average over all the water molecules removed with respect to the initial
having to consider multiple water-assisted processes of fully hydroxylated silica surface.
rupture and formation of siloxane bonds on the silica surface.
Model OH/nm
2
Total n H2O Δ Er Average Δ E
Scheme 3. Example of how a SiO2 reconstruction can take place via successive released (kJ.mol )
-1
per nH2O
water-assisted rupture and formation of siloxane bridges. -1
(kJ.mol )
O O
SiO2-5 2.8 10 43 131
O O O O O
O
O O
O Si
OO 3H2O O OH
HO Si
OO
O OH
Si
O OO H2O
O
Si O
Si
O OO SiO2-6 2.4 11 157 133
Si Si Si Si O
O Si O Si Si O
SiO2-7 2.0 12 27 125
HO Si O O
O O O O O O -4H2O O O -H2O Si O O
O O O O
O Si O O Si O O O Si
O
O OH
SiO2-8 1.6 13 252 134
O OH O O
(HO)3Si O Si
O Si O O
OH HO HO O
OH
SiO2-9 1.1 14 259 143
O O
OH
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2015, 00, 1-3 | 5
a)# b)# reported this kind of sites for their fully dehydroxylated model
View Article Online
53
of amorphous silica-alumina. DOI: 10.1039/C6CP00602G
5#
a) b)
*H2O# 1.689
+#SiO2#
4" 5"
c)# d)# Figure 6. 2MR rings formed upon dehydration of the SiO2-7 surface. a) 2MR formed
*H2O#
upon formation of the SiO2-8 surface and b) upon formation of the SiO2-9 surface.
Distances in Å.
6# +#2SiO2#
The global energetics reported in this study to reach silanol
2
coverage of 1.1 OH/nm presents an average energetic cost of
-1
143 kJ.mol per water molecule. For the case of the smaller
*H2O#
unit cell, the average energetic cost to reach the same silanol
-1
coverage is similar (145 kJ.mol per water molecule, see Table
S2). This energetics is significantly more favored than the one
*H2O# previously reported by Ugliengo et. al in their periodic
6" 7"
e)# f)# amorphous model. In that case, in order to reach a silanol
2 -1
coverage equal to 1.5 OH/nm : 262 kJ.mol per water
molecule were required.
6 | Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2015, 00, 1-3 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
2 -1
1.1 OH/nm , respectively. For the most hydroxylated surface there is only one additional single peak at ca. 3610 cm ,
-1
the highest band of the IR spectrum is centered at 3735 cm , corresponding to interacting silanols (Figure 7c). Finally, the IR
corresponding to isolated silanol groups. In this spectrum spectra from the surfaces with a silanol densities equal to 2.0
-1 2
there are also additional bands in the 3700-3400 cm region and 1.1 OH/nm show only one single sharp band centred at
-1
(Figure 7b) corresponding to interacting silanols. The ca. 3780 cm (Figures 7d-e). In this case, this signal
analogous IR spectrum of the fully hydroxylated SiO2 surface corresponds only to isolated silanol groups. All these
corresponding to a smaller unit cell is quite comparable to this spectroscopic results are in good agreement with the
one (see Figure S13). This IR spectrum can also be compared experimentally reported IR spectra of silica at different OH
with the ones computed for the fully hydroxylated 001, 101 coverages.
b)# c)#
a)#
5
0
7.2
5.9
4.6
Log ( PH2O / P0)
-5
2.0
-10
d)# e)#
1.1
-15
-20
-25
300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200
Temperature)(K))
0
Figure 7. (a) Surface phase diagram as a function of the log(PH2O/P ) and the temperature (in K) including all the silica surfaces. For every area the most stable silanol density
2 2
(in OH/nm ) is depicted. Resulting IR spectra for selected silanol coverages. (b) 7.2, (c) 4.6, (d) 2.0 and (e) 1.1 OH/nm .
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2015, 00, 1-3 | 7
2
density (0.8 OH/nm ) obtained for a silica surface treated Coperet, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2014, 16, 17822-
View Article Online
under high vacuum at 700 °C. The corresponding obtained 17827. DOI: 10.1039/C6CP00602G
vibrational spectra of the Si-OH region for some selected 15. C. Coperet, Chem. Rev., 2010, 110, 656-680.
surfaces is also in qualitative good agreement with the 16. S. Lwin and I. E. Wachs, ACS Catalysis, 2014, 4, 2505-
2520.
experimental IR spectra reported for silica. All the obtained
17. M. F. Delley, F. Núñez-Zarur, M. P. Conley, A. Comas-
heterogeneous systems such as silica-supported metallic and C. Copéret, PNAS, 2014, 111, 11624-11629.
nanoparticles, grafted organometallic catalysts or single- 18. C. Lamberti, A. Zecchina, E. Groppo and S. Bordiga,
site catalysts present on the surface of silica pre-treated Chem. Soc. Rev., 2010, 39, 4951-5001.
under different conditions. The highly dehydroxylated silica 19. D. Gajan and C. Coperet, New J. Chem., 2011, 35,
surfaces present a high degree in strain what could have 2403-2408.
strong influence on the catalytic processes occurring on 20. J. Jarupatrakorn and T. D. Tilley, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
them. 2002, 124, 8380-8388.
21. P. Serna and B. C. Gates, Acc. Chem. Res., 2014, 47,
2612-2620.
22. J. Guzman and B. C. Gates, Dalton Trans., 2003, 3303-
Acknowledgements 3318.
23. A. Rimola, D. Costa, M. Sodupe, J.-F. Lambert and P.
Prof. Christophe Copéret and L. Floryan are acknowledged Ugliengo, Chem. Rev., 2013, 113, 4216-4313.
for fruitful discussions. The Swiss National Foundation is 24. P. Sautet and F. Delbecq, Chem. Rev., 2010, 110, 1788-
acknowledged for financial support (Ambizione project 1806.
PZ00P2_148059). 25. F. Vigné-Maeder and P. Sautet, J. Phys. Chem. B, 1997,
101, 8197-8203.
26. M. P. Conley, M. F. Delley, F. Núñez-Zarur, A. Comas-
Notes Vives and C. Copéret, Inorg. Chem., 2015, 54, 5065-
5078.
The coordinates of all the structures generated in this 27. M. F. Delley, F. Núñez-Zarur, M. P. Conley, A. Comas-
manuscript are available upon request. Vives, G. Siddiqi, S. Norsic, V. Monteil, O. V. Safonova
and C. Copéret, PNAS, 2014, 111, 11624-11629.
28. T. R. Walsh, M. Wilson and A. P. Sutton, J. Chem. Phys.,
References 2000, 113, 9191-9201.
29. X. Solans-Monfort, J.-S. Filhol, C. Copéret and O.
1. C. Copéret, A. Comas-Vives, M. P. Conley, D. Estes, F. Eisenstein, New J. Chem., 2006, 30, 842-850.
Núñez-Zarur, A. Fedorov, V. Mougel, H. Nagae and P. 30. C. Thieuleux, E. A. Quadrelli, J.-M. Basset, J. Dobler and
Zhizhko, Chem. Rev., 2015, in press. J. Sauer, Chem. Commun., 2004, 1729-1731.
2. C. Copéret, M. Chabanas, R. Petroff Saint-Arroman and 31. T. S. Mahadevan and S. H. Garofalini, J. Phys. Chem. C,
J.-M. Basset, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2003, 42, 156-181. 2008, 112, 1507-1515.
3. F. Rascon, R. Wischert and C. Coperet, Chem. Sci., 32. F. Tielens, C. Gervais, J. F. Lambert, F. Mauri and D.
2011, 2, 1449-1456. Costa, Chem. Mater., 2008, 20, 3336-3344.
4. E. Wagner and H. Brünner, Angew. Chem., 1960, 72, 33. D. Ceresoli, M. Bernasconi, S. Iarlori, M. Parrinello and
744-750. E. Tosatti, Phys. Rev. Lett., 2000, 84, 3887-3890.
5. D. Zhao, J. Feng, Q. Huo, N. Melosh, G. H. Fredrickson, 34. C. S. Ewing, S. Bhavsar, G. Veser, J. J. McCarthy and J.
B. F. Chmelka and G. D. Stucky, Science, 1998, 279, K. Johnson, Langmuir, 2014, 30, 5133-5141.
548-552. 35. P. Ugliengo, M. Sodupe, F. Musso, I. J. Bush, R. Orlando
6. A. P. Legrand, The Surface Properties of Silica, Wiley- and R. Dovesi, Adv. Mater., 2008, 20, 4579-4583.
VCH, 1998. 36. S. H. Garofalini, J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 1990, 120, 1-12.
7. C. T. Kresge, M. E. Leonowicz, W. J. Roth, J. C. Vartuli 37. I. S. Chuang and G. E. Maciel, J. Phys. Chem. B, 1997,
and J. S. Beck, Nature, 1992, 359, 710-712. 101, 3052-3064.
8. P. Hoffmann and E. Knözinger, Surf. Sci., 1987, 188, 38. S. Iarlori, D. Ceresoli, M. Bernasconi, D. Donadio and
181-198. M. Parrinello, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2001, 105, 8007-8013.
9. F. Musso, M. Sodupe, M. Corno and P. Ugliengo, J. 39. X. Rozanska, F. Delbecq and P. Sautet, Phys. Chem.
Phys. Chem. C, 2009, 113, 17876-17884. Chem. Phys., 2010, 12, 14930-14940.
10. B. Civalleri, E. Garrone and P. Ugliengo, Chem. Phys. 40. Accelrys, Materials Studio 6.0, San Diego, 2001-2011.
Lett., 1998, 294, 103-108. 41. N. T. Huff, E. Demiralp, T. Çagin and W. A. Goddard Iii,
11. B. A. Morrow and A. J. McFarlan, J. Non-Cryst. Solids, J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 1999, 253, 133-142.
1990, 120, 61-71. 42. J. P. Perdew, K. Burke and M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev.
12. L. T. Zhuravlev, Colloids Surf., A, 2000, 173, 1-38. Lett., 1996, 77, 3865.
13. C. C. Liu and G. E. Maciel, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1996, 118, 43. J. P. Perdew, K. Burke and M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev.
5103-5119. Lett., 1997, 78, 1396.
14. M. P. Conley, A. J. Rossini, A. Comas-Vives, M. Valla, G. 44. S. Goedecker, M. Teter and J. Hutter, Phys. Rev. B,
Casano, O. Ouari, P. Tordo, A. Lesage, L. Emsley and C. 1996, 54, 1703-1710.
8 | Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2015, 00, 1-3 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
45. M. Krack, Theor Chem Acc, 2005, 114, 145-152. View Article Online
46. J. VandeVondele and J. Hutter, J. Chem. Phys., 2007, DOI: 10.1039/C6CP00602G
127, 114105.
47. S. Grimme, J. Antony, S. Ehrlich and H. Krieg, J. Chem.
Phys., 2010, 132, 154104.
48. K. Reuter and M. Scheffler, Phys. Rev. B, 2001, 65,
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2015, 00, 1-3 | 9