1/12 1.209 1.802 P2/ C x 0.685 0.759 1/13 1.466 1.701 ul/C, 0.876 1.092 1/14 1.629 1.505 u 2/Cx 0.670 0.917 eP2 eP3 1.032 1.697 1.385 1.679 °I2 O 0.369 0.707 0.300 0.729 eP4 2.233 2.089 °I O2 0.000 0.034 0.182 0.369 03 0.179 0.419 04 0.313 0.353 a 1.060 1.019 f3 1.045 1.142 oy 1.127 1.302
a All angles are listed in radians.
the plane stress case are less than a-:
s , the laterally confined plane stress (i.e., 3.6Cx ). This implies that ice may fail against very wide structures at less than the type A plane strain strength. The upper and lower bounds for indentation pressure are listed in Table 8.2 and are also compared with Michel and Toussaint's (1976) constant effective strain rate indentation data in Fig. 8.44. The average value for the pressure is 4.12Cx for the plane strain eas e with a maximum possible error of ±8%. For the plane stress case, the average value is 3.13 with a possible error of ±5%. The plane stress bounds agree very weIl with the test data at the higher aspect ratios. At low aspect ratio, the plane strain bounds are onlyabout 30% higher than the plane stress bounds and show good agreement with most of the data obtained with the smaller indenterso This suggests that the data from tests 13 to 17 may be representative of the proper material response, and not a consequence of the ice crystal size. Although the size of these indenters was comparable to the crystal diameter, the size of the plastic deforming region may have been sufficiently large to obscure individual crystal effects.
8.6.2. Indentation of a Semi-Infinite Medium by a Square or
Rectangular Punch Three-dimensional problems of rigid-punch indentation are considered in this section. The material is assumed to obey Tresca's yield criterion of constant maximum shearing stress during plastic deformation.