Professional Documents
Culture Documents
This rubric may be used to compare to learning approaches such as your Capstone
project or to the evaluation of something as complex as a learning theory. If what
the cognitive scientists are saying is valid, then we as teachers and designers and
theorists should be informed by the findings of cognitive science. This rubric is
worked from the brain-based motivation considerations and from Gredler,
Schumann/Scherer and the material on how the neurons and glia operate. Apply
this rubric to a learning activity, provide talking points related to learning theories
and strategies applied, and prepare a summary slide and virtual tour of your efforts.
Accounted
For?
Y = Yes
Element of Motivation N= No Comments
NA = Not
Applicable
? = Cannot
Determine
Presentation
Material is relevant to the needs Y Material meets requirements
and goals of the learner for content to acquire credit
in the Instructional Science
and Technology (MIST)
program. The course
provides information on ID
to prepare students for
future success.
Material and/or Y Material included content
presentation/stimulus is novel, is new to learners in regards to
something new and interesting to the field of Instructional
the learner Design. Readings were
relevant and presented in a
clear and easy to follow
manner.
Presentation approach is Y Materials presented allowed
intrinsically for stimulating engagement
pleasant/interesting/stimulating and learning to take place
/ thought provoking throughout the course.
Wording, visuals, audio, language Y Learning outcomes were at
is manageable and useable to the the top of each week to let
receiving group or individual Learners know what to
expect. All tools provided to
learners were easy to find,
applicable to the field, and
usable in the learner's future
careers.
In terms of a theory, does the Y Presentation was clear and
theory provide/consider the stimulating to the learners in
above? both information given and
feedback provided.
Practice
Participation/Collaboration
There is opportunity for Y Deliverables are posted and
synchronous or asynchronous students and Professor are
review of posted products given an opportunity to
reflect and provide feedback
asynchronously.
Teacher and peer feedback Y Student and professor
promotes a Community of feedback is given in a timely
Practice/Wisdom/Knowledge manner. In addition to
assignments, the professor
provides a Sharing is Caring
Discussion, Share Resources
and Findings and Ask Your
Instructor forum. Feedback is
also given via LMS when
multiple choice and short
answer quizzes are given. At
the end of the course,
students are assigned
peer/self evaluation forms.
Teacher and cohort are able to Y Team assignments such as
see who is contributing and how case studies fulfill this
they are contributing to requirement. Additionally,
knowledge sharing students can share resources
related to course through a
Share Resources and
Findings forum.
Variation in task readiness and Y Students are given content to
ability to contribute is dealt with learn, followed by case study
by group effort to meet goals assignments to work through
as a team. Students are
assigned different roles
(Coordinator, Researcher,
and Recorder) for team
assignments to ensure
workload is evenly
distributed.
Virtual opportunities to meet and Y Instructor provides By
collaborate are provided for and Appointment office hours day
if face to face meetings are not and evening. Students are
feasible and the instruction is encouraged to utilize Zoom
online or blended for collaborating on team
deliverables.
Does the learning approach Y Absolutely. Teams were
provide for collaboration? encouraged to take on
specific roles for
assignments, switch roles,
collaborate via Zoom and
Google technology, and
provide feedback to other
teams in course.
Talking Points
● A final exam was used to determine if learning took place during the course.
● Students were motivated to participate for the reward of a grade. Better
presentation of understanding of the material resulted in better grades. Do
good, get good grade (mouse gets the cheese).
● Forum posts allowed for students to share a variety of perspectives and bring
their own background knowledge and experiences.
● Responding to other student posts created a need to read and understand
other student perspectives and learn from their experiences.
● The case study required a group of students in the class to work together and
analyze a specific topic.
● The Op-Ed had a group of students examine a learning theory and write their
thoughts on the subject.