Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Marcos' declaration of martial rule in 1972 altered the terrain for social movements. All
progressive groups were subjected to repression while some individuals were either
eliminated or arrested by the military. During the early stages of martial rule, all attempts
at organizing ground to a halt, except for the Zone One Tondo Organization (ZOTO).
The repressive situation led a large number of activists to go underground and wage
armed struggle against the Martial Law regime. Some organizations like the FFF were
co-opted by the regime. Others simply laid low.
Church-based programs which functioned as non-government organizations (NGOs)
were the first to engage in organizing despite martial law. These include the Urban and
Rural Missionaries of the Philippines, Task Force Detainees of the Philippines,
Episcopal Commission on Tribal Filipinos, Share and Care Apostolate for Poor Settlers,
and PEACE, among others.
Soon, however, NGOs resumed grassroots activities. The Philippine Ecumenical
Council for Community Organization (PECCO) continued with the refinement and
implementation of the community organizing (CO) approach all over the country, in
combination with the Marxist structural analysis and the thinking of Saul Alinsky and
Paolo Freire. Politicized NGOs used the structural analysis approach in conscientizing
and mobilizing, while the Basic Christian Community framework was developed by the
progressive church as a response to the needs of the time. Programs like education and
health, economic enterprises and cooperative development were used as entry points
for organizing to avoid getting in trouble with the dictatorship.
Various political formations saw the need to set up NGOs or influence the programs and
projects of existing ones in order to pursue their own interests. On the positive side, it
cannot be denied that the most effective NGOs of the period were those whose leaders
and staff had ideological leanings. On the other side, internal ideological struggles
wracked some NGOs as ideological debates and rivalries within the mass movement
spilled over to the social development community. PECCO, for one, split in 1977
because of ideological differences among its elements, leading to the formation of two
separate organizations the Community Organization of the Philippines Enterprise
(COPE) and the People's Ecumenical Action for Community Empowerment (PEACE).
Developmental institutions eventually saw the need for more coordinated activities
among themselves. In December 1972, ten foundations came together and formed the
Association of Foundations (AF). The association expanded to 40 members by 1976.
More progressive groups formed the Philippine Alliance for Rural and Urban
Development (PARUD), a consortium of POs and NGOs with more or less the same
ideological bent.
Repression continued, but opposition to the Martial Law regime became more
consolidated. There was widespread unrest as the majority of the people remained
mired in poverty; wages were kept at very low levels and human rights violations
increased. When Martial Law was paper lifted in 1981, organizing efforts multiplied and
innovative approaches and tools were developed and replicated all over the country.
NGOs were instrumental in the development of the organized mass movement.
Human rights as an advocacy issue was effectively raised by pioneers in this field such
as the Task Force Detainees of the Philippines and lawyers' groups like Free Legal
Assistance Group (FLAG) and MABINI.
International campaigns against weapons of mass destruction, environmental
conservation and sustainable development influenced the Philippine social development
terrain. NGOs with these issues as primary concerns were established during the
period. The women's movement also began to flex its strength locally.
NGOs recognized the need to band together into networks for purposes of link aging,
synchronization of activities, and cooperative exchanges of experiences and resources.
Networks formed during this period include the Philippine Partnership for the
Development of Human Resources in the Rural Areas (PhilDHRRA) and the Council for
People's Development (CPD). Regional NGO networks such as Kahayag Foundation in
Mindanao and the Consortium of Development Programs in the Cordillera were formed
also.
Cooperatives went through a second wave of growth during this period. The
government formed the Cooperative Union of the Philippines in 1979 and required all
cooperatives to register. Independent cooperatives refused to yield and instead formed
the National Confederation of Cooperatives (NATCCO) (ACSPPA/PCHRD, 1995).
The assassination of Benigno Aquino in 1983 led to widespread street protests which
became known as the parliament of the streets. It attracted a cross section of society
including previously unpolitic zed sectors, such as business and the institutional Church.
There were efforts to forge unity among the anti-dictatorship forces. Several coalitions
were formed: Justice for Aquino, Justice for All (JAJA), Kongreso ng Mamamayang
Pilipino (KOMPIL), Bagong Alyansang Makabayan (BAYAN) and others. But these
organizations did not last long due to ideological differences among its members.
Major organizations among the ranks of the peasant, fisher folks and indigenous
peoples were organized for the purpose of advancing sectoral agendas.
Other venues of development work were explored further. Programs that focused on
livelihood, gender equality, ecology, alternative legal assistance, support for migrant
workers and others were implemented.
One of the issues that divided the social development sector during this period was the
question of whether to participate in the 1986 snap presidential election. The
mainstream national democratic movement and the NGOs and POs under its influence
opted to boycott the election, while the other left-of-center formations decided to
participate, albeit critically.
During the First Quarter Storm of the seventies, CO was introduced through the
Philippine Ecumenical Council for Community Organization (PECCO). The group
organized communities in Tondo and established the Council of Tondo Foreshore
Community Organization which proved to be an organization of leaders. Re-training was
carried out to improve the organizing skills of PECCO personnel. The Saul Alinsky
method of conflict-confrontation developed in Chicago was adapted to conditions in
Tondo. As a result, the Zone One Tondo Organization (ZOTO) was born. The program
was replicated in other parts of the Philippines, including the rural areas and usually
introduced through Church structures. The Alinsky CO method was refined to include
reflection sessions, which were, in turn taken from Paulo Freire's Pedagogy of the
Oppressed.
When Martial Law was declared, organizing efforts continued. During this time
development workers began pushing for people's participation and CO became the tool
for achieving this. Both international development groups and government began
advocating and funding CO programs. Thus, community organizing proliferated.
Even before PECCO adopted Alinsky's practice of community organizing, the
progressive section of the Catholic Church were already started organizing Basic
Christian Communities (BCC) in Mindanao with the proclamation of Vatican II. It soon
spread to some parts of Luzon and Visayas and the organizing was basically liturgical,
employing Bible studies and other creative forms of worship. But during the Martial Law
period, the BCC became a means for witnessing the Teachings and Example of Christ
through socio-political work.
4. Fostering Healthy Families, Individuals, and Youth Most communities face a variety
of challenging social issues, such as substance abuse, domestic abuse, poverty,
and other concerns related to the elderly, youth, and families. Addressing these
concerns effectively takes the coordinated efforts of the public, private, and
nonprofit sectors. Support services such as adequate child day care,
comprehensive after-school, youth, teen, and senior programs, preventative health
and substance abuse programs, parenting and family support programs, and
effective human service networks help strengthen the social fabric of a community.
Aided by effective communication, compassionate leadership, active citizen
participation, and inter-group cooperation, a comprehensive package of supportive
services will enable a community to nurture healthy community members.
7. Recreation and Cultural Heritage Recreational and cultural activities nurture the
body and soul of a community - individual and team sports, outdoor activities, art,
crafts, music, dance, theater, holidays, festivals, and celebrations. Recreational
opportunities allow community members to experience and appreciate the
community's diversity of natural and human resources. Cultural activities reflect and
build a community's positive sense of itself and strengthen the fabric of social
interactions within the community
8. Working Landscape and the Natural Environment Natural resources and historical
assets of a community contribute significantly to the quality of life for residents and
play an integral part in defining community character. The lakes, streams, rivers,
walking trails, working farms, forests, clean air, historic buildings and ruins, special
places, wildlife, and open land help determine a community's personality and
contribute to the everyday pleasures of community life. A successful community
recognizes the importance of these assets and takes appropriate measures to
assure their continuance.
9. Economic Vitality the private, public and non-profit sectors are all important in
attracting new investment and in developing new businesses that suit the character
of the community and meet its needs. The need to sustain successful workplaces is
an important factor to the health of a community. The more often money circulates
within the community before leaving, the more the community benefits. A healthy
community includes access to a variety of environmentally sound businesses,
industries, and institutions that provide reasonable wages and benefits to workers,
engage in family-friendly policies, provide workers with opportunities to develop
marketable skills, and contribute to the overall wellbeing of the community.
10. Growth and Development A community can more effectively manage its growth
through the prudent use of local zoning districting and ordinances and planning
regulations that guide how land is divided, used, and developed. These tools allow
the community to regulate the development of residential areas, commercial
districts, and the village centers. These are key considerations in managing growth
while maintaining community character. Another important factor in the
development of a healthy community is the diversity of the housing. This
encompasses availability, affordability, and location, all of which affect the lives of
community members, especially the elderly, disabled, and low-income families.
11. Transportation a community's strategic location and economic importance bring
many people to live, work, and shop here. Roads get most of us where we need
and want to go, and most people drive their own cars for convenience. However,
more vehicles sharing the roads results in increased highway maintenance, air
pollution, and traffic congestion. Alternatives to automobile travel can include
pedestrian and bicycle travel, broadband/internet based ordered and delivered
goods and services, and bus and rail transportation.
More details about participants can be found in the IPC Membership Contract, including
the application process for future Participants. Please contact us if you have further
questions about the privileges and responsibilities of Participants.
Organizational Elements
Organizational elements pertain to the way we interact with each other and the land, the
wider community, other intentional communities and the world at large. All the legal
issues, protocols and processes are all part of the organizational elements as are the
way we live and work together. These can often be nearly invisible structures, such as
the ingrained habits and perceptions within a culture that inadvertently foster predictable
patterns and outcomes. A natural and peaceful flow within the community manifests
when such organizational elements work well together creating invisible 'ties that bind',
which contributes to building healthy relationships.
There are a few models of success that we can glean 'best practices' from, such
communities like Twin Oaks, Crystal Waters, The Farm, Dancing Rabbit and Findhorn
to name a few. Each of these success stories are similar in spirit but different in
application and our organizational elements pulls what we feel are the best mix for our
collective vision.
Community living is not for every one, nor is it an easy ride. Communities often flounder
due to economic and social friction between members. Our community aims to address
these issues in unique ways (social contracts). We will flourish by creating strong
economic and social ties between members. There will be much emphasis on
communication within the community and processes will be in place to ease social
tensions that may arise.
What works and doesn't work for us will be observed as we grow. Organizational
elements can be tweaked over time through our collective decision making process to
best suit our collective needs. If you would like to know the reasoning behind certain
decisions thus far, feel free to contact us and talk about them.
Our intention is to live collectively in such a way that villagers are encouraged and able
to contribute their skills, gifts and interests, to create a solid, diverse, and thriving social
environment. The social dynamics at the IPC are thus born out of the organizational
elements that we, as a community agree to, and take responsibility for. Therefore, to
join, each person must understand and agree with our Organizational elements before
becoming a participant. These are embodied in our Membership Contract.
Physical Elements
Physical elements are the elements which are bound to the earth. The use of land is
therefore its domain. The land will be divided with a balance between agro-forestry,
agricultural, naturally reserved areas and the village land which will further be divided
between private homes and communal/collective spaces. The land will provide food
security in every possible niche. The designation of lands are broken down into the
following 4 zones;
Village Zones
Farm Zones
Agroforestry Zones
Protected Preserve Zones
Village Zones
Personal spaces, community spaces, and cooperative spaces, all have physical
elements that must be considered before the time, effort and expenses are invested in
making them.
The design and layout of a village impacts greatly on the efficiency of a community, on
the psyche and health of its members and on the interactions and relationships that
people have to each other and the environment. Permaculture design therefore is
crucial and some over arching considerations will include integration of natural
resources within the landscape of the village, non grid patterns, useful poly-culture
corridors, ways to promote symbiotic village life relationships and efficiency through well
planned locations of the different physical, cultural and economic elements.
We will explore different fundamental designs for extending the village (vertically and
horizontally) so we reduce the possibility of problems if our population density climbs
and will look carefully at waste streams, water patterns, people movements,
product/good movement, electrical, etc.
Before any permanent structures are started on the land, the community will undertake
a Permaculture Plan which includes Village Design, which will stretch over a one year
period. Any future participants can get involved and the general public can offer
suggestions to the design(s). There has already been some visioning with this in mind
and the following describes a general feel that the core team is hoping for.
The concept of the IPC is not to build a subdivision but rather a more fluid mix of
interconnected communal and private spaces. Since there will be many varied
communal spaces, personal homes will probably not require large amounts of space or
resources. Villager participation in the design and building of their own homes is
recommended and input from the rest of the community will help ensure a nice balance
between personal comfort and resource management. For some villagers a home could
be as simple as a hut or as small as a 2 bedroom apartment and for others intricate
stand alone houses may be in order. Either way, villagers have a personal space to
retire to when they desire to.
Dwellings will primarily be built on the periphery of communal areas for greater
efficiency and facility in sharing of resources. Residential Stewarded Land will be
allotted based on a 1st come basis and their sites chosen and drawn in from the
participants input as to their general needs. These include distance from community
spaces, views, access to waterways and many other attributes.
Easy accessibility to and within the community will be important. An access road or
alternative cargo/transit technology may be necessary to aid in the construction of the
core of the village, however it will become a car free zone with large walking/cycling
paths.
The IPC village will include spaces for learning, sharing and growing, areas to explore
and discuss and places to create and exchange knowledge and techniques. These
communal spaces will reduce the need for large personal homes and keep the village
centered around a core, keeping many social functions within short walking distance or
biking distance. Sound playing structures, mini theater space, public courtyards and
learning spaces, are some of the possible physical elements in the village that promote
communal/family dynamics. Cooperatives and businesses are only limited to members
imagination and capabilities. Some of these physical structures may include a carpentry
workshop, butterfly house, beekeeping operations, kitchen and food transformation
spaces, art studio, etc... . An extensive list of imagined spaces that future villagers
would like, has been started and can be view here: List of Physical Elements.
Civilizations are shaped in part by their technology. We will design our community in the
most efficient way for the enjoyment of its peoples and use appropriate technologies to
reduce our environmental footprint. All buildings will go through an eco-friendly analysis,
weighing the pros and cons of certain materials in this climate and their availability. We
will design and build in ways to harness the waste stream in a useful way for and from
each building.
We are aiming for a complete, vibrant, healthy and productive village with at least 50
participants. It will also be a place of immersion into new social dynamics and of
permaculture put into practice. Guests can integrate into community life and learn about
the relationships and production areas of interest to them.
Farm Zones
Societies who feed their populations with the most wholesome of foods, while using
techniques that are healthy to the land to ensure sustainability, will in our opinion be the
most resilient over time. Therefore we will only grow organic produce. In our village, we
envision a maximum of 200 adult participant residents and a handful of guests from time
to time. There is a document that Ivan Tattoli wrote about the carrying capacity of land
to population size which is available upon request and we have used this information to
help decide our own balance between land and population with a bend to the cautious
side, so if we have 200 people we will have a vibrant village and food sources that will
be able to sustain them substantially.
Our community will strive to be self sufficient in foods first and if successful will expand
to larger plots to grow for sale to what we foresee as our primary market in the region:
restaurants and foreigners. Production Elements will also be using the produce to
create their own products for internal and external use, consumption and sale.
Farming has many physical elements to consider and often looks different in application
based on the techniques one incorporates on the lands. Some clearly defined elements
that we will include are vegetable plots and bio-intensive beds, greenhouses, swales,
irrigation systems, harvesting infrastructure, fencing, animals and of course the plants,
bushes and trees that nourish us.
The staple vegetables and fruits of the region will be planted first to provide for our
community. Staples such as bananas, papayas, pineapples, beans, tomatoes,
eggplants, cassava and rice to name a few. These plots will be inter-planted in the first
few years with larger tree species so that we maximize our time and space in
developing the agricultural aspect of the community.
There will be mixed orchards which will produce fruits that the community can use,
transform and sell easily. The trees will be trimmed for easy picking and fruit promotion.
Such things as grapes, passion fruits, citrus, water apples, caimitos etc. will be planted
and maintained in a mixed orchard setting. Some leguminous trees will be found in this
area for greater shade, nitrogen fixing and to improve the soil biodiversity.
Some animal husbandry may be maintained especially once orchards and forests are
established. We may have animals that assist in work load and providing fertilizer, that
give products to eat or be transformed for other purposes. The raising of animals will
depend primarily on the dietary wants and requirements of community members.
Agroforestry Zones
We aim to plant and maintain mixed timber species, medicinal species and a large food
forest which will share boundaries with land that we have decided to preserve.
Hundreds of species would be maintained and labeled, however some plant and tree
species will be grown in larger patches or will be given more emphasis due to market
opportunities for village sustainability. Some of these species will be exotic fruits,
traditional staple fairs and trees for promoting more eco-conscious lifestyles (such as
the soap nut).
The final goal would be to establish a poly-culture that creates ecological services for
the land and for the community while healing the forest through bio-remediation. The
maintenance and expansion of a permaculture food forest should be well under way by
the 7th year period. We have no current plans to grow tree species for timber for resell
purposes however selective logging may be done in this area in the future to be used by
the community. The food forest will be implemented in small stages and in the early
years could occupy a large portion of the communal work load.
Experimentation and research will be encouraged for those interested and we have
access to a search-able plants database which one of our members already has in the
works. For example: such experiments as the domestication of jungle grapes and
tapping of cohune flowers for sap could have marketable implications as well as new
understandings in the form of pure scientific interest.
These production elements will be the method through which members can participate
in the day to day operations and mini industries in the community. Participants are free
to engage in whatever business, project or cooperative they feel most useful. In our
Sharing Economy, each participant understands and agrees to be responsible for a
certain amount of work hours per month. This ensures things get done, people profit
from the collective labors and everyone contributes. The sharing of the monetary profits
may also act as an incentive but it is secondary, a benefit of the collective effort.
Community Processes
Significance
Community Dynamics is here to work with community to think creatively and act
strategically so that community can achieve their goals.
At Community Dynamics, believes that, creative and sustainable programming
that works to raise the quality of living for those most vulnerable to poverty and
exploitation
• Integrative Forces
• Disintegrative Forces
• Participative group and groupism
• Functions of sub groups
• Minority groups
• Gender and empowerment
Integrative Forces
Participative Group
Group
Subgroup
Functions