Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Part 10 – Performance management
RAMS&E srl
www.eni.it
Contents
Maintenance Management Process
Source:
msg‐man‐eni‐spa
Improvement Planning
Control Execution
No improvement is possible if you do not monitor how things are going on!
Structuring and implementing an effective maintenance
monitoring system, oriented towards evaluating and
Aim improving the effectiveness and efficacy of processes,
activities and resources.
Central Technical
• Definition of locally used Function
indicators
• Support to target • Definition of strategic
definition indicators
• Preparation of reports • Definition of target levels
relevant to indicators • Review of reports
Maintenance
Function
The definition of the core set of indicators is responsibility of the Central Technical Function.
The Maintenance Function at BU/Plant level can integrate this set with other indicators according to:
strategic objectives
historical data
“best in class” plants should be reviewed in order to analyse best practices and management
“worst in class” plants should be reviewed in order to find possible improvement areas
At the end of the year, targets for the next period will be defined during the budget estimation phase.
The Maintenance Function is in charge of calculating actual values for the indicators and to produce the relevant
reports.
Key Performance Indicators (KPI) are numerical indicators that can be used to:
summarize information relevant to Maintenance in a compact, easily understandable
way
identify trends (e.g. degradation of equipment)
prioritize possible corrective actions.
In case a CMMS is properly implemented and constantly updated, Maintenance KPI should rely on
data stored in the CMMS so that their calculation can be automated.
In order to define a lagging indicator:
Identify goals that the Maintenance should achieve (e.g. in terms of plant availability, safety,
operational costs and so on)
Set a lagging indicator to directly show whether or not you are achieving the outcome. If the
outcome has been clearly described it should be possible to just use one indicator.
Lagging indicators show whether the outcome has actually been achieved.
E.g. for plant inspection and maintenance: “The number of
Lagging indicator failures or breakdown of safety critical plant or equipment due
to components wearing out”
Within the candidate of lagging indicators, prioritize them and select one of them for each
outcome to be achieved.
For each Maintenance goal, Leading indicators should be implemented as well, in order to
show that system is operating as intended.
Leading indicators highlight whether Maintenance is operating as designed (i.e. the
prerequisite for achieving Maintenance required outcomes).
E.g. for plant inspection and maintenance: “The percentage of
Leading indicator safety critical plant inspected to schedule”
Follow up adverse findings to rectify faults in the management systems.
Set a tolerance for each leading indicator. This represents the point at which deviation in
performance should be flagged up for attention of senior management. The tolerance may be set a
zero, this means that 100% of actions must be completed on time.
Tolerance
Deviated beyond
Acceptable Acceptable
Follow up deviations from tolerances. The main aim of a performance information system is to
indicate where process control management systems have deteriorated or are not delivering the
intended outcome.
Lagging indicators:
Equipment availability
Maintenance cost
Equipment Failure Rate/MTBF
Number of failure impacting on safety
Leading indicators:
Number of Preventive tasks performed on schedule
Number of CBM tasks performed on schedule
Maintenance backlog
Equipment efficiency
In case a CMMS is in place, CMMS feedback should be used for calculating KPI.
Maintenance
Management
Maintenance Plan Maintenance KPI
Maintenance Management
Maintanance
CMMS
program and data
Execution
Activities
execution
19 eni corporate university
3. Eni basic Maintenance KPI set
Source:
opi‐man‐007‐e&p
Note: as previously explained, other KPI may be defined by the Maintenance Function in addition to the basic ones
Total maintenance cost per production unit Total maint. costs trend against budget
Yearly:
Pconsolidated is expressed in BOE.
Monthly (1 ≤ i ≤ 12):
Oper. maintenance cost per production unit
Pconsolidated is expressed in BOE.
Source:
opi‐man‐007‐e&p
Technical availability of equipment Production losses due to maintenance
Production losses due to PM:
𝑃
𝐹
𝑃
tdown includes downtime due to both CM and
PM.
Production losses due to CM:
𝑃
𝐹
𝑃
Note: these KPI are not covered by opi 007
since they are in Production scope, even if
used for Maintenance monitoring
Source:
opi‐man‐007‐e&p
Ability to perform the maint. work program Ability to perform scheduled PM hours
Ability to perform the PM work program Inability to perform the program on SCE
CM hours against total maint. hours
Source:
opi‐man‐007‐e&p
Company Professional Operating Instruction opi‐ope‐002‐eni‐spa defines a specific set of KPI for monitoring
turnarounds. They are classified according to the phase they are applied to:
Preparation phase
Execution phase
Close‐out phase
Note 1: in the following, only KPI relevant to maintenance proper will be considered. The OPI defines also other
KPI, e.g. related to safety, which will not be treated.
Note 2: only the minimal set of required KPI is described in the following, additional ones can be calculated
TA preparation progress Late scope
Actual progress vs. planned progress, Manhours added after work scope freezing vs.
calculated for: total planned manhours
• each macro‐activity
• the overall turnaround
KPI above should be calculated throughout the preparation phase twice a week.
Source:
opi‐ope‐002‐eni‐spa
TA execution progress Unplanned work
Actual progress vs. planned progress, Manhours required for covering unplanned
calculated for: activities vs. total planned manhours
• each macro‐activity
• the overall turnaround
Source:
opi‐ope‐002‐eni‐spa
Production loss variation TA duration optimization
Actual production loss vs. budgeted production Actual duration vs. budgeted duration
loss
Cancelled work TA cost
Cancelled manhours vs. total planned Actual cost vs. budgeted cost, calculated for:
manhours • each macro‐category (e.g. materials,
logistics and so on)
• the overall turnaround
Source:
KPI above shall be calculated once and included in the Close‐Out Report. opi‐ope‐002‐eni‐spa
RAMS&E srl
www.eni.it
Contents
Maintenance Management Process
Strictly speaking, spare parts management is not covered in the Maintenance MSG as part of the Maintenance
process. However, the importance of proper spares management is remarked at some points.
Planning materials and spare parts management.
Source:
msg‐man‐eni‐spa
Company Specification
1012.SMESIN.RWP.0 – Methodology for material
coding
Material Classes
Rules for Company coding
Source:
1012.SMESIN.RWP.0
Source:
28015.ENG.MNU.STD
Company Standard
22012.MAN.GEN.SDS – Guideline for Maintenance
operating procedures
Workflow during Operations
Responsibility and interfaces
Covers both Maintenance Management and
Material Management
Source:
22012.MAN.GEN.SDS
Companies need to properly plan and manage their service parts inventory to achieve
optimal availability with minimal costs.
Spare part management is the process that companies use to ensure that right spare
part and resources are at the right place (where the broken part is) at the right time.
40 eni corporate university
Start‐up vs. Operational spares
Commissioning / Start‐up spare parts Operational spare parts
Spare parts required to enable uninterrupted Spare parts required for the continuous
installation and start‐up of the equipment operation of the plant after the completion
needed up to the performance test of the of commissioning activity, for possible use
plant. during the lifetime of the equipment.
This type of spare parts, if necessary, shall be These parts may fail in use (there is no
ordered as part of the base Purchase Order planned replacement interval) and
and delivered to site along with the parent replacement is part of a corrective
materials and equipment and the necessary maintenance action or of an overhaul
special tools. scheduled as a result of monitoring or
planned maintenance.
Source:
28015.ENG.MNU.STD
Operational spare parts
Spare parts required for the continuous 2Y Operational spare parts
operation of the plant after the completion of
commissioning activity, for possible use during Also known as “initial spares”, these spare
the lifetime of the equipment. parts are required for the continuous
operation of the plant for the first two years
of operation.
These parts may fail in use (there is no planned
replacement interval) and replacement is part of
a corrective maintenance action or of an This classification is related to parts that
overhaul scheduled as a result of monitoring or encounter wear, corrosion, erosion or
planned maintenance. deterioration in normal service and that can
be reasonably expected to be required
during the first two years of operation.
Source:
28015.ENG.MNU.STD
Insurance spare parts
Parts, assemblies or complete items of
equipment not subject to deterioration by
normal use, but failure of which is critical for
continued and safe operation of the
equipment or plant.
These are specific spare parts which,
although acknowledged to have a long life or
a very small chance of failure, have long
delivery time. Therefore, they may cause a
prolonged shutdown and consequently
unacceptable production losses or costs.
Source:
28015.ENG.MNU.STD
Insurance spare parts
Parts, assemblies or complete items of Capital insurance spare parts
equipment not subject to deterioration by
normal use, but failure of which is critical for They are insurance spare part having high
continued and safe operation of the equipment value. They may be components or
or plant. complete units (e.g. complete pumps, large
valves, motors).
These are specific spare parts which, although
acknowledged to have a long life or a very small Due to their high value (and local tax
chance of failure, have long delivery time. regulations) it may be an advantage to
Therefore, they may cause a prolonged consider them as assets. Since capitalized,
shutdown and consequently unacceptable those spares are not normally considered in
production losses or costs. the spare parts inventory.
Source:
28015.ENG.MNU.STD
Consumables
They include lamps, paint, greases, lubricant,
cleaning rags, filters, some piping
components, bolts and so on.
Source:
28015.ENG.MNU.STD
Stock spare parts (or materials)
Stock Materials are materials that are kept in Automatically replenished spare parts
inventory.
These are stock spare parts (or materials) for
which a reorder point is defined, so that
purchase requests can be generated
automatically by the CMMS.
Non‐stock spare parts (or materials) Direct issue spare parts (or materials)
Non‐stock materials are materials that are Direct issue material are materials or those
ordered regularly but are not part of parts or items that are ordered infrequently
the in house inventory. and are not under an existing contract.
Source:
28015.ENG.MNU.STD
Repairable spare parts Non‐repairable spare parts
Spare parts for which repair is technically Spare parts which are not repaired but
feasible and economically worth doing. simply scrapped and reordered in case of
failure.
For instance, a complete spare pump or a big
valve which can be replaced, then Reuse can be not feasible (e.g. gaskets) or
overhauled and kept in workshop for future not economically justified (e.g. a small
reinstallation. electrical motor, which could be repaired but
it is cheaper to buy a new one).
This type of spare parts is normally traced
individually in the CMMS and has an
associated serial number.
Source:
28015.ENG.MNU.STD
Proper spare parts coding is the basis of any spare parts management strategy.
Any spare part available on the market is surely identified by one or more codes (e.g. OEM code, Vendor code
and so on), however univocal, Company‐defined coding is necessary in order to:
All Company codes for spare parts and materials are 14‐digits alphanumerical strings.
Coding procedures are defined at Corporate level, in order to ensure intercommunicability for all BU and
subsidiaries.
This is supposed to be a provisional code that may defined by the Manufacturer/Vendor while waiting for the
actual code from Company.
Source:
1012.SMESIN.RWP.0
Bulk codes are applicable to materials freely procurable on the market and normalized by international standards
or other regulations (e.g. piping components, cables and so on).
Source:
1012.SMESIN.RWP.0
This type of code is assigned to specific parts produced by a defined Manufacturer for a specific model of
equipment, not normalized as per industry standards/regulation.
Source:
1012.SMESIN.RWP.0
This type of code is assigned to specific parts produced by a defined Manufacturer, possibly applicable to
different models of equipment, not normalized as per industry standards/regulation.
Source:
1012.SMESIN.RWP.0
This codes are applicable to materials freely procurable on the market, not necessarily normalized by
international standards or other regulations.
Source:
1012.SMESIN.RWP.0
Proper coding is neither possible nor useful if personnel in charge of Engineering and/or Operations do not:
provide this information to the function in charge of coding in the required format
actually use this codes in the CMMS and more generally in the spare parts management process
Spare parts should be included in the scope of work of any project, starting from the design (Execution) phase.
Source:
28015.ENG.MNU.STD
SPARE PARTS INTERCHANGEABILITY RECORD "SPIR" FOR COMMISSIONING AND START UP SPARE PARTS
360VA001Z Ball Valve
220PA001B Pump
230PA002A Pump
230PA002A Pump
ENGINEERED BY ADDRESS
AH CHECKED BY
Free Field
(Second TAG
Codification or B
EQUIPMENT IDENTIFICATION
YY1
YY2
SERIAL No.
XX1
C
MAIN PURCHASE ORDER No. PHONE No. / FAX No.
AF AC SPARE PARTS P.O. AUTHORIZATION DATE
E-MAIL ADDRESS
AD
CCC
MODEL OR TYPE
AAA
AAA
BBB
BBB
D
SPARE PARTS IDENTIFICATION
QUANTITY FOR COMMISSIONING AND START UP
PRICE
RELEVANT DOCUMENT No.
DELIVERY TIME
UNIT AMOUNT
EQUIPMENT SUB Business unit PURCHASED
( IN WEEKS)
CHARA CTERISTIC
SPIR POS. No. ORIGINAL ORIGINAL VENDOR UNIT of RECOM M END. ENGINEER. OPERA TION WEIGHT
ITEM No. E (from 0001)
DESCRIPTION OF PARTS MATERIAL
MAKERS NAME MAKERS PART No. CODE No
codification
MEAS. B y VENDOR RECOM M END. RECOM M END.
QUANTITY
[kg]
DIM ENSION OBSOLESCENCE G/S SHELF LIFE
POS. No.
(approved) [m]
(Miap code)
PAGE
CURRENCY
DRAWING No. (US$ or EURO)
No. OF UNITS F 1 1 1 1 5 I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V Z A1 X Y Z1 Z2 Z3 A2 A3 A4
PER ONE UNIT
QUANTITY OF
COLUMN A-E
INSTALLED
SHOWN IN
PARTS
OF
G 6 30 0005 Seal AISI 616 COMPANY 3 SSSS32 WWWW 10-11 UUUU-1111 EA 1 1 1 1 S 2 20 20,00
Source:
28015.ENG.MNU.STD
SPARE PARTS INTERCHANGEABILITY RECORD "SPIR" FOR 2 YEAR OPERATING AND CAPITAL SPARE PARTS
360VA001Z Ball Valve
220PA001B Pump
230PA002A Pump
230PA002A Pump
Codification or B
Item Criticality) CONTRACT No. PERSON IN CHARGE APPROVED BY
AA
YY1
YY2
SERIAL No.
XX1
C
MAIN PURCHASE ORDER No. PHONE No. / FAX No. SPARE PARTS P.O. AUTHORIZATION DATE
AF AC
E-MAIL ADDRESS
AD
CCC
MODEL OR TYPE
AAA
AAA
BBB
BBB
D
SPARE PARTS IDENTIFICATION QUANTITY FOR 2 YEARS OPERATION
CAPITAL SPARES
PRICE
DELIVERY TIME
RELEVANT DOCUMENT No. RECOM M END. B y VENDOR
EQUIPMENT SUB Business unit
( IN WEEKS)
PURCHASED PURCHASED CHA RA CTERISTIC
SPIR POS. No. ORIGINAL ORIGINAL VENDOR UNIT of ENGINEER. OPERA TION RECOM M END. ENGINEER. OP ERA TION WEIGHT OB SOLESCENC UNIT AMOUNT
ITEM No. E (from 0001)
DESCRIPTION OF PARTS MATERIAL
MAKERS NAME MAKERS PART No. CODE No
codification MEAS. RECOM M END. RECOM M END.
QUANTITY B y VENDOR RECOM M END. RECOM M END.
QUANTITY [kg]
DIM ENSION
E
G/S SHELF LIFE
(approved) (approved) [m]
(Miap code)
PAGE
POS.
CURRENCY
No.
DRAWING No. Quantity fo r PM Quantity fo r CM
(US$ or EURO)
No. OF UNITS F 1 1 1 1 5 I J K L M N O P Q R S T U1 U2 V W X Y Z A1 A2 X1 Y1 Z1 Z2 Z3 A3 A4 A5
INSTALLED PER ONE UNIT OF
2 2 2 2 8 0002 Mech Seal NA COMPANY 1 BW ooo23 RRR001 5-8 11111 EA 6 4 7 7 7 0 0 0 0 N S 2 50,00 350,00 6
COLUMN A-E
6 30 0005 Seal AISI 616 COMPANY 3 SSSS32 WWWW 10-11 UUUU-1111 EA 1 1 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 Y S 2 50,00 100,00 4
Source:
28015.ENG.MNU.STD
Source:
22012.MAN.GEN.RWP
Source:
22012.MAN.GEN.RWP
Source:
22012.MAN.GEN.RWP
Source:
22012.MAN.GEN.RWP
The final goal is to guarantee the required availability level of the system
The reorder point (ROP) is the
level of inventory when an order
should be made with suppliers to
top the inventory up.
Sy Co = ordering cost per unit
EOQ ‐
2 x Co x
Ch
Sy = usage in units per year
Ch = holding cost per unit
2 – Holding costs
𝑞
Sy Ch x 𝐴
EOQ 2 x Co x
Ci
2
Ordering costs are all costs associated with the processing of a purchase, from creation to
receipt; they do not include purchase cost of the items themselves (calculated simply as the
unit price times the number of spares bought).
They can be considered as proportional to the amount of orders and not to the ordered
quantity.
Holding cost depends on the average amount of items physically present in the company
inventory.
Inventory holding costs are related to the costs of managing the inventory and are regularly
expressed per item, per unit time.
They include:
capital costs of the investment tied up in inventory,
operational costs of warehousing,
deterioration (or monetary depreciation) of the items.
𝑞 • Ch = Holding cost per unit
Ch x
2 ‐ 𝐴 • q = Ordered quantity
• A = attention level
When estimating the expected spare part usage, it is useful to study the demand pattern.
Possible criteria for this analysis are:
Demand predictability
Predictable/Unpredictable demand (Preventive/Corrective maintenance)
Volume
Low demand/High demand (Commonality)
Demand variability
Steady/Seasonal/Discontinuous and non uniform demand (Inventory review)
ROP ROP
Months Months
Items which mostly takes place in preventive maintenance are likely to have a known and
steady demand structure.
For those items the average amount present in the company inventory is equal to EOQ/2
Spare parts of corrective maintenance depends on the frequency of the failures which is the
source of randomness.
For those items the average Availability
amount present in the company
inventory depends on the safety
stock.
ROP
Months
Safety stock is a term to describe a level of extra stock that is maintained to mitigate risk of
stock‐out or out‐of‐stock.
The causes for out‐of‐stocks due to uncertainties in supply and demand.
Adequate safety stock levels permit business operations to proceed according to their plans.
The optimal size of the safety stock correspond to the stock that minimize two category of
costs:
Holding costs (increase with the increase of the safety stock)
Shortage costs (decrease with the increase of the safety stock)
Shortage costs are the costs that occur in case of stock‐out.
In industries characterized by heavy utilization of equipment and machinery, such as mining,
oil & gas, utilities, transportation, adequate stockholding of critical spare parts becomes
essential to avoid the effects of shortage costs.
Insufficient stocks affect overall performance of physical assets, as lack of spares may result
in gross penalties, lower availability or increased operational risks.
Theoretically, they can be evaluated by the downtime costs of the system related to the
failure to be corrected by the use of the part.
The safety stock is defined depending on the experience or the specific constraints in a
factory.
For critical/expensive parts, it may be evaluated performing a kind of “risk analysis”,
considering the risk of downtime due to stock‐out
It is important to perform a periodic review of assumption and constraints to avoid the risk
of wrong evaluation.