 Open

 Online Viewer - Read-only Mode

 Screen Style
 Letter Style

 Mark as Unread

 Submit a Print Request

View Mail

Actions
<
Print
Reply
Reply to All
Forward

Thread

Thread Mail No Type Subject From

Thread Mail Type Subject From Recipients Status Date
No
KEO- Request Project Codes Mr Patrick Mr Phil Stone - Partial 20/03/2013
IC-RFI- For and Standards Gersch - Broadway Malyan
000002 Information KEO Limited
International
Consultants
BM- Response Re: Project Mr Phil Mr Yann Pennes - N/A 20/03/2013
RTRFI- to RFI Codes and Stone - Dewan Architects &
000001 Standards Broadway Engineers
Malyan (y.pennes@dewan-
Limited architects.com)

BM- Response Re: Project Mr Phil Mr Patrick Gersch - Closed- 24/03/2013

RTRFI- to RFI Codes and Stone - KEO International Out
000002 Standards Broadway Consultants
Malyan
Limited
Thread Mail Type Subject From Recipients Status Date
No

 Mail
 Notes

Al Ain Stadium & Mixed-Use Development

Abu Dhabi -UAE
Abu Dhabi
United Arab Emirates
 Reference No: KEO-IC-RFI-000002

Response to RFI BM-RTRFI-000002

To Mr Patrick Gersch - KEO International Consultants
Cc (7) Ms Cherry de Castro - AAFAQ HOLDING LLC (6 more...)
Mr Roger Mancey - AAFAQ HOLDING LLC
Mr Jonathan Sargent - AAFAQ HOLDING LLC
Mr Ben Bhatti - KEO International Consultants
Mr Keith Jones - KEO International Consultants
Mr Srinivas Kanakamedala - KEO International Consultants
Mr Athanasios Theodoratos - KEO International Consultants
From Mr Phil Stone - Broadway Malyan Limited
Sent Sunday, 24 March 2013 7:10:06 AM GST (GMT +04:00)
Attribute 1 00-Project wide
Status Closed-Out
Subject Re: Project Codes and Standards

Patrick,

Further to my previous response, CDG has checked the relevant information with AAM and
have provided the below response to close this RFI out.

Kind regards

Phil Stone

From: P Gersch
Sent: 20/03/2013 1:51:14 PM GST (GMT +04:00)
To: Phil Stone, Yann Pennes
Cc: Cherry de Castro, Roger Mancey, Jonathan Sargent, Ben Bhatti, Patrick Gersch, Keith Jones, Srinivas Kanakamedala, Athanasios
Theodoratos
Mail Number: KEO-IC-RFI-000002
Subject: Project Codes and Standards

REQUEST FOR INFORMATION (RFI)

DISCIPLINE: All

INFORMATION REQUESTED OR CLARIFICATION REQUIRED:

Thank you for your respective lists of codes and standards to be used across the project, copies attached.

KEO would like to query the absence of ADIBC 2013 which appears to also have been adopted by
the AA Municipality according to KEO’s understanding.

Could you please provide some commentary on which basis this code was not included, or the
resultant pros/cons and related risks/costs for not adapting it going forward?
 Additionally, KEO assume that UPC standards refers to:
· Neighbourhood Planning (Fareej) guidelines
· population & Community Facility standards (previous version attached for info. Please ensure the
latest version is obtained from UPC/AAM)
· Mosque design standards
· Plan Al Ain 2030
· Urban Street Design Manual
· Development review standards for “Large” development
· Any other draft, work in progress or standards known to be under review/development

Please review the above in light of your respective code/standards schedule and advise on any
contradictory/duplicating codes and provide a mitigation strategy forward for clarity.

As discussed at our MP meeting on 14 March 2013, we need to quickly finalize the ROW utility
corridors to meet the authority requirements for the hierarchy of roads proposed so the MP is not
subject to abortive design works.

Please advise how this will affect your individual affection plans/scope as well as joint
coordination/common issues that we will face.

DOCUMENT / DRAWINGS ATTACHED (LIST):

1) AAMU_BM_Local Authorities & Agencies Standards_Rev.0

2) CF_Consolidated Package20091125

3) A12-75 - AAMU - 130317 - Codes and Regulations References

RESPONSE:

We have checked with Al Ain Town Planning Sector regarding the IBC code and they
advised that their review is based on IBC 2009 and they have no objection to use latest
edition which is 2012. Please note, our understanding, there is no 2013 issue.

For UPC standards … we referred to UPC guidelines without specifics which can be
incorporated if required.

For the ROW utility corridors – we have recently added the AATPS utility Section
requirement in the list.
Regarding the affect from individual affection plans/scope in relation to Utility corridors …
as our understanding we will follow AATPS requirements regardless the utilities are within
the plot / affection plan, so in the future the service corridors will be handed to utility
providers and AATPS utility section.

Furthermore, please note we feel that DEWAN should create their own authority codes
document, rather than refer to BMA's documents.

DOCUMENT / DRAWINGS ATTACHED (LIST):

ANSWERED BY (NAME): Philip Stone

 CONSULTANT / COMPANY NAME: Broadway Malyan

DATE: 23/03/2013

Patrick Gersch

Refer To Mail No From From Subject

Organization

Include Attachments