Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ela kusiani
Sesavali.
evrokavSirSi integraciis gzaze myofi saqarTvelosaTvis metad
mniSvnelovania adamianis uflebaTa evropuli konvenciis gamoyenebis
gaZliereba da erovnuli kanonmdeblobisa da sasamarTlo praqtikis
evropul standartebTan SesabamisobaSi moyvana. Kkonkretul SemTxveva-
Si gamovyof 1950 wlis 4 noemberis adamianis uflebaTa da ZiriTad
TavisuflebaTa dacvis konvenciiT (SemdgomSi evro konvencia) garanti-
rebul samarTliani sasamarTlos uflebas, romelsac gaaCnia fun-
damenturi mniSvneloba demokratiul sazogadoebaSi. evrokonvenciis me-
6 muxlis dacvis obieqts warmoadgens kanonis uzenaesobis principi,
romelsac emyareba mTlianad sazogadoeba.1 aRniSnuli muxliT
garantirebuli uflebebia: sasamarTlos xelmisawvdomoba, procesis
sajarooba, procesis gonivruli vada, damoukidebeli da miukerZo-
ebeli sasamarTlo, samarTliani procesi, rac Tavis TavSi gulisxmobs
SejibrebiTobisa da mxareTa Tanasworobis princips da sxva.
saqarTvelosa da evrokavSirs Soris dadebuli asocirebis
xelSekrulebis me-4 muxliT gansazRvrulia saqarTvelos mier Sida
saxelwifoebrivi reformis gatarebis valdebuleba, romelic
demokratiuli institutebis da kanonis uzenaesobis stabilurobisa da
efeqtianobis gamyarebas da gazrdas unda daedos safuZvlad. Ggarda
amisa, xelSekrulebiT gaTvaliswinebulia adamianis uflebaTa da
fundamentur TavisuflebaTa pativiscema, samarTlebrivi reformebis
gatarebis valdebuleba sasamarTlos damoukideblobisa da misi
administraciuli SesaZleblobis gaZlierebis, samarTaldamcav
organoTa miukerZoeblobisa da efeqtianobis uzrunvelyofis mizniT.2
asocirebis xelSekrulebis me-13 muxli gansazRvravs kanonis
uzenaesobisa da adamianis uflebaTa da fundamentur TavisuflebaTa
pativiscemis valdebulebas. igi saqarTvelos aZlevs rekomendacias
xeli Seuwyos Tavisuflebis, usafrTxoebis da marTlmsajulebis sfe-
roSi kanonis uzenaesobas, maT Soris sasamarTlos damoukideblobas,
1 grozevi i., vitkauskasi d., levis-entoni s., (mT. red.), samarTliani sasamarTlo
ganxilvis ufleba adamianis uflebaTa evropuli konvenciis Tanaxmad (me-6 muxli),
saxelmZRvanelo iuristebisTvis, momzadebulia Ria sazogadoebis institutis
mxardaWeriT, Tbilisi 2008, gv. 8.
2 xelSekrulebis me-4 muxli.
116
`inteleqtuali~, #40, 2020 `INTELLECTUAL~, #40, 2020
humanitaruli da socialuri mecnierebebi THE HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES
Kingdom (dec.), no. 14739/89, 1989 wlis 9 maisi, McLoughlin v. Ireland (dec.), no. 15967/90, 1992
wlis 6 ivlisi, Malone v. United Kingdom (dec.), no. 25290/94, 1996 wlis 28 Tebervali, McMullen
v. Ireland (dec.), no. 25353/94, 1996 wlis 28 Tebervali, Klimenteyev v. Russia (dec.), no. 46503/99,
2002 wlis 17 Tebervali.
5
makbraidi j., saqarTveloSi nafic msajulTa sasamarTloebis muSaobis sruli
Sesabamisobis uzrunvelyofa evropul standartebTan, Tb., 2017 wlis ivnisi, gv. 10.
117
`inteleqtuali~, #40, 2020 `INTELLECTUAL~, #40, 2020
humanitaruli da socialuri mecnierebebi THE HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES
1
Mavrantonis George C., JURY SYSTEM IN MODERN RATIONAL LAW: IS THE JURY SYSTEM AN
ABSURD INSTITUTION WHOSE ONLY CLAIM TO LEGITIMACY AFTER ALL, IS ITS ARCHAIC
ROOT? Gray’s Inn Student Law Journal, VOLUME VIII, Association of Gray’s Inn Students LONDON· 2016,
p. 2.
2
meiSvili z., (red.) nafic msajulTa sasamarTlo, warmoSobisa da ganviTarebis mokle
istoria, saqarTvelos uzenaesi sasamarTlo, Tb., 2012, gv. 7.
3
Taxquet v. Belgium [GC],) #926/05,ECHR 2010, §83.
118
`inteleqtuali~, #40, 2020 `INTELLECTUAL~, #40, 2020
humanitaruli da socialuri mecnierebebi THE HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES
1
Taxquet v. Belgium [GC],) #926/05,ECHR 2010, §44.
2
Taxquet v. Belgium [GC],) #926/05,ECHR 2010, §47.
3
Achour v. France [GC], № 67335/01, § 51, ECHR 2006-IV.
4
kelenjeriZe i., saerTaSoriso samarTlebrivi principebi marTlmsajulebis
ganxorcielebis konteqstSi (verifikacia, implementacia, efeqtianoba), disertacia,
Tb., 2015, gv. 26.
119
`inteleqtuali~, #40, 2020 `INTELLECTUAL~, #40, 2020
humanitaruli da socialuri mecnierebebi THE HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES
120
`inteleqtuali~, #40, 2020 `INTELLECTUAL~, #40, 2020
humanitaruli da socialuri mecnierebebi THE HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES
121
`inteleqtuali~, #40, 2020 `INTELLECTUAL~, #40, 2020
humanitaruli da socialuri mecnierebebi THE HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES
122
`inteleqtuali~, #40, 2020 `INTELLECTUAL~, #40, 2020
humanitaruli da socialuri mecnierebebi THE HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES
123
`inteleqtuali~, #40, 2020 `INTELLECTUAL~, #40, 2020
humanitaruli da socialuri mecnierebebi THE HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES
124
`inteleqtuali~, #40, 2020 `INTELLECTUAL~, #40, 2020
humanitaruli da socialuri mecnierebebi THE HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES
125
`inteleqtuali~, #40, 2020 `INTELLECTUAL~, #40, 2020
humanitaruli da socialuri mecnierebebi THE HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES
1
adamianis uflebebi da marTlmsajuleba saqarTveloSisazogadoebis damokidebuleba
da informirebuloba, kvlevis angariSi momzadebulia „eisiTis“ mier evrokavSirisa
(EU) da gaeros ganviTarebis programis (UNDP) mxardaWeriT, 2017.
2 saqarTveloSi sisxlis samarTlis kanonmdeblobisa da praqtikis kvlevebis
krebuli, Tb., 2015, gv. 44.
126
`inteleqtuali~, #40, 2020 `INTELLECTUAL~, #40, 2020
humanitaruli da socialuri mecnierebebi THE HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES
127
`inteleqtuali~, #40, 2020 `INTELLECTUAL~, #40, 2020
humanitaruli da socialuri mecnierebebi THE HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES
1
Taxquet v. Belgium, 2010 wlis 16 noemberi, 73-e punqti.
2 doliZe a., nafic msajulTa sasamarTlo saqarTveloSi da misi Sesabamisoba
adamianis uflebaT aevropul konvenciasTan, statiaTa krebuli – adamianis uflebebi
da samarTlis uzenaesoba, red. k. korkelia, Tb., 2013, gv. 54.
3
burjanaZe g., nafic msajulTa sasamarTlos mier gamotanili verdiqtis
dasabuTebuloba: evropul standartebTan saqarTvelos kanonmdeblobis Sesabamisoba,
statiaTa krebuli“ adamianis uflebaTa dacvis saerTaSoriso standartebi da
saqarTvelo,“ (red.) konstantine korkelia, Tb., 2011, gv. 38.
4
Taxquet v. Belgium, 2010 wlis 16 noemberi, §97-e punqti.
128
`inteleqtuali~, #40, 2020 `INTELLECTUAL~, #40, 2020
humanitaruli da socialuri mecnierebebi THE HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES
1
tabataZe g., motivirebuli gadawyvetilebis ufleba, Jur. sakonstitucio samarTlis
mimoxilva, 2016, gv. 31-32.
2saqarTvelos sakonstitucio sasamarTlos gadawyvetileba – saqarTvelos
moqalaqeebi nadia xurciZe da dimitri lomiZe saqarTvelos parlamentis winaaRmdeg,
№ 1/1/650,699, 27 ianvari, 2017.
3 Tricia Harris, Trial by jury: has the lamp lost its glow?, the UCLan Journal of Undergraduate Research Volume
129
`inteleqtuali~, #40, 2020 `INTELLECTUAL~, #40, 2020
humanitaruli da socialuri mecnierebebi THE HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES
1
„Guarantees of impartiality for Georgian Juries“, Eka Khutsishvili, 21.11. 2011, http://dfwatch.net/guarantees-
of-impartiality-for-georgian-juries-40627-1588
2
uinteri baxmaierl., dali Jerald t., ,,SedarebiTi analizi: araprofesional
mosamarTleTa mier saqmeTa ganxilvis sistemebi evropis sabWos wevr
saxelmwifoebSi”, 2013, gv. 32.
3 Gregory v. United Kingdom, no. 22292/93, 1997 wlis 25 Tebervali, 44-e paragrafi. Aaseve
ixileT: Miah v. United Kingdom (dec.), no. 37401/97, 1998 wlis 1 ivlisi.
130
`inteleqtuali~, #40, 2020 `INTELLECTUAL~, #40, 2020
humanitaruli da socialuri mecnierebebi THE HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES
1 Seckerson and Times Newspapers Ltd. V. United Kingdom (dec.), no. 32844/10, 2012wlis 24 ianvari, 44-e paragrafi.
2
„...ganmartebebis miwodebis gziT ganxorcielda rigiTiwevrebis cnobierebis amaRleba imis
Taobaze, rom isini valdebuli arian imoqmedon damoukideblad, da ar daeqvemdebaron
arasaTanado zemoqmedebas, da maT aseve ganemartaT, Tu ramdenad mniSvnelovania, rom isini
moiazrebodnen damoukidebel pirebad. debulebebi moicavda praqtikul da zust miTiTebebs
imasTan dakavSirebiT, Tu rogor SeiZleboda aRniSnulis miRweva an aRmofxvra konkretul
situaciaSi. sasamarTlo miiCnevs, rom xsenebuli miTiTebebi emsaxureboda ara mxolod
wevrebisTvis sasicocxlod mniSvnelovani damoukideblobis, aramed nebismier iuadgilo
zewolis aRmofxvrisuzrunvelyofas“; Cooper v. United Kingdom [GC], no. 48843/99, 2003 წლის dekemberi,
124-eparagrafi.
3
makbraidi j., saqarTveloSi nafic msajulTa sasamarTloebis muSaobis sruli Sesabamisobis
uzrunvelyofa evropul standartebTan, Tb., 2017 wlis ivnisi, gv. 62.
4
iqve, gv. 65.
131
`inteleqtuali~, #40, 2020 `INTELLECTUAL~, #40, 2020
humanitaruli da socialuri mecnierebebi THE HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES
132
`inteleqtuali~, #40, 2020 `INTELLECTUAL~, #40, 2020
humanitaruli da socialuri mecnierebebi THE HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES
daskvna.
TiTqmis 10 welia, rac nafic msajulTa instituti moqmedebs
saqarTveloSi da am drois ganmavlobaSi daaxloebiT 40 saqme3 iqna
ganxiluli nafic msajulTa mier. Aaqedan gamomdinare sakmarisad
dagrovda gamocdileba aRniSnuli institutis muSaobis kuTxiT da
gamoikveTa misi reformirebis saWiroeba sxvadasxva mimarTulebiT.
upirvelesyovlisa xazi unda gaesvas im problemas, rac xSirad
aRniSnula advokatebTan intervius dros – saxelmwifos mxridan ar
arsebobs nafic msajulTa sasamarTlos realurad damkvidrebisaTvis
arc finansuri mzaoba da arc realuri survili. Aamas ganapirobebs is,
rom umetesad „nafici msajulebi moqmedeben TviTneburad, arian
araprognozirebadi, sentimentalurebi, ar eqvemdebarebian
1
Gastil J., Pierre Deess E., Weiser Philip J., Simmons C., The Jury and Democracy - How Jury Deliberation
Promotes Civic Engagement and Political Participation, 2010, 14, Warren, 1996, 22.
2
Ibid, 22.
3
http://www.supremecourt.ge/files/upload-file/pdf/nafici-msajulebis-mier-ganxiluli-saqmeebis-statistika.pdf
133
`inteleqtuali~, #40, 2020 `INTELLECTUAL~, #40, 2020
humanitaruli da socialuri mecnierebebi THE HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES
1 Sherrod Drury R., The Jury Crisis What’s wrong with Jury Trials and how we can save them, Rowman
&Littlefield, 2019, 123.
2
saqarTvelos moqalaqeebi valerian gelbaxiani, mamuka nikolaiSvili da aleqsandre
silagaZe saqarTvelos parlamentis winaaRmdeg, №1/4/557,571,576, 13 noemberi, 2014.
3 vidmari n., hansi v. p., amerikeli nafici msajulebi verdiqti, ilias saxelmwifo
universitetis gamomcemloba, Tb., 2019, gv. 76.
4
B. Michael Dann, “Learning Lessons and “Speaking Rights:”Creating Educated and Democratic Juries, 68
Indiana Law Journal 1229, 1993.
134
`inteleqtuali~, #40, 2020 `INTELLECTUAL~, #40, 2020
humanitaruli da socialuri mecnierebebi THE HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES
135
`inteleqtuali~, #40, 2020 `INTELLECTUAL~, #40, 2020
humanitaruli da socialuri mecnierebebi THE HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES
l i t e r a t u r a
L iterature
Литература
136
`inteleqtuali~, #40, 2020 `INTELLECTUAL~, #40, 2020
humanitaruli da socialuri mecnierebebi THE HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES
137
`inteleqtuali~, #40, 2020 `INTELLECTUAL~, #40, 2020
humanitaruli da socialuri mecnierebebi THE HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES
29. Harris Tricia, Trial by jury: has the lamp lost its glow? the UCLan Journal of
Undergraduate Research Volume 3 Issue 2 (December 2010).
30. Duff, Findlay, Howarth and Chan, Juries: A Hong Kong Perspective (1st edn, HKU
1992) .
31. B. Michael Dann, “Learning Lessons and “Speaking Rights:”Creating Educated and
Democratic Juries, 68 Indiana Law Journal 1229, 1993.
32. X and Y v. Ireland (dec.), no. 8299/78, 1980 wlis 10 oqtomberi, Callaghan and
Others v. United Kingdom (dec.), no. 14739/89, 1989 wlis 9 maisi, McLoughlin
v. Ireland (dec.), no. 15967/90, 1992 wlis 6 ivlisi, Malone v. United Kingdom
(dec.), no. 25290/94, 1996 wlis 28 Tebervali, McMullen v. Ireland (dec.), no.
25353/94, 1996 wlis 28 Tebervali, 1999 wlis 23 noemberi, Klimenteyev
v. Russia (dec.), no. 46503/99, 2002 wlis 17 seqtemberi.
33. Taxquet v. Belgium [GC],) #926/05, ECHR 2010.
34. Achour v. France [GC], № 67335/01, ECHR 2006-IV.
35. Grishin v. Russia, #14807/08, ECHR 2012,§170.
36. Tryumbach v Ukraine, No. 44385/02, 12 January 2012; J.M. v Denmark, No.
34421/09, 13 November 2012.
37. Cooper v. United Kingdom [GC], #48843/99, ECHR 2003.
38. Gregory v. United Kingdom, no. 22292/93, 1997 wlis 25 Tebervali, aseve
ixileT: Miah v. United Kingdom (dec.), no. 37401/97, 1998 wlis 1 ivlisi.
39. Seckerson and Times Newspapers Ltd. V. United Kingdom (dec.), no. 32844/10,
2012wlis 24 ianvari.
r e z i u m e
Eela kusiani
138
`inteleqtuali~, #40, 2020 `INTELLECTUAL~, #40, 2020
humanitaruli da socialuri mecnierebebi THE HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES
SUMMARY
ELLA KUSIANI
In the framework of this article, I will try to discuss the Georgian model of the jury trial
in the context of the right to a fair trial.I will try to discuss issues such as: the right to hear a
case within a reasonable time, the compliance of the jury verdict with the principle of
reasoning court decision, the right to a lawyer, the independence and impartiality of the court,
the protection of jurors from external influences.The article also covers the views of Georgian
practicing lawyers on problems of the jury. I will briefly touch the role of the jury in
promoting civic responsibility and civic engagement.
In the end of the article, some recommendations will be made to ensure that the
institution of jury operating in Georgia is closer to European standards.
РЕЗЮМЕ
ЭЛЛА КУСИАН
139