You are on page 1of 7

VHA RTWP Investigation Report

227073 / Centennial Avenue -V / 27 Oct 2020 Incomplete

Score 100% Failed items 1 Actions 0

Site 227073 - Centennial Avenue -V, VHA,


27073

VHA RTWP Investigation Report


1. Site ID 227073

2. Site Name Centennial Avenue -V

3. Conducted on 27th Oct, 2020 11:11 AM AEDT

4. Location Epping Rd & Centennial Ave,


Lane Cove NSW 2066,
Australia (-33.8106968,
151.163545)
5. State NSW - ACT

Private & 1/
Confidential
Failed Items 1 failed

2. RTWP Fault Investigation Details

2.9 Fault Status ? Not Resolved


1. Site, INC / WO & Tech Details 100%

1.1 Have you logged onto site with GDC on 1800 683 683 ? Yes

1.2 Technician name Alex Dagger

1.3 Technician Mobile Number 0432155434

1.4 Technician Email Address Alex.dagger@nokia.com

1.5 Company Name Nokia

1.6 ITSM INC Reference INC000013575106

1.7 MyWFM Task / WO Reference Task ID: TAS000000273204

1.8 Number of Riggers involved 1

1.9 Is EWP used ? No


2. RTWP Fault Investigation Details 1 failed, 100%

2.1 Fault Summary

Optus reporting High RTWP issue on U900 sector 2 issue on site 27073_ Centennial Avenue -V OVL: 37391
IM125810

2.2 Fault Start Date / Time 27th Oct, 2020 10:00 AM AEDT

2.3 GDC RAN Engineer Name NA

2.4 Fault Rectification details performed at site

levels on arrival =
FXDB 1.1.1 ANT 3 -100.5.
FXDB 1.1.1 ANT 4 -82.2
Load test after internal LB
combiner FXDB 1.1.1 ANT 3 -101.9
FXDB 1.1.1 ANT 4 -111.4
PIM test from output of Combiner with antenna as
load. FAIL -88.8dBc
PIM test from output of Combiner with load before
TMA PASS -165.9dBc
PIM test from output of Combiner with load on output TMA
PASS -157.6 dBc
PIM test from output of Combiner and by-pass TMA with antenna as load.
FAIL -103.5dBc
Port swap A B leg at antenna to prove faulty port. Fault stay with port, fault now on A leg.
Faulty antenna cause of High RTWP. Antenna replacement required.

2.5 List of spares picked by technician

N/A

2.6 List of spares replaced by technician

N/A

2.7 Number of Site visits for this particular fault ? 1

2.8 Whether next site visit required? Yes

Reason / Dependencies for next site visit ? antenna replacement.

2.8.1 Is EWP Required for next visit ? Yes

2.8.2 How long is the EWP required for- 2/4/6/8/10/12… 45m

2.8.3 Is Traffic Control Required for next visit ? Yes

2.8.4 How long is the Traffic Control required for – 2/4/6/8/10/12/… 6 hours

2.9 Fault Status ? Not Resolved


2.10 Provide the details why the fault is not resolved ?

-Antenna replacement required.


-If Slim Type antenna replacement Required then new tails required
= 4 x 2m 4310-DIN
4x 3m 4310-DIN
4x4m 4310-DIN
*THIS IS NOT A STANDARD ANTENNA REPLACEMENT. *
site has Antenna shroud and is not easily accessible by EWP. Building rooftop is surrounded by powerlines making
EWP setup difficult. Antenna shroud has to be removed then antenna can be accessed for replacement. refer photos
of layout. Proper planning required before next site visit. need to engage

2.11 Attach Test Results (Before and after rectification screen capture as photos)

Photo 1 Photo 2 Photo 3 Photo 4 Photo 5 Photo 6

Photo 7

2.12 Any other issues ?

2.13 if EWP has been used, how many hours of usage – 2/4/6/8/10/12 hrs N/A
Appendix

Photo 1
Photo 2

Photo 3
Photo 4

Photo 5
Photo 7 Photo 6

You might also like