Professional Documents
Culture Documents
COLOUR Psychology
#Competitive Exams
#Essay Writing
#Current Affairs
#Historical episodes
#Pakistan Affairs
# General Knowledge
# Global Issues
# Geopolitics
# International Relations
# Foreign Policy
The assertion(declaration) was made by CAA Director General Hassan Nasir Jamy in a
letter to a senior official of Oman’s aviation authority, which has expressed concerns about
the credentials of Pakistani pilots working in Oman-based airlines.
Further, Mr Jamy said that the CAA had verified/cleared the names of “96 Pakistani pilots
out of 104 names received from various civil aviation authorities/foreign airlines”.
According to him, the matter has been “misconstrued and incorrectly highlighted in the
media/social media”.
The allegation against the media is patently(without doubt) untrue, a red herring
(misleading information) meant to deflect from what has been a fiasco ever since Aviation
Minister Ghulam Sarwar Khan made his shocking claim on the floor of the National
Assembly. He presented as established fact a matter that was still under investigation, saying
unequivocally(unambiguous) that 262 pilots had had proxies sit their exams. At a press
conference a few days later, he gave a breakdown as to which Pakistan-based airlines the
pilots concerned were working for, with the rest employed by foreign airlines, chartered
plane services and flying clubs.
PIA grounded (prohibited or prevented from flying)150 of its pilots over their allegedly
‘dubious’ licences. In subsequent weeks, news began to trickle(leak) in about batches of
Pakistani pilots, although only those employed by overseas airlines, being cleared by the
CAA of having dubious credentials(qualification) .
Critical Analysis
After all, the CAA recently apprised the Supreme Court of the measures it is taking to secure
its examination and licensing systems — which is an implicit admission of procedural
failures.What is beyond doubt is that the aviation minister and the CAA are not on the same
page. One wonders what Mr Khan’s objective was in publicly levelling such serious
allegations when the facts had yet to be established. If it was to ‘expose’ previous
governments’ culpability in the decline of the national airline, the resulting earthquake has
created a crisis from which the country’s aviation industry will take a long time to recover.
Critical Analysis
The government has not really offered a solution to the debt crisis. Its primary fix,
converting short-term debt to long-term debt, is only exacerbating the problem by adding to
debt-servicing costs while doing nothing to reduce the total amount owed.
After achieving which no one else could achieve, Quaid-e-Azam passed away one year after
the birth of Pakistan. Allah willed his departure honorably since had he lived longer, the
chronic foul-mouthed intriguers (one who forms plots) would not have spared him. He is
the only leader who is held in highest esteem and he is today remembered with greater
approbation (appreciation) after seeing the sorry plight of the Indian Muslims and Muslim
Kashmiris at the hands of RSS (Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh) and Indian forces.
▪ His untimely death created leadership crisis and power of pendulum kept swinging
between the Governor General and PM.
▪ Passage of Objectives Resolution in 1949 strengthened Religious Right and
heightened secular-Islamic divide.
▪ Murder of Liaqat Ali Khan in October 1951 gave rise to ethnicity and regional
loyalties.
▪ Corruption raised its head due to unfair allotment of properties to refugees by the
Evacuee Trustee Board. 1953 saw Ahmadi movement in West Punjab and language
riots in East Pakistan.
▪ The political class in West Pakistan was heavy with Choudhries, Maliks, Waderas,
Sardars, Peers and industrialists who had gained material benefits from the British in
return for their loyalty.
Devoid (lacking) of high morals and competence to govern the ungovernable, these families
put self before national interests. Power tussle between landholders of East and West Punjab
and between Punjab and East Bengal delayed constitution making for nine years. The
British trained white-collar CSP cadre, the crème of the nation, aped(imitate) the colonial
masters by behaving like snobbish (superior) Brown Sahibs and never served the hapless
people. Their arrogant attitude and lackadaisical approach of early leaders were the major
causes of alienation of Bengalis who were in the vanguard (forefront) of Pakistan
movement. Ghulam Muhammad and Iskandar Mirza’s palace intrigues(conspiracy)
strengthened bureaucrat-military oligarchy and severely bruised growth of democracy.
Pak-US Relationship
Pakistan decided to change its status of non-alignment and
join the SEATO, CENTO Western pacts in 1954 due to
Non-
extreme security threats posed by India and Afghanistan
Aligned Movement
backed by former Soviet Union, which had got refers to the movement
irked(annoyed) when PM Liaqat Ali preferred Washington of states considering
over Moscow for his first state visit abroad. Thereon, themselves not
Pakistan tailored its foreign and defence policies in formally aligned with
accordance with the wishes of Washington and it put all its or against any major
power bloc.
eggs in the basket of USA. Ironically none of the defence
agreements had any clause of security against Indian
aggression. Owing to its full reliance on USA, Pakistan was
termed as the most allied ally of USA.
▪ The western assistance coupled with Soviet support tilted the military balance in favor
of India, which forced Ayub Khan to lean on China and he accordingly brought a
slight change in Pakistan’s foreign policy.
▪ Governed by the policy of enticing(attractive) India, the US instead of helping
Pakistan in the 1965 and 1971 wars, imposed sanctions. Indian military
succeeded in cutting the eastern limb of Pakistan in 1971 due to all-out support of
USSR.
▪ India’s nuclear explosion in August 1974 and its expansionism were looked the other
way by the US led west.
Although ZA Bhutto was criticized for playing a role in truncating (cutting) the country,
but he is credited for gifting 1973 Constitution and laying the foundation of nuclear
program. To restrain him, Henry Kissinger threatened him to be made a horrible example.
His hanging on 4 April 1979 alienated Sindhis and divided the nation between Bhutto lovers
and haters.
Pakistan under Gen Ziaul Haq was once again put under sanctions by Jimmy Carter
regime in 1979 after it alleged that Pakistan had undertaken a nuclear program
clandestinely and was developing an Islamic bomb. Ronald Reagan took Pakistan on board
Zia era gave fillip to Jihadism, religious extremism and sectarianism, but Zia earned his
name in history by playing a key role in ousting Soviet forces from Afghanistan and in
completing the nuclear program and also giving Islamic direction to the country. During the
rule of Zia’s handpicked Junejo, culture of loans from banks and writing off loans by the
politicians came in fashion and black money as well Mafias gained strength.
Pak-US honeymoon ended soon after the US accomplished its objectives in 1989 with the
help of Mujahideen and Pakistan. The holy warriors were abandoned and later on declared
terrorists. It was put under harsh sanctions due to which it became politically and
economically weak. To rub salt on Pakistan’s wounds, the US embraced India and was made
its strategic partner.
Israel joined hands with the duo and the trio worked in unison to disable Pakistan’s
nuclear program. Their antagonism increased after Pakistan responded to India’s five
nuclear tests by conducting six nuclear tests in May 1998, and became the 7th nuclear
power. Thereon, denuclearization of Pakistan became an obsession of Indo-US-Israel
nexus.
The democratic era from 1988 to 1999 saw PML-N and PPP locked up in infighting, which
made Pakistan politically unstable and economically weak. The two mainstream parties in
their bid to topple the other had no time to combat the fallout effects of 10-year Afghan war
which had militarized the society. The armed uprising of Kashmiris in IOK was not cashed
in to liberate J&K. External debts swelled, and the state institutions became feeble. That
period intensified ethnicity/sectarianism and fortified Mafias, profiteers, hoarders,
smugglers, drug peddlers and racketeers. 10% Zardari blemished the image of Benazir
Bhutto.
Israel dreamed of establishing Greater Israel since 1982. The first moves made in this regard
were
Musharraf readily fell into the honeycombed trap of USA since he was badly in need of
legitimacy. Being liberal, he was otherwise averse to Mullahs and extremist Muslims.
He was led up the garden path by George W. Bush junior regime that it will atone the
wrongs done in the past and would build relations based on mutual trust and equality.
Pakistan was made an ally and coalition partner of US-NATO, and a frontline state to
fight war on terror on its soil. It was also made a non-NATO ally and a strategic
partner. However, irrespective of the impressive labels, PakistanPakista was never trusted
and was given a raw deal. Throughout the 19-year war on terror, it was insulted,
humiliated, criticized and pressured to do more. It was encrusted with unsubstantiated
accusations of being either complicit with the terrorists or incompetent to deal with them,
and providing sanctuaries(refuge) to the terrorist groups. No proof was ever furnished to
prove their allegations.
The lawyer’s movement in 2007 joined by civil society eclipsed his popularity and
paled his impressive achievements. NRO was his last gift to the nation the ill-effects of
which are still being borne by the people. It enabled the most corrupt Zardari to ascend to
power in 2008 and become the strongest president.
(PART 2- to be continued)
Asif Haroon Raja is a retired Brig Gen, war veteran, defence & security analyst, international columnist,
author of five books, Chairman Thinkers Forum Pakistan, Director Measac Research Centre, member CWC
PESS, Member Council TJP. He can be reached at asifharoonraja@gmail.com
Introduction
Infighting for power amongst local rulers of Gilgit resulted in an ousted Raja going to
Kashmir to seek assistance from the Sikhs in 1842. An army of one thousand was sent to
Gilgi—an ac which reshaped history by introducing a new outside force, Sikhs, in the
region. On March 16, 1849, Kashmir was sold to Gulab Singh by the British which created
the new princely state of Jammu and Kashmir. In this treaty, there was no mention of Gilgit,
Baltistan, Chilas, Hunza, Nager or Yasin. It was only after the death of Raja Gohar Aman in
1860 that some local rajas, who were fugitives in Jammu, returned to Gilgit with the Dogra
Liberation of Gilgit-Baltistan
In 1877, due to a threat by the Russians, Britishers appointed Major John Biddluph as an
Officer on Special Duty (OSD) and the region practically remained under British control.
i. state territory -i.e., Gilgit Wazarat, comprising of Gilgit tehsil including Bunji with its
niabat of Astor.
ii. Second, the political districts of Nager, Hunza, Punial, Yasin, Ishkoman and Chilas.
iii. Last, the un-administered areas of Darel, Tangir, Kandia, Jhalkot, Sazin, Shatial and
Harbun.
Suzerainty (/ˈsjuːzərənti, -
It was also mentioned in the gazetteer that these areas rɛnti/) is any relationship in
acknowledge the suzerainty of Kashmir but form no part of which one region or polity
its territory and they only pay tribute to the Maharaja controls the foreign policy
and relations of a tributary
annually. On March 20 1935, the British decided to take
state, while allowing the
Gilgit Wazarat on lease from the Maharaja for 60 years and tributary state to have
an agreement was signed. Accordingly, the entire Gilgit internal autonomy.
agency was handed over to Maharaja. The local population
was never consulted about it as they, along with rajas, had
already decided in the favour of Pakistan.
On August 1 1947, Brigadier Ghansara Singh took over as governor. The people in
Gilgit never accepted his authority and on the night of October 31, the residence of the
governor was surrounded by scouts. The following morning, the Brigadier surrendered; the
Dogra flag was pulled down as Pakistan’s flag was raised.
The liberation forces emancipated(liberated) Skardu exactly one year after Pakistan’s
independence when Major Thappa, with his 250 soldiers, surrendered. The people of
ICEP Dawn Analysis
Gilgit-Baltistan were able to liberate their land from the Dogras and Indian army without
any external help and defeated a well-equipped and trained army with meagre resources.
In 2015, the federal government constituted a committee headed by Sartaj Aziz which
proposed giving Gilgit-Baltistan the status of a province.
On May 27 2018, a new Gilgit-Baltistan order was introduced and all the powers of the
Gilgit Baltistan Council were transferred to its assembly. There was a mixed response to this
order as the majority termed it to be prime minister centric with absolute powers.
The GBESGO of 2009 and the Gilgit Baltistan Order of 2018 were challenged in the
Supreme Court of Pakistan. In response, it reconfirmed its earlier judgement given in the
case of Al-Jehad Trust that the people of Gilgit-Baltistan are citizens of Pakistan. The court
also suggested that certain changes should be made to the presidential order issued by the
present government and instructed the federal government to promulgate(enact) the
modified Gilgit-Baltistan Reforms of 2019.
The people of Gilgit-Baltistan are loyal and true patriots who want their identity with
Pakistan. Their demand is that they be declared as constitutional citizens of Pakistan with
Gilgit-Baltistan being made the fifth province of the country. Its assembly has already
adopted a unanimous(uniform) resolution for a full-fledged provincial status for the region.
The government has to find a way that will give them their full rights within Pakistan
in accordance with the international commitment under the UNSC resolution on
Kashmir.
Suggestions
This can be done by giving Gilgit-Baltistan provincial status on a provisional basis, pending
the implementation of the UNSC resolution. Proper representation may be given
▪ in the Parliament,
▪ National Economic Council (NEC),
▪ Council of Common Interest (CCI) and Indus River System Authority (ISRA) with the
powers to participate in decision making.
Their people are convinced that Imran Khan’s government can take this historic decision and
grant them their basic rights by making Gilgit-Baltistan the fifth province of the country.
Amid the global pandemic that has troubled the world from east to west, the credibility of
education in Pakistan has been exposed. The governments around the globe have taken steps
that are either non-binding or unreachable to most of the students, primarily in under
developed and resourceless areas. In Pakistan, the education system has faced many
controversies ever since the pandemic has arrived in its borders. Significantly on the reach of
internet in rural areas. Most of the Pakistan’s population lives in rural areas where the
internet facility is not present. This has provoked students and teachers to hold protests in
Balochistan and other rural areas. Isn’t it necessary to question what the government has
done to ensure the continuation of education?
Education is one of the most neglected sectors in Pakistan proven by the report of UNICEF
that the current literacy rate is below 60 percent. Even before the pandemic, about 24 million
children were reported to be out of schools, HEC funds were minimized and education was
given little space in the annual budget. This ignorance negates the Pakistan law on
education, mainly Article 25A and Article 38(d), which states that the state shall provide
education to every citizen.
If the government has already failed to give effect to the law and its constitutional duty
before the outbreak of the novel coronavirus, the question that arises is, how will it give
effect to the law and constitution while coping with the troubles for access to education
caused by the virus and once the pandemic has ended?
In a world where a communicable virus has proved itself fatal and is responsible for more
than half a million deaths, therefore realizing the gravity of the situation Pakistan
government announced to close schools. Government took some steps, as the end of the
pandemic is still not in sight, the motive is to save the education cycle from any disruption
and this transition is worth struggling. Recently, a tele-education channel was launched by
Prime Minister Imran Khan to keep the students associated with their education through
ICEP Dawn Analysis
dedicated lectures for class I to XII. The measures are clearly not enough given the ongoing
protests concerning the reach of the education in rural areas.
To analyze the challenges for online learning in Pakistan, particularly during this pandemic,
the first step is to factor in all the stakeholders of education. Initially students criticized the
move of education ministry in the wake of the issues stemming from quality and
connectivity issues but just like any other transformation, developing the capacity of the
institutions was going to take time. The drawbacks have been observed that most of the
students either do not have a laptop, and internet connection or they have no idea how to use
online platforms.
Besides, the idea of equitable education has become dubious with this selection because
financially all students are not equal. Most of the challenges are related to our behaviors: the
lack of acceptance for online education by students. Similarly, lack of individual space at
homes in joint family systems i.e. for families where parents and children both need to work
and study from home respectively.
The lack of awareness about digital learning ethics has worsened the situation. First issue is
the unavailability of the internet in remote areas which makes the students living in those
areas unable to get benefit from online education. The bandwidth limitations across the
country, with only a few exceptions, when combined with the increased usage burden on
feeble internet infrastructure, add to the misery of most of the students. Another challenge is
the expensive high-speed internet. As there is always a silver lining in the clouds, it is high
time to see opportunities in these challenging times. For a paradigm shift from traditional
teaching towards inclusively effective and equitable e-learning, some of the
recommendations include the development of a standard and comprehensive policy for e-
learning with the consensus of all the stakeholders alike.
The issues of educational institutes shouldn’t be ignored as well as in Pakistan, tuition fees
are the principal source of revenue for the majority of private sector universities and they
solely depend on it because the government hardly issues grants to them. But, since many
people have lost their jobs and students have applied for waiver in tuition fee and writing off
other charges such as clubs, sports and hostel rents, it has become a challenge for
universities as well. The government has also forced the universities to give relief to students
in payments and to opt for half payments. It has also instructed to pay salaries to the faculty
and staff by managing their resources. Likewise, no any employee would be fired from the
job as long as there is lockdown imposed in the country. This is quite difficult for
universities to survive.
There is a famous proverb, “In every crisis, there is an opportunity”. This is the right time
when whole world is in the race to invent the vaccine of COVID-19 we need to think that
being a nation where we are standing. Along with the enactment of the recommendations of
the health department, we need to paint the situation in a positive manner to our youth in a
way that human and viruses are born to live together. Until humanity triumphs with the good
vaccine of COVID-19, we must set a plan for students to learn how to work in this weird
situation. The new paradigm in the world emphasizes on online education and work from
home scenarios that can save time and resources, and is more practical. Hence, we must
move with the time or wait for the time to move past us while we are busy in addressing less
important issues.
The writer's name is Palwasha binte inam and she hails from Peshawar .She is a freelance
columnist and researcher.She is a social media human rights activist.