Professional Documents
Culture Documents
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
LEARNING CONTENT
1. CLARITY & APPROPRIATENESS OF LEARNING TARGETS
Assessment should be clearly stated and specified and centered on what is truly
important.
"Teaching emphasis should parallel testing emphasis."
LEARNING TARGETS
Essay Reasoning
Self-report Affects
3. BALANCE
Assessment methods should be able to assess all domains of learning and
hierarchy of objectives.
The cognitive domain involves the development of our mental skills and the acquisition
of knowledge. The six categories under this domain are:
B. Affective Domain
5. Characterization: the ability to internalize values and let them control the person`s
behaviour.
Example: A man marries a woman not for her looks but for what she is.
C. Psychomotor Domain
The psychomotor domain is comprised of utilizing motor skills and coordinating them.
The seven categories under this include:
HIERARCHY OF OBJECTIVES
(BLOOM) (ANDERSON)
Evaluation Create
Synthesis Evaluate
Analysis Apply
Application Analyze
Comprehension Understand
Knowledge Remember
1.3 Applying - using what Apply, change, compute, Use a mathematical formula
was learned in the construct, demonstrate, to solve an algebra
classroom into similar new discover, modify, prepare, problem; prepare daily
situations. produce, show, solve, use menus for one week for a
family of six
3.1 Receiving – being Select, point to, sit, chose, Listen to others with
aware or sensitive to describe, follow, hold, respect, try to remember
something and being identify, name, reply profile and facts
willing to listen or pay
attention
1. VALIDITY
Assessment should be valid. There are several types of validity that are to be
established.
Types of Validity
● Construct validity: Does the test measure the concept that it’s intended to measure?
● Content validity: Is the test fully representative of what it aims to measure?
● Face validity: Does the content of the test appear to be suitable to its aims?
● Criterion validity: Do the results correspond to a different test of the same thing?
Note that this article deals with types of test validity, which determine the accuracy of
the actual components of a measure. If you are doing experimental research, you also
need to consider internal and external validity, which deal with the experimental
design and the generalizability of results.
1. Construct validity
Construct validity evaluates whether a measurement tool really represents the
thing we are interested in measuring. It’s central to establishing the overall validity of
a method.
What is a construct?
A construct refers to a concept or characteristic that can’t be directly observed, but
can be measured by observing other indicators that are associated with it.
Example
To achieve construct validity, you have to ensure that your indicators and
measurements are carefully developed based on relevant existing knowledge. The
questionnaire must include only relevant questions that measure known indicators of
depression.
The other types of validity described below can all be considered as forms of
evidence for construct validity.
2. Content validity
Content validity assesses whether a test is representative of all aspects of the
construct.
To produce valid results, the content of a test, survey or measurement method must
cover all relevant parts of the subject it aims to measure. If some aspects are missing
from the measurement (or if irrelevant aspects are included), the validity is threatened.
Example
A mathematics teacher develops an end-of-semester algebra test for her class. The
test should cover every form of algebra that was taught in the class. If some types of
algebra are left out, then the results may not be an accurate indication of students’
understanding of the subject. Similarly, if she includes questions that are not related to
algebra, the results are no longer a valid measure of algebra knowledge.
3. Face validity
Face validity considers how suitable the content of a test seems to be on the
surface. It’s similar to content validity, but face validity is a more informal and subjective
assessment.
Example
You create a survey to measure the regularity of people’s dietary habits. You
review the survey items, which ask questions about every meal of the day and snacks
eaten in between for every day of the week. On its surface, the survey seems like a
good representation of what you want to test, so you consider it to have high face
validity.
As face validity is a subjective measure, it’s often considered the weakest form of
validity. However, it can be useful in the initial stages of developing a method.
4. Criterion validity
Criterion validity evaluates how closely the results of your test correspond to the results
of a different test.
What is a criterion?
The criterion is an external measurement of the same thing. It is usually an
established or widely-used test that is already considered valid.
Example
5. RELIABILITY
Assessment should show consistent and stable results. There are methods which can
be used to measure and establish reliability.
6. FAIRNESS
Assessment should give equal opportunities for every student. There should be no
discrimination of any kind (racial, age, gender, etc.)
7. AUTHENTICITY
Assessment should touch real life situations and should emphasize practicability.
ASSESSMENT FORMS:
Assessment should not be used to derogate the students. One example of this is the
right to confidentiality.
Assessment's results should be communicated to the learners and the people involved.
Communication should also be established between the teacher and the learners by
way of pre- and post-test reviews.
Assessment should have a positive effect. It should motivate students to learn and do
more and should give way to improve the teacher's instruction.
learning task
A. The following are examples of learning outcomes; on the second column, write
the domain in which each outcome is classified and on third column the level or
category to which the learning outcome belongs.
B. Using the indicated topic or subject matter, write learning outcomes for each of
the 3 domain arranged from the simplest to the most complex level or category.
2.4 Organizing: Learn to manage conflicts and understand and apply the
skills of problem solving.