HANOI UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING PHYSICS

EXPERIMENT REPORT
Physics I

Name: Nguyễn Minh Đức

ID: 20196907

Class: CTTT.KT Ô tô

Hanoi, 2019
 Experiment report 3

MOMENT OF INERTIA OF THE SYMMETRIC RIGID BODIES

Name: Nguyễn Minh Đức Mark Comment
Student ID: 20196907

Class: CTTT KT Ô tô

Group: 02

I.DATA TABLE

1.Measurement of rod.

Trial 1 2 3 4 5
T (s) 2.647 2.646 2.645 2.642 2.644

2.Measurement of solid disk.

Trial 1 2 3 4 5
T (s) 2.092 2.088 2.087 2.085 2.087

3.Measurement of support disk and hollow cylinder.

Trial 1 2 3 4 5
T (s) 1.146 1.145 1.142 1.147 1.144
4.Measurement of support disk.

Trial 1 2 3 4 5
T (s) 0.323 0.321 0.325 0.322 0.323

5.Measurement of solid sphere.

Trial 1 2 3 4 5
T (s) 2.168 2.171 2.174 2.169 2.173

II. DATA TREATMENT

I T 2× D T̄ 2 × D̄ 2× ΔT 2
We have T =2 π
√ D
⇒ I=
4 π2
. Therefore, Ī =
4 π2
ΔI = Ī
√( T̄ )
1.Rod

∑ T i = 2.647+2.646+2.645+ 2.642+ 2.644 ≈ 2.645 ( s ) s . d= ∑ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿

T̄ =
5 5
√
s.d
∆T Rod =S . D= ¿ 0.001 ( s )
√5
Hence,

T̄ 2 × D̄ 2.6452 ×0.044 −3 2
T rod =2.645± 0.001( s) Ī = 2
= 2
≈ 7.805 ×1 0 ( kg . m )
4π 4 ×3.1 4 1
2× ΔT 2 2 ×0.001 2
ΔI = Ī
√( T̄ ) =7.805 ×1 0−3
√( 2.645
I rod =(7.805 ± 0.006)×1 0−3 (kg . m2)
)≈ 0.006 ×1 0−3 ( kg . m2 ) Hence ,

1 1
The theoritical value is I cm = ml 2= × 0.240× 0.62 02=7.688 ×1 0−3 ( kg . m2 )
12 12
Therefore , ¿ I cm −I rod∨ =¿ 7.688−7.805∨ ¿ =1.5 % is the difference between measured value and theoriti
¿
I cm 7.688

2. Solid disk
 ∑ T i = 2.092+2.088+2.087+2.085+2.087 ≈ 2.088 ( s ) s . d= ∑ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿
T̄ =
5 5
√
s.d
∆ T Solid disk =S . D= =0.001
√5
Hence,

T soliddisk =2.088 ± 0.001(s )

T̄ 2 × D̄ 2. 0882 ×0.044 −3 2
Ī = 2
= 2
≈ 4.861 ×1 0 ( kg . m )
4π 4 × 3.1 4 1
2× ΔT 2 2 ×0.001 2
ΔI = Ī
√( T̄ )=4.861× 10−3
√( 2.088 )≈ 0.005 ×1 0−3 (kg . m2 ) Hence ,

I soliddisk =(4.861 ±0.005) ×1 0−3 (kg . m2 )

1 1
The theoritical value is I cm = m R 2= ×0.795 ×0.11 02=4.809 ×1 0−3 (kg . m 2)
2 2
Therefore , ¿ I cm −I soliddisk ∨ ¿ =¿ 4.861−4.809∨ ¿ ≈1.08 % is the difference between measured value and the
I cm 4.809

3.Hollow cylinder

a.Support disk

∑ T i = 0.323+0.321+0.325+0.322+ 0.323 ≈ 0.323 ( s ) s . d= ∑ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿

T̄ =
5 5
√
s.d
∆T ¿disk =S . D= ¿ 0.001 ( s )
√5

Hence, T ¿d isk =0.323 ± 0.001(s )

T̄ 2 × D̄ 0.32 32 ×0.044 −3 2
Ī = 2
= 2
≈ 0.116 ×1 0 (kg . m )
4π 4 × 3.1 4 1
2× ΔT 2 2× 0.001 2
ΔI = Ī
√( T̄ )
=0.116 ×1 0−3
√( 0.323 )
≈ 0.001×1 0−3 (kg . m2) Hence ,

I ¿d isk =(0.116 ± 0.001)×1 0−3(kg . m 2)

b.Support disk and hollow cylinder

 ∑ T i = 1.146+1.145+1.142+1.147+1.144 ≈ 1.145 ( s ) s . d= ∑ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿
T̄ =
5 5
√
s.d
∆T ❑ =S . D= ¿ 0.001(s)
√5
Hence , T support disk∧hollow cylinder =1.145 ± 0.001(s)
T̄ 2 × D̄ 1.14 52 ×0.044 −3 2
Ī = 2
= 2
≈ 1.46 2× 1 0 (kg .m )
4π 4 ×3.1 4 1
2× ΔT 2 2× 0.001 2
ΔI = Ī
√( T̄ )=1.46 2 ×1 0−3
√( 1.145 )
≈ 0.003× 10−3 (kg . m2) Hence ,

I support disk∧hollow cylinder =(1.462± 0.003)× 10−3 (kg . m2)

c.Hollow cylinder

We have I hollow cylinder =I support disk∧hollow cylinder −I support d isk , therefore

Ī hollow cylinder = Ī support disk∧hollow cylinder − Ī support d isk =1.46 2× 10−3−0.116 ×1 0−3=1.34 6 ×1 0−3 ( kg . m2 )
Δ I hollcylinder = √ Δ I 2diskandcylinder + Δ I 2¿ d isk =√ 0.0 12+0,0 3 2 . ×10−3

¿ 0.003 ×1 0−3 ( kg . m 2 )

Hence , I hollcylinder =(1.34 6 ± 0.003)× 10−3 (kg . m 2)

The theoritical value is I cm =m R 2=0.780 ×0.04 452=1.55 × 10−3 (kg . m2)
Therefore , ¿ I cm −I hollowcylinder ∨ ¿ =¿ 1.55 1−1.34 6∨ ¿ =13.54 % is the difference ¿ ¿
I cm 1.55 1
between measured value and theoritical valu e

4.Sphere

∑ T i = 2.168+2.171+2.174+2.169+ 2.173 ≈ 2.171 ( s ) s . d= ∑ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿

T̄ =
5 5
√
s.d
∆T Sphere =S . D= ¿ 0.001 ( s )
√5
 T̄ 2 × D̄ 2.1712 ×0.04 4 −3 2
Hence , T shpere =2.171 ±0.001 ( s ) Ī = 2
= 2
=5.255 ×1 0 ( kg .m )
4π 4 ×3.1 4 1
2× ΔT 2 2 ×0.001 2
ΔI = Ī
√( T̄ ) =5.255 ×1 0−3
√( 2.171 )≈ 0.005× 1 0−3 ( kg . m 2 ) Hence ,

I sphere =( 5.255 ±0.005 ) ×1 0−3 ( kg . m2 )

2 2
The theoritical value is I cm = m R 2= ×2.290 × 0.07 32=4.88 2 ×1 0−3 ( kg . m2 )
5 5
Therefore , ¿ I cm −I sphere ∨ ¿ =¿ 4.88 2−5.255∨ ¿ ≈7.7 % is the difference between measured value and theo
I cm 4.88 2