Doc No:

Issue No:
Minutes of MRM Issue Date:

Rev No/ Date:

Mng.Rev. NO : 01 PLACE : CONFERENCE ROOM TIME : 10.00 AM to 5.00 PM

FREQUENCY : ONCE IN YEAR

Mng.Rev. DATE : LAST MRM CONDUCTED ON :- Nil
REVIEW PERIOD : (Nov 2018 - Oct 2019)

STANDARD : IATF 16949 : 2016

MEMBERS

NAME DESIGNATION SIGNATURE

CHAIRED BY

Mr.AAAAA

GM
# POINTS DISCUSSED ACTION DECIDED RESPONSIBILITY TARGET DATE REVIEW COMMENTS

RESULTS OF AUDITS :
QMS AUDITS :
1 No Action needed ICO (IATF Coordinator) - Action plans for non conformities raised during internal audit are
PROCESS AUDIT: closed within target dates
PRODUCT AUDIT:

CUSTOMER FEEDBACK AND ANALYSIS OF CUSTOMER SATISFACTION :

TARGET : 85 %
2 No Action needed Quality / PPC - Monthwise Feedback data presented in KPI sheet
RNAIPL - 98 %

Since this is the first Management Review Meeting inline with

3 FOLLOW UP ACTIONS ON PREVIOUS MANAGEMENT REVIEWS : No Action needed ICO - IATF 16949, No pending points to review from previous
Review Meeting

Internal and External issues are identified in Doc : XXXXX;

4 CHANGES IN INTERNAL & EXTERNAL ISSUES RELEVANT TO QMS: No Action needed ICO - There is no changes in issue which affect QMS

5 RESOURCE NEEDS : Top Management -

Quality policy is appropriate to the purpose and context of

the organization and supports its statergic direction
6 REVIEW OF QUALITY POLICY & OBJECTIVES : No Action needed ICO - Quality Objectives are consistent with quality policy
The defined objectives are inline with customer
requirements; no changes needed.

Identified Risks to be closed within target

Risk and opportunities are identified effectively and
7 EFFECTIVENESS OF ACTIONS TAKEN TO ADDRESS RISKS & OPPORTUNITY: dates as mentioned in risk register: Process Owners - documented Doc No:XXXXXX
MLT/ICO/D/12

Supplier corrective action reports evidenced for raised Non

conformities.
8 NON CONFIRMITY AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS : No Action needed Process Owners - Inhouse corrective action reports evidenced issues as per
pareto chart analysis.
Customer 8D reports evidenced for all customer complaints.

Tool Room:
Production:
9 CONTINUAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS : Quality: Process Owners -
M/C Maintenance:
Purchase:

Feasibility study performed for all new projects and

ASSESSMENT OF MANUFACTURING FEASIBILITY: (For changes to existing operations
10 and for New products): No Action needed NPD - documents evidenced
There is no engineering changes undergone till now.
# POINTS DISCUSSED ACTION DECIDED RESPONSIBILITY TARGET DATE REVIEW COMMENTS

11 Warranty performance(where applicable): No Action needed Quality / Marketing - Zero warranty claims as these is no onsite or field failures

12 Review of Customer Score cards: No Action needed Quality / Sales - Customer's monthly targets have been met every month's

13 IDENTIFICATION OF POTENTIAL FIELD FAILURES IDENTIFIED THROUGH RISK AND No Action needed NPD - Potential failures are identified in FMEA & appropriate
ANALYSIS(SUCH AS FMEA): preventive controls evidenced

ANALYSIS OF ACTUAL AND POTENTIAL FIELD-FAILURES AND THEIR IMPACT ON

14 No Action needed Quality / Marketing - No field failures occurred till now.
QUALITY , SAFETY OR THE ENVIRONMENT:

SUMMARY RESULTS OF MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED STAGES DURING THE DESIGN Phase wise development activities reviewed timely; No
15 AND DEVELOPMENT OF PRODUCTS AND PROCESSES, AS APPLICABLE No Action needed MDT - significant lag in design and development plan Vs Act
# POINTS DISCUSSED ACTION DECIDED RESPONSIBILITY TARGET DATE REVIEW COMMENTS

Department Process Measures defined are discussed and reviewed for suitability.
GM informed that though the Measure of Performancefor all departments were defined exhaustively.
16 PROCESS PERFORMANCE AND PRODUCT CONFORMITY : In charge shall ensure that all dates with supporting reasons and causes shall be submitted to Top Management thru ICO on or before 5th of
every month.

STATUS ACTION NEED ( NOT MEETING THE TARTGET ) ACTION NOT NEED ( TARGET MET )

PERIOD: Nov 2018-Oct 2019

K PI
ISE
S S W
OC E
PR
# POINTS DISCUSSED ACTION DECIDED RESPONSIBILITY TARGET DATE REVIEW COMMENTS
# POINTS DISCUSSED ACTION DECIDED RESPONSIBILITY TARGET DATE REVIEW COMMENTS

#
PROCESS MEASURES & Department ACTUAL UOM STATUS ACTION DECIDED / TAKEN RESPONSIBILITY TARGET DATE REVIEW COMMENTS
Targets

process 1 Nos

process 2 Nos

Nos

Nos

Nos
1
KAIZEN
(MIN 2)
Nos

Nos

Nos

Nos

Process 10 Nos
# POINTS DISCUSSED ACTION DECIDED RESPONSIBILITY TARGET DATE REVIEW COMMENTS

process 1 Rupees

process 2 Rupees

Rupees

Rupees

Rupees
2
COST SAVINGS
(AVG 15,000)
Rupees

Rupees

Rupees

Rupees

Process 10

# OTHER POINTS DISCUSSED ACTION DECIDED RESPONSIBILITY TARGET DATE REVIEW COMMENTS

PREPARED BY : APPROVED BY :