You are on page 1of 7

Version Control

Version Revision notes


0
1
2 Rewritten to the standard agreed in November 2017
3
4
5

Template Instructions
1 For Reference PFMEA press option 1.
For Process / Product application press option 2. to expand the full PFMEA
2
columns.
Q
Version Control
GPO
Date Who GPO Notes Jerry Satchwell

1/26/2018 Jerry Satchwell Jerry Satchwell


Quality Check
GPO Head of ME (Central Team)
Jerry Satchwell Phil Holmshaw
WARNING STATEMENT AND DESTINATION CONTROL STATEMENT

Export Control
Jurisdiction Classification Date
(Rating)
UK Not listed 29-Jan-18

© 2017 Rolls-Royce Plc. All Rights Reserved.


This document and the information embodied herein is the property of and proprietary to
Rolls-Royce Corporation, and shall not, without prior written permission of Rolls-Royce
Corporation, be used or disclosed in whole or in part to third parties. This legend shall be
included on any reproduction of this document in whole or in part.

This document contains information which is proprietary and confidential to Rolls-Royce and
may not be used or reproduced, in whole or in part, or communicated to any person not
employed by Rolls-Royce, without the express written consent of Rolls-Royce.
CONTROL STATEMENT

Rated by

Ajay Mande
Date: 03/14/2021
Page 6 of 7
Requirements (Product
Potential Failure Mode Potential Cause(s) of Failure Control (Prevention) Control (Detection)
Characteristics)

What is the Product Characteristic What could be wrong with the 1st level why of the 5 whys (the top Typical provention controls used to How would we detect that the
we need to achieve during the Product Characteristic (hole too big, things we would look at)…if I get avoid potential causes occuring failure mode has occurred
process (diameter, depth, length, hole too small, CME outside spec, this occuring when I use this FMEA
radius, CME, surface finish, too rough surface finish) then I need an improvement
metallurgy standard, adhesion, activitiy that would understand root
residual stress, coverage etc - or cause and close out plan.
avoid such as damage, weld spatter
etc)
Parts received in non-standard
5.2.7.1. Contamination free Contaminated part Receipt inspection Visual inspection
condition
Degreaser activity depleted Visual inspection
Degreasing solution temperature
Temperature indicator on tank. Visual inspection
incorrect
Degreasing solution concentration Solution analysis process.
Visual inspection
incorrect
Immersion time too short Stopwatch. Visual inspection
Degrease solution contaminated Visual inspection
Scheduled pH and density
measurements.
Automated controls.
Cold Rinse water contaminated Visual inspection
Central System - Manual check
sheets as part of maintenance
schedule for the Water.
Scheduled pH and density
measurements.
Automated controls.
Hot (drying) water contaminated Visual inspection
Central System - Manual check
sheets as part of maintenance
schedule for the Water.
Wash cycle does not complete
Controlled by program. Visual inspection
(washing machine)
Wash cycle not initiated (washing
Controlled by program. Visual inspection
machine)
Solution levels too low (washing Templates for the correct solution
Visual inspection
machine) level depending on the parts
Asset care and regular filter
changes.
Blocked wash filters (washing Ensure filtration system is adequate Visual inspection
machine) for the amount of material being
removed.
Air entrapment (washing machine) Visual inspection
Tagging system to identify
Incorrect wash programme selected
component and auto-select Visual inspection
(washing machine)
program.
Obscured surfaces (washing
Visual inspection
machine)
Test piece run prior to processing
Incorrect chemical selected Visual inspection
the component
Contaminated drying environment Visual inspection

Date Created: 09/03/2017 Creator: Ong, Chun-Ho Generated by ReliaSoft's RBI Software http://www.ReliaSoft.com
Date: 03/14/2021
Page 7 of 7
Requirements (Product
Potential Failure Mode Potential Cause(s) of Failure Control (Prevention) Control (Detection)
Characteristics)
What is the Product Characteristic What could be wrong with the 1st level why of the 5 whys (the top Typical provention controls used to How would we detect that the
we need to achieve during the Product Characteristic (hole too big, things we would look at)…if I get avoid potential causes occuring failure mode has occurred
process (diameter, depth, length, hole too small, CME outside spec, this occuring when I use this FMEA
radius, CME, surface finish, too rough surface finish) then I need an improvement
metallurgy standard, adhesion, activitiy that would understand root
residual stress, coverage etc - or cause and close out plan.
avoid such as damage, weld spatter
etc)
Inadequate part protection during Dedicated Fixturing.
5.2.7.2. Damage free Damage - In Process Visual inspection
process - multiple parts

Date Created: 09/03/2017 Creator: Ong, Chun-Ho Generated by ReliaSoft's RBI Software http://www.ReliaSoft.com

You might also like