Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form (IPCRF) for T I-III

(SY 2020-2021) In the Time of COVID-19

Name of Employee: TOTOL, MARIS D. Name of Rater: MONCERA, RODNEL A.

Position: Teacher I Position: T-III / Teacher-In-Charge
Bureau/Center/Service/School: CUSTODIO CASTRO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL School Head: MONCERA, RODNEL A.
Rating Period: S.Y. 2020-2021 Date of Review:

KRAs Outputs Objectives Performance Indicators Weight per Objective Rating Score* Total
(Rating x
Quality Weight)

1. Content 2 Classroom Observation 1. Applied The average transmuted rating for the 8.18%
Knowledge and Tool (COT) rating sheet Knowledge of indicator:
Pedagogy or inter-observer agreement form content 4.50-5.00-5
(online, video lesson, demonstration lesson) within and across 3.50-4.49-4
curriculum teaching 2.50-3.49-3 1.64%
area 1.50-2.49-2
1.00-1.49-1

1.Printouts of screenshot or an analogous -Correctness of the responses of the 6.54%

documentation of responses of the teacher to teacher to the questions or queries of
questions or queries of the parents and/or the parents and/or learners on the
learners on the specific contents of DepEd- specific contents of DepEd-developed
developed SLMs SLMs

2.Feedback Form or other equivalent tools
where the teacher responds to questions or
queries of the parents and/or learners on the
specific contents of DepEd-developed SLMs
3.Teacher-made Learning Activity Sheets
intended to simplify, further explain, and/or
provide more examples on a specific content
found in the DepEd-developed SLMs
6 MOVs per quarter (24 for the whole
year)
Example: 24 printouts of screenshots of
the conversation of the teacher and 24
different parents/learners on a specific
content of the SLM or to a
parent/learner on 24 different contents

4.Recorded video or audio materials

intending to explain the content of the Combination of any of the possible
DepEd-developed SLMs MOVs is allowed.
Example:
5.Parent Guide or Toolkit on how to assist 8 printouts of screenshots,
Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form (IPCRF) for T I-III Page | 1
 the child in learning the content of the
DepEd-developed SLMs
-Other equivalent MOVs as may be agreed
upon by the ratee and the rater (must be
forwarded to the Division PMT thru the
Secretariat for approval)
1.Teacher-made Learning Activity Sheets
acknowledging the sources of content and
images used
2.Teacher-made audio or video lessons
3.Copy of a monitoring form or an equivalent
tool that the school head or the master
teacher, as rater, uses to ensure that the
teacher contribute to the printing of SLMs to
ensure availability of such materials during
the scheduled distribution
4.Printouts of screenshot of group chats
created by the teacher or other online
platforms that the teacher uses for engaging
learners in meaningful conversations
-Other equivalent MOVs as may be agreed
upon by the ratee and the rater (must be
forwarded to the Division PMT thru the
Secretariat for approval)
Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form (IPCRF) for T I-III
12 different Feedback Forms,
15 Teacher-made Learning Activity
Sheets on 15 different contents
Note: MOV with wrong response or
which introduces a misconception or
not related to a specific content of the
DepEd-developed SLMs will not be
accepted as valid MOV
Example: A printout of a screenshot
where the teacher responds to the
query of a parent on the question on the
distribution and retrieval of SLMs
Scoring Guide:
33-40 valid MOVs--------------5 pts
25-32 valid MOVs--------------4 pts
24 valid MOVs------------------3 pts
16-23 valid MOVs-------------2 pts
Below 16 valid MOVs -------1 pt
2. Ensured the (Ensured that the 8.18% 8.18%
positive ICT used redefine and
use of ICT to transform learning
facilitate the experiences and are documented
teaching and properly and
learning consistently using any
process referencing style as shown in the
submitted learning material)
1.Scoring Guide if Teacher-made
Learning Activity Sheets (LASs) are
presented as MOVs :
20 or more LASs with proper
acknowledgement of sources – 5pts
16-19 more LASs with proper
acknowledgement of sources – 4pts
10-15 more LASs with proper
acknowledgement of sources – 3pts
5-9 more LASs with proper
acknowledgement of sources – 2pts
4 or less LASs with proper
acknowledgement of sources – 1pt
2.Scoring Guide if Teacher-made
audio or video lessons are presented as
MOVs
-provided 6 quality audio or video
lessons-5 pts
-provided 5 quality audio or video
lessons-4 pts
Page | 2
 -provided 4 quality audio or video
lessons-3 pts
provided 3 quality audio or video
lessons-2 pts
provided 2 quality audio or video
lessons-1 pt

3.Scoring Guide for the teacher’s

contribution in the printing of SLMs
-Printed assigned SLMs using personal
ICT equipment (computer/laptop,
printer) with certification from the
school head or master teacher – 5 pts
-Printed assigned SLMs with assistance
from others (technical or resources)-3
pts

4.Scoring Guide if the printouts of

screenshots of group chat created or
other platforms used purposely for
teaching-learning process

Group chat is created or started using

other platforms on October-5 pts
November-4 pts
December-3 pts
January-2 pts
February and most recent-1 pt

Accumulation of the scores for the

possible MOVs is allowed but the final
score of the teacher for the objective
must not exceed 5 pts.

Example:
The teacher’s score for the following
MOVs presented:
Teacher-made LAS – 3 pts
Printing of SLMs – 5 pts
Total – 8 pts
Final score in the objective: 5 pts
2 Classroom Observation 3. Applied a The average transmuted rating for the 8.18%
Tool (COT) rating sheet range of teaching indicator:
or inter-observer agreement form strategies to develop 4.50-5.00-5
(online, video lesson, demonstration lesson) critical and creative 3.50-4.49-4 1.64%
thinking, as well as 2.50-3.49-3
other higher-order 1.50-2.49-2
thinking skills 1.00-1.49-5

Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form (IPCRF) for T I-III Page | 3
 1.Teacher-made Learning Activity Sheets
intended to improve the presentation or
contextualize of a particular page or section
in the SLMs so that the learners become more
engaged with the material (indicate the page
or section)
2.Documentation of strategies adopted to
ensure 100% access to DepEd-developed
SLMs and Teacher-made Learning Activity
Sheet
3.Copy of a monitoring form or an equivalent
tool that the school head or the master
teacher, as rater, uses to ensure that the
teacher finds ways for the learners to have
access to the DepEd-developed SLMs and
Teacher-made Learning Activity Sheet
-Other equivalent MOVs as may be agreed
upon by the ratee and the rater (must be
forwarded to the Division PMT thru the
Secretariat for approval)
Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form (IPCRF) for T I-III
(Applied teaching strategies that
challenge learners to draw conclusions
and justify their thinking or put parts
together to promote deeper
understanding of ideas learned as
shown in the submitted learning
material).
1.4 -Teacher-made Learning Activity
Sheets (LASs) per quarter intended to 6.54%
improve the presentation or
contextualize of a particular page or
section in the SLMs so that the learners
become more engaged with the material
(16 for the whole year)
Scoring Guide if Teacher-made
Learning Activity Sheets (LASS)are
presented as MOVs
Note:
21or more valid MOVs----5 pts
17-20 valid MOVs -----------4 pts
16 valid MOVs----------------3 pts
15-12 valid MOVs----------2 pts
Below 12 MOVs------------1 pt
2.Scoring Guide if the teacher claims
to have ensured that learners have
access to DepEd-developed SLMs or
Teacher-made Learning Activity
Sheets; the MOVs presented shows
that:
-100% of learners have access to
SLMs or LASs--------------------5 pts
-91%1-99% of learners have access to
SLMs or LASs ------4 pts
-81%-90% of learners have access to
SLMs or LASs ------3 pts
-71%-80% of learners have access to
SLMs or LASs ------2 pts
-below 71% of learners have access to
SLMs or LASs -------1 pt
Note :Accumulation of the scores for
the possible MOVs is allowed but the
final score of the teacher for the
objective must not exceed 5 pts.
Page | 4
 Example:
The teacher’s score for the following
MOVs presented:
Teacher-made LAS – 2 pts
Only 78% of his/her learners have
access to SLMs or LASs as per MOV
presented – 2 pts
Total -------------------– 4 pts
Final score in the objective: 4 pts
2. Diversity of Teacher-made Learning Activity 4. Established a (Utilized effective teaching strategies
Learners & Sheets(LASs) intended to contextualize of a learner-centered that are appropriate
Assessment and particular page or section in the DepEd- culture by in responding to learners’
Reporting developed SLMs so that the examples, using teaching linguistic, cultural, socioeconomic, or
illustrations, language level, medium of strategies that religious backgrounds at
instruction used are appropriate and respond to their an individual level as shown
meaningful to the experiences and context of linguistic, in the submitted learning materials)
the learners cultural,
socioeconomic 4 Teacher-made Learning Activity
-Other equivalent MOVs as may be agreed and religious Sheets intended contextualize of a
upon by the ratee and the rater (must be backgrounds particular page or section in the DepEd-
forwarded to the Division PMT thru the developed SLMs so that the examples, 8.18% 8.18%
Secretariat for approval) illustrations, language level, medium of
instruction used are appropriate and
meaningful to the experiences and
context of the learners
(16 for the whole year)
Note:
21-24 valid MOVs-------------5 pts
17-20 valid MOVs-------------4 pts
16 valid MOVs-----------------3 pts
12-15 valid MOVs------------2 pts
Below 12------------------------1 pt
1.Documentation of strategies adopted to 5. Planned and Scoring Guide if the teacher claims to 8.18%
ensure 100% of the learners have access to delivered have ensured that learners have access
DepEd-developed SLMs Teacher-made teaching strategies to DepEd-developed SLMs or Teacher-
Learning Activity Sheets that made Learning Activity Sheets; the
are responsive to the MOVs presented shows that:
2. Copy of a monitoring form or an special -100% of learners have access to SLMs
equivalent tool that the school head or the educational needs of or LASs-----------------------5 pts
master teacher, as rater, uses to ensure that learners in -9%1-99% of learners have access to
the teacher finds ways for the learners to have difficult SLMs or LASs -------4 pts
access to the DepEd-developed SLMs and circumstances, -81%-90% of learners have access to
Teacher-made Learning Activity Sheet including: SLMs or LASs -------3 pts
geographic -71%-80% of learners have access to
3. Accomplished anecdotal records of isolation; SLMs or LASs -------2 pts
learners under difficult circumstances or chronic illness; -below 71% of learners have access to
Individual Learners Monitoring Form (ILMP) displacement due to SLMs or LASs -------1 pt
armed conflict,
Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form (IPCRF) for T I-III Page | 5
 4. Documentation of monitoring the tuning in
of learners to RBI Episodes
5.Documentation of the utilized two-way
radio or any available communication
platforms to deliver the contents of DepEd-
developed SLMs and Teacher-made
--Other equivalent MOVs as may be agreed
upon by the ratee and the rater (must be
forwarded to the Division PMT thru the
Secretariat for approval)
1.Feedback forms where the teacher specifies
the strengths and areas of improvement of the
learners with recommendations to the learners
and their parents on the possible interventions
or remediations that can be undertaken to
address the areas for improvement
2.Class records, Tracking Forms or
equivalent tools showing Learners’ Progress
3.Samples of Learners’ Outputs with
Teacher’s Comments and Parent’s
concurrence
4.Copy of a monitoring form or an equivalent
tool that the school head or the master
teacher, as rater, uses to ensure that the
teacher is tracking the progress of the leaners
and providing them and their parents with
timely, accurate, and constructive feedback
--Other equivalent MOVs as may be agreed
upon by the ratee and the rater (must be
forwarded to the Division PMT thru the
Secretariat for approval)
Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form (IPCRF) for T I-III
urban Scoring Guide if the other possible
resettlement or MOVs are used
disasters; child 6 other possible MOVs ----– 5 pts
abuse and child 5 other possible MOVs ----– 4 pts
labor practices 4 other possible MOVs ----– 2 pts
2 or less other possible MOVs – 1 pt
6. Used strategies Scoring Guide : 8.18% 8.18%
for providing 3 of the possible MOVs for tracking
timely, accurate and learners’ progress and providing
constructive feedback submitted 5 days before the
feedback to deadline as agreed by the rater and rater-
improve learner 5 pts
performance -3 of the possible MOVs for tracking
learners’ progress and providing
feedback submitted 1-4 days before the
deadline as agreed by the rater and rater-
4 pts
-3 of the possible MOVs for tracking
learners’ progress and providing
feedback submitted on the deadline as
agreed by the rater and rater-3 pts
- 3 of the possible MOVs for tracking
learners’ progress and providing
feedback submitted 1-4 days after the
deadline as agreed by the rater and rater-
2 pts
-3 of the possible MOVs for tracking
learners’ progress and providing
feedback submitted 5 days or more after
the deadline as agreed by the rater and
rater-1 pt
-2 of the possible MOVs for tracking
learners’ progress and providing
feedback submitted 1-4 days before the
deadline as agreed by the rater and rater-
4 pts
-2 of the possible MOVs for tracking
learners’ progress and providing
feedback submitted on the deadline as
agreed by the rater and rater-3 pts
- 2 of the possible MOVs for tracking
Page | 6
 learners’ progress and providing
feedback submitted 1-4 days after the
deadline as agreed by the rater and rater-
2 pts
-2 of the possible MOVs for tracking
learners’ progress and providing
feedback submitted 5 days or more after
the deadline as agreed by the rater and
rater-1 pt

-1 of the possible MOVs for tracking

learners’ progress and providing
feedback submitted 5 days before the
deadline as agreed by the rater and rater-
3 pts
-1 of the possible MOVs for tracking
learners’ progress and providing
feedback submitted 1-4 days before the
deadline as agreed by the rater and rater-
2 pts
-1 of the possible MOVs for tracking
learners’ progress and providing
feedback submitted on the deadline as
agreed by the rater and rater-1 pt

3.Curriculum and 2 Classroom Observation 7. Selected, The average transmuted rating for the
Planning Tool (COT) rating sheet developed, indicator:
or inter-observer agreement form (online, organized and used 4.50-5.00-5
video lesson, demonstration lesson ) appropriate 3.50-4.49-4
teaching and 2.50-3.49-3
learning resources, 1.50-2.49-2
including ICT, 1.00-1.49-1
to address learning
goals
1.64%

8.18%

1. Teacher-made Learning Activity Sheets

intended to modify the content, presentation,
or learning activities included in a particular
page or section in the DepEd-developed 1 activity sheet per quarter intended to
SLMs modify the content, presentation, or
learning activities included in a 6.54%
2. Documentation of the provided appropriate particular page or section in the

Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form (IPCRF) for T I-III Page | 7
 additional learning resources to learners other
than the DepEd-developed SLMs and the
Teacher-made Learning Activity Sheets
(examples: coloring materials, tablets,
cartolina and the like)
--Other equivalent MOVs as may be agreed
upon by the ratee and the rater (must be
forwarded to the Division PMT thru the
Secretariat for approval)
Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form (IPCRF) for T I-III
DepEd-developed SLMs (4 for the
whole year)
Scoring Guide of the Teacher-made
LASs are used as MOVs
6 or more MOVs------------5 pts
5 MOVs------------------------4 pts
4 MOVs-----------------------3 pts
3 MOVs-----------------------2 pts
2 or less MOVs------------1 pt
1 type of additional learning resource
provided per quarter (4 for the whole
year)
Scoring Guide if a documentation of
additional learning materials provided
to learners is presented
6 or more types of additional learning
materials provided to
learners-----------------------5 pts
5 types of additional learning materials
provided to learners –
-----------------------------------4 pts
4 types of additional learning materials
provided to learners –
-----------------------------------3 pts
3 types of additional learning materials
provided to learners –-
-----------------------------------2 pts
2 or less types of additional learning
materials provided to learners
-------------------------1 pt
Accumulation of the scores for the
possible MOVs is allowed but the final
score of the teacher for the objective
must not exceed 5 pts.
Example:
The teacher’s score for the following
MOVs presented:
Teacher-made LAS –--------- 3 pts
Additional learning materials – 2 pts
Total --------------------------5 pts
Final score in the objective: 5 pts
Page | 8
 1.Sample guide to the learners in organizing
their task for the week (e.g. Weekly Home
Learning Plan)
2.Weekly listing of the major outputs for the
students to submit for the week received and
signed by the parent and learner
--Other equivalent MOVs as may be agreed
upon by the ratee and the rater (must be
forwarded to the Division PMT thru the
Secretariat for approval)
8. Set achievable All of the learning outcomes set are 8.185 8.18%
and appropriate aligned with the learning competencies
learning outcomes as shown in the MOV submitted
that are aligned with
learning 8 sample guides provided per quarter
competencies (24 for the whole year)
33-40 valid MOVs---------------5 pts
25-32 valid MOVs---------------4 pts
24 valid MOVs--------------------3 pts
16-23 valid MOVs---------------2 pts
Below 16---------------------------1 pt
8 weekly listing of the major outputs
provided per quarter (24 for the whole
year)
33-40 valid MOVs---------------5 pts
25-32 valid MOVs---------------4 pts
24 valid MOVs-------------------3 pts
16-23 valid MOVs--------------2 pts
Below 16--------------------------1 pt

Accumulation of the scores for the

possible MOVs is allowed but the final
score of the teacher for the objective
must not exceed 5 pts.

Example:
The teacher’s score for the following
MOVs presented:
Sample Guide (WHLP) –----- 3 pts
Weekly Listing of Outputs –- 4 pts
Total ------------------------- 7 pts
Final score in the objective: 5 pts

4.Community 1.Documentation of Home visitation 9. Built (Sustained engagement 8.18% 8.18%

Linkages and 2.Directory of parents relationships with parents/ guardians
Professional 3.Group chat with parents with parents/ and/or wider school
Engagement & 4.Letters/Messages notifying parents on guardians and the community to facilitate
Personal Growth school related concerns wider school involvement in the educative
and Professional 5.Documentation of parent-teacher dialogue community to process as evidenced by a variety of
Development 6.Advocacy Mechanisms conducted facilitate MOVs)
(campaign for enrollment, learning modality) involvement in the
--Other equivalent MOVs as may be agreed educative process Scoring Guide
upon by the ratee and the rater (must be 6 of 6 different MOVs on building
forwarded to the Division PMT thru the relationships with parents – 5 pts
Secretariat for approval) 5 of 6 different MOVs on building
relationships with parents – 4 pts
Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form (IPCRF) for T I-III Page | 9

Proof of application of learning from
professional development programs attended
such as but not limited to contextualized
learning materials, plans, learner’s tracking
tools, audio and video lessons
-Certificate of participation in the following
 webinar
 in a conference
 benchmarking activity
 school LAC session
 various INSET activities
Main MOV
Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form (IPCRF) for T I-III
4 of 6 different MOVs on building
relationships with parents – 3 pts
3 of 6 different MOVs on building
relationships with parents – 2 pts
2 or 1 of 6 different MOVs on building
relationships with parents – 1 pt
10. Participated (Participated in any professional 8.18% 8.18%
in professional network/activity that requires
networks to share output* ,(lesson plan, instructional
knowledge and materials, action plan, or any teaching
to enhance practice and learning-related materials )
and proof of implementation
** ( implemented action plan, lesson
plan executed in class, application
project), within the
School
Scoring Guide
3 proofs of application of learning from
professional development activities
attended in SY 2020-2021
---------------– 5 pts
2 proofs of application of learning from
professional development activities
attended in SY 2020-2021 –--------------
4 pts
1 proof of application of learning from
professional development activities
attended in SY 2020-2021
----------------------------– 3 pts
2 or more certificates of participation
to professional development programs
in SY 2020-2021 –--------------------- 2
pts
1 certificate of participation to a
professional development program in
SY 2020-2021 –- 1 pt
11. Developed a Scoring Guide 8.18% 8.18%
Page | 10
 -1 Individual Professional Development Plan personal -IPDP SY 2020-2021 with 3 proofs of
(IPDP) for SY 2020-2021 improvement implementation –--------- 5 pts
Supporting MOV: plan based on -IPDP SY 2020-2021 with 2 proofs of
Any document aligned reflection of implementation –--------- 4 pts
with the IPDP SY 2020-2021 such as one’s practice and -IPDP SY 2020-2021 with 1 proof of
• 2 Reflection of one’s ongoing implementation –------------- 3 pts
practice during LAC professional - IPDP SY 2020-2021 without proof of
session/s with proof of learning implementation –---------- 2 pts
attendance -No IPDP –------------------------- 1 pt
• 2 Reflection/Personal
Notes on Coaching and
Mentoring and/or Midyear
Review

Depends on what will be agreed upon by the 12. Performed Depends on what will be agreed upon 10.0% 10.00%
ratee and the rater as valid MOVs (must be various related by the ratee and the rater on how to
forwarded to the Division PMT thru the works/activities score the MOVs (must be forwarded to
Secretariat for approval) that contribute the Division PMT thru the Secretariat
to the teaching for approval)
learning
process
Over-all
Rating
I hereby certify that I fully understand what is required of me as a Teacher I and willingly We hereby certify that the Overall Rating of the Ratee reflected herein is product of a careful appraisal of the
commit to implement what have been stipulated and agreed upon in this document to the best evidences to support each rating and a thorough deliberation between the Ratee and the Rater.
of my ability.
Ratee: Rater:

Ratee : MARIS D. TOTOL RODNEL A. MONCERA

Teacher I T-III / Teacher-In-Charge
MARIS D. TOTOL
Teacher I
Date : ________________ Approving Authority:
Rater:
REYNALDO G. GICO, EdD, CESO VI
Schools Division Superintendent
RODNEL A. MONCERA Date: __________________________
T-III / Teacher-In-Charge
Date : ________________

Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form (IPCRF) for T I-III Page | 11