Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form (IPCRF) for T I-III

(SY 2020-2021) In the Time of COVID-19

Name of Employee: ______________________________________________________________ Name of Rater: _______________________________________________________________________________

Position: _________________________________________________________________________ Position: School Head: ________________________________________________________________________
Bureau/Center/Service/School: ___________________________________________________ Date of Review: _______________________________________________________________________________
Rating Period: S.Y. 2020-2021

KRAs Outputs Objectives Performance Indicators Weight per Objective Rating Score* Total
(Rating x
Quality Weight)

1. Content Knowledge 2 Classroom Observation 1. Applied The average transmuted rating for the 8.18%
and Pedagogy Tool (COT) rating sheet Knowledge of content indicator:
or inter-observer agreement form within and across 4.50-5.00-5
(online, video lesson, demonstration curriculum teaching 3.50-4.49-4
lesson) area 2.50-3.49-3 1.64%
1.50-2.49-2
1.00-1.49-5

1.Printouts of screenshot or an -Correctness of the responses of the 6.54%

analogous documentation of responses of teacher to the questions or queries of
the teacher to questions or queries of the the parents and/or learners on the
parents and/or learners on the specific specific contents of DepEd-developed
contents of DepEd-developed SLMs SLMs

2.Feedback Form or other equivalent 6 MOVs per quarter (24 for the whole
tools where the teacher responds to year)
questions or queries of the parents and/or
learners on the specific contents of Example: 24 printouts of screenshots of
DepEd-developed SLMs the conversation of the teacher and 24
different parents/learners on a specific
3.Teacher-made Learning Activity Sheets content of the SLM or to a
intended to simplify, further explain, parent/learner on 24 different contents
and/or provide more examples on a
specific content found in the DepEd- Combination of any of the possible
developed SLMs MOVs is allowed.
Example:
8 printouts of screenshots,
12 different Feedback Forms,
4.Recorded video or audio materials 15 Teacher-made Learning Activity
intending to explain the content of the Sheets on 15 different contents
DepEd-developed SLMs Note: MOV with wrong response or

5.Parent Guide or Toolkit on how to
assist the child in learning the content of
the DepEd-developed SLMs
-Other equivalent MOVs as may be
agreed upon by the ratee and the rater
(must be forwarded to the Division PMT
thru the Secretariat for approval)
1.Teacher-made Learning Activity Sheets
acknowledging the sources of content and
images used
2.Teacher-made audio or video lessons
3.Copy of a monitoring form or an
equivalent tool that the school head or the
master teacher, as rater, uses to ensure
that the teacher contribute to the printing
of SLMs to ensure availability of such
materials during the scheduled
distribution
4.Printouts of screenshot of group chats
created by the teacher or other online
platforms that the teacher uses for
engaging learners in meaningful
conversations
-Other equivalent MOVs as may be
agreed upon by the ratee and the rater
(must be forwarded to the Division PMT
thru the Secretariat for approval)
2. Ensured the positive
use of ICT to facilitate the
teaching and learning
process
which introduces a misconception or
not related to a specific content of the
DepEd-developed SLMs will not be
accepted as valid MOV
Example: A printout of a screenshot
where the teacher responds to the
query of a parent on the question on the
distribution and retrieval of SLMs
Scoring Guide:
33-40 valid MOVs--------------5 pts
25-32 valid MOVs--------------4 pts
24 valid MOVs------------------3 pts
16-23 valid MOVs-------------2 pts
Below 16 valid MOVs -------1 pt
(Ensured that the 8.18% 8.18%
ICT used redefine and
transform learning
experiences and are documented
properly and
consistently using any
referencing style as shown in the
submitted learning material)
1.Scoring Guide if Teacher-made
Learning Activity Sheets (LASs) are
presented as MOVs :
20 or more LASs with proper
acknowledgement of sources – 5pts
16-19 more LASs with proper
acknowledgement of sources – 4pts
10-15 more LASs with proper
acknowledgement of sources – 3pts
5-9 more LASs with proper
acknowledgement of sources – 2pts
4 or less LASs with proper
acknowledgement of sources – 1pt
2.Scoring Guide if Teacher-made
audio or video lessons are presented as
MOVs
-provided 6 quality audio or video
lessons-5 pts
-provided 5 quality audio or video
lessons-4 pts
-provided 4 quality audio or video
lessons-3 pts
provided 3 quality audio or video
lessons-2 pts
 provided 2 quality audio or video
lessons-1 pt

3.Scoring Guide for the teacher’s

contribution in the printing of SLMs
-Printed assigned SLMs using personal
ICT equipment (computer/laptop,
printer) with certification from the
school head or master teacher – 5 pts
-Printed assigned SLMs with assistance
from others (technical or resources)-3
pts

4.Scoring Guide if the printouts of

screenshots of group chat created or
other platforms used purposely for
teaching-learning process

Group chat is created or started using

other platforms on October-5 pts
November-4 pts
December-3 pts
January-2 pts
February and most recent-1 pt

Accumulation of the scores for the

possible MOVs is allowed but the final
score of the teacher for the objective
must not exceed 5 pts.

Example:
The teacher’s score for the following
MOVs presented:
Teacher-made LAS – 3 pts
Printing of SLMs – 5 pts
Total – 8 pts
Final score in the objective: 5 pts
2 Classroom Observation 3. Applied a The average transmuted rating for the
Tool (COT) rating sheet range of teaching indicator:
or inter-observer agreement form strategies to develop 4.50-5.00-5
(online, video lesson, demonstration critical and creative 3.50-4.49-4 1.64%
lesson) thinking, as well as other 2.50-3.49-3
higher-order 1.50-2.49-2
8.18%
thinking skills 1.00-1.49-5

1.Teacher-made Learning Activity Sheets (Applied teaching strategies that

intended to improve the presentation or challenge learners to draw conclusions
contextualize of a particular page or and justify their thinking or put parts
section in the SLMs so that the learners
become more engaged with the material
(indicate the page or section)
2.Documentation of strategies adopted to
ensure 100% access to DepEd-developed
SLMs and Teacher-made Learning
Activity Sheet
3.Copy of a monitoring form or an
equivalent tool that the school head or the
master teacher, as rater, uses to ensure
that the teacher finds ways for the
learners to have access to the DepEd-
developed SLMs and Teacher-made
Learning Activity Sheet
-Other equivalent MOVs as may be
agreed upon by the ratee and the rater
(must be forwarded to the Division PMT
thru the Secretariat for approval)
together to promote deeper
understanding of ideas learned as
shown in the submitted learning
material).
1.4 -Teacher-made Learning Activity
Sheets (LASs) per quarter intended to 6.54%
improve the presentation or
contextualize of a particular page or
section in the SLMs so that the learners
become more engaged with the material
(16 for the whole year)
Scoring Guide if Teacher-made
Learning Activity Sheets (LASS)are
presented as MOVs
Note:
21or more valid MOVs----5 pts
17-20 valid MOVs -----------4 pts
16 valid MOVs----------------3 pts
15-12 valid MOVs----------2 pts
Below 12 MOVs------------1 pt
2.Scoring Guide if the teacher claims
to have ensured that learners have
access to DepEd-developed SLMs or
Teacher-made Learning Activity
Sheets; the MOVs presented shows
that:
-100% of learners have access to
SLMs or LASs--------------------5 pts
-91%1-99% of learners have access to
SLMs or LASs ------4 pts
-81%-90% of learners have access to
SLMs or LASs ------3 pts
-71%-80% of learners have access to
SLMs or LASs ------2 pts
-below 71% of learners have access to
SLMs or LASs -------1 pt
Note :Accumulation of the scores for
the possible MOVs is allowed but the
final score of the teacher for the
objective must not exceed 5 pts.
Example:
The teacher’s score for the following
MOVs presented:
Teacher-made LAS – 2 pts

2. Diversity of Learners & Teacher-made Learning Activity
Assessment and Sheets(LASs) intended to contextualize
Reporting of a particular page or section in the
DepEd-developed SLMs so that the
examples, illustrations, language level,
medium of instruction used are
appropriate and meaningful to the
experiences and context of the learners
-Other equivalent MOVs as may be
agreed upon by the ratee and the rater
(must be forwarded to the Division PMT
thru the Secretariat for approval)
1.Documentation of strategies adopted to
ensure 100% of the learners have access
to DepEd-developed SLMs Teacher-
made Learning Activity Sheets
2. Copy of a monitoring form or an
equivalent tool that the school head or the
master teacher, as rater, uses to ensure
that the teacher finds ways for the
learners to have access to the DepEd-
developed SLMs and Teacher-made
Learning Activity Sheet
3. Accomplished anecdotal records of
learners under difficult circumstances or
Individual Learners Monitoring Form
(ILMP)
4. Documentation of monitoring the
tuning in of learners to RBI Episodes
4. Established a learner-
centered culture by
using teaching strategies
that
respond to their linguistic,
cultural, socioeconomic
and religious backgrounds
5. Planned and delivered
teaching strategies that
are responsive to the
special
educational needs of
learners in
difficult circumstances,
including: geographic
isolation;
chronic illness;
displacement due to
armed conflict, urban
resettlement or disasters;
child
abuse and child labor
practices
Only 78% of his/her learners have
access to SLMs or LASs as per MOV
presented – 2 pts
Total -------------------– 4 pts
Final score in the objective: 4 pts
(Utilized effective teaching strategies
that are appropriate
in responding to learners’
linguistic, cultural, socioeconomic, or
religious backgrounds at
an individual level as shown
in the submitted learning materials)
4 Teacher-made Learning Activity
Sheets intended contextualize of a
particular page or section in the DepEd-
developed SLMs so that the examples, 8.18% 8.18%
illustrations, language level, medium of
instruction used are appropriate and
meaningful to the experiences and
context of the learners
(16 for the whole year)
Note:
21-24 valid MOVs-------------5 pts
17-20 valid MOVs-------------4 pts
16 valid MOVs-----------------3 pts
12-15 valid MOVs------------2 pts
Below 12------------------------1 pt
Scoring Guide if the teacher claims to 8.18%
have ensured that learners have access
to DepEd-developed SLMs or Teacher-
made Learning Activity Sheets; the
MOVs presented shows that:
-100% of learners have access to SLMs
or LASs-----------------------5 pts
-9%1-99% of learners have access to
SLMs or LASs -------4 pts
-81%-90% of learners have access to
SLMs or LASs -------3 pts
-71%-80% of learners have access to
SLMs or LASs -------2 pts
-below 71% of learners have access to
SLMs or LASs -------1 pt
Scoring Guide if the other possible
MOVs are used
6 other possible MOVs ----– 5 pts
5 other possible MOVs ----– 4 pts
4 other possible MOVs ----– 2 pts
5.Documentation of the utilized two-way
radio or any available communication
platforms to deliver the contents of
DepEd-developed SLMs and Teacher-
made
--Other equivalent MOVs as may be
agreed upon by the ratee and the rater
(must be forwarded to the Division PMT
thru the Secretariat for approval)
1.Feedback forms where the teacher
specifies the strengths and areas of
improvement of the learners with
recommendations to the learners and their
parents on the possible interventions or
remediations that can be undertaken to
address the areas for improvement
2.Class records, Tracking Forms or
equivalent tools showing Learners’
Progress
3.Samples of Learners’ Outputs with
Teacher’s Comments and Parent’s
concurrence
4.Copy of a monitoring form or an
equivalent tool that the school head or the
master teacher, as rater, uses to ensure
that the teacher is tracking the progress of
the leaners and providing them and their
parents with timely, accurate, and
constructive feedback
--Other equivalent MOVs as may be
agreed upon by the ratee and the rater
(must be forwarded to the Division PMT
thru the Secretariat for approval)
2 or less other possible MOVs – 1 pt
6. Used strategies for Scoring Guide :
providing 3 of the possible MOVs for tracking
timely, accurate and learners’ progress and providing
constructive feedback to feedback submitted 5 days before the
improve learner deadline as agreed by the rater and rater-
performance 5 pts
-3 of the possible MOVs for tracking
learners’ progress and providing
feedback submitted 1-4 days before the
deadline as agreed by the rater and rater-
4 pts
-3 of the possible MOVs for tracking
learners’ progress and providing
feedback submitted on the deadline as
agreed by the rater and rater-3 pts
- 3 of the possible MOVs for tracking
learners’ progress and providing
feedback submitted 1-4 days after the
deadline as agreed by the rater and rater-
8.18% 8.18%
2 pts
-3 of the possible MOVs for tracking
learners’ progress and providing
feedback submitted 5 days or more after
the deadline as agreed by the rater and
rater-1 pt
-2 of the possible MOVs for tracking
learners’ progress and providing
feedback submitted 1-4 days before the
deadline as agreed by the rater and rater-
4 pts
-2 of the possible MOVs for tracking
learners’ progress and providing
feedback submitted on the deadline as
agreed by the rater and rater-3 pts
- 2 of the possible MOVs for tracking
learners’ progress and providing
feedback submitted 1-4 days after the
 deadline as agreed by the rater and rater-
2 pts
-2 of the possible MOVs for tracking
learners’ progress and providing
feedback submitted 5 days or more after
the deadline as agreed by the rater and
rater-1 pt

-1 of the possible MOVs for tracking

learners’ progress and providing
feedback submitted 5 days before the
deadline as agreed by the rater and rater-
3 pts
-1 of the possible MOVs for tracking
learners’ progress and providing
feedback submitted 1-4 days before the
deadline as agreed by the rater and rater-
2 pts
-1 of the possible MOVs for tracking
learners’ progress and providing
feedback submitted on the deadline as
agreed by the rater and rater-1 pt

3.Curriculum and 2 Classroom Observation 7. Selected, developed, The average transmuted rating for the
Planning Tool (COT) rating sheet organized and used indicator:
or inter-observer agreement form (online, appropriate 4.50-5.00-5
video lesson, demonstration lesson ) teaching and learning 3.50-4.49-4
resources, including ICT, 2.50-3.49-3
to address learning goals 1.50-2.49-2
1.00-1.49-5

1.64%

8.18%

1. Teacher-made Learning Activity

Sheets intended to modify the content,
presentation, or learning activities
included in a particular page or section in 1 activity sheet per quarter intended to
the DepEd-developed SLMs modify the content, presentation, or
learning activities included in a
2. Documentation of the provided particular page or section in the 6.54%
appropriate additional learning resources DepEd-developed SLMs (4 for the
to learners other than the DepEd- whole year)
developed SLMs and the Teacher-made Scoring Guide of the Teacher-made
Learning Activity Sheets (examples: LASs are used as MOVs
coloring materials, tablets, cartolina and 6 or more MOVs------------5 pts
the like) 5 MOVs------------------------4 pts
4 MOVs-----------------------3 pts
--Other equivalent MOVs as may be 3 MOVs-----------------------2 pts
agreed upon by the ratee and the rater 2 or less MOVs------------1 pt
(must be forwarded to the Division PMT
thru the Secretariat for approval) 1 type of additional learning resource
provided per quarter (4 for the whole
year)

Scoring Guide if a documentation of

additional learning materials provided
to learners is presented

6 or more types of additional learning

materials provided to
learners-----------------------5 pts
5 types of additional learning materials
provided to learners –
-----------------------------------4 pts
4 types of additional learning materials
provided to learners –
-----------------------------------3 pts
3 types of additional learning materials
provided to learners –-
-----------------------------------2 pts
2 or less types of additional learning
materials provided to learners
-------------------------1 pt

Accumulation of the scores for the

possible MOVs is allowed but the final
score of the teacher for the objective
must not exceed 5 pts.

Example:
The teacher’s score for the following
MOVs presented:
Teacher-made LAS –--------- 3 pts
Additional learning materials – 2 pts
Total --------------------------5 pts
Final score in the objective: 5 pts

1.Sample guide to the learners in 8. Set achievable and All of the learning outcomes set are 8.185 8.18%
organizing their task for the week (e.g. appropriate learning aligned with the learning competencies
Weekly Home Learning Plan) outcomes that are aligned as shown in the MOV submitted

2.Weekly listing of the major outputs for
the students to submit for the week
received and signed by the parent and
learner
--Other equivalent MOVs as may be
agreed upon by the ratee and the rater
(must be forwarded to the Division PMT
thru the Secretariat for approval)
4.Community Linkages 1.Documentation of Home visitation
and Professional 2.Directory of parents
Engagement & Personal 3.Group chat with parents
Growth and Professional 4.Letters/Messages notifying parents on
Development school related concerns
5.Documentation of parent-teacher
dialogue
6.Advocacy Mechanisms conducted
(campaign for enrollment, learning
modality)
--Other equivalent MOVs as may be
agreed upon by the ratee and the rater
(must be forwarded to the Division PMT
thru the Secretariat for approval)
with learning
competencies 8 sample guides provided per quarter
(24 for the whole year)
33-40 valid MOVs---------------5 pts
25-32 valid MOVs---------------4 pts
24 valid MOVs--------------------3 pts
16-23 valid MOVs---------------2 pts
Below 16---------------------------1 pt
8 weekly listing of the major outputs
provided per quarter (24 for the whole
year)
33-40 valid MOVs---------------5 pts
25-32 valid MOVs---------------4 pts
24 valid MOVs-------------------3 pts
16-23 valid MOVs--------------2 pts
Below 16--------------------------1 pt
Accumulation of the scores for the
possible MOVs is allowed but the final
score of the teacher for the objective
must not exceed 5 pts.
Example:
The teacher’s score for the following
MOVs presented:
Sample Guide (WHLP) –----- 3 pts
Weekly Listing of Outputs –- 4 pts
Total ------------------------- 7 pts
Final score in the objective: 5 pts
9. Built relationships (Sustained engagement 8.18% 8.18%
with parents/ guardians with parents/ guardians
and the wider school and/or wider school
community to facilitate community to facilitate
involvement in the involvement in the educative
educative process process as evidenced by a variety of
MOVs)
Scoring Guide
6 of 6 different MOVs on building
relationships with parents – 5 pts
5 of 6 different MOVs on building
relationships with parents – 4 pts
4 of 6 different MOVs on building
relationships with parents – 3 pts
3 of 6 different MOVs on building

Proof of application of learning from
professional development programs
attended such as but not limited to
contextualized learning materials, plans,
learner’s tracking tools, audio and video
lessons
-Certificate of participation in the
following
 webinar
 in a conference
 benchmarking activity
 school LAC session
 various INSET activities
Main MOV
-1 Individual Professional Development
Plan (IPDP) for SY 2020-2021
Supporting MOV:
Any document aligned
with the IPDP SY 2020-2021 such as
• 2 Reflection of one’s
relationships with parents – 2 pts
2 or 1 of 6 different MOVs on building
relationships with parents – 1 pt
10. Participated (Participated in any professional 8.18% 8.18%
in professional network/activity that requires
networks to share output* ,(lesson plan, instructional
knowledge and materials, action plan, or any teaching
to enhance practice and learning-related materials )
and proof of implementation
** ( implemented action plan, lesson
plan executed in class, application
project), within the
School
Scoring Guide
3 proofs of application of learning from
professional development activities
attended in SY 2020-2021
---------------– 5 pts
2 proofs of application of learning from
professional development activities
attended in SY 2020-2021 –--------------
4 pts
1 proof of application of learning from
professional development activities
attended in SY 2020-2021
----------------------------– 3 pts
2 or more certificates of participation
to professional development programs
in SY 2020-2021 –--------------------- 2
pts
1 certificate of participation to a
professional development program in
SY 2020-2021 –- 1 pt
11. Developed a Scoring Guide 8.18% 8.18%
personal improvement -IPDP SY 2020-2021 with 3 proofs of
plan based on reflection implementation –--------- 5 pts
of -IPDP SY 2020-2021 with 2 proofs of
one’s practice and implementation –--------- 4 pts
ongoing -IPDP SY 2020-2021 with 1 proof of
professional learning implementation –------------- 3 pts
- IPDP SY 2020-2021 without proof of
 practice during LAC implementation –---------- 2 pts
session/s with proof of -No IPDP –------------------------- 1 pt
attendance
• 2 Reflection/Personal
Notes on Coaching and
Mentoring and/or Midyear
Review

Depends on what will be agreed upon by 12. Performed Depends on what will be agreed upon 10.0% 10.00%
the ratee and the rater as valid MOVs various related by the ratee and the rater on how to
(must be forwarded to the Division PMT works/activities score the MOVs (must be forwarded to
thru the Secretariat for approval) that contribute the Division PMT thru the Secretariat
to the teaching learning for approval)
process
Over-all
Rating
I hereby certify that I fully understand what is required of me as a Teacher (I,II,III) and willingly We hereby certify that the Overall Rating of the Ratee reflected herein is product of a careful appraisal of the
commit to implement what have been stipulated and agreed upon in this document to the best of my evidences to support each rating and a thorough deliberation between the Ratee and the Rater.
ability.
Ratee: Rater:

Ratee : NAME OF TEACHER NAME OF SCHOOL HEAD

Position Position
NAME OF TEACHER
Position
Date : ________________ Approving Authority:
Rater:
NAME OF APPROVING AUTHORITY
Position
NAME OF SCHOOL HEAD
Position
Date : ________________ Date: __________________________