Total No.

of Sheets 8
FUTONG JETTY
PILE ECCENTRICTY CHECK AND REVIEW OF RECTIFICATION METHOD
INTERIM REPORT 1
(Volume 01 of 01)
0 FOR CLIENT REVIEW 19 JAN 2021 ACK LEO CKS
Rev. DESCRIPTION DATE BY CHECKED APPROVED
Owner: APRILASIA (PT. RIAU ANDALAN PULP AND PAPER) Project No: ES 2028
Client: APRILASIA (PT. RIAU ANDALAN PULP AND PAPER)
Project Ref.
No.:
-
Doc. No: ES2028-REP-01
ENGINEERS 9000 PTE LTD
Blk 211 Henderson Road
#12-01 Henderson Industrial Park
Singapore 159552
Tel: 6275 9000 Fax: 6275 7600
Email: e9000@e9000.com.sg
CONTENTS

1
INTRODUCTION.......................................................................
.......................................................3
2 REVIEW
PROCESS............................................................................
...............................................3
3 DESIGN BASIS
REVIEW ............................................................................
........................................5

3.1 DESIGN CODES AND

STANDARDS .........................................................................
..................5

3.2 DESIGN LOAD AND

COMBINATION........................................................................
................. 6

3.3 PILE
DESIGN.............................................................................
...............................................6
4 IN-
HOUSECALCULATIONANDRECTIFICATIONREVIEW.............................................
....................7
5
PROGRESS ..........................................................................
............................................................8
6
CLARIFICATION......................................................................
.........................................................8
7
CONCLUSION.........................................................................
.........................................................8

2| Page
1 INTRODUCTION

Upon completion of Futong Jetty Extension, Aprilasia (PT. Riau Andalan Pulp and
Paper,
abbreviated as RAPP) as the owner of the said jetty, decided to carry out
engineering evaluation
to assess the structural adequacy of constructed jetty due to excessive pile
eccentricity and
inclination. From the latest report submitted by contractor, it is known that
significant number
of the constructed piles have exceeding their allowable limit as specified by the
Jetty�s design
consultant. Hence, there is a concern with regards to the Jetty�s structural
safety.

In order to address the concern, RAPP civil design team has carried out analysis &
design
check and produce a rectification proposal. To review and validate the proposal,
RAPP engaged
M/s Engineers 9000 Pte Ltd to perform independent analysis and review on their
proposal, if
the proposal is found to be not adequate, E9000 will propose enhancement to the
original
proposal. Analysis and design check will be carried out based on as-built
information that was
provided to us on 31st Dec 2021.

As the work is tedious and complex and the jetty platform structure is
significantly large, we
proposed to work by stages as stated in the following chapter. This interim report
is serves as
progress report to client and will be updated in future once we obtain analysis
results from our
independent model.

2 REVIEW PROCESS

Steps of our review process of reviewing through all the documents and drawings
provided,
listing all the information that were provided.

1) Review as-built drawings and other relevant documents provided by client.

2) Review design basis.
3) Review in-house calculation and rectification proposal provided.
4) Modelling and calculation of the jetty with the actual conditions as per
info/data provided

by client.
5) Upon re-modelling, review the original rectification design approach and propose
a
rectification plan as necessary.
6) Preparation of final report.

Below is the list of documents received via email dated 31/12/2020.

A.
As-built drawings (all file is in PDF UOS)
1) 1091-C-1121 rev.2.1 Jetty head-Piling layout plan_RHDV
2) 1091-C-1122 Jetty head-pile details D800-120_RHDHV
3) 1091-C-1123 Jetty head-pile details D1000-140_RHDHV
4) 1091-C-1124 Jetty head pile plug reinforcement_RHDV
5) 1091-C-1130 rev.2.1 Jetty head-general arrangement_RHDHV
6) 1091-C-1131 Jetty head suggested construction sequence_RHDV
3| Page
7)
1091-C-1132 Jetty head-typical sections (sheet 1)_RHDHV

8)
1091-C-1133 Jetty head-typical sections (sheet 2)_RHDHV

9)
1091-C-1134 Jetty head-typical sections (sheet 3)_RHDHV

10) 1091-C-1135 Jetty head-furniture details_RHDHV

11) 1091-C-1136 rev.2.1 Jetty head pc pile cap unit layout_RHDV

12) 1091-C-1137 rev.2.1 Jetty head-pc beam unit layout_RHDHV

13) 1091-C-1138 Jetty head-pc plank unit layout_RHDHV

14) 1091-C-1139 rev.2.1 Jeety head pc pilecap & fender beam unit details_RHDV

15) 1091-C-1140 Jetty head-PC beam unit details sheet 1_RHDV

16) 1091-C-1141 Jetty head-PC beam unit details sheet 2_RHDV

17) 1091-C-1142 Jetty head-pc plank unit details (sheet 1)_RHDHV

18) 1091-C-1143 Jetty head-pc plank unit details (sheet 2)_RHDHV

19) 1091-C-1144 Jetty head-pc plank unit details (sheet 3)_RHDHV

20) 1091-C-1145 rev.2.1 Jetty head pc pilecap unit reinforcement_RHDV

21) 1091-C-1146 Jetty head-PC fender block reinforcement_RHDV

22) 1091-C-1148 Jetty head-PC beam reinforcement TB1B_RHDV

23) 1091-C-1149 Jetty head-PC beam reinforcement TB2_RHDV

24) 1091-C-1150 Jetty head-PC beam reinforcement TB3_RHDV

25) 1091-C-1151 Jetty head-PC beam reinforcement TB3A_RHDV

26) 1091-C-1152 jetty head-pc plank reinforcement type 1A, 1B & type 2_RHDHV

27) 1091-C-1153 Jetty head-pc plank reinforcement type 3,3A, 3B & 3C_RHDHV

28) 1091-C-1154 Jetty head-typical in-situ transverse beam reinforcement (sheet

1)_RHDHV

29) 1091-C-1155 Jetty head-typical in-situ transverse beam reinforcement (sheet

2)_RHDHV

30) 1091-C-1156 Jetty head-typical in-situ transverse beam reinforcement (sheet

3)_RHDHV

31) 1091-C-1157 Jetty head-in-situ slab reinforcement (sheet 1)_RHDHV

32) 1091-C-1158 Jetty head-in-situ slab reinforcement (sheet 2)_RHDHV

33) 1091-C-1159 Jetty head-in-situ slab reinforcement (sheet 3)_RHDHV

34) 1091-C-1160 Jetty head-in-situ slab reinforcement (sheet 4)_RHDHV

35) 1091-C-1161 Jetty head-miscellaneous details_RHDHV

B.
Rectification sketches: (all file is in PDF UOS)
1) FJ-1000-C-0001-Layout
2) FJ-1000-C-SK-0001
3) FJ-1000-C-SK-0002
4) FJ-1000-C-SK-0003
5) FJ-1000-C-SK-0004
6) FJ-1000-C-SK-0005
7) FJ-1000-C-SK-0006
8) FJ-1000-C-SK-0007
9) FJ-1000-C-SK-0008
4| Page
10) FJ-1000-C-SK-0009
11) FJ-1000-C-SK-0010
12) FJ-1000-C-SK-0011
13) FJ-1000-C-SK-0012
14) FJ-1000-C-SK-0013

C.
Field survey(all file is in PDF UOS)
1) Firdaus piling2 16.12.20.dwg
2) horizontal eccentricity grid 1-10
3) horizontal eccentricity grid 11-20
4) horizontal eccentricity grid 21-30
5) VERTICAL 1-10
6) VERTICAL 11-20
7) VERTICAL 21-30
8) VERTICAL 31-40
D.
SITE VISIT REPORT OF EXTENDED PULP JETTY AT FUTONG PORT (151220)
Up to date, we have received 58 files (calculation and drawing) in total.

3 DESIGN BASIS REVIEW

The size of new Jetty Head is 200m x 25m, it was designed as a deck on piles
structure with
precast reinforced concrete beams and slabs standing on driven precast hollow spun
piles. It
was planned to cater for maximum container vessel size of 65,000DWT.

3.1 DESIGN CODES AND STANDARDS

The Euro Code was adopted in the original �Jetty Head -Superstructure Design
Report� as
shown below. There are more than 3000 load combinations were considered in the
design,
which should lead to more accurate and economical result.

The following codes, standards and guidelines used for berthing analysis.

� British Standards:
o BS EN-1990: Basis of Structural Design;
o BS EN-1991: Actions on Structures;
o BS EN-1992: Design of Concrete Structures;
o BS EN-1993: Design of Steel Structures;
o BS EN-1998: Seismic Design;
o BS 6349-1-1: Maritime works -General: Code of Practice for Planning and Design
for
Operations;
o BS 6349-1-2: Maritime works -General: Code of Practice for Assessment of Actions;
o BS
6349-1-4: Maritime works -General: Code of Practice for Materials;
5| Page
o BS 6349-2: Maritime works -Code of Practice for The Design of Quay Walls, Jetties
and
Dolphins;
� Other design supplementary design codes, standards and guidelines:
o SNI 03 1726-2012 Standar Perencanaan Ketahanan Gempa untuk Struktur Bangunan
Gedung dan Non-Gedung. Bandung: Badan Standarisasi Nasional Indonesia;
o JIS A 5373 Precast pre-stressed concrete product;
o ACI 543R-00 Design, manufacture and installation of concrete piles;
o ASCE/COPRI 61-14 Seismic Design of Piers and Wharves.
3.2 DESIGN LOAD AND COMBINATION
Design load considered in the original design is as follows:

� Dead loads:
� Live loads: New Jetty: 40kN/m2 , Trestle: 20kN/m2
� Equipment loads
� Mooring and berthing loads
� Environmental loads
� Seismic load.
We will adopt the above loads which have been derived by original designer into our
model.
3.3 PILE DESIGN
The original analysis was considering a range of fixity levels. The length of the
pile below the
level of seabed is represented in the model by applying a vertical spring stiffness
coefficient at
the node at the end of the pile element.

There are two size of piles used in this project. Below picture shows the size and
locations of
spun piles.

6| Page
IN-HOUSE CALCULATION AND RECTIFICATION REVIEW

We noted that there are only five load combination were considered according to SNI
Code
in the Site Visit and Rectification Report for Extended Pulp Jetty Futong Port.

Five load combinations for serviceability and ultimate limit state is shown as
below:

1. SLS1=1.0DL+1.0LL+1.0Ex
2. SLS2=1.0DL+1.0LL-1.0Ex
3. ULS1=1.2DL+1.6LL
4. ULS2=1.2DL+1.0LL+1.0Ex
5. ULS3=1.2DL+1.0LL-1.0Ex
In order to obtain a more accurate and economical result, we will be considered all
load
combinations required by Euro Code with actual as-built piles� eccentricities to
assess the
jetty structure and the proposed rectification, and provide modified rectification,
if required.

The computer analysis based on the SNI Code by the In-house engineering team is
adequate
for preliminary assessment, as it provides quick and simple approach by calculating
the load
taking using tributary area and ignoring horizontal load.

We envisage that the jetty design has to be re-modelled with the as-built pile
location due to
large eccentricity and the rectification solution could then be derived upon
obtaining
computer analysis results.

7| Page
5 PROGRESS

Basing on the information provided, we have now completed the 3D remodelling of the
jetty layout.
The next stage of work is to introduce pile eccentricity into the 3-D model and
analyse the impact to
jetty and the piles system.

6 CLARIFICATION

We noticed that there is discrepancy between as-built drawing and rectification

report with
regards to tie beam and piles position at GL 38-40/A. An email clarification has
been sent on
12/01/2021 the owner�s representative and we are waiting for a reply to move
further forward.
An early response would be greatly appreciated.

7 CONCLUSION

The next updated interim report will present the outcome on the study after the
completion of the 3-D
modelling design taking into consideration of the pile eccentricities.

8| Page