Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mackenzie Smith
EDU 105-47
Bloom’s Digital Taxonomy is a key model that holds importance and value to educators. With
this special model, educators are able to create meaningful lessons with the input of technology.
It is evident that with the infiltration of such technologies, students utilize their experiences and
develop higher-order thinking skills. Times are changing and technology is becoming more
popular each day. Since humans have such a deep connection with technology, it is promising
and critical that educators come to terms with updated styles of presenting information to their
students. It is well noted that using technology in the classroom helps students engage in their
work. The following will be a discussion assessing the use of Bloom’s Digital Taxonomy in the
classroom.
Assessment of Bloom’s Digital Taxonomy
According to the video regarding the topic of discussion, Bloom’s Digital Taxonomy was
first created in the 1950s by educational psychologist Benjamin Bloom (“What is Bloom's
Digital Taxonomy? YouTube”). It began as the following, in order from the lowest-order
analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. The three lower levels were the most basic levels of
cognition, where lower-order thinking skills were challenged and facilitated. The upper three
levels consist of higher-order thinking skills, which included abstract, critical metacognitive
creative thinking. Later during the 1990s, this platform of Bloom’s Taxonomy was updated by
David Krathwohl and Lorin Anderson (“What is Bloom's Digital Taxonomy? YouTube”). The
upgraded list is as follows, in order from the lowest-order thinking skills to the highest-order
thinking skills: remember, understand, apply, analyze, evaluate, and create. Bloom’s Digital
Taxonomy is essential for educators to identify students’ levels of thinking. Here, technology
guides instruction and engages learners. All in all, Bloom’s Cognitive Taxonomy is a scale of
increasingly complex levels of thinking where students evidently can demonstrate as they learn.
For the purpose of this assessment, an educator who teaches English could use Bloom’s
Digital Taxonomy to further engage and assess their students. Say that this specific English
educator were to teach a lesson about poems- the facilitator could use Bloom’s model categories
to instill new knowledge within their students. To begin, for the lower three steps: remembering,
understanding, and applying, the educator could use online tools such as Quizlet, Diigo, and
PowerPoint to help students captivate the information they have just learned. Quizlet will
facilitate “remembering” by allowing students to recall and memorize certain terms or key
elements of poems by using repetition while studying flashcards. Diigo will allow students to
engage in “understanding” by enforcing students to link articles, critiques, and evaluations of
poems being read in class. PowerPoint will encourage students to “apply” their knowledge that
they have learned so that they are able to present their findings to the class through a
presentation. These three online technology tools are assigned as promoting and assisting
students’ lower-order thinking skills. Moving on to the upper three categories: analyzing,
evaluating, and creating, these steps are the most crucial part in order for students to fully learn
the information to their potential. For “analyzing”, educators could use Survey Monkey as a way
to understand where each student is within the lesson and how comfortable they are with the
lesson’s information that is being taught. As for “evaluating”, students could collaborate with
other students on classwork assignments dealing with the topic of poetry through Google
Hangouts. “Creating” could lead the educator to assign students a final project where students
are able to choose a platform such as Screencast-o-matic, to create a voice-over where they read
a poem of their own that they have created. All digital platforms that have been mentioned
previously are great tools that surpass the criteria on the “Rubric for eLearning Tool Evaluation”
document. It is important that educators carefully choose the most beneficial and safe online
Like stated before, the educator could assess the students on poetry by creating projects
that require the use of PowerPoint or Screencast-o-matic, rather than traditionally assigning an
exam to complete on paper. Using the two online tools will further motivate and engage students
in the topic of discussion. Educators will be able to evaluate and rule whether students have
learned the material through the depths of the students’ presentations and projects. The specified
educator could potentially pick and choose which assignments will best be beneficial to
incorporate the use of technology throughout the lesson. Not every assignment needs the use of
technology. The educator will determine which steps of Bloom’s Digital Taxonomy will further
incorporation of technology in class. Using this model as a guideline is extremely crucial and
beneficial to both the educators and students. Establishing limits and strengths within the system
will allow for the ease and control of lessons throughout many school ages. It is evident that as
educators, new ideas and strategies are shared across the board in hopes of helping one another.
Together, educators can impact greatly the lives and futures of many students through simple
infiltrations as discussed.
References
Antsey, L. M., & Watson, G. P. L. (2018). Rubric for eLearning Tool Evaluation.
https://teaching.uwo.ca/pdf/elearning/Rubric-for-eLearning-Tool-Evaluation.pdf.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fqgTBwElPzU.