Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Section 2 Lecturer Ts. Dr. Rosnawati Binti Buhari Group Members
Section 2 Lecturer Ts. Dr. Rosnawati Binti Buhari Group Members
GROUP PROJECT
SECTION 2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 INTRODUCTION 1
2 OBJECTIVES 2
7 CONCLUSION 36
8 REFERENCES 37
9 APPENDIX 38-45
ABSTRACT
1
2. To investigate and identify the road defect of the road pavement at selected location.
3. To evaluate the causes of pavement distresses.
2
3.1 LITERATURE REVIEW
B. Longitudinal Cracks
Longitudinal cracks formed parallel to the center line of the road pavement.
This may caused by to poor constructed paving joint, asphalt layer shrinkage
and the cracks formed from an underlying layer.
3
C. Raveling
Raveling is caused by the dislodging of aggregate particles and wearing away
the pavement surface. Raveling looks like loose rocks and debris because the
asphalt may have raveling.
D. Bleeding
Bleeding occurs when film of asphalt binder appears on road surface.
Insufficient air void is one of the causes of bleeding. It usually creates a shiny,
glass-like reflecting surface.
Figure 4: Bleeding
E. Crescent-shaped cracks
Crescent-shaped cracks are half moon shaped cracks which having two ends
pointed away from the direction of traffic. Cracks is due braking or turning
wheels and cause the pavement surface to slide and deform.
4
Figure 6: Block Cracks
A. Alligator Cracks
Alligator cracks or Fatigue cracking is a series of interconnecting cracks
caused by fatigue failure of the asphalt concrete surface under repeated traffic
loading such as wheel paths.
B. Depression
Localized road sections with a slight depression, it causes roughness and
collects water which may lead to potholes.
C. Corrugation
Regular transverse undulations, closely alternate valleys and crests with wave
length. It usually caused by traffic action combined with an unstable pavement
surface.
Figure 7: Corrugation
D. Potholes
5
Bowl-shaped cavity in the pavement surface resulting from the loss of wearing
course and binder course materials. Measuring the pothole by counting the
number.
E. Shoving
Bulging of the road surface generally parallel to the direction of traffic or
horizontal displacement of surface material, mainly in the direction of traffic
where braking or acceleration movements c=occur, caused by traffic pushing
against the pavement.
F. Patch
Repair section of pavement where a portion of the pavement surface has been
removed and replaced. It may not be associated with either a loss of
serviceability.
Figure 8: Patch
4.1 METHODOLOGY
6
Figure 9: Study Area
START
Overviewtheprojecttask
Identifythestudyarea
DataCollection
ProvideFinal Report
7
Figure 9: Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Input
This project begins with identify the types of pavement distresses which occur
at selected road. Length, width, depth, diameter and area will be taken to measure
the distress. Quantity of the road distress is calculated. Types of distress is then
defined according to low, moderate or high level. When illustrating the collected
data, three aspect were identify which is composite index, types of distress present
and the rate of road condition. A sample unit is any identifiable area of the
pavement section. It is the smallest component of the pavement network. Each
pavement section is divided into sample units for the purpose of pavement
inspection.
8
Figure 10: Selection of the minimum number of sample units
N 10
Interval,I 2n
5
9
5.0 DATA ANALYSIS
ASPHALT SURFACED ROADS AND PARKING SKETCH
LOTS CONDITION SURVEY DATA SHEET
FOR SAMPLE UNIT
BRANCH: DATE:
01. Alligator Cracking (m2) 06. Depression (m2) 11. Patching & Utility Cut Patching ((m2) 16. Shoving (m2)
02. Bleeding (m2) 07. Edge Cracking (m) 12. Polished Aggregate (m2) 17. Slippage Cracking (m2)
03. Block Cracking (m2) 08. Joint Reflection Cracking (m) 13. Potholes (no.) 18. Swell (m2)
04. Bumps and Sags (m) 09. Lane/Shoulder Drop Off (m) 14. Railroad Crossing (m2) 19. Weathering/Ravelling (m2)
05. Corrugation (m2) 10. Longitudinal & Transverse Cracking (m) 15. Rutting (m2)
10
• Since the maximum allowable number of deduct values, m is 7.8, therefore only the 6th deduct values are selected, by multiplying by
(7.8 – 6 = 1.8).
26, 20, 18, 17, 5, (1.8*2 = 3.6)
11
DISTRES RELATED PICTURES
S
SURVEY
07L
13L
13 M
01M
02. Bleeding (m2) 07. Edge Cracking (m) 12. Polished Aggregate (m2) 17. Slippage Cracking (m2)
03. Block Cracking (m2) 08. Joint Reflection Cracking (m) 13. Potholes (no.) 18. Swell (m2)
04. Bumps and Sags (m) 09. Lane/Shoulder Drop Off (m) 14. Railroad Crossing (m2) 19. Weathering/Ravelling
(m2)
05. Corrugation (m2) 10. Longitudinal & Transverse Cracking (m) 15. Rutting (m2)
DISTRESS QUANTIT DENSITY DEDUCT
SURVEY TOTAL % VALUE
Y
10 L 7 5 6 18 18 12
13 L 1 1 1 3 3 36
13 M 1 1 1 31
14
• Since the maximum allowable number of deduct values, m is 6.9, therefore only the 7 th deduct values are selected, multiplying by (7 –
6.9 = 0.1).
• 36, 31, 25, 18, 12, 8, (0.1*2 = 0.2)
No. Deduct Values Total q CDV
36 31 25 18 12 8 0.2 130.2 7 62
1
36 31 25 18 12 8 2 132 6 64
2
36 31 25 18 12 2 2 126 5 66
3
36 31 25 18 2 2 2 116 4 68
4
36 31 25 2 2 2 2 100 3 64
5
36 31 2 2 2 2 2 77 2 54
6
36 2 2 2 2 2 2 48 1 50
7
2) Maximum corrected deduct value, CDV
15
RELATED PICTURES
DISTRES
S
SURVEY
13L
13 M
01. Alligator Cracking (m2) 06. Depression (m2) 11. Patching & Utility Cut Patching ((m2) 16. Shoving (m2)
02. Bleeding (m2) 07. Edge Cracking (m) 12. Polished Aggregate (m2) 17. Slippage Cracking (m2)
03. Block Cracking (m2) 08. Joint Reflection Cracking (m) 13. Potholes (no.) 18. Swell (m2)
04. Bumps and Sags (m) 09. Lane/Shoulder Drop Off (m) 14. Railroad Crossing (m2) 19. Weathering/Ravelling (m2)
05. Corrugation (m2) 10. Longitudinal & Transverse Cracking (m) 15. Rutting (m2)
18
• Since the maximum allowable number of deduct values, m is 5.7, therefore only the 6 th deduct values are selected, multiplying by (6 –
5.7 = 0.3).
• 38, 28, 20, 8, 7, (0.3*2 = 0.6)
Based on the rating for PCI value of 42, this section needs to major rehabilitation or deferred action.
19
DISTRES
01M RELATED PICTURES
S
SURVEY
19L
10L
07L
13M
01. Alligator Cracking (m2) 06. Depression (m2) 11. Patching & Utility Cut Patching ((m2) 16. Shoving (m2)
02. Bleeding (m2) 07. Edge Cracking (m) 12. Polished Aggregate (m2) 17. Slippage Cracking (m2)
03. Block Cracking (m2) 08. Joint Reflection Cracking (m) 13. Potholes (no.) 18. Swell (m2)
04. Bumps and Sags (m) 09. Lane/Shoulder Drop Off (m) 14. Railroad Crossing (m2) 19. Weathering/Ravelling (m2)
05. Corrugation (m2) 10. Longitudinal & Transverse Cracking (m) 15. Rutting (m2)
22
• Since the maximum allowable number of deduct values, m is 7.06, therefore only the 6 th deduct values are selected, multiplying by
(7.06 – 6 = 1.06),
• 34, 22, 15, 6, 5, ( 1.06*2 = 2.12)
No. Deduct Values Total q CDV
34 22 15 6 5 2.12 84.12 6 42
1
34 22 15 6 5 2 84 5 44
2
34 22 15 6 2 2 81 4 46
3
34 22 15 2 2 2 77 3 48
4
34 22 2 2 2 2 64 2 54
5
34 2 2 2 2 2 44 1 46
6
2) Maximum corrected deduct value, CDV
23
19 L
DISTRES RELATED PICTURES
S
SURVEY
10 L
01 M
07 L
13 M
01. Alligator Cracking (m2) 06. Depression (m2) 11. Patching & Utility Cut Patching ((m2) 16. Shoving (m2)
02. Bleeding (m2) 07. Edge Cracking (m) 12. Polished Aggregate (m2) 17. Slippage Cracking (m2)
03. Block Cracking (m2) 08. Joint Reflection Cracking (m) 13. Potholes (no.) 18. Swell (m2)
04. Bumps and Sags (m) 09. Lane/Shoulder Drop Off (m) 14. Railroad Crossing (m2) 19. Weathering/Ravelling (m2)
05. Corrugation (m2) 10. Longitudinal & Transverse Cracking (m) 15. Rutting (m2)
26
• Since the maximum allowable number of deduct values, m is 7.89, therefore only the 6 th deduct values are selected, multiplying by
(7.89 – 6 = 1.89),
• 25, 18, 10, 8, 7, ( 1.89*2 = 3.75)
Based on the rating for PCI value of 58, this section needs maintenance of rehabilitation.
27
RELATED PICTURES
DISTRESS
SURVEY
01L
07L
35
13L
13M
36
ESTIMATION OF RESURFACE CONSTRUCTION
1 250
2 250
3 250
4 250
5 250
TOTAL AREA = 250 + 250 + 250 + 250 + 250
= 1250
37
DISCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY RATES AMOUNT (RM)
ITEM
NO. (RM)
PV1 PAVEMENT
1.1 RESURFACING
38
1.1.3 2 1250 25.00 31250
Preparation of Formation as
specified and as directed by the
S.O. for receiving road pavement.
Total collection (RM) 35,375
39
2.1.1
COLLECTION
1.0A 35,375
2.0B 7,600
40
6.0 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATION
41
After collecting and summarizing the damage type, we have come up with a few
improvements and rehabilitation that will be needed to repair the road pavement. In order to
increase the strength of road, we can doubling the base or the sub-base thickness to distribute
a point load over a larger area. A well-constructed base and sub-base will aid drainage and
prevent settlement. The interlock between adjacent particles of the base or sub-base material
greatly improves the ability of the ground to carry heavier loads. Also, we could do the crack
treatment as a preventive treatment. Crack treatment is consist of placing specialized
materials into prepared cracks to prevent water and incomprehensible intrusion into the cracks
and underlying pavement. This treatment can reduce potholes, slower the pavement
deterioration.
Besides, the fog seals can be used to an aging pavement. A light application of a
diluted slow-setting asphalt emulsion to the surface of an aged pavement surface that can help
to prevent water intrusion and improves aggregate retention. The chip seals treatment is used
to combines one or more layers of asphalt with one or more layers of fine aggregate while the
micro surfacing treatment is used to combines a layer of asphalt emulsion and finely crushed
stone. These two treatment can help to prevent water intrusion, fill and seal pavement
distresses, corrects minor rutting and minimize the reflective cracking.
Another improvement that can be used is surface patching. Surface Patches are
usually temporary patches. They are constructed by milling a portion of the pavement to a
depth that removes all deteriorated material. The patch area should be milled to a minimum
depth size of the aggregate used in the patch. Using a 3/8 inch size aggregate or ¼ inch size
aggregate will minimize the necessary milling depth, help tie the patch to the existing
pavement and provide adequate hot mix thickness to reduce possibility of raveling.
However, the surface treatments can experience their own distresses. These include
loss of cover aggregate and streaking. Surface treatments can lose the aggregate cover
prematurely. Typically this is caused by spreading the chips too late in the construction
process, using a dirty aggregate, allowing traffic to use the surface before the aggregate is
seated and bonded or applying too little asphalt to embed the aggregate. Streaking is the
presence of alternating stripes of aggregate or asphalt. Streaking is primarily caused by the
uneven application of the asphalt to the pavement surface before the aggregate ships are
applied. Asphalt pavement are quick and economical to construct, have excellent ride quality
and are long lasting even still they are the subject to the some distresses and failure on road
pavement.
7.0 CONCLUSION
42
To conclude the study that have been done from Jalan Limau 9 and Kolej Kediaman
Perwira which the road is used by the buses as transportation for students from Universiti Tun
Hussein Onn (UTHM). The road that we selected provide with minimum damage categorized
as function damage and structural damage such as potholes, rutting and cracking. Therefore,
routine maintenance work should be carried out also known as resurface. From the data
record that have been taken there are minor damage that occur on the road. As the chosen
road is the main road for a students in UTHM, safety is a priority and we have come up with
a few improvements and rehabilitation that will be needed to repair the road pavement to
increase the strength of the road and decrease the damage such as doubling the base or the
sub-base thickness to improves the ability of the ground to carry heavier load. Other methods
have been discussed and recorded in the discussion.Data were analyzed at the level or index
on the road. Furthermore, an example of calculation is provided in the result and analysis for
future purpose. From the rating for PCI section having Level of Service B (LOS) B which
required only preventive maintenance. The resurface cost estimation has been made based on
the JKR Standard Table of Pricing per m2 include additional cost that’s has been stated on the
BQ form. Finally, the resurface of the road contributed to human comfort where it is
frequently used by all users. Therefore, the parties involved, and the authorities should always
ensure the quality of the road for satisfaction of the users.
8.0 REFERENCES
1. Robert B. Greene (2018) Three Common Causes of Pavement Failure and Their
Solutions.
2. Prof. Dr Fareed M.A. Karim, Dr Khaled Abdul Haleem Rubasi, and Dr Ali Abdo
Saleh (2016) The Road Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Evaluation and Maintenance:
A Case Study of Yemen, August 2, 2016. Organization, Technology and Management
in Construction 2016; 8: 1446–1455.
3. Galehouse, L., Moulthrop, J. S., & Hicks, R. G. (2003) Principles for Pavement
Preservations: Definitions, Benefits, Issues and Barriers. TR News, 228, pp. 4-9.
4. Shahin, M. Y., Darter, M. J., & Kohn, S. D. (1997). Development of a Pavement
Maintenance Management System, Volume V, CEEDO-TR-77-44.
5. Smith, R. E., Darter, M. I., & Herrin, S. M. (1979). Highway Pavement Distress
Identification Manual. Federal Highway Administration, United States.
43
6. Valentin Donev & Markus Hoffmann (2018) Optimisation of pavement maintenance
and rehabilitation activities, timing and work zones for short survey sections and
multiple distress types, International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 21:5, 583-607.
7. Chen, C.H. and Schonfeld, P. (2007) Pavement resurfacing intervals in work zone
optimization.
8. Williams, R.C., Hildreth, J.C., and Vorster, M.C., 2009. Highway construction data
collection and treatment in preparation for statistical regression analysis. Journal of
Construction Engineering and Management, 135 (12), 1299–1306.
9. FHWA (1998), ―Pavement Condition Index Distress Identification Manual for
Asphalt and Surface Treatment Pavements. Federal Highway Administration, United
States Department of Transportation.
10. ASTM D6433 - “Standard practice for Roads and Parking Lots Pavement Condition
Index Surveys”.
11. JKR 20709-2060-92 – “A Guide To The Visual Assessment of Flexible Pavement
Surface Conditions”.
9.0 APPENDIX
44
45
46
MINUTE OF MEETING
MINUTE OF MEETING 1
HIGHWAY ENGINEERING
FACULTY OF CIVIL AND BUILD ENGINEERING
Members Present:
1) DIANA DAYANG LAWRENCE (CF190013) - CHAIRPERSON
2) LYDIALLYE GITOM (CF190004)
3) EIRSARD EMIER BIN YAHYA (CF180090)
4) SITI RAIHANUR BINTI RAMLI (AF180055)
5) MUHAMMAD RIDUAN BIN MAHADI (DF180103)
47
2.0 DISCUSSION
1) Choosing the road distress All group All group members
members
on any 1 km length of road in give cooperation in
Malaysia through google map. presenting their
2) The chosen road that we ideas and solving
the problems
selected is from Jalan Limau 9 to
Kolej Kediaman
Perwira
3) Each members were
appointed with part from report
based on picking random paper
written with work to be done.
3.0 CLOSING
1) Chairperson thanked all the group Chairperson The group
members for their hard work in members thanked
giving ideas. each other for their
hard work.
2) Each group members need to gather
as many information regarding their
part in report.
3) The next meeting was decided to be
held on 19 May 2020.
MINUTE OF MEETING 2
HIGHWAY ENGINEERING
FACULTY OF CIVIL AND BUILD ENGINEERING
Members Present:
1) DIANA DAYANG LAWRENCE (CF190013) - CHAIRPERSON
2) LYDIALLYE GITOM (CF190004)
3) EIRSARD EMIER BIN YAHYA (CF180090)
4) SITI RAIHANUR BINTI RAMLI (AF180055)
48
5) MUHAMMAD RIDUAN BIN MAHADI (DF180103)
NO SUBJECT ACTION BY FEEDBACK
2.0 DISCUSSION
1) The information collected were All group All group
members members give
gathered.
cooperation in
2) All of the information were preparing the
materials.
arranged into the report.
3) Few part of the report were done
during the meeting.
3.0 CLOSING
49
1) Chairperson thanked all the group Chairperson The group
members for their hard work in members thanked
collecting the information. each other for their
hard work.
2) The report will be done from time
to time and everything will be
discussed through WhatsApp
application.
MINUTE OF MEETING 3
HIGHWAY ENGINEERING
FACULTY OF CIVIL AND BUILD ENGINEERING
Members Present:
4) DIANA DAYANG LAWRENCE (CF190013) - CHAIRPERSON
5) LYDIALLYE GITOM (CF190004)
6) EIRSARD EMIER BIN YAHYA (CF180090)
4) SITI RAIHANUR BINTI RAMLI (AF180055)
5) MUHAMMAD RIDUAN BIN MAHADI (DF180103)
50
NO SUBJECT ACTION BY FEEDBACK
2.0 DISCUSSION
All group
members
3.0 CLOSING
The group
members thanked
each other for their
hard work.
51