Data Presentation

PROBLEM 1

a.)

Frequency Distribution:
----------------------

  Frequency

---------- -----------

**DS** 8

**MIWY** 10

**PD** 12

**Prob** 20

---------------------

Relative Frequencies:

-------------------------------

  Relative Frequency

---------- --------------------

**DS** 0.16

**MIWY** 0.2

**PD** 0.24

**Prob** 0.4

-------------------------------

Percentage Frequencies:
------------------------------
   Percent Frequency

---------- -------------------

**DS** 16

**MIWY** 20

**PD** 24

**Prob** 40

------------------------------

All in one table:

---------------------------------------------------------------

  Frequency Relative Frequency Percent Frequency

---------- ----------- -------------------- -------------------

**DS** 8 0.16 16

**MIWY** 10 0.2 20

**PD** 12 0.24 24

**Prob** 20 0.4 40

---------------------------------------------------------------

Make it more presentable

Frequency
DS 8
MIWY 10
PD 12
Prob 20

Relative Frequency
DS 0.16
MIWY 0.2
PD 0.24
Prob 0.4
 Percent Frequency
DS 16
MIWY 20
PD 24
Prob 40

Frequency Relative Frequency Percent Frequency

DS 8 0.16 16
MIWY 10 0.2 20
PD 12 0.24 24
Prob 20 0.4 40

b.) Bar Chart and Pie Chart

c.) The graphs tell us the ranking of the top four Primetime Television Shows on the basis of which is
more preferred by the sample audience. As the bar and pie charts show, Ang Probinsyano (Prob) is the
most preferred. Next to this is Prima Donnas (PD), third will be Make It With You (MIWY), and lastly is
the Descendants of the Sun PH adaptation (DS). The graphs make it virtually easier to determine and
identify the rank of each shows in the survey.

PROBLEM 2

This dotplot tells us how many audit days are required for each of the 20 clients of Sanderson and
Clifford. As we can see, 3 of the clients require 18 audit days to complete their year-end audits, which is
the highest number among the number of days.
PROBLEM 3:

a.) Rank vs. Discipline

* **cross_table**:

-----------------------------------
  A B Total
--------------- ----- ----- -------
**AssocProf** 26 38 64

**AsstProf** 24 43 67

**Prof** 131 135 266

**Total** 181 216 397

-----------------------------------

* **proportions**:

-----------------------------------------
  A B Total
--------------- -------- -------- -------
**AssocProf** 0.4062 0.5938 1

**AsstProf** 0.3582 0.6418 1

**Prof** 0.4925 0.5075 1

**Total** 0.4559 0.5441 1

-----------------------------------------

Cross tables

A B Total
AssocProf 26 38 64
AsstProf 24 43 67
Prof 131 135 135
Total 181 216 1397

Proportions

A B Total
AssocProf 0.4062 0.4062 1
AsstProf 0.3582 0.3582 1
Prof 0.4925 0.4925 1
Total 0.4559 0.4559 1

b.) Rank vs. Years of Service

* **cross_table**:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  [0,10) [10,20) [20,30) [30,40) [40,50) [50,60) Total
--------------- -------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -------
**AssocProf** 14 38 7 1 4 0 64

**AsstProf** 63 4 0 0 0 0 67

**Prof** 0 61 90 77 33 5 266

**Total** 77 103 97 78 37 5 397

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* **proportions**:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  [0,10) [10,20) [20,30) [30,40) [40,50) [50,60) Total
--------------- -------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -------
**AssocProf** 0.2188 0.5938 0.1094 0.01562 0.0625 0 1

**AsstProf** 0.9403 0.0597 0 0 0 0 1

**Prof** 0 0.2293 0.3383 0.2895 0.1241 0.0188 1

**Total** 0.194 0.2594 0.2443 0.1965 0.0932 0.01259 1

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[0,10) [10,20) [20,30) [30,40) [40,50) [50,60) Total

AssocProf 14 38 7 1 4 0 64
AsstProf 63 4 0 0 0 0 67
Prof 0 61 90 77 33 5 266
Total 77 103 97 78 37 5 397

[0,10) [10,20) [20,30) [30,40) [40,50) [50,60) Total

AssocProf 0.2188 0.5938 0.1094 0.01562 0.0625 0 1
AsstProf 0.9403 0.0597 0 0 0 0 1
Prof 0 0.2293 0.3383 0.2895 0.1241 0.0188 1
Total 0.194 0.2594 0.2443 0.1965 0.0932 0.01259 1

c.) Rank vs. Salary

-----------------------------------------------------------------
  [0,2.5e+04) [2.5e+04,5e+04) [5e+04,7.5e+04)
--------------- ------------- ----------------- -----------------
**AssocProf** 0 0 8

**AsstProf** 0 0 21

**Prof** 0 0 3

**Total** 0 0 32
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
  [7.5e+04,1e+05) [1e+05,1.25e+05) [1.25e+05,1.5e+05)
--------------- ----------------- ------------------ --------------------
**AssocProf** 28 27 1

**AsstProf** 46 0 0

**Prof** 34 101 73

**Total** 108 128 74

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
  [1.5e+05,1.75e+05) [1.75e+05,2e+05) [2e+05,2.25e+05)
--------------- -------------------- ------------------ ------------------
**AssocProf** 0 0 0

**AsstProf** 0 0 0

**Prof** 41 11 2

**Total** 41 11 2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------
  [2.25e+05,2.5e+05) Total
--------------- -------------------- -------
**AssocProf** 0 64

**AsstProf** 0 67

**Prof** 1 266

**Total** 1 397
--------------------------------------------
* **proportions**:

-----------------------------------------------------------------
  [0,2.5e+04) [2.5e+04,5e+04) [5e+04,7.5e+04)
--------------- ------------- ----------------- -----------------
**AssocProf** 0 0 0.125

**AsstProf** 0 0 0.3134
 **Prof** 0 0 0.01128

**Total** 0 0 0.0806
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
  [7.5e+04,1e+05) [1e+05,1.25e+05) [1.25e+05,1.5e+05)
--------------- ----------------- ------------------ --------------------
**AssocProf** 0.4375 0.4219 0.01562

**AsstProf** 0.6866 0 0

**Prof** 0.1278 0.3797 0.2744

**Total** 0.272 0.3224 0.1864

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
  [1.5e+05,1.75e+05) [1.75e+05,2e+05) [2e+05,2.25e+05)
--------------- -------------------- ------------------ ------------------
**AssocProf** 0 0 0

**AsstProf** 0 0 0

**Prof** 0.1541 0.04135 0.007519

**Total** 0.1033 0.02771 0.005038

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------
  [2.25e+05,2.5e+05) Total
--------------- -------------------- -------
**AssocProf** 0 1

**AsstProf** 0 1

**Prof** 0.003759 1

**Total** 0.002519 1
--------------------------------------------

{0,25k) [25k,50k) [50k,75k) [75k,100k) [100k,125k) [125k,150k) [150k,175k) [175k,200k) [200k,225k) [225k,250k) Total
AssocPro 0 0 8 28 27 1 0 0 0 0 64
f
AsstProf 0 0 21 46 0 0 0 0 0 0 67
Prof 0 0 3 34 101 73 41 11 2 1 266
Total 0 0 32 108 128 74 41 11 2 1 397

{0,25k) [25k,50k) [50k,75k) [75k,100k) [100k,125k) [125k,150k) [150k,175k) [175k,200k) [200k,225k) [225k,250k) Total
AssocPro 0 0 0.125 0.4375 0.4219 0.01562 0 0 0 0 1
f
AsstProf 0 0 0.3134 0.6866 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Prof 0 0 0.0112 0.1278 0.3797 0.2744 0.1541 0.04135 0.007519 0.003759 1
8
Total 0 0 0.0806 0.272 0.3224 0.1864 0.1033 0.02771 0.005038 0.002519 1

The graphs show us a tabular summary of the two variables, either both qualitative (Rank vs. Discipline),
or combination of qualitative and quantitative (Rank vs. Years of Service and Salary). The first crosstables
show us how many of the different ranks have A or B as their discipline, as well as their corresponding
proportions. Rank vs. Years of Service cross table reveals how many of the different ranks have less than
10 years of service and so on. Rank vs. Salary is almost the same with Rank vs. Years of Service in that
the salaries are grouped by $25,000s.