Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1.1 Introduction:
The material balance equation (MBE) has long been recognized as one of the
basic tools of reservoir engineers for interpreting and predicting reservoir
performance. The equation is structured to keep inventory of all material
entering, leaving , and accumulating in the reservoir.
The concept of the MBE was presented by Schilthuis in 1936 and is simply
based on the principle of the volumetric balance. It states that the cumulative
withdrawal of reservoir fluids is equal to the combined effects of fluid
expansion, pore volume compaction , and water influx. In its simplest form,
the equation can be written on a volumetric basis as:
The material balance equation has some basic assumptions and limitations
which can cause some errors when applied to some reservoirs.
Pressure:
The MBE is a tank model treating the reservoir as a large tank at which the
pressure is constant throughout the reservoir at a particular time. It clearly
ignores pressure changes which may arise across the reservoir. In the radial
flow section it was clear that there are large pressure variations around the
producing and injection wells.
Temperature:
Reservoir characteristics:
Pressure equilibrium:
All production data should be recorded with respect to the same time period.
or
By treating the reservoir pore as an idealized container, as illustrated below,
volumetric balance expressions can be derived:
1+2=3+4+5+6+7+8+9
Pi P
Pore volume occupied by the
gas in the gas cap at p
3
Pore volume occupied by Pore volume occupied by the
the gas in the gas cap at pi evolved solution gas at p
4
1 Pore volume occupied by the
injected gas at p
Pore volume occupied by 5
the oil initially in place at Change in pore volume due to connate
pi = water expansion and pore
6
volume reduction due to rock expansion
Change in pore volume due to connate water expansion and pore volume
reduction due to rock expansion
The above nine terms composing the MBE can be separately determined from
the hydrocarbon PVT and rock properties, as follows:
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ] [ ( ) ]
( )
Combining Equations (1.2) through (1.9) with Equation (1.1) and rearranging
gives:
( ) ( )
[ ] [ ]
[ ] [ ]
[ ( ) ] ( )
[ ] [ ]
1.5 The straight line material balance equation (Havlena & Odeh):
Havlena and Odeh (1963) expressed equation (1.12) in the following form:
[ ( ) ]
[ ] [ ]
[ ]
[ ] ( )
[ ]
[ ] [ ( ) ]
For undersaturated reservoirs with strong water influx, formation and water
compressibility are considered negligible (in case of low pressure, low and
reservoirs). Hence, Eq. (1.17) becomes:
[ ( ) ]
[ ( ) ]
The LHS of Eq. (1.19) represents cumulative voidage from the reservoir, and
the RHS represents energy from oil expansion and water influx. If cumulative
reservoir voidage is denoted as , then:
[ ( ) ]
Equation (1.23) is the Havlena-Odeh straight line form of the material balance
equation for undersaturated oil reservoirs with water influx. A plot of ⁄ vs.
⁄ will give a straight line with an intercept on the y-axis equal to N, and
the slope equal to unity.
For undersaturated reservoirs with strong water influx, formation and water
compressibility are included (in case of high pressure, high and
reservoirs). Hence, the MBE becomes:
[ ] [ ( ) ]
[ ( ) ]
[ ]
The characteristics and the shapes of this line will be the same as described
previously for the plot of ⁄ vs. ⁄ .
2. Water Influx Models:
Water influx (water encroachment, (We)) into reservoir can be estimated with
steady-state, unsteady-state, pseudosteady-state, and approximation models.
[ ]
( )
∫
2.2 Unsteady-state models:
2.2.1 The van Everdingen and Hurst (edge-water drive) model: which is
based on the radial diffusivity equation.
Van Everdingen and Hurst assumed that the aquifer is characrerized by:
Uniform thickness.
Constant permeability.
Uniform porosity.
Constant rock compressibility.
Constant water compressibility.
They made the solution to the diffusivity equation generalized and applicable
to any aquifer where the flow of water into the reservoir is essentially radial.
They expressed their mathematical relationship for calculating the water influx
in a form of a dimensionless parameter that is called dimensionless water
influx WeD. They also expressed the dimensionless water influx as a function of
the dimensionless time tD, and dimensionless radius rD. The solutions were
derived for cases of bounded aquifers and aquifers of infinite extent. They
presented their solutions in tabulated (tables 8-1 & 8-2, Craft & Hawkins) and
graphical forms.
[ ]
where
t = time, days
k = permeability of the aquifer, md
= porosity of the aquifer
= viscosity of water in the aquifer, cp
ra = radius of the aquifer, ft
re = radius of the reservoir, ft
cw = water compressibility, psi-1
cf = aquifer formation compressibility, psi-1
ct = total compressibility coefficient, psi-1
The cumulative water influx is then given by:
with
where
The general solution of Eq. (2.5) is presented in terms of tD, rD, and zD.
h = aquifer thickness, ft
The solution to the bottom-water influx is comparable in form to that of the
edge-water:
where the water influx constant is identical to that of the edge-water model,
except that for the bottom-water, the encroachment angle is not included.
The actual values of WeD are different from those of the edge-water model,
because WeD for the bottom-water model is also a function of the vertical
permeability. The values of Wed are tabulated as a function of rD, tD, and zD.
These values are presented in tables 8-6 to 8-10 (Craft & Hawkins).
The primary difference between the Carter-Tracy method and the van
Everdingen-Hurst method is that the Carter-Tracy technique assumes constant
water influx rates over each finite time interval. Using the Carter-Tracy
technique, the cumulative water influx at any time , can be calculated
directly from the previous value obtained at , or:
[ ][ ]
√
√
[ ]
It should be noted that the Carter-Tracy method is not an exact solution to the
diffusivity equation and should be considered an approximation.
The Fetkovich water influx during any time interval is given by:
[ ̅ ̅ ][ ( )]
where
̅ ( )
The cumulative (total) water influx at the end of any time period is given by:
∑
Case Study: Application of MBE for calculation of initial oil in place
The oil field "Libyaoil" is produced from carbonate reservoir located at depth
of about 2600 ftss. The reservoir is undersaturated oil reservoir with strong
water drive. Based on volumetric calculation, OOIP was estimated as 1500
MMSTB. The field was put on production in 1971. As end of 2011, a
cumulative of 546 MMSTB have been produced from the reservoir.
Reservoir data:
Aquifer data:
Pressure z
psia rb/stb scf/stb cp cp rb/stb cp
14.65 1.0151 0 1.366 0.999 0.0107 2.85E-6 1.020 0.4978
100 1.118 116 0.952 0.9897 0.0109 2.85E-6 1.020 0.4996
200 1.1387 147.1 0.891 0.9797 0.0111 2.84E-6 1.020 0.5016
281.7 1.147 165 0.854 0.9716 0.0113 2.84E-6 1.020 0.5033
300 1.1469 165 0.855 0.9699 0.0114 2.84E-6 1.020 0.5037
400 1.1461 165 0.859 0.9603 0.0116 2.83E-6 1.020 0.5058
500 1.1454 165 0.864 0.9509 0.0119 2.83E-6 1.020 0.5079
750 1.1436 165 0.875 0.9287 0.0125 2.81E-6 1.019 0.5134
1000 1.1418 165 0.886 0.9086 0.0132 2.80E-6 1.019 0.5191
1500 1.1381 165 0.908 0.8761 0.0146 2.77E-6 1.018 0.5311
2000 1.1345 165 0.93 0.8564 0.0160 2.74E-6 1.018 0.5438
2500 1.1308 165 0.952 0.8512 0.0175 2.72E-6 1.017 0.5573
3000 1.1272 165 0.974 0.8599 0.0190 2.69E-6 1.016 0.5716
3500 1.1235 165 0.996 0.8801 0.0205 2.67E-6 1.015 0.5867
4000 1.1199 165 1.018 0.9090 0.0221 2.64E-6 1.013 0.6025
Production and pressure data:
Time Pressure Np Wp
Year psi STB STB
1970 1188 0 0
1971 1109.1331 40833204 4631803
1972 1050.1643 77058970 15409756
1973 1009.1589 1.11E+08 35365039
1974 979.45414 1.42E+08 53929220
1975 957.2685 1.71E+08 69029855
1976 940.3646 1.98E+08 79371915
1977 927.3174 2.23E+08 1.03E+08
1978 917.1644 2.45E+08 1.32E+08
1979 909.2253 2.66E+08 1.73E+08
1980 903.0014 2.85E+08 2.17E+08
1981 898.1166 3.02E+08 2.52E+08
1982 894.2809 3.18E+08 2.73E+08
1983 891.2656 3.32E+08 3.01E+08
1984 888.8881 3.45E+08 3.31E+08
1985 887.0001 3.57E+08 3.7E+08
1986 885.4798 3.67E+08 4.05E+08
1987 884.2263 3.77E+08 4.44E+08
1988 883.1549 3.85E+08 4.7E+08
1989 882.1944 3.93E+08 5E+08
1990 881.284 3.99E+08 5.19E+08
1991 880.3721 4.05E+08 5.49E+08
1992 879.4138 4.11E+08 5.85E+08
1993 878.3709 4.16E+08 6.22E+08
1994 877.2097 4.21E+08 6.42E+08
1995 875.9012 4.25E+08 6.69E+08
1996 874.4199 4.3E+08 7.04E+08
1997 872.7435 4.34E+08 7.36E+08
1998 870.8523 4.38+E08 7.69E+08
1999 868.729 4.43E+08 8.02E+08
2000 866.3583 4.47E+08 8.15E+08
2001 863.7267 4.53E+08 8.43E+08
2002 860.8222 4.58E+08 8.7E+08
2003 857.634 4.64E+08 8.93E+08
2004 854.1528 4.71E+08 9.16E+08
2005 850.3701 4.79E+08 9.39E+08
2006 846.2785 4.87E+08 9.62E+08
2007 841.8714 4.97E+08 9.83E+08
2008 837.1427 5.07E+08 1E+09
2009 823.0873 5.19E+08 1.02E+09
2010 826.7004 5.32E+08 1.04E+09
2011 820.978 5.46E+08 1.06E+09
The reservoir initial pressure is 1188psi and the bubble point pressure is 281.7
psi.
Slope = 1
Slope = 0.845568397
The Carter-Tracy calculations show that the best or the most representative
encroachment angle to be used for calculation of water influx constant is
, although the reservoir structure map shows that the encroachment
angle is bigger than that (may be 270o or more).
The calculations show also that the most representative aquifer thickness to be
used is 900 ft.
Slope = 0.8487219
Edge-water drive model calculations show that the best or the most
representative encroachment angle to be used for calculation of water influx
constant is , although the reservoir structure map shows that the
encroachment angle is bigger than that (may be 270o or more).
The calculations show also that the most representative aquifer thickness to be
used is 900 ft.
Slope = 0.4734024
The calculations show that the most representative aquifer thickness to be used
is 1000 ft.
After many iterations on the calculation of water influx by using the three
models (the Carter-Tracy, the edge and the bottom), we found that when we
use these estimated values of water influx for the calculation of OOIP, this
will give a value of OOIP different from that one obtained by volumetric
estimation.
The values of OOIP as calculated from the material balance (using water
influx calculated from models) are in the range of (1.5E+10 to 2.0E+10) which
is considered very different from the value obtained by volumetric calculations
(1.5E+09).
As we saw that the plots are slightly curved downward at the end of the
production history, this may be due to the use of constant formation
compressibility. Also we saw that the plots are slightly curved upward at the
beginning of the production, this may indicate that there was instability in
production at the early production period.
References