Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(Reaffirmed 2003)
Edition 3.2
(2002-03)
Indian Standard
CODE OF PRACTICE FOR DESIGN LOADS
(OTHER THAN EARTHQUAKE)
FOR BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES
PART 3 WIND LOADS
( Second Revision )
(Incorporating Amendment Nos. 1 & 2)
UDC 624.042.41
© BIS 2007
Price Group 14
IS : 875 (Part 3) - 1987
CONTENTS
Page
0. FOREWORD 3
1. SCOPE 5
2. NOTATIONS 5
3. TERMINOLOGY 6
4. GENERAL 7
5. WIND SPEED AND PRESSURE 7
5.1 Nature of Wind in Atmosphere 7
5.2 Basic Wind Speed 8
5.3 Design Wind Speed ( Vz ) 8
5.3.1 Risk Coefficient ( k1 Factor ) 8
5.3.2 Terrain, Height and Structure Size Factor ( k2 Factor ) 8
5.3.3 Topography ( k3 Factor ) 12
5.4 Design Wind Pressure 12
5.5 Off-Shore Wind Velocity 13
6. WIND PRESSURE AND FORCES ON BUILDINGS/STRUCTURES 13
6.1 General 13
6.2 Pressure Coefficients 13
6.2.1 Wind Load on Individual Members 13
6.2.2 External Pressure Coefficients 13
6.2.3 Internal Pressure Coefficients 27
6.3 Force Coefficients 36
6.3.1 Frictional Drag 37
6.3.2 Force Coefficients for Clad Buildings 37
6.3.3 Force Coefficients for Unclad Buildings 38
7. DYNAMIC EFFECTS 47
7.1 General 47
7.2 Motion Due to Vortex Shedding 48
7.2.1 Slender Structures 48
8. Gust Factor ( GF ) or Gust Effectiveness Factor ( GEF ) Method 49
8.1 Application 49
8.2 Hourly Mean Wind 49
8.2.1 Variation of Hourly Mean Wind Speed with Height 49
8.3 Along Wind Load 49
APPENDIX A BASIC WIND SPEED AT 10 m HEIGHT FOR SOME IMPORTANT
CITIES/TOWNS 53
APPENDIX B CHANGES IN TERRAIN CATEGORIES 54
APPENDIX C EFFECT OF A CLIFF OR ESCARPMENT ON EQUIVALENT HEIGHT
ABOVE GROUND ( k3 FACTOR ) 55
APPENDIX D WIND FORCE ON CIRCULAR SECTIONS 57
1
As in the Original Standard, this Page is Intentionally Left Blank
IS : 875 (Part 3) - 1987
Indian Standard
CODE OF PRACTICE FOR DESIGN LOADS
(OTHER THAN EARTHQUAKE)
FOR BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES
PART 3 WIND LOADS
( Second Revision )
0. F O R E W O R D
0.1 This Indian Standard (Part 3) (Second structures were included; wind pressure
Revision) was adopted by the Bureau of Indian coefficients for sheeted roofs, both curved and
Standards on 13 November 1987, after the sloping were modified; seismic load provisions
draft finalized by the Structural Safety were deleted (separate code having been
Sectional Committee had been approved by the prepared) and metric system of weights and
Civil Engineering Division Council. measurements was adopted.
0.2 A building has to perform many functions 0.3.1 With the increased adoption of this Code,
satisfactorily. Amongst these functions are the a number of comments were received on provi-
utility of the building for the intended use and sions on live load values adopted for different
occupancy, structural safety, fire safety and occupancies. Simultaneously, live load surveys
compliance with hygienic, sanitation, have been carried out in America and Canada
ventilation and daylight standards. The design to arrive at realistic live loads based on actual
of the building is dependent upon the minimum determination of loading (movable and
requirements prescribed for each of the above immovable) in different occupancies. Keeping
functions. The minimum requirements this in view and other developments in the field
pertaining to the structural safety of buildings of wind engineering, the Structural Safety
are being covered in loading codes by way of Sectional Committee decided to prepare the
laying down minimum design loads which have second revision of IS : 875 in the following five
to be assumed for dead loads, imposed loads, parts:
wind loads and other external loads, the Part 1 Dead loads
structure would be required to bear. Strict
conformity to loading standards, it is hoped, Part 2 Imposed loads
will not only ensure the structural safety of the
Part 3 Wind loads
buildings and structures which are being
designed and constructed in the country and Part 4 Snow loads
thereby reduce the hazards to life and property
Part 5 Special loads and load combinations
caused by unsafe structures, but also eliminate
the wastage caused by assuming unnecessarily Earthquake load is covered in a separate
heavy loadings without proper assessment. standard, namely, IS : 1893-1984* which
should be considered along with the above
0.3 This standard was first published in 1957 loads.
for the guidance of civil engineers, designers
and architects associated with the planning 0.3.2 This Part (Part 3) deals with wind loads
and design of buildings. It included the to be considered when designing buildings,
provisions for the basic design loads (dead structures and components thereof. In this
loads, live loads, wind loads and seismic loads) revision, the following important modifications
to be assumed in the design of the buildings. In have been made from those covered in the 1964
its first revision in 1964, the wind pressure version of IS : 875:
provisions were modified on the basis of studies
of wind phenomenon and its effect on a) The earlier wind pressure maps (one
structures, undertaken by the special giving winds of shorter duration and an-
committee in consultation with the Indian other excluding winds of shorter duration)
Meteorological Department. In addition to this, *Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures
new clauses on wind loads for butterfly type ( fourth revision ).
3
IS : 875 (Part 3) - 1987
have been replaced by a single wind map Indian conditions on statistical analysis. The
giving basic maximum wind speed in m/s Committee, therefore, recommends to all
(peak gust velocity averaged over a short individuals and organizations responsible for
time interval of about 3 seconds duration). putting-up of tall structures to provide
The wind speeds have been worked out for instrumentation in their existing and new
50 years return period based on the structures (transmission towers, chimneys,
up-to-date wind data of 43 dines pressure cooling towers, buildings, etc) at different
tube (DPT) anemograph stations and elevations (at least at two levels) to
study of other related works available on continuously measure and monitor wind data.
the subject since 1964. The map and The instruments are required to collect data on
related recommendations have been provi- wind direction, wind speed and structural
ded in the code with the active cooperation response of the structure due to wind (with the
of Indian Meteorological Department help of accelerometer, strain gauges, etc). It is
(IMD). Isotachs (lines of equal velocity) also the opinion of the committee that such
have not been given as in the opinion of instrumentation in tall structures will not in
the committee, there is still not enough any way affect or alter the functional behaviour
extensive meteorological data at close of such structures. The data so collected will be
enough stations in the country to justify very valuable in evolving more accurate wind
drawing of isotachs. loading of structures.
b) Modification factors to modify the basic 0.4 The Sectional Committee responsible for the
wind velocity to take into account the preparation of this standard has taken into
effects of terrain, local topography, size of account the prevailing practice in regard to
structure, etc, are included. loading standards followed in this country by the
c) Terrain is now classified into four various authorities and has also taken note of
categories based on characteristics of the the developments in a number of other countries.
ground surface irregularities. In the preparation of this code, the following
d) Force and pressure coefficients have been overseas standards have also been examined:
included for a large range of clad and a) BSCP 3 : 1973 Code of basic data for
unclad buildings and for individual design of buildings: Chapter V Loading,
structural elements. Part 2 Wind loads.
e) Force coefficients (drag coefficients) are b) AS 1170, Part 2-1983 SAA Loading code
given for frames, lattice towers, walls and Part 2 — Wind forces.
hoardings.
c) NZS 4203-1976 Code of practice for
f) The calculation of force on circular sections
is included incorporating the effects of general structural design loading for
buildings.
Reynolds number and surface roughness.
g) The external and internal pressure d) ANSI A58.1-1972 American Standard
coefficients for gable roofs, lean-to roofs, Building code requirements for minimum
curved roofs, canopy roofs (butterfly type design loads in buildings and other
structures) and multi-span roofs have structures.
been rationalised. e) Wind resistant design regulations, A
h) Pressure coefficients are given for World List. Association for Science
combined roofs, roofs with sky light, Documents Information, Tokyo.
circular silos, cylindrical elevated 0.5 This edition 3.2 incorporates Amendment
structures, grandstands, etc. No. 1 (December 1997) and Amendment No. 2
j) Some requirements regarding study of (March 2002). Side bar indicates modification
dynamic effects in flexible slender of the text as the result of incorporation of the
structures are included. amendments.
k) Use of gust energy method to arrive at the
0.6 For the purpose of deciding whether a parti-
design wind load on the whole structure is cular requirement of this standard is complied
now permitted.
with, the final value, observed or calculated,
0.3.3 The Committee responsible for the expressing the result of a test or analysis, shall
revision of wind maps while reviewing be rounded off in accordance with IS : 2-1960*.
available meteorological wind data and The number of significant places retained in
response of structures to wind, felt the paucity the rounded off value should be the same as
of data on which to base wind maps for that of the specified value in this standard.
4
IS : 875 (Part 3) - 1987
5
IS : 875 (Part 3) - 1987
pz = design wind pressure at height Z; 3.1.5 Effective Frontal Area — The projected
area of the structure normal to the direction of
pe = external pressure; the wind.
pi = internal pressure; 3.1.6 Element of Surface Area — The area of
Re = reynolds number; surface over which the pressure coefficient is
S = strouhal number; taken to be constant.
Vb = regional basic wind speed; 3.1.7 Force Coefficient — A non-dimensional
coefficient such that the total wind force on a
Vz = design wind velocity at height z;
body is the product of the force coefficient, the
Vz = hourly mean wind speed at height z; dynamic pressure of the incident design wind
w = lesser horizontal dimension of a speed and the reference area over which the
building, or a structural member; force is required.
w′ = bay width in multi-bay buildings; NOTE — When the force is in the direction of the
incident wind, the non-dimensional coefficient will be
x = distance down wind from a change in called as ‘drag coefficient’. When the force is perpendi-
terrain category; cular to the direction of incident wind, the non-dimen-
sional coefficient will be called as ‘lift coefficient’.
θ = wind angle from a given axis;
3.1.8 Ground Roughness — The nature of the
∝ = inclination of the roof to the hori- earth’s surface as influenced by small scale
zontal; obstructions such as trees and buildings (as
β = effective solidity ratio; distinct from topography) is called ground
η = shielding factor or shedding frequency; roughness.
φ = solidity ratio; 3.1.9 Gust — A positive or negative departure
of wind speed from its mean value, lasting for
z = a height or distance above the ground; not more than, say, 2 minutes over a specified
and interval of time.
ε = average height of the surface rough-
Peak Gust — Peak gust or peak gust speed is
ness.
the wind speed associated with the maximum
amplitude.
3. TERMINOLOGY
Fetch Length — Fetch length is the distance
3.1 For the purpose of this code, the following measured along the wind from a boundary at
definitions shall apply. which a change in the type of terrain occurs.
When the changes in terrain types are
3.1.1 Angle of Attack — Angle between the encountered (such as, the boundary of a town or
direction of wind and a reference axis of the city, forest, etc), the wind profile changes in
structure. character but such changes are gradual and
3.1.2 Breadth — Breadth means horizontal start at ground level, spreading or penetrating
dimension of the building measured normal to upwards with increasing fetch length.
the direction of wind. Gradient Height — Gradient height is the
height above the mean ground level at which the
NOTE — Breadth and depth are dimensions measured gradient wind blows as a result of balance among
in relation to the direction of the wind, whereas length
and width are dimensions related to the plan. pressure gradient force, coriolis force and
centrifugal force. For the purpose of this code, the
3.1.3 Depth — Depth means the horizontal gradient height is taken as the height above the
dimension of the building measured in the mean ground level, above which the variation of
direction of the wind. wind speed with height need not be considered.
3.1.4 Developed Height — Developed height is Mean Ground Level — The mean ground
the height of upward penetration of the velocity level is the average horizontal plane of the area
profile in a new terrain. At large fetch lengths, enclosed by the boundaries of the structure.
such penetration reaches the gradient height, Pressure Coefficient — Pressure coefficient is
above which the wind speed may be taken to be the ratio of the difference between the pressure
constant. At lesser fetch lengths, a velocity acting at a point on a surface and the static
profile of a smaller height but similar to that of pressure of the incident wind to the design wind
the fully developed profile of that terrain pressure, where the static and design wind
category has to be taken, with the additional pressures are determined at the height of the
provision that the velocity at the top of this point considered after taking into account the
shorter profile equals that of the unpenetrated geographical location, terrain conditions and
earlier velocity profile at that height. shielding effect. The pressure coefficient is also
6
IS : 875 (Part 3) - 1987
7
IS : 875 (Part 3) - 1987
mean value and a fluctuating component around of obstructions which constitute the ground sur-
this average value. The average value depends face roughness. The terrain category used in the
on the averaging time employed in analysing the design of a structure may vary depending on the
meteorological data and this averaging time direction of wind under consideration. Wherever
varies from a few seconds to several minutes. The sufficient meteorological information is
magnitude of fluctuating component of the wind available about the nature of wind direction, the
speed which is called gust, depends on the orientation of any building or structure may be
averaging time. In general, smaller the suitably planned.
averaging interval, greater is the magnitude of
the gust speed. Terrain in which a specific structure stands
5.2 Basic Wind Speed — Figure 1 gives basic shall be assessed as being one of the following
wind speed map of India, as applicable to 10 m terrain categories:
height above mean ground level for different a) Category 1 — Exposed open terrain with
zones of the country. Basic wind speed is based few or no obstructions and in which the
on peak gust velocity averaged over a short average height of any object surrounding
time interval of about 3 seconds and the structure is less than 1.5 m.
corresponds to mean heights above ground
NOTE — This category includes open sea-coasts and
level in an open terrain (Category 2). Basic flat treeless plains.
wind speeds presented in Fig. 1 have been
worked out for a 50 year return period. Basic b) Category 2 — Open terrain with well
wind speed for some important cities/towns is scattered obstructions having heights
also given in Appendix A. generally between 1.5 to 10 m.
NOTE — This is the criterion for measurement of
5.3 Design Wind Speed ( Vz ) — The basic regional basic wind speeds and includes airfields,
wind speed ( Vb ) for any site shall be obtained open parklands and undeveloped sparsely built-up
from Fig. 1 and shall be modified to include the outskirts of towns and suburbs. Open land adjacent
following effects to get design wind velocity at to sea coast may also be classified as Category 2 due
any height ( Vz ) for the chosen structure: to roughness of large sea waves at high winds.
8
IS : 875 (Part 3) - 1987
Based upon Survey of India map with the NOTE 1 — The occurrence of a tornado is NOTE 2 — The total number of cyclonic storms
permission of the Surveyor General of India. possible in virtually any part of India. They that have struck different sections of east and
are particularly more severe in the northern west coasts are included in Fig. 1, based on
The territorial waters of India extend into the sea parts of India. The recorded number of these available records for the period from 1877 to
to a distance of twelve nautical miles measured tornados is too small to assign any frequency. 1982. The figures above the lines (between the
from the appropriate base line. The devastation caused by a tornado is due to stations) indicate the total number of severe
exceptionally high winds about its periphery, cyclonic storms with or without a core of
Responsibility for the correctness of Internal and the sudden reduction in atmospheric hurricane winds (speeds above 87 km/h) and
details shown on the map rests with the publisher. pressure at its centre, resulting in an the figures in the brackets below the lines
explosive outward pressure on the elements of indicate the total number of cyclonic storms.
the structure. The regional basic wind speeds Their effect on land is already reflected in the
The boundary of Meghalaya shown on this map is do not include any specific allowance for basic wind speeds specified in Fig. 1. These
as Interpreted from the North-Eastern Areas tornados. It is not the usual practice to allow have been included only as an additional
(Reorganization) Act, 1971, but has yet to be for the effect of tornados unless special information.
verified. requirements are called for as in the case of
important structures such as, nuclear power
reactors and satellite communication towers.
9
As in the Original Standard, this Page is Intentionally Left Blank
IS : 875 (Part 3) - 1987
The buildings/structures are classified into ponents such as cladding, glazing, roofing,
the following three different classes depending etc, having maximum dimension (greatest
upon their size: horizontal or vertical dimension) between 20
Class A — Structures and/or their com- and 50 m.
ponents such as cladding, glazing, roofing, Class C — Structures and/or their components
etc, having maximum dimension (greatest such as cladding, glazing, roofing, etc,
horizontal or vertical dimension) less than having maximum dimension (greatest
20 m. horizontal or vertical dimension) greater
Class B — Structures and/or their com- than 50 m.
YEARS 33 39 44 47 50 55
All general buildings and structures 50 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Temporary sheds, structures such as 5 0.82 0.76 0.73 0.71 0.70 0.67
those used during construction
operations (for example, form-
work and falsework), structures
during construction stages and
boundry walls
Buildings and structures presenting 25 0.94 0.92 0.91 0.90 0.90 0.89
a low degree of hazard to life and
property in the event of failure,
such as isolated towers in wooded
areas, farm buildings other than
residential buildings
Important buildings and structures 100 1.05 1.06 1.07 1.07 1.08 1.08
such as hospitals communication
buildings/towers, power plant
structures
NOTE — The factor k1 is based on statistical concepts which take account of the degree of reliability required and period
of time in years during which these will be exposure to wind, that is, life of the structure. Whatever wind speed is
adopted for design purposes, there is always a probability (however small) that it may be exceeded in a storm of
exceptional violence; the greater the period of years over which these will be exposure to the wind, the greater is the
probability. Higher return periods ranging from 100 to 1 000 years (implying lower risk level) in association with greater
periods of exposure may have to be selected for exceptionally important structures, such as, nuclear power reactors and
satellite communication towers. Equation given below may be used in such cases to estimate k1 factors for different
periods of exposure and chosen probability of exceedance (risk level). The probability level of 0.63 is normally considered
sufficient for design of buildings and structures against wind effects and the values of k1 corresponding to this risk level
are given above.
1
A – B l n – ---- l n 1 – P
X N, P N N
k 1 = ----------------------
- = ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
X 50, 0.63 A + 4B
where
N = mean probable design life of structure in years;
PN = risk level in N consecutive years (probability that the design wind speed is exceeded at least once in N
successive years), nominal value = 0.63;
XN,P = extreme wind speed for given values of N and PN; and
X50, 0.63 = extreme wind speed for N = 50 years and PN = 0.63.
A and B are coefficients having the following values for different basic wind speed zones:
Zone A B
33m/s 83.2 9.2
39 m/s 84.0 14.0
44 m/s 88.0 18.0
47 m/s 88.0 20.5
50 m/s 88.8 22.8
55 m/s 90.8 27.3
11
IS : 875 (Part 3) - 1987
m A B C A B C A B C A B C
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13)
10 1.05 1.03 0.99 1.00 0.98 0.93 0.91 0.88 0.82 0.80 0.76 0.67
15 1.09 1.07 1.03 1.05 1.02 0.97 0.97 0.94 0.87 0.80 0.76 0.67
20 1.12 1.10 1.06 1.07 1.05 1.00 1.01 0.98 0.91 0.80 0.76 0.67
30 1.15 1.13 1.09 1.12 1.10 1.04 1.06 1.03 0.96 0.97 0.93 0.83
50 1.20 1.18 1.14 1.17 1.15 1.10 1.12 1.09 1.02 1.10 1.05 0.95
100 1.26 1.24 1.20 1.24 1.22 1.17 1.20 1.17 1.10 1.20 1.15 1.05
150 1.30 1.28 1.24 1.28 1.25 1.21 1.24 1.21 1.15 1.24 1.20 1.10
200 1.32 1.30 1.26 1.30 1.28 1.24 1.27 1.24 1.18 1.27 1.22 1.13
250 1.34 1.32 1.28 1.32 1.31 1.26 1.29 1.26 1.20 1.28 1.24 1.16
300 1.35 1.34 1.30 1.34 1.32 1.28 1.31 1.28 1.22 1.30 1.26 1.17
350 1.37 1.35 1.31 1.36 1.34 1.29 1.32 1.30 1.24 1.31 1.27 1.19
400 1.38 1.36 1.32 1.37 1.35 1.30 1.34 1.31 1.25 1.32 1.28 1.20
450 1.39 1.37 1.33 1.38 1.36 1.31 1.35 1.32 1.26 1.33 1.29 1.21
500 1.40 1.38 1.34 1.39 1.37 1.32 1.36 1.33 1.28 1.34 1.30 1.22
NOTE 1 — See 5.3.2.2 for definitions of Class A, Class B and Class C structures.
NOTE 2 — Intermediate values may be obtained by linear interpolation, if desired. It is permissible to assume constant
wind speed between 2 heights for simplicity.
5.3.2.3 Terrain categories in relation to the TABLE 3 FETCH AND DEVELOPED HEIGHT
direction of wind — The terrain category used RELATIONSHIP
in the design of a structure may vary depending ( Clause 5.3.2.4 )
on the direction of wind under consideration. FETCH ( x ) DEVELOPED HEIGHT, hx IN METRES
Where sufficient meteorological information is km
available, the basic wind speed may be varied Terrain Terrain Terrain Terrain
Catogory 1 Catogory 2 Catogory 3 Catogory 4
for specific wind direction.
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
5.3.2.4 Changes in terrain categories — The 0.2 12 20 35 60
velocity profile for a given terrain category does
0.5 20 30 35 95
not develop to full height immediately with the
commencement of that terrain category but 1 25 45 80 130
develop gradually to height ( hx ) which increa- 2 35 65 110 190
ses with the fetch or upwind distance ( x ). 5 60 100 170 300
a) Fetch and developed height relationship — 10 80 140 250 450
The relation between the developed height 20 120 200 350 500
( hx ) and the fetch ( x ) for wind-flow over 50 180 300 400 500
each of the four terrain categories may be
taken as given in Table 3. 5.3.3.1 The effect of topography will be
b) For structures of heights greater than the significant at a site when the upwind slope (θ)
developed height ( hx ) in Table 3, the is greater than about 3º, and below that, the
velocity profile may be determined in value of k3 may be taken to be equal to 1.0. The
accordance with the following: value of k3 is confined in the range of 1.0 to 1.36
i) The less or least rough terrain, or for slopes greater than 3º. A method of
evaluating the value of k3 for values greater
ii) The method described in Appendix B.
than 1.0 is given in Appendix C. It may be
5.3.3 Topography ( k3 Factor ) — The basic noted that the value of k3 varies with height
wind speed Vb given in Fig. 1 takes account of above ground level, at a maximum near the
the general level of site above sea level. This ground, and reducing to 1.0 at higher levels.
does not allow for local topographic features
such as hills, valleys, cliffs, escarpments, or 5.4 Design Wind Pressure — The design
ridges which can significantly affect wind speed wind pressure at any height above mean
in their vicinity. The effect of topography is to ground level shall be obtained by the following
accelerate wind near the summits of hills or relationship between wind pressure and wind
crests of cliffs, escarpments or ridges and velocity:
decelerate the wind in valleys or near the foot pz = 0.6 V 2
of cliffs, steep escarpments, or ridges. z
12
IS : 875 (Part 3) - 1987
13
IS : 875 (Part 3) - 1987
BUILDING BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN WIND Cpe FOR SURFACE LOCAL Cpe
HEIGHT PLAN ANGLE
RATIO RATIO θ A B C D
degrees
0 + 0.7 – 0.2 – 0.5 – 0.5
1< ---l- 3
--- – 0.8
w 2 90 – 0.5 – 0.5 + 0.7 – 0.2
h 1
---- ---
w 2
1 h 3
--- < ---- ---
2 w 2
3 h- < 6
--- < ---
2 w
( Continued )
14
IS : 875 (Part 3) - 1987
BUILDING BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN WIND Cpe FOR SURFACE LOCAL Cpe
HEIGHT PLAN ANGLE
RATIO RATIO θ
A B C D
h- ≥ 6
--- 0 + 0.95 – 1.25 – 0.7 – 0.7
– 1.25
l
w ---- = 1.0
w 90 – 0.7 – 0.7 + 0.95 – 1.25
NOTE — h is the height to caves or parapet, l is the greater horizontal dimensions of a building and w is the lesser
horizontal dimension of a building.
6.2.2.3 Monoslope roofs of rectangular clad to the wind direction φ = 0 represents a canopy
buildings — The average pressure coefficient with no obstructions underneath. φ = 1 repre-
and pressure concentration coefficient for sents the canopy fully blocked with contents to
monoslope (lean-to) roofs of rectangular clad the downwind eaves. Values of Cp for
buildings shall be as given in Table 6. intermediate solidities may be linearly
interpolated between these two extremes, and
6.2.2.4 — Canopy roofs with --l- < ---
h- < apply upwind of the position of maximum
4 w 1 and blockage only. Downwind of the position of
L
1 < ---- < 3 — The pressure coefficients are maximum blockage the coefficients for φ = 0
w may be used.
given in Tables 7 and 8 separately for monopitch
In addition to the pressure forces normal to the
and double pitch canopy roofs such as open-air
canopy, there will be horizontal loads on the
parking garages, shelter areas, outdoor areas,
canopy due to the wind pressure on any fascia
railway platforms, stadiums and theatres. The
and to friction over the surface of the canopy. For
coefficients take account of the combined effect of
any wind direction, only the greater of these two
the wind exerted on and under the roof for all
forces need be taken into account. Fascia loads
wind directions; the resultant is to be taken
should be calculated on the area of the surface
normal to the canopy. Where the local
facing the wind, using a force coefficient of 1.3.
coefficients overlap, the greater of the two given
Frictional drag should be calculated using the
values should be taken. However, the effect of
coefficients given in 6.3.1.
partial closures of one side and or both sides, such
NOTE — Tables 9 to 14 may be used to get internal and
as those due to trains, buses and stored materials external pressure coefficients for pitches and troughed
shall be foreseen and taken into account. free roofs for some specific cases for which aspect ratios
and roof slopes have been specified. However, while
The solidity ratio φ is equal to the area of using Tables 9 to 14 any significant departure from it
obstructions under the canopy divided by the should be investigated carefully. No increase shall be
gross area under the canopy, both areas normal made for local effects except as indicated.
15
IS : 875 (Part 3) - 1987
TABLE 5 EXTERNAL PRESSURE COEFFICIENTS ( Cpe ) FOR PITCHED ROOFS OF RECTANGULAR CLAD BUILDINGS
( Clause 6.2.2.2 )
EF GH EG FH
degrees
0 – 0.8 – 0.4 – 0.8 – 0.4 – 2.0 – 2.0 – 2.0 —
5 – 0.9 – 0.4 – 0.8 – 0.4 – 1.4 – 1.2 – 1.2 – 1.0
10 – 1.2 – 0.4 – 0.8 – 0.6 – 1.4 – 1.4 – 1.2
h 1 20 – 0.4 – 0.4 – 0.7 – 0.6 – 1.0 – 1.2
---- --- 30 0 – 0.4 – 0.7 – 0.6 – 0.8 – 1.1
w 2
45 + 0.3 – 0.5 – 0.7 – 0.6 – 1.1
60 + 0.7 – 0.6 – 0.7 – 0.6 – 1.1
16
NOTE 2 – Where no local coefficients are given, the overall coefficients apply.
NOTE 3 – For hipped roofs the local coefficient for the hip ridge may be conservatively taken as the appropriate ridge value.
NOTE 4 — W and L are overall length and width including overhangs, w and l are dimensions between the walls excluding overhangs.
17
y = h or 0.15 w,
whichever is the lesser.
remainder
Applies to
ward end
5 – 1.0 – 0.5 – 1.0 – 0.9 – 1.0 – 0.5 – 0.9 – 1.0 – 0.5 – 1.0 – 2.0 – 1.5 – 2.0 – 1.5 – 2.0 – 2.0
10 – 1.0 – 0.5 – 1.0 – 0.8 – 1.0 – 0.5 – 0.8 – 1.0 – 0.4 – 1.0 – 2.0 – 1.5 – 2.0 – 1.5 – 2.0 – 2.0
15 – 0.9 – 0.5 – 1.0 – 0.7 – 1.0 – 0.5 – 0.6 – 1.0 – 0.3 – 1.0 – 1.8 – 0.9 – 1.8 – 1.4 – 2.0 – 2.0
20 – 0.8 – 0.5 – 1.0 – 0.6 – 0.9 – 0.5 – 0.5 – 1.0 – 0.2 – 1.0 – 1.8 – 0.8 – 1.8 – 1.4 – 2.0 – 2.0
25 – 0.7 – 0.5 – 1.0 – 0.6 – 0.8 – 0.5 – 0.3 – 0.9 – 0.1 – 0.9 – 1.8 – 0.7 – 0.9 – 0.9 – 2.0 – 2.0
30 – 0.5 – 0.5 – 1.0 – 0.6 – 0.8 – 0.5 – 0.1 – 0.6 0 – 0.6 – 1.8 – 0.5 – 0.5 – 0.5 – 2.0 – 2.0
NOTE 1 — h is the height to eaves at lower side, l is the greater horizontal dimension of a building and w is the lesser
horizontal dimension of a building.
NOTE 2 — W and L are overall length and width including overhangs, w and l are dimensions between the walls
excluding overhangs.
18
IS : 875 (Part 3) - 1987
ROOF ANGLE SOLIDITY RATIO MAXIMUM (LARGEST + VE) AND MINIMUM (LARGEST – VE) PRESSURE
(DEGREES) COEFFICIENTS
19
IS : 875 (Part 3) - 1987
ROOF ANGLE SOLIDITY MAXIMUM (LARGEST + VE) AND MINIMUM (LARGEST – VE) PRESSURE
(DEGREES) RATIO COEFFICIENTS
20
IS : 875 (Part 3) - 1987
TABLE 9 PRESSURE COEFFICIENTS (TOP AND BOTTOM) FOR PITCHED ROOFS, α = 30º
( Clause 6.2.2.4 )
PRESSURE COEFFICIENTS, Cp
θ
End Surfaces
D D′ E E′
C C′ G G′
21
IS : 875 (Part 3) - 1987
TABLE 10 PRESSURE COEFFICIENTS (TOP AND BOTTOM) FOR PITCHED FREE ROOFS,
α = 30º WITH EFFECTS OF TRAIN OR STORED MATERIALS
( Clause 6.2.2.4 )
PRESSURE COEFFICIENTS, Cp
θ
End Surfaces
D D′ E E′
C C′ G G′
22
IS : 875 (Part 3) - 1987
TABLE 11 PRESSURE COEFFICIENTS (TOP AND BOTTOM) FOR PITCHED FREE ROOFS, α = 10º
( Clause 6.2.2.4 )
PRESSURE COEFFICIENTS, Cp
θ End Surfaces
D D′ E E′
C C′ G G′
23
IS : 875 (Part 3) - 1987
TABLE 12 PRESSURE COEFFICIENTS (TOP AND BOTTOM) FOR PITCHED FREE ROOFS,
α = 10º WITH EFFECTS OF TRAIN OR STORED MATERIALS
( Clause 6.2.2.4 )
PRESSURE COEFFICIENTS, Cp
θ End Surfaces
D D′ E E′
C C′ G G′
24
IS : 875 (Part 3) - 1987
PRESSURE COEFFICIENTS, Cp
θ
D D′ E E′
25
IS : 875 (Part 3) - 1987
TABLE 14 PRESSURE COEFFICIENTS (TOP AND BOTTOM) FOR TROUGHED FREE ROOFS,
α = 10º WITH EFFECTS OF TRAINS OR STORED MATERIALS
( Clause 6.2.2.4 )
PRESSURE COEFFICIENTS, Cp
θ
D D′ E E′
26
IS : 875 (Part 3) - 1987
6.2.2.5 Curved roofs — For curved roofs, the The total resultant load ( P ) acting on the roof
external pressure coefficients shall be as given of the structure is given by the following formula:
in Table 15. Allowance for local effects shall be
P = 0.785 D2 ( Cpi – Cpe ) pd
made in accordance with Table 5.
6.2.2.6 Pitched and saw-tooth roofs of multi- The resultant of P for roofs lies at 0.1 D from
span buildings — For pitched and saw-tooth the centre of the roof on the windword side.
roofs of multi-span buildings, the external 6.2.2.10 Combined roofs and roofs with a sky
average pressure coefficients and pressure light — The average external pressure
concentration coefficients shall be as given in coefficients for combined roofs and roofs with a
Tables 16 and 17 respectively. provided that all sky light is shown in Table 20.
spans shall be equal and the height to the eaves
6.2.2.11 Grandstands — The pressure coeffi-
shall not exceed the span.
cients on the roof (top and bottom) and rear
NOTE — Evidence on multi-span buildings is wall of a typical grandstand roof which is open
fragmentary; any departure given in Tables 16 and 17
should be investigated separately. on three sides is given in Table 21. The
pressure coefficients are valid for a particular
6.2.2.7 Pressure coefficients on overhangs from
ratio of dimensions as specified in Table 21 but
roofs — The pressure coefficients on the top
may be used for deviations up to 20 percent. In
overhanging portion of the roofs shall be taken
to be the same as that of the nearest top portion general, the maximum wind load occurs when
of the non-overhanging portion of the roofs. The the wind is blowing into the open front of the
pressure coefficients for the underside surface stand, causing positive pressure under the roof
of the overhanging portions shall be taken as and negative pressure on the roof.
follows and shall be taken as positive if the 6.2.2.12 Upper surface of round silos and
overhanging portion is on the windward side: tanks — The pressure coefficients on the upper
a) 1.25 if the overhanging slopes downwards, surface of round silos and tanks standing on
b) 1.00 if the overhanging is horizontal, and ground shall be as given in Fig. 2.
c) 0.75 if the overhanging slopes upwards. 6.2.2.13 Spheres — The. external pressure
For overhanging portions on sides other than coefficients for spheres shall be as given in
the windward side, the average pressure coeffi- Table 22.
cients on adjoining walls may be used. 6.2.3 Internal Pressure Coefficients — Internal
6.2.2.8 Cylindrical structures — For the pur- air pressure in a building depends upon the
pose of calculating the wind pressure degree of permeability of cladding to the flow of
distribution around a cylindrical structure of air. The internal air pressure may be positive
circular crosssection, the value of external or negative depending on the direction of flow
pressure coefficients given in Table 18 may be of air in relation to openings in the buildings.
used provided that the Reynolds number is 6.2.3.1 In the case of buildings where the
greater than 10 000. They may be used for wind
claddings permit the flow of air with openings
blowing normal to the axis of cylinders having
not more than about 5 percent of the wall area
axis normal to the ground plane (that is,
but where there are no large openings, it is
chimneys and silos) and cylinders having their
necessary to consider the possibility of the
axis parallel to the ground plane (that is,
horizontal tanks) provided that the clearance internal pressure being positive or negative.
between the tank and the ground is not less Two design conditions shall be examined, one
than the diameter of the cylinder. with an internal pressure coefficient of + 0.2
and another with an internal pressure
h is height of a vertical cylinder or length of coefficient of – 0.2.
a horizontal cylinder. Where there is a free flow
of air around both ends, h is to be taken as half The internal pressure coefficient is algebrai-
the length when calculating h/D ratio. cally added to the external pressure coefficient
and the analysis which indicates greater
In the calculation of the resultant load on the
distress of the member shall be adopted. In
periphery of the cylinder, the value of Cpi shall
most situations a simple inspection of the sign
be taken into account. For open ended
cylinders, Cpi shall be taken as follows: of external pressure will at once indicate the
proper sign of the internal pressure coefficient
a) -0.8 where h/D is not less than 0.3, and to be taken for design.
b) -0.5 where h/D is less than 0.3. NOTE — The term normal permeability relates to the
6.2.2.9 Roofs and bottoms of cylindrical flow of air commonly afforded by claddings not only
through open windows and doors, but also through the
elevated structures — The external pressure slits round the closed windows and doors and through
coefficients for roofs and bottoms of cylindrical chimneys, ventilators and through the joints between
elevated structures shall be as given in roof coverings, the total open area being less than 5
Table 19 ( see also Fig. 2 ). percent of area of the walls having the openings.
27
IS : 875 (Part 3) - 1987
28
IS : 875 (Part 3) - 1987
ROOF WIND FIRST SPAN FIRST OTHER END SPAN LOCAL COEFFICIENT
ANGLE ANGLE INTERMEDIATE INTERMEDIATE
SPAN SPAN
α θ a b c d m n x z
degrees degrees
5 0 – 0.9 – 0.6 – 0.4 – 0.3 – 0.3 – 0.3 – 0.3 – 0.3
10 – 1.1 – 0.6 – 0.4 – 0.3 – 0.3 – 0.3 – 0.3 – 0.4
20 – 0.7 – 0.6 – 0.4 – 0.3 – 0.3 – 0.3 – 0.3 – 0.5 – 2.0 – 1.5
30 – 0.2 – 0.6 – 0.4 – 0.3 – 0.2 – 0.3 – 0.2 – 0.5
45 + 0.3 – 0.6 – 0.6 – 0.4 – 0.2 – 0.4 – 0.2 – 0.5
Distance
Roof Wind h1 h2 h3
Angle Angle
α θ
degrees degrees
Up to 45 90 – 0.8 – 0.6 – 0.2
Frictional drag: When wind angle θ = 0º, horizontal forces due to frictional drag are allowed for in the above
values; and
when wind angle θ = 90º, allow for frictional drag in accordance with 6.3.1.
NOTE — Evidence on these buildings is fragmentary and any departure from the cases given should be investigated
separately.
29
IS : 875 (Part 3) - 1987
a b c d m n x z
degrees
DISTANCE
WIND h1 h2 h3
ANGLE θ
degrees
90 – 0.8 – 0.6
– 0.2
Frictional drag: When wind angle θ = 0º horizontal forces due to frictional drag are allowed for in the above
values; and
when wind angle θ = 90º, allow for frictional drag in accordance with 6.3.1.
NOTE — Evidence on these buildings is fragmentary and any departure from the cases given should be investigated
separately.
30
IS : 875 (Part 3) - 1987
31
IS : 875 (Part 3) - 1987
a, b and c d
Total force acting on the roof of the structure, P = 0.785 D2 ( Cpi – Cpe ) pd
The resultant of P lies eccentrically, e = 0.1D
32
IS : 875 (Part 3) - 1987
TABLE 20 EXTERNAL PRESSURE COEFFICIENTS, Cpe FOR COMBINED ROOFS AND ROOFS
WITH A SKY LIGHT
( Clause 6.2.2.10 )
a) Combined Roofs
VALUES OF Cpe
h
Cpe = – 0.5, ------1 1.5 – 0.4
h2
b
h
Cpe = – 0.7, ------1 > 1.5
h2
e See 6.2.2.7
( Continued )
33
IS : 875 (Part 3) - 1987
TABLE 20 EXTERNAL PRESSURE COEFFICIENTS, Cpe FOR COMBINED ROOFS AND ROOFS
WITH A SKY LIGHT — Contd
b1 > b2 b1 b2
PORTION a b a and b
34
IS : 875 (Part 3) - 1987
θ J K L M
θ A B C D E F G H
35
IS : 875 (Part 3) - 1987
36
IS : 875 (Part 3) - 1987
6.3.1 Frictional Drag — In certain buildings of Cf′ = 0.02 for surfaces with corrugations
special shape, a force due to frictional drag across the wind direction, and
shall be taken into account in addition to those
loads specified in 6.2. For rectangular clad Cf′ = 0.04 for surfaces with ribs across the
buildings, this addition is necessary only where wind direction.
the ratio d d
--- or --- is greater than 4. The
h b For other buildings, the frictional drag has
frictional drag force, F′, in the direction of the been indicated, where necessary, in the tables
wind is given by the following formulae: of pressure coefficients and force coefficients.
If h b, F′ = Cf′ ( d – 4h ) bpd
+ Cf′ ( d – 4h ) 2 hpd, and 6.3.2 Force Coefficients for Clad Buildings
if h > b, F′ = Cf′ ( d – 4b ) bpd
6.3.2.1 Clad buildings of uniform section — The
+ Cf′ ( d – 4b ) 2 hpd.
overall force coefficients for rectangular clad
The first term in each case gives the drag on buildings of uniform section with flat roofs in
the roof and the second on the walls. The value uniform flow shall be as given in Fig. 4 and for
of Cf′ has the following values: other clad buildings of uniform section (without
Cf′ = 0.01 for smooth surfaces without corru- projections, except where otherwise shown)
gations or ribs across the wind direction, shall be as given in Table 23.
37
IS : 875 (Part 3) - 1987
38
IS : 875 (Part 3) - 1987
boundary layer on them. Although this obstructed, the ratio l/b shall be taken as
phenomenon is well known in the case of infinity for the purpose of determining K.
circular cylinders, the same phenomenon exists b) Flat-sided members — Force coefficients
in the case of many other well-rounded for wind normal to the longitudinal axis
structures, and this possibility must be of flat-sided structural members shall be
checked.
as given in Table 26.
6.3.3.2 Individual members The force coefficients are given for two
a) The coefficients refer to the members of mutually perpendicular directions
infinite length. For members of finite relative to a reference axis on the
length, the coefficients should be structural member. They are designated
multiplied by a factor K that depends on as Cfn and Cft, give the forces normal
the ratio l/b where l is the length of the and transverse, respectively to the
member and b is the width across the reference plane as shown in Table 26.
direction or wind. Table 25 gives the Normal force, Fn = Cfn = pd K l b
required values of K. The following special
cases must be noted while estimating K. Transverse force Ft = Cft pd K l b
i) Where any member abuts onto a c) Circular sections — Force coefficients for
plate or wall in such a way that free members of circular section shall be as
flow of air around that end of the given in Table 23 ( see also Appendix D ).
member is prevented, then the ratio d) Force coefficients for wires and cables
of l/b shall be doubled for the shall be as given in Table 27 according to
purpose of determining K; and the diamater ( D ), the design wind
ii) When both ends of a member are so speed ( Vz ) and the surface roughness.
39
IS : 875 (Part 3) - 1987
m2/s Up to 1/2 1 2 5 10 20 ∞
See also Appendix D Smooth 6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6
b/d = 2 All
0.9 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.5 1.9
r/b = 1/12 values
( Continued )
40
IS : 875 (Part 3) - 1987
m2/s Up to 1/2 1 2 5 10 20 ∞
r/a = 1/3
10 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6
All
r/a = 1/12 values 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.6
All
r/a = 1/48 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.6
values
All
r/b = 1/12 0.8 0.8 0.8 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.4
values
All
r/b = 1/48 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.3
values
( Continued )
41
IS : 875 (Part 3) - 1987
m2/s Up to 1/2 1 2 5 10 20 ∞
1/48<r/b All
1.2 1.2 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.7 2.1
<1/12 values
All
Octagon 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.4
values
All
Hexagon 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.5
values
Structures that, because of their size and design wind velocity, are in the supercritical flow regime may need further
calculation to ensure that the greatest loads do not occur at some wind speed below the maximum when the flow will be
subcritical.
The coefficient are for buildings without projections, except where otherwise shown.
42
IS : 875 (Part 3) - 1987
Cf
FIG. 5 VARIATION OF -------------------
- WITH Re ( >3 × 104 ) FOR CIRCULAR SECTIONS
2ε
1 + ------
D
TABLE 24 FORCE COEFFICIENTS FOR LOW WALLS OR HOARDINGS (< 15 m HIGH)
( Clause 6.3.2.3 )
10 20 1.3
16 32 1.4
20 40 1.5
40 80 1.75
60 120 1.8
43
IS : 875 (Part 3) - 1987
HEMISPERICAL
1.4
BOWL
HEMISPERICAL
0.4
BOWL
HEMISPERICAL
1.2
SOLID
Circular cylinder, 0.58 0.62 0.68 0.74 0.82 0.87 0.98 1.00
subcritical flow
Circular cylinder, 0.80 0.80 0.82 0.90 0.98 0.99 1.00 1.00
supercritical flow
( DVz 6m2/s)
For plate perpendi- 0.62 0.66 0.69 0.81 0.87 0.90 0.95 1.00
cular to wind
( DVz 6m2/s)
44
TABLE 26 FORCE COEFFICIENTS ( Cf ) FOR INDIVIDUAL STRUCTURAL MEMBERS OF INFINITE LENGTH
[ Clause 6.3.3.2 (b) ]
0 Cfn Cft Cfn Cft Cfn Cft Cfn Cft Cfn Cft Cfn Cft
degrees
0 + 1.9 + 0.95 + 1.8 + 1.8 + 1.75 + 0.1 + 1.6 0 + 2.0 0 + 2.05 0
45 + 1.8 + 0.8 + 2.1 + 1.8 + 0.85 + 0.85 + 1.5 – 0.1 + 1.2 + 0.9 + 1.85 + 0.6
90 + 2.0 + 1.7 – 1.9 – 1.0 + 0.1 + 1.75 – 0.95 + 0.7 – 1.6 + 2.15 0 + 0.6
135 – 1.8 – 0.1 – 2.0 + 0.3 – 0.75 + 0.75 – 0.5 + 1.05 – 1.1 + 2.4 – 1.6 + 0.4
45
180 – 2.0 + 0.1 – 1.4 – 1.4 – 1.75 – 0.1 – 1.5 0 – 1.7 ± 2.1 – 1.8 0
degrees
0 + 1.4 0 + 2.05 0 + 1.6 0 + 2.0 0 + 2.0 0
45 + 1.2 + 1.6 + 1.95 + 0.6 + 1.5 + 1.5 + 1.8 + 0.1 + 1.55 + 1.55
90 0 + 2.2 + 0.5 + 0.9 0 + 1.9 0 + 0.1 0 + 2.0
NOTE — In this table, the force coefficient Cf is given in relation to the dimension b and not, as in other cases, in relation to effective frontal area Ae.
IS : 875 (Part 3) - 1987
Smooth Moder- Fine Thick sided members as given in
Surface ately Stranded Stranded Table 28,
Smooth Cables Cables Acirc sub = effective area of subcritical
Wire circular members
(Galvani-
zed or Aflat = effective area of flat-sided
Painted) members,
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) Asub = Acirc sub + Aflat, and
DVz < 0.6 m2/s – – 1.2 1.3
0.6 m2/s ( Area of the frame in a supercritical flow )
DVz – – 0.9 1.1 γ = ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DVz < 6 m2/s 1.2 1.2 – – Ae
DVz 0.6 m2/s 0.5 0.7 – –
6.3.3.3 Single frames — Force coefficients for a 6.3.3.4 Multiple frame buildings — This section
single frame having either: applies to structures having two or more
parallel frames where the windward frames
a) all flat sided members, or may have a shielding effect upon the frames to
b) all circular members in which all the leeward side. The windward frame and any
members of the frame have either: unshield parts of other frames shall be
i) DVz less than 6 m2/s, or calculated in accordance with 6.3.3.3, but the
wind load on the parts of frames that are
ii) DVz greater than 6 m2/s
sheltered should be multiplied by a shielding
shall be as given in Table 28 according to the factor which is dependent upon the solidity
type of the member, the diameter ( D ), the ratio of the windward frame, the types of the
design wind speed ( Vz ) and the solidity ratio members comprising the frame and the spac-
( φ ). ing ratio of the frames. The values of the
shielding factors are given in Table 29.
TABLE 28 FORCE COEFFICIENTS FOR
SINGLE FRAMES TABLE 29 SHIELDING FACTOR η FOR
SOLIDITY FORCE COEFFICIENTS, Cf, FOR MULTIPLE FRAMES
RATIO φ EFFECTIVE FRAME SPACING RATIO
Force coefficients for a single frame not com- Where there are more than two frames of
plying with the above requirements shall be similar geometry and spacing, the wind load on
calculated as follows: the third and subsequent frames should be
taken as equal to that on the second frame. The
A circ sub loads on the various frames shall be added to
Cf = γ Cf super+(1 – γ) --------------------
- Cf sub
A sub obtain total load on the structure.
a) The frame spacing ratio is equal to the
A flat
+ (1 – γ) -----------
- C distance, centre to centre of the frames,
A sub f flat beams or girders divided by the least
where overall dimension of the frame, beam or
girder measured at right angles to the
Cf super = force coefficient for the super- direction of the wind. For triangular
critical circular members as framed structures or rectangular framed
given in Table 28 or Appen- structures diagonal to the wind, the
dix D, spacing ratio should be calculated from
46
IS : 875 (Part 3) - 1987
the mean distance between the frames in (e) Force coefficients for lattice towers of
the direction of the wind. equilateral-triangle section with circular
b) Effective solidity ratio, β: members all in the same flow ragime may
be as given in Table 32.
β = φ for flat-sided members.
TABLE 31 OVERALL FORCE COEFFICIENT FOR
β is to be obtained from Fig. 7 for members SQUARE TOWERS COMPOSED OF
of circular cross-sections. ROUNDED MEMBERS
[ Clause 6.3.3.5 (d) ]
SOLIDITY FORCE COEFFICIENT FOR
RATIO OF
FRONT FACE Subcritical Flow Supercritical Flow
( DVz < 6 m2/s ) ( DVz 6 m2/s )
Onto face Onto Onto face Onto
Corner Corner
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
0.05 2.4 2.5 1.1 1.2
0.1 2.2 2.3 1.2 1.3
0.2 1.9 2.1 1.3 1.6
0.3 1.7 1.9 1.4 1.6
0.4 1.6 1.9 1.4 1.6
0.5 1.4 1.9 1.4 1.6
47
IS : 875 (Part 3) - 1987
b) Buildings and structures whose natural oscillation to another, and the structure is seen to
frequency in the first mode is less execute sustained or divergent oscillations with a
type of motion which is a combination of the
than 1.0 Hz. individual modes of motion. Such energy transfer
Any building or structure which satisfies takes place when the natural frequencies of modes,
taken individually, are close to each other (ratio.
either of the above two criteria shall be being typically less than 2.0). Flutter can set in at
examined for dynamic effects of wind. wind speeds much less than those required for
exciting the individual modes of motion. Long span
NOTE 1 — The fundamental time period ( T ) may either suspension bridge decks or any member of a
be established by experimental observations on similar structure with large values of d/t (where d is the
buildings or calculated by any rational method of depth of a structure or structural member parallel to
analysis. In the absence of such data, T may be wind stream and t is the least lateral dimension of a
determined as follows for multi-storeyed buildings: member) are prone to low speed flutter. Wind tunnel
(a) For moment resisting frames without bracing or testing is required to determine critical flutter
shear walls for resisting the lateral loads speeds and the likely structural response. Other
T = 0.1 n types of flutter are single degree of freedom stall
flutter, torsional flutter, etc.
where
c) Ovalling — This walled structures with open ends at
n = number of storeys including basement sto- one or both ends such as oil storage tanks, and
reys; and natural draught cooling towers in which the ratio of
(b) For all others the diameter of minimum lateral dimension to the
wall thickness is of the order of 100 or more, are
0.09 H prone to ovalling oscillations. These oscillations are
T = ------------------- characterized by periodic radial deformation of the
d
hollow structure.
where
NOTE 7 — Buildings and structures that may be
H = total height of the main structure of the subjected to serious wind excited oscillations require
building in metres, and careful investigation. It is to be noted that wind induc-
d = maximum base dimension of building in ed oscillations may occur at wind speeds lower than the
metres in a direction parallel to the applied static design wind speed for the location.
wind force.
NOTE 8 — Analytical methods for the response of
NOTE 2 — If preliminary studies indicate that dynamic structures to wind loading can be found in the
wind-induced oscillations are likely to be significant, following publications:
investigations should be persuade with the aid of analy-
tical methods or, if necessary, by means of wind tunnel i) Engineering Science Data, Wind Engineering
tests on models. Sub-Series (4 volumes), London, ESDU Inter-
national.
NOTE 3 — Cross-wind motions may by due to lateral
gustiness of the wind, unsteady wake flow (for example, ii) ‘Wind Engineering in the Eighties’,
vortex shedding), negative aerodynamic damping or to a Construction Industry Research and
combination of these effects. These cross-wind motions, Information Association, 1981, London.
can become critical in the design of tall iii) ‘Wind Effects on Structures’ by E. Simiu and
buildings/structures. R.H. Scanlan, New York, John Wiley and Sons,
NOTE 4 — Motions in the direction of wind (known also 1978.
as buffeting) are caused by fluctuating wind force iv) Supplement to the National Building Code of
associated with gusts. The excitations depend on gust Canada. 1980. NRCC, No. 17724, Ottawa,
energy available at the resonant frequency. National Research Council of Canada, 1980.
NOTE 5 — The wake shed from an upstream body may v) Wind forces on structures by Peter Sachs.
intensify motions in the direction of the wind, and may Pergamon press.
also affect crosswind motions. vi) Flow induced vibration by Robert D. Clevins,
NOTE 6 — The designer must be aware of the following Von Nostrand Reinfold Co.
three forms of wind induced motion which are vii) Appropriate Indian Standards ( see 1.1.3 ).
characterized by increasing amplitude of oscillation
with the increase of wind speed. NOTE 9 — In assessing wind loads due to such dynamic
phenomenon as galloping, flutter and ovalling, if the
a) Galloping — Galloping is transverse oscillations required information is not available either in the
of some structures due to the development of references of Note 8 or other literature, specialist advise
aerodynamic forces which are in phase with the shall be sought, including experiments on models in
motion. It is characterized by the progressively wind tunnels.
increasing amplitude of transverse vibration with
increase of wind speed. The cross-section which 7.2 Motion Due to Vortex Shedding
are particularly prone to this type of excitation
include the following:
7.2.1 Slender Structures — For a structure, the
i) All structures with non-circular cross-sections, shedding frequency, η shall be determined by
such as triangular, square, polygons, as well as the following formula:
angles, crosses, and T-sections,
SV
ii) Twisted cables and cables with ice encrusta-
η = ----------z-
tions. b
b) Flutter — Flutter is unstable oscillatory motion of
a structure due to coupling between aerody- where
namic force and elastic deformation of the S = Strouhal number,
structure. Perhaps the most common form is
oscillatory motion due to combined bending and
Vz = design wind velocity, and
torsion. Although oscillatory motions in each b = breadth of a structure or structural
degree of freedom may be damped, instability can members in the horizontal plane
set in due to energy transfer from one mode of normal to the wind direction.
48
IS : 875 (Part 3) - 1987
a) Circular Structures — For structures 8.2.1 Variation of Hourly Mean Wind Speed
circular in cross-section: with Height — The variation of hourly mean
S = 0.20 for bVz not greater than 7, wind speed with height shall be calculated as
and follows:
V z = Vb k1 k 2 k3
= 0.25 for bVz greater than 7.
b) Rectangular Structures — For structures where
of rectangular cross-section: V z = hourly mean wind speed in m/s, at
S = 0.15 for all values of bVz. height z;
NOTE 1 — Significant cross wind motions may be Vb = regional basic wind speed in m/s
produced by vortex shedding if the natural frequency of ( see Fig. 1 );
the structure or structural element is equal to the
frequency of the vortex shedding within the range of k1 = probability factor ( see 5.3.1 );
expected wind velocities. In such cases, further analysis
should be carried out on the basis of references given in k 2 = terrain and height factor ( see
Note 8 of 7.1. Table 33 ); and
NOTE 2 — Unlined welded steel chimney stacks and k3 = topography factor ( see 5.3.3 ).
similar structures are prone to excitation by vortex
shedding.
NOTE 3 — Intensification of the effects of periodic vortex TABLE 33 HOURLY MEAN WIND SPEED FACTOR
shedding has been reported in cases where two or more k 2 IN DIFFERENT TERRAINS FOR
similar structures are located in close proximity, for DIFFERENT HEIGHTS
example, at less than 20 b apart, where b is the ( Clauses 8.2 and 8.2.1 )
dimension of the structure normal to the wind.
HEIGHT TERRAIN
NOTE 4 — The formulae given in 7.2.1(a) and (b) are m
valid for infinitely long cylindrical structures. The value Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 Category 4
of S decreases slowly as the ratio of length to maximum (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
transverse width decreases; the reduction being up to Up to 10 0.78 0.67 0.50 0.24
about half the value, if the structure is only three times
15 0.82 0.72 0.55 0.24
higher than its width. Vortex shedding need not be
considered if the ratio of length to maximum transverse 20 0.85 0.75 0.59 0.24
width is less than 2.0. 30 0.88 0.79 0.64 0.34
50 0.93 0.85 0.70 0.45
8. GUST FACTOR ( GF ) OR GUST EFFEC-
100 0.99 0.92 0.79 0.57
TIVENESS FACTOR ( GEF ) METHOD
150 1.03 0.96 0.84 0.64
8.1 Application — Only the method of 200 1.06 1.00 0.88 0.68
calculating load along wind or drag load by 250 1.08 1.02 0.91 0.72
using gust factor method is given in the code 300 1.09 1.04 0.93 0.74
since methods for calculating load across-wind 350 1.11 1.06 0.95 0.77
or other components are not fully matured for 400 1.12 1.07 0.97 0.79
all types of structures. However, it is 450 1.13 1.08 0.98 0.81
permissible for a designer to use gust factor 500 1.14 1.09 0.99 0.82
method to calculate all components of load on a
structure using any available theory. However, 8.3 Along Wind Load — Along wind load on a
such a theory must take into account the structure on a strip area ( Ae ) at any height
random nature of atmospheric wind speed. ( z ) is given by:
NOTE — It may be noted that investigations for various Fz = Cf Ae, p z G
types of wind induced oscillations outlined in 7 are in no where
way related to the use of gust factor method given in 8
although the study of 7 is needed for using gust factor Fz = along wind load on the structure at any
method. height z corresponding to strip area Ae,
8.2 Hourly Mean Wind — Use of the existing Cf = force coefficient for the building,
theories of gust factor method require a knowl- Ae = effective frontal area considered for the
edge of maximum wind speeds averaged over structure at height z,
one hour at a particular location. Hourly mean
wind speeds at different heights in different p z = design pressure at height z due to
terrains is given in Table 33. hourly mean wind obtained as 0.6 Vz2
NOTE — It must also be recognized that the ratio of
(N/m2),
hourly mean wind (HMW) to peak speed given in Table peak load , and is
33 may not be obtainable in India since extreme wind G = gust factor = ---------------------------
-
mean load
occurs mainly due to cyclones and thunderstorms,
unlike in UK and Canada where the mechanism is fully given by:
developed pressure system. However Table 33 may be
followed at present for the estimation of the hourly 2 SE
mean wind speed till more reliable values become G = 1 + gf r B ( 1 + φ ) + --------
β
available.
49
IS : 875 (Part 3) - 1987
50
51
52
IS : 875 (Part 3) - 1987
APPENDIX A
( Clause 5.2 )
City/Town Basic Wind Speed ( m/s ) City/Town Basic Wind Speed (m/s)
Agra 47 Jhansi 47
Ahmadabad 39 Jodhpur 47
Ajmer 47 Kanpur 47
Almora 47 Kohima 44
Amritsar 47 Kurnool 39
Asansol 47 Lakshadweep 39
Aurangabad 39 Lucknow 47
Bahraich 47 Ludhiana 47
Bangalore 33 Madras 50
Barauni 47 Madurai 39
Bareilly 47 Mandi 39
Bhatinda 47 Mangalore 39
Bhilai 39 Moradabad 47
Bhopal 39 Mysore 33
Bhubaneshwar 50 Nagpur 44
Bhuj 50 Nainital 47
Bikaner 47 Nasik 39
Nellore 50
Bokaro 47
Panjim 39
Bombay 44
Patiala 47
Calcutta 50
Patna 47
Calicut 39
Pondicherry 50
Chandigarh 47
Port Blair 44
Coimbatore 39
Pune 39
Cuttack 50
Raipur 39
Darbhanga 55
Rajkot 39
Darjeeling 47
Ranchi 39
Dehra Dun 47
Roorkee 39
Delhi 47 Rourkela 39
Durgapur 47 Simla 39
Gangtok 47 Srinagar 39
Gauhati 50 Surat 44
Gaya 39 Tiruchirrappalli 47
Gorakhpur 47 Trivandrum 39
Hyderabad 44 Udaipur 47
Imphal 47 Vadodara 44
Jabalpur 47 Varanasi 47
Jaipur 47 Vijaywada 50
Jamshedpur 47 Visakhapatnam 50
53
IS : 875 (Part 3) - 1987
APPENDIX B
[ Clause 5.3.2.4(b)(ii) ]
54
IS : 875 (Part 3) - 1987
APPENDIX C
( Clause 5.3.3.1 )
C-1. The influence of the topographic feature is Z = effective height of the feature, and
considered to extend 1.5 Le upwind and 2.5 Le θ = upwind slope in the wind direction.
downwind of the summit of crest of the feature
where Le is the effective horizontal length of If the zone downwind from the crest of the
the hill depending on slope as indicated below feature is relatively flat ( θ < 3º ) for a distance
( see Fig. 13 ): exceeding Le, then the feature should be treated
as an escarpment. If not, then the feature should
Slope Le be treated as a hill or ridge. Examples of typical
features are given in Fig. 13.
3º < θ 17º L NOTE 1 — No difference is made, in evaluating k3
between a three dimensional hill and two dimensional
> 17º Z ridge.
-------- NOTE 2 — In undulating terrain, it is often not possible
0.3 to decide whether the local topography to the site is
significant in terms of wind flow. In such cases, the
where average value of the terrain upwind of the site for a
distance of 5 km should be taken as the base level from
L = actual length of the upwind slope in wind to assess the height, z, and the upwind slope θ, of
the wind direction, the feature.
55
IS : 875 (Part 3) - 1987
C-2. TOPOGRAPHY FACTOR, k3 ground level and the distance, X, from the
The topography factor k3 is given by the summit or crest, relative to the effective length,
following: Le.
k3 = 1+ Cs C-2.1 The factor, s, should be determined from:
where C has the following values: a) Figure 14 for cliffs and escarpments, and
Slope C b) Figure 15 for hills and ridges.
z
3º < θ 17º 1.2 NOTE — Where the downwind slope of a hill or ridge is
L
greater than 3º, there will be large regions of reduced
> 17º 0.36 accelerations or even shelter and it is not possible to
give general design rules to cater for these
and s is a factor derived in accordance with circumstances. Values of s from Fig. 15 may be used as
C-2.1 appropriate to the height, H above mean upper bound values.
56
IS : 875 (Part 3) - 1987
APPENDIX D
[ Clauses 6.3.2.2, 6.3.3.2(c) and 6.3.3 3(b) ]
D-1. The wind force on any object is given by: range of wind speeds likely to be encountered.
F = C f A e pd However, for objects of circular cross-section, it
varies considerably.
where
For a circular section, the force coefficient
Cf = force coefficient,
depends upon the way in which the wind flows
Ae = effective area of the object normal to around it and is dependent upon the velocity
the wind direction, and and kinematic viscosity of the wind and
diameter of the section. The force coefficient is
pd = design pressure of the wind.
usually quoted against a non-dimensional
For most shapes, the force coefficient parameter, called the Reynolds number, which
remains approximately constant over the whole takes account of the velocity and viscosity of the
57
IS : 875 (Part 3) - 1987
58
Bureau of Indian Standards
BIS is a statutory institution established under the Bureau of Indian Standards Act, 1986 to promote
harmonious development of the activities of standardization, marking and quality certification of goods and
attending to connected matters in the country.
Copyright
BIS has the copyright of all its publications. No part of these publications may be reproduced in any form
without the prior permission in writing of BIS. This does not preclude the free use, in the course of
implementing the standard, of necessary details, such as symbols and sizes, type or grade designations.
Enquiries relating to copyright be addressed to the Director (Publications), BIS.