Assessment Session: Week 5

Plate no.2 Literature Review Duration: 4 hours

PLEASE INCLUDE RUBRICS ON 2ND PAGE OF YOUR

WORK

LITERATURE REVIEW WORKSHEET

List the strengths and weaknesses of the Literature
STRENGTHS Weaknesses
1)_detailed information_ 1) difficult to analyze__
2)_understanding of underlying reasons 2) time consuming_____
3) organized 3)

Answer the following questions:

1.) What strategies or methodologies does the author use in the article?
 The methodology or strategy the author used in the article was the
qualitative research.
2.) Which of the arguments was most persuasive? Why?
 The most persuasive arguments for me in this article are the forum
of opinions on the question of whether yõga or nihonga was better
positioned to serve the Japanese nation as "national painting"
because it tackles the imperative issues for the National painting in
1932.
3.) Which was the least persuasive? Why?
 For me it was the "Will a splendid and refined nihonga have
sufficient worth in the future to attract supporters and compete with
seiyõga or not?" Because for me art is not a competition.
4.) Are there any important issues regarding the topic that are not covered
by this article, but that you would write about if you were addressing this
topic?
 By reading the article I have learned some things about the
Western, National and Global painting of Japan. And I must say
that they tackle the important issues of the topic.
5.) What original contribution does the article make to the discussion about
the topic?
 The contribution of this article for me is that I have learned about
that there is this called Yōga and Nihonga, the two styles of artistic
paintings in Japan.
Format:
1page Letter size, portrait orientation
Arial, size 12 (Font)

Submission Date:
Before April 30, 2021

Rubrics for Assessment:

Criteria and Missing or Below Meets Excellent Work Points
Points Serious Expectation Expectation Earned
Assigned Problems
(50-74%) (75-83%) (84-91%) (92-100%)
The essay did Answer is Answer is brief Addresses each
not answer the incomplete. with insufficient question and all its
Content problem Excessive detail. parts thoroughly;
discussion of Unrelated incorporates
unrelated issues were relevant course
40% issues and/or introduced content into
significant and/or minor responses; uses
errors in errors in specific
content content. information from
case in response
20 21 22 23 24 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40
25
None of the Serious gaps in Most of the Demonstrates
Understanding/ relevant the basic basic details are deep
Application details were details needed included but understanding of
30% included some are topics and ideas
missing applied to analysis
of case situations
15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Structure Weak Minor problems Clear and Response to each
organization; of organization logical question is well
20% sentences or logic; Needs presentation; organized and
rambling; work on Transitions are clearly written;
ideas are creating made clearly there is evidence
repeated transitions and smoothly of planning before
between ideas writing
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Grammar and Major Frequent Clear, readable, Response is
mechanics problems with problems with prose. Good virtually free of
10% mechanics of mechanics of use of mechanical,
language; language; transitions; no grammatical
Awkward Occasional problems with writing errors
sentence awkward spelling,
construction; sentences and punctuation, or
Poor or absent poor grammar
transitions; transitions;
Frequently reduce
difficult to readability
understand
5 5.5 6 7 7.5 8 8.5 9 9.5 10