Professional Documents
Culture Documents
http://www.scirp.org/journal/ajac
ISSN Online: 2156-8278
ISSN Print: 2156-8251
Keywords
Urban Soil, Element, Characterization, Pollution Indices, Sources, SEM-EDX
1. Introduction
Pollution of urban soil is of a great public health interest due to receiving of large
amounts of heavy metals from multiple sources including industrial wastes, vehicle
emissions, coal and biomass burnings, etc. [1]-[6]. India is the third-largest producer of
coal in the World. It is a naturally occurring combustible materials contains elemental
carbon, sulfur, hydrocarbons, trace metals, etc. [7] [8]. Several millions ton of coal is
mined out and burnt in the Korba basin for generation of electricity by pouring the ef-
fluents into the environment. The whole environment of the basin is covered by the fly
ash and black carbon. The air, rain and groundwater were contaminated with higher
content of acids and metals [9]-[13]. The SEM-EDX is a versatile, accurate and repro-
ducible technique to quantify the major elements on the surface of geomedia [14].
Hence, in this work, the soil contamination of the Korba basin with elements i.e. C, O,
S, Cl, Na, Mg, Al, Si, P, K, Ca, Ti, Fe, Mn and Ni is investigated by using technique i.e.
SEM-EDX. The concentration variations, enrichments and sources of the elements in
the soil are discussed.
2.4. Analysis
A Hitachi SU-6600 Scanning Electron Microscope equipped with the Thermo disper-
sive X-ray spectrometer (EDS) and cathode luminescence (CL) detector was used for
characterization of major elements (i.e. O, S, Cl, Na, Mg, Al, Si, P, K, Ca, Ti, Fe, Mn and
Ni) in the soil at the Maria Sklodowska-Curie University, Lublin, Poland.The sample
was exposed with the X-ray in a polyethylene disc with recording of surface soil photo-
graph and analytical peaks. The mean value of three measurements at different loca-
tions of the dried soil sample is summarized in Table 1 and Table 2. The standard soil
sample (NCS DC 73382˚C RM) was used for the quality control.
725
R. Sharma et al.
726
R. Sharma et al.
727
R. Sharma et al.
S. No. Na Mg Al Si P K Ca Ti Fe Mn Ni
1 0.39 0.33 6.09 19.16 0.34 1.27 1.87 0.57 4.81 0.17 0.07
2 0.13 0.24 5.61 16.45 0.25 0.99 1.53 0.46 4.31 0.11 0.04
3 0.11 0.31 4.43 12.78 0.2 1.02 0.86 0.25 2.32 0.08 0.06
4 0.25 0.36 6.22 19.09 0.39 2.13 1.63 0.41 4.75 0.18 0.08
5 0.37 0.48 6.79 24.42 0.46 2.57 2.34 0.61 6.4 0.21 0.14
6 0.21 0.28 5.96 17.37 0.33 2.01 1.87 0.5 4.71 0.18 0.07
7 0.24 0.25 5.23 15.53 0.18 0.92 0.84 0.38 2.77 0.09 0.04
8 0.12 0.26 5.9 13.77 0.26 0.74 0.9 0.44 4.05 0.08 0.05
9 0.26 0.17 5.42 16.4 0.12 0.82 0.84 0.35 3.88 0.10 0.12
10 0.17 0.23 5.14 14.04 0.28 1.77 1.48 0.48 4.74 0.21 0.06
11 0.33 0.27 5.36 18.4 0.26 1.49 0.83 0.45 4.77 0.16 0.05
12 0.14 0.44 6.09 15.99 0.29 1.29 1.41 0.34 3.02 0.12 0.04
13 0.16 0.33 5.09 17.26 0.21 1.7 1.57 0.37 3.95 0.09 0.05
14 0.35 0.38 9.5 16.15 0.23 1.37 1.64 0.48 5.78 0.16 0.06
15 0.36 0.49 7.36 17.66 0.37 2.18 1.57 0.58 5.15 0.21 0.12
16 0.18 0.27 5.98 17.37 0.16 1.41 1.33 0.25 3.81 0.12 0.08
17 0.25 0.33 8.49 15.42 0.18 1.24 1.26 0.33 3.04 0.11 0.07
18 0.11 0.28 5.21 17.57 0.17 1.69 1.39 0.36 3.44 0.12 0.05
19 0.26 0.38 4.53 12.86 0.29 1.95 1.65 0.56 4.06 0.19 0.09
20 0.13 0.35 3.68 19.15 0.16 1.71 1.58 0.32 3.96 0.17 0.06
21 0.19 0.32 4.76 13.97 0.11 0.68 1.65 0.36 3.25 0.18 0.06
22 0.27 0.28 7.59 14.59 0.21 1.26 1.47 0.31 5.94 0.11 0.07
23 0.17 0.29 5.27 16.2 0.29 2.17 1.01 0.41 5.91 0.09 0.07
24 0.1 0.26 5.85 17.86 0.35 1.06 1.63 0.41 4.41 0.22 0.16
25 0.24 0.35 6.19 17.09 0.26 1.84 1.11 0.36 4.99 0.1 0.05
26 0.27 0.12 4.56 12.19 0.16 1.35 1.27 0.31 2.42 0.12 0.04
27 0.31 0.31 9.85 17.61 0.34 1.6 2.3 0.46 5.63 0.18 0.16
28 0.19 0.33 5.44 17.88 0.30 1.86 0.85 0.32 4.53 0.11 0.05
29 0.21 0.32 6.19 20.34 0.60 1.62 2.17 0.35 4.26 0.12 0.10
30 0.36 0.48 10.31 22.31 0.49 3.22 2.72 0.53 5.22 0.21 0.15
crustal element (e.g. Al) in the soil sample to the {[X]/[Al]} ratio in the earth’s crust was
normalised by using following indices [16] [17].
EF = {[Xs]/[Als]}/{[Xe]/[Ale]}
CF = {[Xs]/[Xe]}
PLI = (CF1 × CF2 × CF3 × CF4.........CFn)l/n
728
R. Sharma et al.
Where, symbols: Xs, Xe, Als and Ale denote concentration of metal and Al in the soil and
earth crust, respectively.
Figure 2. The SEM photograph of surface soil, no. S-1 (A), S-1 (B), S-1 (C) and S-
26. A = 0 - 10 cm, B = 10 - 20 cm, C = 20 - 30 cm.
729
R. Sharma et al.
(a)
(b)
730
R. Sharma et al.
C and O content of surface soil (n = 30) was ranged from 6.6% - 36.4% and 37.8% -
54.0% with mean value (p = 0.05) of 18.8% ± 2.7% and 49.0% ± 1.5%, respectively. The
C and O content was found to be slightly higher than recommended value of 0.03 and
46.6%, respectively [19]. A negative correlation of the C with the O-content was
marked, may be due to reduction of O-content with the C (r = −0.72). The concentra-
tion of Si, P, S and Cl in the soil (n = 30) was ranged from 12.2% - 24.4%, 0.11% -
0.60%, 0.07% - 0.39% and 0.03% - 0.25% with mean value (p = 0.05) of 16.9 ± 0.9,
0.27% ± 0.04%, 0.18% ± 0.03% and 0.11% ± 0.02%, respectively. Among them, the con-
tent of P, S and Cl was observed to be much higher than the base line value reported of
0.065%, 0.006% and 0.037%, respectively.
731
R. Sharma et al.
AMV = Arithmetic mean value, GMV = Geometrical mean value, RSD = Relative standard deviation, CL = Confi-
dence limit at 95% probability, Ku = Kurtosis, Sk = Skewness.
C S Cl Na Mg Al Si P K Ca Ti Fe Mn Ni
C 1.00
S 0.01 1.00
Ca 0.30 0.46 0.57 0.40 0.51 0.53 0.59 0.65 0.55 1.00
Ti 0.28 0.45 0.31 0.59 0.46 0.33 0.39 0.53 0.53 0.53 1.00
Fe 0.34 0.12 0.39 0.50 0.39 0.51 0.53 0.51 0.51 0.44 0.58 1.00
Mn 0.18 0.44 0.51 0.42 0.43 0.27 0.40 0.44 0.47 0.66 0.67 0.42 1.00
Ni 0.03 0.38 0.44 0.37 0.33 0.51 0.51 0.54 0.39 0.61 0.41 0.46 0.59 1.00
shown in Figure 4. The concentration of 10 elements (i.e. C, Si, P, Al, Mg, K, Ca, Ti, Fe
732
R. Sharma et al.
Concentration, %
60
Depth, cm
40
20 x3
0 x1
Si C O Fe Al
(a)
Concentration, %
1.5
Depth, cm
0.5
0 x1
K Ca Ti P Mg Mn
(b)
Concentration, %
Depth, cm
0.3
0.2 x3
0.1
x1
0
S Cl Ni
Element
x1 x2 x3
(c)
Figure 4. Vertical distribution of element via soil: x1 (0 - 10 cm), x2(10 - 20 cm) and x3 (20 - 30
cm).
and Mn) was found to decrease with respect to increasing depth profile, may be due to
their strong binding with soil organic compounds. The reverse trend was observed with
4 elements (i.e. O, S, Cl and Ni), may be due to their less binding with the organic
733
R. Sharma et al.
compounds.
4. Conclusion
The SEM-EDX is a simple and versatile technique, quickly used for quantification of
macro elements (i.e. C, O, S, Cl, Na, Mg, Al, Si, P, K, Ca, Ti, Fe, Mn and Ni) in soil. The
elevated concentration of elements i.e. S, P, As, Fe, Mn and Ni in the surface soil was
observed probably due to demobilization. The occurrence of S and P at the excessive
levels lead to soil to be acidic in nature. The highest pollution indices for S and Ni were
recorded. The increasing vertical transport of elements i.e. S, Cl and Ni via the soil me-
dia was observed may be due to less binding with the soil matrices.
Acknowledgements
We are thankful to Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University, Raipur, India for providing
Scholarship to RS.
References
[1] Khan, S., Cao, Q., Zheng Y.M., Huang, Y.Z. and Zhu, Y.G. (2008) Health Risks of Heavy
Metals in Contaminated Soils and Food Crops Irrigated with Wastewater in Beijing, China.
Environmental Pollution, 152, 686-692. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2007.06.056
[2] Wuana, R.A. and Okieimen, F.E. (2011) Heavy Metals in Contaminated Soils: A Review of
Sources, Chemistry, Risks and Best Available Strategies for Remediation. International
Scholarly Research Notices, 2011, Article ID: 402647.
[3] Wei, B. and Yang, L. (2010) A Review of Heavy Metal Contaminations in Urban Soils, Ur-
ban Road Dusts and Agricultural Soils from China. Microchemical Journal, 94, 99-107.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2009.09.014
[4] Agrawal, P., Mittal, A., Prakash, R., Kumar, M., Singh, T.B. and Tripathi, S.K. (2010) As-
sessment of Contamination of Soil due to Heavy Metals Around Coal Fired Thermal Power
Plants at Singrauli Region of India. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicol-
ogy, 85, 219-223. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00128-010-0043-8
[5] Bhuiyan, M.A., Parvez, L., Islam, M.A., Dampare, S.B. and Suzuki, S. (2010) Heavy Metal
734
R. Sharma et al.
735
Submit or recommend next manuscript to SCIRP and we will provide best service
for you:
Accepting pre-submission inquiries through Email, Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, etc.
A wide selection of journals (inclusive of 9 subjects, more than 200 journals)
Providing 24-hour high-quality service
User-friendly online submission system
Fair and swift peer-review system
Efficient typesetting and proofreading procedure
Display of the result of downloads and visits, as well as the number of cited articles
Maximum dissemination of your research work
Submit your manuscript at: http://papersubmission.scirp.org/
Or contact ajac@scirp.org