Professional Documents
Culture Documents
RESIDENTIAL
Introduction
Water – how essential is it?
▪ Human body: 3 L of potable water
per day to maintain body
▪ Older toilet flush: 19 L ofTOTAL
water
▪ Person’s typical day: 200 – 300 L
▪ Groundwater Contamination
▪ Groundwater monitoring at contaminated sites
▪ Satisfy the specific regulatory and legal requirements
▪ Working for site owners, consulting firms and regulatory agencies
Introduction
Groundwater: Profession/Science
▪ Professional/Scientific Societies
▪ American Geophysical Union (AGU)
▪ United States Geological Survey (USGS)
▪ Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
▪ Geological Society of America (GSA)
▪ National Ground Water Association (NGWA)
▪ Association of Groundwater Scientists and Engineers (AGWSE)
▪ International Association of Hydrological Sciences (IAHS)
▪ American Institute of Hydrology (AIH)
▪ International Association of Hydrologists (IAH)
▪ International Association for Hydraulic Research (IAHR)
▪ American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
Introduction
Groundwater: Profession/Science
▪ Selected Academic Journals
▪ Water Resources Research (AGU)
▪ Ground Water (NGWA)
▪ Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation (NGWA)
▪ Journal of Contaminant Hydrology
▪ Advances in Water Resources
▪ Journal of Hydrology
▪ Journal of Environmental Engineering (ASCE)
▪ Environmental Science and Technology (ES&T)
▪ Transport in Porous Media
▪ USGS Water Supply Papers
▪ Groundwater Models
▪ MODFLOW (PMWIN)
▪ FEFLOW by DHI
▪ Model Repository at the Integrated Groundwater Modeling Center
Introduction
Groundwater Science: A Historical Perspective
▪ 800 B.C. : groundwater exploitation by the ancients; early Greek
philosophers hypothesize the origin of groundwater
▪ 1500 A.D. : infiltration theory articulated – Palissy
▪ 1680 A.D. : empirical observations of hydraulic cycle; application of the
scientific method (e.g., Perrault Marriotte – Halley)
▪ 1859-1900 : principles of steady groundwater flow by Darcy and Dupuit
▪ 1879 : establishment of USGS
▪ 1900-1930 : field methods: Theim, Horton, Meinzer
▪ 1930-1950 : unsteady groundwater flow: Theis, Hantush, Forchheiner
▪ 1965-1975 : advent of computational hydrology; Renson, Pinder,
Bredhoeft (USGS), Freeze
▪ 1975-1985 : solute transport: Bear, Cherry (Waterloo), Dagan (Israel)
▪ 1985-Present : multiphase flow and reactive transport
The Hydrologic Cycle
The Hydrologic Cycle
Global hydrologic cycle
The Hydrologic Cycle
Global hydrologic cycle
10,530, 00
tr = = 4, 786 years
2, 200
The Hydrologic Cycle
Hydrologic Equation
Simple statement of the law of mass conservation (water balance/budget)
The Hydrologic Cycle
Hydrologic Equation
Simple statement of the law of mass conservation (water balance/budget)
Simplified cross-section
The Hydrologic Cycle
Processes/fluxes affecting groundwater
Precipitation:
▪ Falls on land surface and surface water
▪ Given rain gauge measurements, find
average precipitation over an area
▪ Arithmetic Mean method Theissen Polygon: Pi Ai
▪ Theissen Polygon method Weighted average = Atotal
▪ Isohyetal method
Arithmetic:
crude answer as no topo or Isohyetal
catchment area info Include knowledge of topo/geography
The Hydrologic Cycle
Processes/fluxes affecting groundwater
Evaporation
▪ Water is evaporated to water vapor from open water bodies, leaves and
other vegetated surfaces, and near surface soil moisture.
▪ Evaporation depends on many factors (e.g., water temp, air temp and
humidity above water, solar radiation, wind)
▪ Simple measurements using shallow land pans
▪ Pans will be warmed much more by solar radiation,
so pan coefficients are used
The Hydrologic Cycle
Processes/fluxes affecting groundwater
Evaporation:
▪ Modified Penman equation (Shuttleworth, 1993) describes evaporation
from an open water surface
m
PE = ( Rn ) + (6.43(1 + 0.536 U 2 ) e )
(v ) m + (v ) m +
= Slope of the saturation vapor pressure curve (kPa/K) U 2 = wind speed (m/s)
m
= net incoming radiation (MJ/m²/day) e = vapor pressure deficit (kPa)
Rn
= psychrometric constant (kPa/K) v = latent heat of vaporization (MJ/kg)
The Hydrologic Cycle
Processes/fluxes affecting groundwater
Evaporation EXAMPLE: For a given shallow lake, the mean
daily air temperature Ta is 76°F. The solar
radiation is measured as 500 langley/day (1
Langley = 1 cal/cm²). The mean daily dew point
temperature is 50°F, and the wind movement at
six inches above the pan rim is 200 mi/day.
Using the nomograph for the shallow lake
evaporation, determine the daily lake
evaporation in inches.
Evapotranspiration
▪ Combination of ‘evaporation from land surfaces’ and ‘transpiration by
plants’
▪ Potential evapotranspiration (PET):
▪ Equal to the water loss which will occur if at no time there is a deficiency of
moisture in the soil
▪ Actual evapotranspiration (AET):
▪ Amount of ET that actually occurs under varying field conditions (i.e.,periods
of sufficient and insufficient available soil moisture)
The Hydrologic Cycle
Processes/fluxes affecting groundwater
PET vs AET
The Hydrologic Cycle
Processes/fluxes affecting groundwater
Evapotranspiration
▪ ET Estimation
Approaches for estimating ET:
1) Direct measurements (field plots, lysimeters)
2) Pan coefficients (Kp)
3) Empirical approach: Blaney-Criddle Method
4) Adaptions of Penman equation for ET estimates
The Hydrologic Cycle
Processes/fluxes affecting groundwater
Evapotranspiration
▪ ET Estimation
Approaches for estimating ET:
1) Direct measurements (lysimeters, eddy covariance)
2) Pan coefficients (Kp)
3) Empirical approach: Blaney-Criddle Method
4) Adaptions of Penman equation for ET estimates
The Hydrologic Cycle
Processes/fluxes affecting groundwater
Evapotranspiration
▪ ET Estimation
Approaches for estimating ET:
1) Direct measurements (lysimeters, eddy covariance)
2) Pan coefficients (Kp)
3) Empirical approach: Blaney-Criddle Method
4) Adaptions of Penman equation for ET estimates
The Hydrologic Cycle
Processes/fluxes affecting groundwater
Evapotranspiration
▪ ET Estimation
Approaches for estimating ET:
1) Direct measurements (lysimeters, eddy covariance)
2) Pan coefficients (Kp)
3) Empirical approach: Blaney-Criddle Method
4) Adaptions of Penman equation for ET estimates
(ti pi ) K i (ti pi )
ETp = K s im=1 or
100 100
The Hydrologic Cycle
Processes/fluxes affecting groundwater
Evapotranspiration
▪ ET Estimation
Approaches for estimating ET:
1) Direct measurements (lysimeters, eddy covariance)
2) Pan coefficients (Kp)
3) Empirical approach: Blaney-Criddle Method
4) Adaptions of Penman equation for ET estimates
(ti pi ) K i (ti pi )
ETp = K s im=1 or
100 100
The Hydrologic Cycle
Processes/fluxes affecting groundwater
Evapotranspiration
▪ ET Estimation
Approaches for estimating ET:
1) Direct measurements (lysimeters, eddy covariance)
2) Pan coefficients (Kp)
3) Empirical approach: Blaney-Criddle Method
4) Adaptions of Penman equation for ET estimates
Example: Estimate ETp for a corn field in
(ti pi ) K i (ti pi ) Kansas City, MS
ETp = K s im=1 or
100 100 • 40° Latitude
• 4 month growing season (May to August)
The Hydrologic Cycle
Processes/fluxes affecting groundwater
Evapotranspiration
▪ ET Estimation
Approaches for estimating ET:
1) Direct measurements (lysimeters, eddy covariance)
2) Pan coefficients (Kp)
3) Empirical approach: Blaney-Criddle Method
4) Adaptions of Penman equation for ET estimates (e.g., Penman-Monteith)
( Rn − G) + a c p ( e ) g a
ET =
( + (1 + g a / g s )) Lv
= rate of change of saturation specific humidity with air temperature (kPa/K) cp = specific heat capacity of air (J/kg/K)
Rn = net irradiance (W/m²) a = dry air density (kg/m³)
= psychrometric constant (kPa/K) e = vapor pressure deficit (Pa)
G = ground heat flux (W/m²), usually difficult to measure ga = conductivity of air, atmospheric cond. (m/s)
gs = conductivity of stoma, surface cond. (m/s)
The Hydrologic Cycle
Processes/fluxes affecting groundwater
Surface runoff or overland flow
▪ Rain or melting snow will drain across the
land surface
Infiltration
▪ Rain or melting snow will seep into pervious soil. Infiltration capacity
varies from soil to soil, and from dry to moist conditions in the same soil
The Hydrologic Cycle
Processes/fluxes affecting groundwater
Interflow
▪ Infiltrating water may move horizontally if
it encounters a more impermeable layer
Baseflow
▪ Groundwater discharging to a surface water body
Water Balance
Groundwater Recharge
Water Balance
Application examples:
Stormwater Management
Examples:
Examples:
Mine waste/landfill covers
Green roofs, bioretention cells Source: scalar.usc.edu
Climate and land-use changes
Water Balance
CASE STUDY: Water Infiltration through Mine Waste Covers
Water Balance
CASE STUDY: Water Infiltration through Mine Waste Covers
40
Elevation (m)
30 Waste Rock
20 Till
Bedrock
10
0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300
Distance (m)
Nova Scotia
Sydney
Water Balance
CASE STUDY: Water Infiltration through Mine Waste Covers
40
Elevation (m)
30 Waste Rock
20 Till
Bedrock
10
0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300
Distance (m)
Nova Scotia
Soil Cover over Waste Rock
Sydney
Water Balance
CASE STUDY: Water Infiltration through Mine Waste Covers
40
Elevation (m)
30 Waste Rock
20 Till
Bedrock
10
0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300
Distance (m)
Nova Scotia
Soil Cover over Waste Rock
Sydney
QUESTION: How well is the cover working? How much water is passing through?
Water Balance
CASE STUDY: Water Infiltration through Mine Waste Covers
Rearrange the water balance to estimate water infiltration
PPT = AET + R + ΔS + IN
Net Percolation to
Waste Rock
Water Balance
CASE STUDY: Water Infiltration through Mine Waste Covers
Monitoring instrumentation used to collect water balance parameters
LEGEND:
Meteorological Station
Weir
Soil Monitoring Station
Internal Monitoring Station
Surface Water Sampling Point
Toe Seep
Outline of WRP
Water Balance
CASE STUDY: Water Infiltration through Mine Waste Covers
Monitoring instrumentation used to collect water balance parameters
Weather Station
Wind Speed/Direction
Net Radiation
Temperature/RH
Rainfall
Snow Depth
Water Balance
CASE STUDY: Water Infiltration through Mine Waste Covers
Monitoring instrumentation used to collect water balance parameters
8 Monitoring
Stations
Water Content
Temperature
SS-4 Suction
Pore-Gas
SS-3
Water Balance
CASE STUDY: Water Infiltration through Mine Waste Covers
Monitoring instrumentation used to collect water balance parameters
Weir
Eddy Covariance
Water Balance
CASE STUDY: Water Infiltration through Mine Waste Covers
Evolution of key variables over time
Water Balance
CASE STUDY: Water Infiltration through Mine Waste Covers
Cumulative flux for each water balance component: 2014
Rain
AET
Net Surface
Infiltration
(ΔS) Change in
Moisture Storage
Net Percolation to
Waste Rock
In 2014, 57 mm of water infiltrated through the cover system into the waste
Water Balance
CASE STUDY: Water Infiltration through Mine Waste Covers
Cumulative flux for each water balance component: 2014
Rain
AET
Net Surface
Infiltration
(ΔS) Change in
Moisture Storage
Net Percolation to
Waste Rock
In 2014, 57 mm of water infiltrated through the cover system into the waste
Water Balance
CASE STUDY: Water Infiltration through Mine Waste Covers
Cumulative flux for each water balance component: 2014
Rain
AET
Net Surface
Infiltration
(ΔS) Change in
Moisture Storage
Net Percolation to
Waste Rock
In 2014, 57 mm of water infiltrated through the cover system into the waste
Water Balance
CASE STUDY: Water Infiltration through Mine Waste Covers
Cumulative flux for each water balance component: 2014
Rain
AET
Net Surface
Infiltration
(ΔS) Change in
Moisture Storage
Net Percolation to
Waste Rock
In 2014, 57 mm of water infiltrated through the cover system into the waste
Water Balance
CASE STUDY: Water Infiltration through Mine Waste Covers
Cumulative flux for each water balance component: 2014
Rain
AET
Net Surface
Infiltration
(ΔS) Change in
Moisture Storage
Net Percolation to
Waste Rock
In 2014, 377 mm of water infiltrated through the cover system into the waste
Before the cover? 434 mm.
Water Balance
CASE STUDY: Water Infiltration through Mine Waste Covers
Cumulative flux for each water balance component: 2012 - 2016
The Hydrologic Cycle
References
Chow VT, Maidment DR, Mays LW (1988) Applied Hydrology. McGraw-Hill Book Company.
ISBN 0-07-100174-3.
Fitts CR (2012) Groundwater Science. Second Edition. Academic Press. ISBN 978-0-12-
384705-8.
Pinder GF, Celia MA (2006) Subsurface Hydrology. John Wiley & Sons Inc., Hoboken, New
Jersey. ISBN-13 978-0-471-74243-2.
Shuttleworth, WJ (1993) Evaporation. Chapter 4 in Handbook of Hydrology. Edited by DR
Madiment, McGraw-Hill, New York.