OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

Name of Employee: JUAN DELA CRUZ Name of Rater: ESTELA B. SUSVILLA, Ph.D
Position: PSDS Position: Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
Review Period: JUNE 2016-MARCH 2017 Date of Review: MAY 2017
School/Division: MANDAUE CITY DIVISION

To ensure full implementation of the articulated curriculum towards improvement in the quality of learning outcomes, provision of quality learning and teaching resource materials; and PROVIDE Technical assistance to schools in the areas of curriculum implementation and instructional supervision, SIP implementation and access to basic/functional literacy skills

To provide strategic and technical inputs towards the full implementation of the articulated basic education curriculum to suit the conditions and context of the locality; and direct and manage the work of the CID team and provide technical assistance to the schools in line with the curriculum and learning management.

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) MOV'S

WEIGHT
KRA's OBJECTIVES SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES TIMELINE TARGET ACTUAL RATING
PER KRA
QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS
5- NAT performance and GSA is 97.5-100% and above the target
4- NAT performance and GSA is 86.25-
a.Increased NAT/ GSA performance over June to 97.49 % above the target 3- NAT performance and GSA
5.0% NAT/ GSA Results
the previous year March is 75-86.24% above the target 2- NAT
performance and GSA is 37.5-74.99 % above the target
1- NAT performance
5-0 drop-out rate or decreased drop out byand GSAand
97.5% is 37.49% andtarget
above the below
4-decreased drop out by 86.25-97.49 above the target
June to 3- decreased drop out by 75-86.24% above the target LIS Generated
b. Decreased drop out rate 5.0%
March 2- decreased drop out by 37.5-74.99% Report
above the target 1-decreased drop
5-increased
out by 37.49%enrolment
and belowrate by 97.5% and above the target
1.Accounted for 4-increased enrolment rate by 86.25-97.49%
learning outcomes 3- increased enrolment rate by
June to LIS Generated
of schools and c. Increased in enrolment rate 5.0% 75-86.24%
March Report
centers viz-a-viz 2- increased enrolment rate by37.5-74.99%
goals and targets. 5-increased promotion rate by 130% and above 1-increased enrolment rate
by 37.49% and below 4-increased promotion rate by 86.25-97.49%
3- increased
d. Increased Promotion Rate by 2% or LIS Generated
5.0% promotion rate by 75-86.24% 2-
more from the planned target. Report
increased promotion rate by37.5-74.99%
5-0 Failure rate or decreased failure by 130% and1-increased
above promotion rate by 37.49%
and below 4-decreased failure by 86.25-97.49%
e. Decreased failure rate by 2% or more June to MEA Report/ LIS
5.0% 3- decreased failure by 75-86.24%
from the planned target. March Generated Report
2-decreased failure by 37.5-
74.99%
I. INSTRUCTIONAL
LEAERSHIP 1-decreased failure by 37.49% and below
I. INSTRUCTIONAL
LEAERSHIP a. Performed instructional supervision to
Instructional
achieve learning outcomes 5-Indicator was performed Supervision Report
excellently with complete
b. Checked lesson plans of all the supporting documents for a Lesson Plan
teachers. specific indicator/ task Monitoring Report
4- With 5-100% of the IL Task was
c. Observed at least 10 classes or more in complete supporting provided/given to teachers Submitted reports of
documents for a specific 4- 80-99% of accomplishments: Class Observation
a month
Cat 5 4 3 2 1
indicator/
Cat 5
task4 but3 quality
2
is1 theCatIL Task
5
was3 2 1
4
5- Report
Cat 5 4 3 2 1
Pts. Pts. Pts. Pts. Pt. Pts. Pts. Pts. Pts. Pt. Pts. Pts. Pts. Pts. Pt. Pts. Pts. Pts. Pts. Pt.
d. Checked implementation of the ExS 30 25 20 15 10
from
ExS
80-99%
30 25 20 15 10
provided/given to teachers
ExS 30 25 20 15 10
submitted days ahead of ExS 30 25 20 15 10
2. Performed remedial instruction of at least 5 sections BS 25 20 15 10 5 BS 253-With
20 complete
15 10 5 BS 25 20 15 10 5 3- time/schedule Remedial
BS 25 20 15 10 5
or more supporting15 documents 6 for a3 60-79%
MS 15of the 12 IL9 Task
6 was Instruction
MS 15 12 Report
instructional MS 15 12 9 6 3 MS 12 9 3 9 6 3
SS 10 8 6 4 2 specific
SS indicator/
10 8 6task4 but 2 provided/given
SS 10 8 to 6 teachers
4 4- submitted a day before
2 SS 10 8 6 4 2
supervision to e. Provided CGs, TGs, LMs, to all June to March 5.0%
quality is from 60-79% schedule time Report of Learning
achieve learning teachers and learners 2- 40- 3- Submitted on Resources Provided to
outcomes. Teachers
2- With 59% of the IL Task was time/schedule
f. Recommended localized curriculum incomplete supporting provided/given to teachers 2. submitted after the
Localization Reprt
(Mother Tongue based for instruction) documents for a specific 1- deadline
(All Learning Area)
indicator/ task and quality is below 40% of the IL Task 1- Did not
from 40-59% was provided/given to submit report
g. Formulated intervention programs for 1-With teachers Intervention Report for
learners development incomplete supporting Learners development
h. Practiced equitable distribution of
teaching loads. documents for a specific
indicator/task and quality is
below 40% Form 7

a. Adhered to Child-Friendly environment Child-Friendly

standards and programs School Survey
b. Institutionalized child protection
mechanisms and processes (per DepEd 5-Indicator was performed CRPU Manual
Order 40, s. 2012) excellently with complete
supporting documents for a
c. Formulated school-based anti-bullying specific indicator/ task
Anti-Bullying Policy
policies 4- With 5-100% of the IL Task was
complete supporting provided/given to teachers Submitted reports of
d. Has clear DRRM mobilization plans documents for a specific 4- 80-99% of accomplishments: DRRM Mobilization
indicator/ task but quality is the IL Task was 5- Plan
from 80-99% provided/given to teachers submitted days ahead of
3-With complete 3- time/schedule
1. Provided safe e. With Security personnel with Visitors' Security Log Book
supporting documents for a 60-79% of the IL Task was
and child-friendly Log Book
June to specific indicator/ task but provided/given to teachers 4- submitted a day before
learning and school 10.0%
March quality is from 60-79% schedule time
environment for School Clubs
2- 40- 3- Submitted on
students/learners f. Functional School Clubs/ Organizations Monitoring Report
2- With 59% of the IL Task was time/schedule
incomplete supporting provided/given to teachers 2. submitted after the
documents for a specific 1- deadline
indicator/ task and quality is below 40% of the IL Task 1- Did not
from 40-59% was provided/given to submit report
1-With teachers
incomplete supporting
documents for a specific
 1. Provided safe
supporting documents for a 60-79% of the IL Task was
and child-friendly
June to specific indicator/ task but provided/given to teachers 4- submitted a day before
learning and school 10.0%
March quality is from 60-79% schedule time
environment for
2- 40- 3- Submitted on
students/learners
2- With 59% of the IL Task was time/schedule
g. Participation to Academic and Co- incomplete supporting provided/given to teachers 2. submitted after the
Report of Academic and
curricular activities conducted (List of documents for a specific 1- deadline Co-curricular Activities
winners, publication) indicator/ task and quality is below 40% of the IL Task 1- Did not Participated
from 40-59% was provided/given to submit report
h. Information dessimination/advocacy
1-With teachers Advocacy
campaign (flyers, posters, leaflets, and
incomplete supporting campaign materials
etc.
documents for a specific
i. Functional CPC/ Help desk, Record of indicator/task and quality is CPC Accomplishment
Cases, Action Taken/ Recommendation below 40% Reports and Records

j. GAD Activities, Action Plan, Utilization of GAD Reports and

GAD Funds Records

Library/Mini-library/
a. Library/Mini-library/ Reading Nook
Reading Nook

II. LEARNING b. School Canteen School Canteen

ENVIRONMENT

c. School Clinic School Clinic

d. Guidance Office 5-Indicator was performed Guidance Office

excellently with complete
supporting documents for a
e. Principal's Office specific indicator/ task Principal's Office
4- With 5-100% of the IL Task was
complete supporting provided/given to teachers Submitted reports of Handwashing
f. Handwashing Facilities
documents for a specific 4- 80-99% of accomplishments: Facilities
indicator/ task but quality is the IL Task was 5-
g. Comfort Rooms from 80-99% provided/given to teachers submitted days ahead of Comfort Rooms
2. Provided facilites 3-With complete 3- time/schedule
for safe and child- h. HE Rooms supporting documents for a 60-79% of the IL Task was HE Rooms
friendly learning specific indicator/ task but provided/given to teachers 4- submitted a day before Functional ICT
10.0%
and school i. Functional ICT Facilities/ workshop quality is from 60-79% schedule time Facilities/ workshop
environment for rooms with utilization plan 2- 40- 3- Submitted on rooms with
students/learners 2- With 59% of the IL Task was time/schedule utilization plan
j. Safe playground incomplete supporting provided/given to teachers 2. submitted after the Safe playground
documents for a specific 1- deadline Interactive Park
k. Interactive Park (Math park, Science indicator/ task and quality is below 40% of the IL Task 1- Did not (Math park,
park and others. from 40-59% was provided/given to submit report Science park and
1-With teachers others.
incomplete supporting Print rich
l. Print rich environment
documents for a specific environment
indicator/task and quality is Gulayan sa
m. Gulayan sa Paaralan below 40% Paaralan
Waste segragation
n. Waste segragation (3Rs)
(3Rs)
 indicator/task and quality is
below 40%

o. Signages Signages

School perimeter
p. School perimeter fence
fence
a.teacher porfolio containing observation
Teachers' Portfolio
reports
b. School Professional Plan for
SPPD
Development (SPPD) 5-Indicator was performed
excellently with complete
c. LAC Activities supporting documents for a LAC Report
1. Provided
technical specific indicator/ task
June to March 7.5% 4- With 5-100% of the IL Task was Peer Mentoring and
assistance to d. Peer Mentoring and Coaching
complete supporting provided/given to teachers Submitted reports of Coaching Report
teachers
documents for a specific 4- 80-99% of accomplishments:
indicator/ task but quality is the IL Task was 5- In-Set Records and
e. In-Service Training (IN-SET)
from 80-99% provided/given to teachers submitted days ahead of Reports
3-With complete 3- time/schedule CI Records,
III. HUMAN
f. CI Activities supporting documents for a 60-79% of the IL Task was Outputs and
RESOURCE
specific indicator/ task but provided/given to teachers 4- submitted a day before Reports
MANAGEMENT
Performed RPMS processes among quality is from 60-79% schedule time
AND
school personnel with the following as 2- 40- 3- Submitted on
DEVELOPMENT Performance
evidences: 2- With 59% of the IL Task was time/schedule
1. performance contract incomplete supporting provided/given to teachers 2. submitted after the Contract
documents for a specific 1- deadline
2.. performance evaluation results in indicator/ task and quality is below 40% of the IL Task 1- Did not
RPMS Evaluation
2. Performed prescribed tools from 40-59% was provided/given to submit report
Report
RPMS processes 1-With teachers
June to March 7.5%
among school incomplete supporting
personnel documents for a specific Performance
3. Performance feedback and results indicator/task and quality is Feedback Results
below 40%

4. Proposed development plans Development Plan

5-Indicator was performed excellently with

1, Stakeholders' Mobilization Plan complete supporting documents for a Mobilization Plan
specific indicator/ task
5-100% of the IL Task was
4- With complete supporting Submitted reports of accomplishments:
provided/given to teachers
documents for a specific indicator/ task 5-
1. Established but quality is from 80-99%
4- 80-99% of the IL Task was
submitted days ahead of time/schedule
IV. PARENTS' provided/given to teachers
school and family 2. Organized programs with stakeholders, 3-With complete supporting
3-60-79% of the IL Task Brigada Eskwela
INVOLVEMENT June to documents for a specific indicator/ task 4- submitted a day before schedule
and commuinty esp, parents for academic and other 10.0% was provided/given to teachers Report and
AND COMMUNITY March but quality is from 60-79% time 3- Submitted on
partnership for purposes 2- With time/schedule 2. Records
PARTNERSHIP incomplete supporting documents for a
2- 40-59% of the IL Task was
submitted after the deadline
performance specific indicator/ task and quality is from
provided/given to teachers
1- Did not submit
1-below 40% of the IL
40-59% report
Task was provided/given to teachers
1-With incomplete supporting
documents for a specific indicator/task
and quality is below 40%
 provided/given to teachers
documents for a specific indicator/ task 5-
1. Established but quality is from 80-99%
4- 80-99% of the IL Task was
submitted days ahead of time/schedule
IV. PARENTS' provided/given to teachers
school and family 3-With complete supporting
3-60-79% of the IL Task
INVOLVEMENT June to documents for a specific indicator/ task 4- submitted a day before schedule
and commuinty 10.0% was provided/given to teachers
AND COMMUNITY March but quality is from 60-79% time 3- Submitted on
partnership for 2- With time/schedule 2.
PARTNERSHIP incomplete supporting documents for a
2- 40-59% of the IL Task was
submitted after the deadline
performance provided/given to teachers
3. Coordinated with stakeholders on specific indicator/ task and quality is from
1-below 40% of the IL
1- Did not submit
40-59% report Adopt-A-School
resource mobilization Task was provided/given to teachers
1-With incomplete supporting Program
4. documents for a specific indicator/task
and quality is below 40% Accomplishment
Obtained resources for the school through
Report
stakeholders partnership

1. With clear financial management system for

the school supported by evidences such as MOOE Liquidation
reports, account logs, database system

2. Allocated/prioritized funds for 5-Indicator was performed

programs and school facilities improvement and excellently with complete
maintenance 3.
Reported sources and uses of funds supporting documents for a PTA Liquidation
specific indicator/ task
4. Ensured quality 4- With 5-100% of the IL Task was
standards for facilities given to the school complete supporting provided/given to teachers Submitted reports of
5. Coordinated with documents for a specific 4- 80-99% of accomplishments:
stakeholders on resource mobilization Other Funds
indicator/ task but quality is the IL Task was 5-
Performed data- Liquidation
from 80-99% provided/given to teachers submitted days ahead of
based strategic
3-With complete 3- time/schedule
planning and
V. SCHOOL supporting documents for a 60-79% of the IL Task was
performed School Scholl Form 1
LEADERSHIP June to specific indicator/ task but provided/given to teachers 4- submitted a day before
Leadership and 10.0%
MANAGEMENT March quality is from 60-79% schedule time
Management and Scholl Form 2
AND OPERATIONS 2- 40- 3- Submitted on
Operations
2- With 59% of the IL Task was time/schedule Scholl Form 3
functions with
incomplete supporting provided/given to teachers 2. submitted after the
evidences:
documents for a specific 1- deadline Scholl Form 4
indicator/ task and quality is below 40% of the IL Task 1- Did not
6. Maintained school EMIS and regularly from 40-59% was provided/given to submit report Scholl Form 5
submit SMEA reports to the Division 1-With teachers
Office on time incomplete supporting Scholl Form 6
documents for a specific
indicator/task and quality is Scholl Form 7
below 40%
Scholl Form 8

Scholl Form 9

Scholl Form 10

a. Performed additional functions

(Technical Committee/Chairmanship)
5-Indicator was performed
b. Assigned as Coordinator of any excellently with complete
program/project supporting documents for a
specific indicator/ task
4- With 5-100% of the IL Task was
complete supporting provided/given to teachers Submitted reports of
documents for a specific 4- 80-99% of accomplishments:
indicator/ task but quality is the IL Task was 5-
Perfformed tasks / from 80-99% provided/given to teachers submitted days ahead of
functions that lead 3-With complete 3- time/schedule
to the attainment of supporting documents for a 60-79% of the IL Task was
higher learning June to specific indicator/ task but provided/given to teachers 4- submitted a day before
 5-Indicator was performed
excellently with complete
supporting documents for a
specific indicator/ task
c. Attained perfect attendance for the 4- With 5-100% of the IL Task was
school year and in all required activities complete supporting provided/given to teachers Submitted reports of
documents for a specific 4- 80-99% of accomplishments:
d. Reported to the office/school/venue at indicator/ task but quality is the IL Task was 5-
Perfformed tasks / least 15 minutes before the from 80-99% provided/given to teachers submitted days ahead of
functions that lead official/required time 3-With complete 3- time/schedule
to the attainment of supporting documents for a 60-79% of the IL Task was
higher learning e.Generated at least P100,000.00 for June to specific indicator/ task but provided/given to teachers 4- submitted a day before
VI. PLUS FACTOR 5%
outcomnes, office/school use March quality is from 60-79% schedule time
spefically but not f. Acted as Resource/Guest Speaker in 2- 40- 3- Submitted on
limited to the Private/Higher Education Institutions and 2- With 59% of the IL Task was time/schedule
following: other Private and Public incomplete supporting provided/given to teachers 2. submitted after the
Recognize/Accredited Organizations documents for a specific 1- deadline
g. Introduced reform/innovation that has indicator/ task and quality is below 40% of the IL Task 1- Did not
significant impact on the attainmert of from 40-59% was provided/given to submit report
PDP targets 1-With teachers
incomplete supporting
h. Perform other tasks as required by the documents for a specific
higher authorities. indicator/task and quality is
below 40%
i. Presented research papers to
conferences
Rater : Ratee :

ESTELA B. SUSVILLA, Ph.D JUAN DELA CRUZ ARDEN D. MONISIT, Ed.D.

DepEd RPMS Form- School Heads

 OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW
Name of Employee: JUAN DELA CRUZ
Position: PRINCIPAL IV
Review Period: JUNE 2016-MARCH 2017
School/Division: MANDAUE CITY DIVISION
To ensure full implementation of the articulated curriculum towards improvement in the quality of learning outcomes, provision of quality learning and teaching resource materials; and PRO
implementation and instructional supervision, SIP implementation and access to basic/functional literacy skills
To provide strategic and technical inputs towards the full implementation of the articulated basic education curriculum to suit the conditions and context of the locality; and direct and mana
in line with the curriculum and learning management.

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)

TIMELIN WEIGHT
KRA's OBJECTIVES SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES
E PER KRA
QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS
5- GSA is 97.5 - 100 %
4- GSA is 86.25 - 97.49 %
a.Increased NAT/ GSA 3- GSA is 75.00 - 86.24 %
June to
performance over the
March
previous year 2- GSA is 37.50 - 74.99 %
1- GSA is 37.49
5-
% Zero drop-out rate or decreased drop out by 97.5 % -100 % of the
and below
preceding school year
4-
decreased drop out by 86.25 - 97.49% of the preceding school year
June to
b. Decreased drop out rate 3- decreased drop out by 75.00 - 86.24 % of the
March
preceding school year 2-
decreased drop out by 37.50 - 74.99 % of the preceding school year
1-decreased drop out by below
537.50%
- Enrolment
of the ispreceding
130% of year
the target
Accounted for learning 4 - Enrolment is 115% - 129% of the target
I. INSTRUCTIONAL outcomes of schools and c. Increased in enrolment 3 - Erolment is 100% - 114% of
June to 15.0%
LEADERSHIP centers viz-a-viz goals rate the target
March
and targets. 2- Enrolment is 50% - 99% of the target
1-
5- Promotion
Enrolment rate is50%
is below 97.5 of- 100 %
target
4- Promotion rate is 86.25 - 97.49 %
3-
d. Increased Promotion Rate
June to Promotion rate is 75.00 - 86.24 %
by 2% or more from the
March 2-
planned target.
Promotion rate is 37.50 - 74.99 %
5-Decreased failure by 97.5-100% of the preceding year rate is below37.50
1- Promotion
% 4-Decreased failure
by 86.27 - 97.49% of the preceding year
e. Decreased failure rate by 3-Decreased
June to
2% or more from the failure by 75.00 - 86.24 % of the preceding year
March
planned target. 2-Decreased
failure by 37.50 - 74.99 % of the preceding year
1-
Decreased failure by below 37.50%
Performed instructional Accounted for learning outcomes of schools and centers viz-a-viz goals and ta
supervision to achieve
learning outcomes

a. Checked daily
lesson plans of all the 5 - Achieved specific
teachers. Cat 5 4 3 2 1 objective
Cat 5 with
4 97.50
3 2to 1 Cat 5 4 3 2 1
Pts. Pts. Pts. Pts. Pt. Pts. Pts. Pts. Pts. Pt. Pts. Pts. Pts. Pts. Pt.
ExS 30 25 20 15 10
100% complete
ExS 30 25 20 15
and 10 ExS 30 25 20 15 10
b. Observed classes BS 25 20 15 10 5 accurate
BS 25 supporting
20 15 10 5 BS 25 20 15 10 5
monthly MS 15 12 9 6 3 documents
MS 15 12 9 6 3 MS 15 12 9 6 3
S 10 8 6 4 2 SS 10 8 6 4 2 SS 10 8 6 4 2
5-
c. Checked implementation Submitted reports 6 to
of the remedial instruction 4 - 5- Utilized 50% and below 10 days ahead of
every quarter across Achieved specific objective of the alloted resources time/schedule
learning area. with 86.26 to 97.49%
complete and accurate
Performed 4- Utilized 51% to 4-
supporting documents
99% of the alloted Submitted 1 to 5 day
instructional 3- Achieved resources 3- Utilized before schedule time
supervision to 15.0% specific objective with
the alloted resources 3-
achieve learning 75.00 to 86.24% complete
and accurate supporting 2 - Utilized 1- Submitted on
outcomes 25% more than the alloted time/schedule
documents
 documents
5-
Submitted reports 6 to
4 - 5- Utilized 50% and below 10 days ahead of
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
TIMELIN WEIGHT Achieved specific objective of the alloted resources time/schedule
KRA's OBJECTIVES SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES
E PER KRA with 86.26 to 97.49%
complete QUALITY
and accurate EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS
Performed 4- Utilized 51% to 4-
d. Provided CGs, TGs, LMs, supporting documents
99% of the alloted Submitted 1 to 5 day
instructional to all teachers and learners 3- Achieved resources 3- Utilized before schedule time
supervision to across all learning areas. 15.0% specific objective with
the alloted resources 3-
achieve learning 75.00 to 86.24% complete
and accurate supporting 2- Utilized 1- Submitted on
outcomes 25% more than the alloted time/schedule
documents
e. Recommended localized resources 2-
curriculum (Mother Tongue 2- Achieved specific
objective with 37.50 to 1 - Utilized more than 25% Submitted after the
based for instruction) across of the alloted resources schedule/deadline
all laerning areas. 74.99% complete and
accurate supporting
documents 1- Did not submit
f. Formulated intervention report
programs for learners 1- Achieved specific
g. Practiced equitable
development across all objective with below
distribution of teaching
learning areas. 37.50% complete and
loads. accurate supporting
documents

Performed instructional supervision to achieve learning outco

5 - Achieved specific objective with
97.50 to 100% complete and
a. Adhered to Child-Friendly accurate supporting documents 5- Utilized 50% and below of
environment standards and the alloted resources
5- Submitted reports
programs 4 - Achieved specific 6 to 10 days ahead of
objective with 86.26 to 97.49%
time/schedule
complete and accurate supporting 4- Utilized 51% to 99% of the
b. Institutionalized child documents alloted resources
protection mechanisms and June to 3- Achieved 4- Submitted 1 to 5 day
II. LEARNING specific objective with 75.00 to before schedule time
ENVIRONMENT processes (per DepEd Order March Cat 5
Pts.
4
Pts.
3
Pts.
2
Pts.
1
Pt.
Cat 5
86.24% complete
Pts.
4
Pts.and
3 2
accurate
Pts. Pts.
1
Pt.
3- Utilized
Cat 5 the
4 alloted
3
Pts. Pts. Pts.
2 resources
Pts.
1
Pt. 3- Submitted on
40, s. 2012) supporting documents 10 2-
ExS 30 25 20 15 10 ExS 30 25 20 15 10 ExS 30 25 20 15
time/schedule
BS 25 20 15 10 5 BS 25 20 15 10 5
Utilized
BS
1-
25
25%
20
more
15 10
than5
the
MS 15 12 9 6 3 MS 15
2- Achieved
12
10 specific
9 6
objective
4 with
3 MS 15 12 9 6 3
2- Submitted after
SS 10 8 6 4 2 SS 8 6 2 alloted
SS resources
10 8 6 4 2
37.50 to 74.99% complete and the schedule/deadline
c. Formulated school-based accurate supporting documents
1- Utilized more than
anti-bullying policies 1- Did not submit report
1- Achieved specific objective with 25% of the alloted resources
below 37.50% complete and accurate
d. Has clear DRRM supporting documents
5 - Achieved specific
mobilization plans objective with 97.50 to 100%
complete and accurate
e. With Security personnel supporting documents
Provided safe and child- 5-
with Visitors' Log Book
friendly learning and Submitted reports 6 to
10.0%
school environment for
f. Functional School Clubs/ 4 - 5- Utilized 50% and below 10 days ahead of
students/learners Achieved specific objective of the alloted resources time/schedule
Organizations
with 86.26 to 97.49%
complete and accurate 4- Utilized 51% to 4-
g. Participation to Academic supporting documents
and Co-curricular activities 99% of the alloted Submitted 1 to 5 day
3- Achieved specific
II. LEARNING conducted (List of winners, June to objective with 75.00 to
resources 3- Utilized before schedule time
ENVIRONMENT publication) March 86.24% complete and the alloted resources 3-
h. Information accurate supporting 2- Utilized 1- Submitted on
dessimination/advocacy documents 25% more than the alloted time/schedule
campaign (flyers, posters, 2- Achieved specific resources 2-
leaflets, and etc. objective with 37.50 to 1- Utilized more than 25% Submitted after the
i. Functional CPC/ Help 74.99% complete and schedule/deadline
of the alloted resources
desk, Record of Cases, accurate supporting
Action Taken/ documents 1- Did not submit
Recommendation 1- Achieved specific
objective with below 37.50%
report
j. GAD Activities, Action
Plan, Utilization of GAD complete and accurate
Funds supporting documents

Provided safe and child-friendly learning and school environment for students/le
Established a functional: 5 - Achieved specific
objective with 97.50 to 100%
complete and accurate
a. supporting documents
Library/Mini-library/ Reading 5-
Nook Submitted reports 6 to
4 - 5- Utilized 50% and below 10 days ahead of
Achieved specific objective of the alloted resources time/schedule
with 86.26 to 97.49%
complete and accurate 4- Utilized 51% to 4-
Established facilites for supporting documents 99% of the alloted Submitted 1 to 5 day
 5 - Achieved specific
objective withPERFORMANCE
97.50 to 100% INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
TIMELIN WEIGHT
KRA's OBJECTIVES SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES
E PER KRA
complete and accurate
supporting documents
QUALITY EFFICIENCY 5-
TIMELINESS
Submitted reports 6 to
b. School Canteen 4 - 5- Utilized 50% and below 10 days ahead of
Achieved specific objective of the alloted resources time/schedule
with 86.26 to 97.49%
complete and accurate 4- Utilized 51% to 4-
Established facilites for c. School Clinic supporting documents 99% of the alloted Submitted 1 to 5 day
safe and child-friendly 3- Achieved specific
II. LEARNING
learning and school
June to
objective with 75.00 to
resources 3- Utilized before schedule time
ENVIRONMENT
environment for d. Guidance Office March
86.24% complete and the alloted resources 3-
students/learners accurate supporting 2- Utilized 1- Submitted on
documents 25% more than the alloted time/schedule
e. Principal's Office 2- Achieved specific resources 2-
objective with 37.50 to 1- Utilized more than 25% Submitted after the
74.99% complete and of the alloted resources schedule/deadline
f. Handwashing Facilities accurate supporting
documents 1- Did not submit
1- Achieved specific
objective with below 37.50%
report
g. Comfort Rooms
complete and accurate
supporting documents
h. HE Rooms 5 - Achieved specific
objective with 97.50 to
10.0% 100% complete and
i. ICT Facilities/ workshop accurate supporting
rooms with utilization plan documents
5-
Submitted reports 6 to
j. Safe playground 4 - 5- Utilized 50% and below 10 days ahead of
Achieved specific objective of the alloted resources time/schedule
k. Interactive Park (Math with 86.26 to 97.49%
park, Science park and complete and accurate
4- Utilized 51% to 4-
Established facilites for others. supporting documents
99% of the alloted Submitted 1 to 5 day
safe and child-friendly 3- Achieved
II. LEARNING
learning and school
June to resources 3- Utilized before schedule time
l. Print rich environment specific objective with
ENVIRONMENT
environment for
March the alloted resources 3-
75.00 to 86.24% complete
students/learners and accurate supporting 2- Utilized 1- Submitted on
documents 25% more than the alloted time/schedule
m. Gulayan sa Paaralan
resources 2-
2- Achieved specific
objective with 37.50 to 1 - Utilized more than 25% Submitted after the
n. Waste segragation (3Rs) of the alloted resources schedule/deadline
74.99% complete and
accurate supporting
documents 1- Did not submit
o. Signages report
1- Achieved specific
objective with below
37.50% complete and
p. School perimeter fence accurate supporting
documents

Established facilites for safe and child-friendly learning and school environment for students/le
Provided technical assistance in the
establishment/ conduct/ preparation of:
5-
a.teacher porfolio containing 5 - Achieved specific objective with
observation reports 97.50 to 100% complete and Submitted reports 6 to
accurate supporting documents 5- Utilized 50% and below 10 days ahead of
b. School Professional Plan for
of the alloted resources time/schedule
Development (SPPD) 4 - Achieved specific
objective with 86.26 to 97.49%
complete and accurate supporting
4- Utilized 51% to 4-
III. HUMAN c. LAC Activities documents 99% of the alloted Submitted 1 to 5 day
3- Achieved
RESOURCE Provided technical June to
7.5% specific objective with 75.00 to
resources 3- Utilized before schedule time
MANAGEMENT AND assistance to teachers March 86.24% complete and accurate the alloted resources 3-
DEVELOPMENT d. Peer Mentoring and
Coaching
supporting documents
2- Utilized 1- Submitted on
2- Achieved specific objective with 25% more than the alloted time/schedule
37.50 to 74.99% complete and resources 2-
accurate supporting documents
e. In-Service Training (IN- 1- Utilized more than 25% Submitted after the
SET) 1- Achieved specific objective of the alloted resources schedule/deadline
with below 37.50% complete and
accurate supporting documents
1- Did not submit
report
RESOURCE Provided technical June to
7.5% specific objective with 75.00 to
resources 3- Utilized before schedule time
MANAGEMENT AND assistance to teachers March 86.24% complete and accurate the alloted resources 3-
DEVELOPMENT supporting documents
2- Utilized 1- Submitted on
2- Achieved specific objective with 25% more than the alloted time/schedule
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
KRA's OBJECTIVES SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES
TIMELIN WEIGHT 37.50 to 74.99% complete and resources 2-
accurate supporting documents
E PER KRA
1- Utilized more than 25% Submitted after the
1- Achieved
QUALITY specific objective of the alloted resources
EFFICIENCY schedule/deadline
TIMELINESS
with below 37.50% complete and
accurate supporting documents
1- Did not submit
f. CI Activities
report

Provided technical assistance to te

Performed/ implemented/
prepared 5 - Achieved specific objective
1. with 97.50 to 100% complete
and accurate supporting
5-
performance contract Submitted reports 6 to
documents
5- Utilized 50% and below 10 days ahead of
of the alloted resources time/schedule
2.. performance evaluation 4 - Achieved specific
objective with 86.26 to 97.49%
results in prescribed tools
complete and accurate
4- Utilized 51% to 4-
III. HUMAN supporting documents 99% of the alloted Submitted 1 to 5 day
Performed RPMS
RESOURCE
processes among school
June to
7.5%
3- Achieved specific resources 3- Utilized before schedule time
MANAGEMENT AND
personnel
March objective with 75.00 to 86.24% the alloted resources 3-
DEVELOPMENT complete and accurate
3. Performance feedback supporting documents
2- Utilized 1- Submitted on
2- Achieved specific 25% more than the alloted time/schedule
and results
objective with 37.50 to 74.99% resources 2-
complete and accurate 1- Utilized more than 25% Submitted after the
supporting documents of the alloted resources schedule/deadline
1- Achieved specific
4. Proposed development objective with below 37.50%
complete and accurate 1- Did not submit
plans
supporting documents report

Performed RPMS processes among school per

Updated/ implemented/ prepared

financial management sytems: 5 - Achieved specific objective
with 97.50 to 100% complete
1,
and accurate supporting
5-
Stakeholders' Mobilization Plan
documents Submitted reports 6 to
5- Utilized 50% and below 10 days ahead of
of the alloted resources time/schedule
4 - Achieved specific
objective with 86.26 to 97.49%
4- Utilized 51% to 4-
2. Organized programs with complete and accurate
IV. PARENTS' Established school and supporting documents 99% of the alloted Submitted 1 to 5 day
stakeholders, esp, parents
INVOLVEMENT AND family and commuinty
for academic and other
June to 3- Achieved specific
10.0% objective with 75.00 to 86.24%
resources 3- Utilized before schedule time
COMMUNITY partnership for
purposes
March the alloted resources 3-
PARTNERSHIP performance complete and accurate
supporting documents
2- Utilized 1- Submitted on
2- Achieved specific 25% more than the alloted time/schedule
3. Coordinated with objective with 37.50 to 74.99% resources 2-
stakeholders on resource complete and accurate 1- Utilized more than 25% Submitted after the
supporting documents schedule/deadline
mobilization of the alloted resources
1- Achieved specific
objective with below 37.50%
4. Obtained complete and accurate 1- Did not submit
resources for the school supporting documents report
through stakeholders
partnership
Established school and family and commuinty partnership for perfor

5 - Achieved specific
1. With clear financial objective with 97.50 to
management system for the 100% complete and
school supported by accurate supporting
evidences such as reports, documents
account logs, database 5-
system Submitted reports 6 to
4 - 5- Utilized 50% and below 10 days ahead of
2. Achieved specific objective of the alloted resources time/schedule
Allocated/prioritized funds for with 86.26 to 97.49%
Performed data-based programs and school complete and accurate
4- Utilized 51% to 4-
strategic planning and facilities improvement and supporting documents
V. SCHOOL 99% of the alloted Submitted 1 to 5 day
performed School maintenance 3- Achieved
LEADERSHIP
Leadership and 3. Reported
June to
10.0% specific objective with
resources 3- Utilized before schedule time
MANAGEMENT AND
Management and sources and uses of funds
March the alloted resources 3-
OPERATIONS 75.00 to 86.24% complete
Operations functions with and accurate supporting 2- Utilized 1- Submitted on
 school supported by accurate supporting
evidences such as reports, documents
account logs, database 5-
system
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency,Submitted
Timeliness)reports 6 to
KRA's OBJECTIVES SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES
TIMELIN WEIGHT 4- 5- Utilized 50% and below 10 days ahead of
2. E PER KRA Achieved specific objective of the alloted resources time/schedule
Allocated/prioritized funds for with 86.26QUALITY
to 97.49% EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS
Performed data-based programs and school complete and accurate
4- Utilized 51% to 4-
strategic planning and facilities improvement and supporting documents
V. SCHOOL 99% of the alloted Submitted 1 to 5 day
LEADERSHIP
performed School maintenance
June to
3- Achieved resources 3- Utilized before schedule time
Leadership and 3. Reported 10.0% specific objective with
MANAGEMENT AND
Management and sources and uses of funds
March the alloted resources 3-
75.00 to 86.24% complete
OPERATIONS 2- Utilized 1- Submitted on
Operations functions with and accurate supporting
evidences: 25% more than the alloted time/schedule
documents
resources 2-
2- Achieved specific
4. Ensured quality objective with 37.50 to 1- Utilized more than 25% Submitted after the
standards for facilities given of the alloted resources schedule/deadline
74.99% complete and
to the school accurate supporting
5. documents 1- Did not submit
Coordinated with report
1- Achieved specific
stakeholders on resource objective with below
mobilization 37.50% complete and
accurate supporting
documents

Established school and family and commuinty partnership for perfor

5 - Achieved specific objective with 5-

97.50 to 100% complete and Submitted reports 6 to
accurate supporting documents
5- Utilized 50% and below 10 days ahead of
of the alloted resources time/schedule
4 - Achieved specific
Performed data-based objective with 86.26 to 97.49%
complete and accurate supporting 4 - Utilized 51% to 4-
strategic planning and documents 99% of the alloted Submitted 1 to 5 day
V. SCHOOL 6. Maintained school EMIS
performed School 3-
LEADERSHIP
Leadership and
and regularly submit SMEA June to Achieved specific objective with 75.00 resources 3 before schedule time
- Utilized
MANAGEMENT AND
Management and
reports to the Division Office March to 86.24% complete and accurate
supporting documents
the alloted resources 3-
OPERATIONS on time 2- Utilized 1- Submitted on
Operations functions with
evidences
2- Achieved specific objective
with 37.50 to 74.99% complete and
25% more than the alloted time/schedule
accurate supporting documents resources 2-
1- Achieved specific
1- Utilized more than 25% Submitted after the
objective with below 37.50% of the alloted resources schedule/deadline
complete and accurate supporting
documents
1- Did not submit
report

5 - Achieved specific
objective with 97.50 to
100% complete and
accurate supporting
10.0% documents
5-
Submitted reports 6 to
4 - 5- Utilized 50% and below 10 days ahead of
Achieved specific objective of the alloted resources time/schedule
with 86.26 to 97.49%
Performed data-based complete and accurate
4- Utilized 51% to 4-
strategic planning and supporting documents
V. SCHOOL 6. Maintained school EMIS 99% of the alloted Submitted 1 to 5 day
performed School 3- Achieved
LEADERSHIP
Leadership and
and regularly submit SMEA June to resources 3- Utilized before schedule time
specific objective with
MANAGEMENT AND
Management and
reports to the Division Office March the alloted resources 3-
OPERATIONS on time 75.00 to 86.24% complete
Operations functions with and accurate supporting 2- Utilized 1- Submitted on
evidences documents 25% more than the alloted time/schedule
resources 2-
2- Achieved specific
objective with 37.50 to 1 - Utilized more than 25% Submitted after the
of the alloted resources schedule/deadline
74.99% complete and
accurate supporting
documents 1- Did not submit
report
1- Achieved specific
 with 86.26 to 97.49%
Performed data-based complete and accurate
4- Utilized 51% to 4-
strategic planning and supporting documents
V. SCHOOL 6. Maintained school EMIS 99% of the alloted Submitted 1 to 5 day
performed School 3- Achieved
LEADERSHIP
Leadership and
and regularly submit SMEA June to PERFORMANCE resources (Quality,
INDICATORS 3- Utilized
Efficiency,before schedule time
Timeliness)
specific objective with
MANAGEMENT
KRA's AND OBJECTIVES
Management and
reports to theOBJECTIVES
SPECIFIC Division Office TIMELIN
March WEIGHT the alloted resources 3-
OPERATIONS on time
E PER KRA 75.00 to 86.24% complete
Operations functions with and accurate supporting 2- Utilized 1- Submitted on
QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS
evidences documents 25% more than the alloted time/schedule
resources 2-
2- Achieved specific
objective with 37.50 to 1 - Utilized more than 25% Submitted after the
of the alloted resources schedule/deadline
74.99% complete and
accurate supporting
documents 1- Did not submit
report
1- Achieved specific
objective with below
37.50% complete and
accurate supporting
documents

Performed data-based strategic planning and performed School Leadership and Management and Operations functions with ev
a. Performed additional functions
(Technical Committee/
Chairmanship)

b. Assigned as Coordinator of any

program/project

c. Attained perfect attendance for the

school year and in all required 5-Five or more Indicators were accomplished/ performed with
activities
corresponding supporting document
d. Submitted Boy Scouts Report with 4- Four
complete accomplishment reports Indicators were accomplished/ performed with corresponding
supporting document
e. Submitted Girl Scouts Report with
Performed tasks / complete accomplishment reports 3- Three Indicators were accomplished/ performed with
functions that lead to the
VI. PLUS FACTOR
attainment of higher
5% corresponding supporting document
learning outcomes f.Generated at least P100,000.00 for
office/school use
2- Two Indicators were
g. Acted as Resource/Guest Speaker in accomplished/ performed with corresponding supporting
Private/Higher Education Institutions and other
Private and Public Recognize/Accredited
document
Organizations 1- One
h. Introduced reform/innovation that Indicator was accomplished/ performed with corresponding
has significant impact on the
attainmert of PDP targets supporting document

i. Presented research papers in

conferences

j. Received award/ recognition from

reputable government/ non-government
organizations (personal/institutional award)

Performed tasks / functions that lead to the attainment of higher learning out
OVERALL RATING

DESCRIPTIVE RATING
 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
TIMELIN WEIGHT
KRA's OBJECTIVES SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES
E PER KRA
QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS

ESTELA B. SUSVILLA, Ph.D JUAN DELA CRUZ

Rater Ratee
MMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM
Name of Rater: Name of Rater: ESTELA B. SUSVILLA, Ph.D
Position: Position: Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
Date of Review: MAY 2017
Date of Review:

learning and teaching resource materials; and PROVIDE Technical assistance to schools in the areas of curriculum

ons and context of the locality; and direct and manage the work of the CID team and provide technical assistance to the schools

TO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION PHASE

TARGET

ACTUAL
MOV'S Q E T AVERAGE RATING SCORE

From To

NAT/ GSA
Results

LIS Generated
Report

LIS Generated
Report

LIS Generated
Report

MEA Report/ LIS

Generated Report

schools and centers viz-a-viz goals and targets. AVERAGE

Lesson Plan
Monitoring Report
Cat5 4 3 2 1
Pts. Pts. Pts. Pts. Pt.
ExS 30 25 20 15 10
Class
BS 25 20 15 10 5
Observation
MS 15 12 9 6 3
Report
SS 10 8 6 4 2

Remedial
Instruction Report
 TARGET

ACTUAL
MOV'S Q E T AVERAGE RATING SCORE

From To

Report of Learning
Resources Provided
to Teachers

Localization Reprt
(All Learning
Area)

Intervention Report
for Learners
development

Form 7

nal supervision to achieve learning outcomes AVERAGE

Child-Friendly
School Survey

CRPU
Cat 5
Manual
4 3 2 1
Pts. Pts. Pts. Pts. Pt.
ExS 30 25 20 15 10
BS 25 20 15 10 5
MS 15 12 9 6 3
SS 10 8 6 4 2

Anti-Bullying
Policy

DRRM
Mobilization Plan

Security Log
Book

School Clubs
Monitoring Report

Report of Academic and

Co-curricular Activities
Participated

Advocacy
campaign
materials

CPC Accomplishment
Reports and Records

GAD Reports and

Records

g and school environment for students/learners AVERAGE

Library/Mini-
library/ Reading
Nook
 TARGET

ACTUAL
MOV'S Q E T AVERAGE RATING SCORE

From To

School Canteen

School Clinic

Guidance Office

Principal's Office

Handwashing
Facilities

Comfort Rooms

HE Rooms
Functional ICT
Facilities/
workshop rooms
with utilization
plan
Safe playground
Interactive Park
(Math park,
Science park and
others.
Print rich
environment

Gulayan sa
Paaralan

Waste
segragation (3Rs)

Signages

School perimeter
fence

g and school environment for students/learners AVERAGE

Teachers'
Portfolio

SPPD

LAC Report

Peer Mentoring
and Coaching
Report

In-Set Records
and Reports
 TARGET

ACTUAL
MOV'S Q E T AVERAGE RATING SCORE

From To

CI Records,
Outputs and
Reports

Provided technical assistance to teachers AVERAGE

Performance
Contract

RPMS Evaluation
Report

Performance
Feedback Results

Development
Plan

med RPMS processes among school personnel AVERAGE

Mobilization Plan

Brigada Eskwela
Report and
Records

Adopt-A-School
Program
Accomplishment
Report

ily and commuinty partnership for performance AVERAGE

MOOE
Liquidation

PTA Liquidation
 TARGET

ACTUAL
MOV'S Q E T AVERAGE RATING SCORE

From To

Other Funds
Liquidation
(Canteen, Income-
Generating Project
Fund)

School
Improvement
Plan (SIP)
Accomplishment
Report

APP-PPMP
Report

ily and commuinty partnership for performance AVERAGE

School Form 1

School Form 2

School Form 3

School Form 4

School Form 5

School Form 6

School Form 7
 TARGET

ACTUAL
MOV'S Q E T AVERAGE RATING SCORE

From To

School Form 8

School Form 9

School Form 10

Management and Operations functions with evidences AVERAGE

Memo/Designation
Order ✘

Memo/Designation
Order

Certification duly
signed by the PSDS

Boy Scouts Reports

(monthly and
annually)

Girl Scouts Reports

(monthly and
annually) Please tick tasks/indicators which was/were
accomplished fully supported with
Financial Statements documentary requirements.
(Cash or In-Kind
Donations)

Certificate of
Recognition/
Appreciation

Appropriate
supporting
documents

Certification as
Presenter

Certificate of
Recognition/
Appreciation

d to the attainment of higher learning outcomes AVERAGE 1.0 1.0 1 0.050

OVERALL RATING

DESCRIPTIVE RATING
 TARGET
ACTUAL

MOV'S Q E T AVERAGE RATING SCORE

From To

JUAN DELA CRUZ ARDEN D. MONISIT, Ed.D.

Ratee Approving Authority

DepEd RPMS Form- School Heads

 Results-Based Performance Management System (RPMS)
Name of Employee: JUAN DELA CRUZ
Legend:
Position: PSDS RM- Role Model
CD- Consistently Demonstrates
Review Period: JUNE 2016-MARCH 2017 MD- Most of the time Demonstrates
SD - Sometimes Demonstrates
School/Division: MANDAUE CITY DIVISION RD - Rarely Demonstrates

Part II. C O M P E T E N C I E S
Indicator 1 Self Management
RM CD MD SD RD Rating
1 1. Sets personal needs, goals, and directions toward personal development. ✘

2 2. Undertakes personal actions and behaviors that are clear and purposive and takes into account personal goals and values congruent to that of the organization.
3 3. Displays emotional maturity and enthusiasm for and is challenged by higher goals. 0.0
4 4. Prioritizes work tasks and schedules (through ghantt charts, checklists, etc.) to achieve goals.
5 5. Sets high quality, challenging, realistic goals for self and others.
###
Indicator 2 Professionalism and Ethics ###
RM CD MD SD RD Rating
1 1. Demonstrates the values and behavior enshrined in the Norms of Conduct and Ethical Standards for public officials and employees (RA 6713).
2 2. Practices ethical and professional behavior and conduct taking into account the impact of his/her actions and decisions on others.
3 3. Maintains a professional image: being trustworthy, punctual and regular in attendance, well-groomed and a good communicator. 0.0
4 4. Makes personal sacrifices(reporting to school on Saturdays and Holidays) to meet the organization’s needs.
5 5. Acts with a sense of urgency and responsibility to meet the organization’s needs, improve systems and help others improve their effectiveness.
###
Indicator 3 Result Focus ###
RM CD MD SD RD Rating
1 1. Achieves results with optimal use of time and resources most of the time.
2 2. Avoids rework, mistakes and wastage through effective work methods by placing organizational needs before personal needs.
3. Delivers error-free outputs most of the time by conforming to standard operating procedures correctly and consistently. Able to produce very satisfactory quality of work In terms of usefulness/acceptability and completeness with no supervision
3 required. 0.0
4 4. Expresses desire to do better and frustration at waste or inefficiency. May focus on new or more precise ways of meeting goals set.
5 5. Makes specific changes in the system or in own work methods to improve performance. Examples may include doing something better, faster, at a lower cost, more efficiently; or improving quality, customer satisfaction, morale, without setting any specific goal.
###
Indicator 4 Teamwork ###
RM CD MD SD RD Rating
1 1. Willingly does his/her share of responsibility.
2 2. Promotes collaboration and removes barriers to teamwork and goal accomplishment across the organization.
3 3. Applies negotiation principles in arriving at win-win agreements. 0.0
4 4. Drives consensus and team ownership of decisions.
5 5. Works constructively and collaboratively with others and across organizations to accomplish organizational goals and objectives.
Indicator 5 Service Orientation ###
RM CD MD SD RD Rating
1 1. Can explain and articulate organizational directions, issues and problems
2 2. Takes personal responsibility for dealing with and/or correcting customer service issues and concerns.
3 3. Initiates activities that promotes advocacy for men and women empowerment. 0.0
4 4. Participates in updating of office vision, mission, mandates and strategies based on DepEd strategies and directions.
5 5. Develops and adopts service improvement programs through simplified procedures that will further enhance service delivery.
###
Indicator 6 Innovation ###
H S F L L Rating
1 1. Examines the root cause of problems and suggests effective solutions. Fosters new ideas, processes, and suggests better ways to do things (cost and/or operational efficiency).
2 2. Demonstrates an ability to think “beyond the box”. Continuously focuses on improving personal productivity to create higher value and results.
3 3. Promotes a creative climate and inspires co – workers to develop original ideas or solutions. 0.0
4 4. Translates creative thinking into tangible changes and solutions that improve the work unit and organization.
5 5. Uses ingenious methods to accomplish responsibilities.Demonstrates resourcefulness and the ability to succeed with minimal resources.
###
Indicator7 Leading People ###
RM CD MD SD RD Rating
1 1. Uses basic persuasion techniques in a discussion or presentation e.g., staff mobilization, appeals to reason and/or emotions, uses data and examples, visual aids
2 2. Persuades, convinces or influences others, in order to have a specific impact or effect.
3 3. “Sets a good example”, is a credible and respected leader; and demonstrates desired behavior. 0.0
4 4. Forwards personal, professional and work unit needs and interests in an issue.
5. Assumes a pivotal role in promoting the development of an inspiring, relevant vision for the organization and influences others to share ownership of DepEd goals, in
5
order to create an effective work environment. ###
Indicator 8 People Performance Management ###
RM CD MD SD RD Rating
1Makes specific changes in the performance management system or in own work methods to improve performance (e.g. does something better, faster, at lower cost, more
1
efficiently; improves quality, customer satisfaction, morale, revenues).
2 2. Sets performance standards and measures progress of employees based on office and department targets.
3 3. Provides feedback and technical assistance such as coaching for performance improvement and action planning. 0.0
4 4. States performance expectations clearly and checks understanding and commitment.
5 5 Performs all the stages of result-based performance management system supported by evidence and required documents/forms.
###
Indicator 9 People Development ###
RM CD MD SD RD Rating
1 1. Improves the skills and effectiveness of individuals through employing a range of development strategies.
2 2 Facilitates workforce effectiveness through coaching and motivating/developing people within a work environment that promotes mutual trust and respect.
3 3 Conceptualizes and implements learning interventions to meet identified training needs.
4 Does long-term coaching or training by arranging appropriate and helpful assignments, formal training, or other experiences for the purpose of supporting a person’s
0.0
4
learning and development.
5 Cultivates a learning environment by structuring interactive experiences such as looking for future opportunities that are in support of achieving individual career goals.
###
Tick only one box provided for in each of the objective. Untick item is colored Gray. If correctly done, it will be colored Green and if more than one box were ticked, it will be colored Red. If all the ROWS are colored Green,
you may print this sheet.
 Republic of the Philippines

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

Region VII, Central Visayas

MANDAUE CITY DIVISION

Part III. SUMMARY OF RATINGS FOR DISCUSSION

Final Performance Results Rating
Accomplishments of KRAs and Objectives
Employee-Superior Agreement
The signature below confirm that the employee and his/her superior has agreed to the contents of the performance as captured in this form.

Name of Employee Name of Superior

JUAN DELA CRUZ ESTELA B. SUSVILLA, Ph.D

Signature Signature

Date Date

Part IV. DEVELOPMENT PLANS

Strengths Development Needs Action Plan Timeline Resources Needed

(Recommended Developmental Intervention)

ESTELA B. SUSVILLA, Ph.D JUAN DELA CRUZ

Rater Ratee
DepEd RPMS Form- School Heads
 Republic of the Philippines

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

Region VII, Central Visayas

MANDAUE CITY DIVISION

EMPLOYEE FEEDBACK FORM
Rating Period: JUNE 2016-MARCH 2017

Strengths Development Needs Action Plan Timeline Resources Needed

Employee Feedback

1. The RPMS is a tool in improving teachers' quality performances and productivity towards his commitment in teaching.

2. The competencies are designed to help improve perspective towards personal and professional growth, students' quality performances and community linkages.

ESTELA B. SUSVILLA, Ph.D JUAN DELA CRUZ

Rater Ratee
DepEd RPMS Form- School Heads
 Republic of the Philippines

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

Region VII, Central Visayas

MANDAUE CITY DIVISION

PERFORMANCE MONITORING AND COACHING FORM
Rating Period: JUNE 2016-MARCH 2017

Date CRITICAL INCIDENCE DESCRIPTION OUTPUT IMPACT ON JOB/ ACTION PLAN SIGNATURE OF (RATEE/
RATER)

ESTELA B. SUSVILLA, Ph.D JUAN DELA CRUZ

Rater Ratee
DepEd RPMS Form- School Heads