Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Fin LL Prez 2016
Fin LL Prez 2016
John Wendel
Dokkyo University, Japan
3-Way Classification
Additional analyses
1. Evaluation of ‘language richnes’ (LR index) for each district.
2. Evaluation of language function: symbolic vs. informational.
Procedures
•
All linguistic objects from ground level to 2nd floor level
(including carts, banners over streets, etc.)
• Each sign counted as I unit. Exceptions: multiples of
small signs in windows or store fronts—each cluster
counted as one sign.
• Each sign categorized in terms of…
•
Turkish (T=244)
•
• O: 18.8%
• C: 78.2%
• I: 3.0%
English (E + TE=15)
•
Turkish (T=265)
•
• O: 9.8%
• C: 88.3%
• I: 1.8%
English (E+TE= 60)
•
Turkish (T=78)
•
• O: 15%
• C: 82.%
• I: 3%
English (TE+E)=30
•
English (E=151)
•
•
Searle, J. 1969. Speech Acts. Cambridge University Press.
• Halliday, MAK. 2004. The Language Of Science. Continuum.
• Pavlenko, Aneta. 2008. Linguistic Landscape of Kyiv, Ukraine: A Diachronic Study.
Routlege.
•