Professional Documents
Culture Documents
OBJECTIVES: At the end of the lesson, the students will be able to:
OBJECTIVES:
1. To enhance moral awareness, increase
At the end of thethinking
lesson,ability shared values,
the students will beand consciously
able to: plan value
education.
1.
2. Define core values and identify your own personal core values.
3. Explore your true values.
4.
1. A description of moral insights into a moral experience shows the following: * there
is awareness of the difference between right and wrong; * moral experience cannot be
reduced to other human experiences; * there is a “must” quality; *we experience an
“ought” in doing good and avoiding evil; * yet we are free to do good or evil.
2. From the phenomenon of dialogue, when we speak of and judge others, we
distinguish between the hero and the villain in myths, history, in everyday experience;
we praise some and blame others. We contrast the hero and the rascal; the faithful and
the unfaithful husband.
1
MODULE 2
Knowledge of Values
1. A value is immediately felt or experienced before it is known and explained. Pre-
philosophical knowledge precedes philosophical, reflective knowledge.
1. What is the source of our moral ideal, i.e., what we should do become to be fully human?
- The moral ideal in us is both present (we are human) and absent (the fullness of human
life is still to be realized). Hence, the moral ideal is a task of a lifetime. It is our vocation
to exist as fully as possible as human persons.
2
MODULE 2
C. Hierarchy of Values
1. Religious values
2. Moral Values
3. Infra-moral values -Economic values and values of well-being -Social and aesthetic values -
Intellectual values -Personality values
4. Infra-human values -Biological or vital values -Sensible values
Value- is not simply the good but it is an added aspect of the good. Moral value makes a man,
through his human actions, good simply as a human person.
Max Scheler’s Non-Formal Ethics of Values Throughout history there have existed many
different moralities in different peoples, races, nations, cultures, and religious. This has led to the
assumption that moral values and norms are relative.
Kant’s refutation of an ethics of goods and purpose (such as Aristotle’s) or an ethics of happiness
( such as utilitarianism).
Kant criticized all non- formal ethics which placed the basis of morality o man’s egoism as a
natural drive.
Kant’s formal ethics established a formal priori universal moral law- the categorical imperative-
independently of man’s natural being.
Scheler hold’s that Kant’s formal ethics as a refutation of an ethics of good and purpose is
overcome by the possibility of a non- formal, nevertheless absolute ethics of values.
In Max Scheler’s non-formal ethics of values, the whole of man, emotional, voluntative, rational,
soci al, historical, cultural, evolutionary, is the object of investigation. Questions of philosophy
ultimately reduce themselves to the questions of “what is man?”
3
MODULE 2
- The prior givenness of values pertains both to the psychic and the physical. Values are
not qualities of things, nor do all good and noble things have common properties, for one
single act or one individual can comprehend a real value.
2. Values are always exhibit a specific content. Their content and the ordered ranks (higher
and lower values) among them posses a priority of givenness in the order of experience
because value-feeling is prior to a given thing.
- In the order of reality, values and things form an insoluble interconnection. And finally,
in the order of essence, values are independent of being. Values do not change with
changing objects. All kinds of values form an absolute order and they are immutable.
3. In this order of values, there arise also a priori formal laws. Values are either positive or
negative. One value cannot be at the same time both positive and negative. Every non-
negative value is positive and vice-versa.
- The order of ranks of values (higher or lower) is absolute. Therefore, it is possible to relate all
historical moralities ad forms of ethos to a universal system of reference; however, only one of
the order of value- modalities and qualities, not of goods and norms. It also gives a negative
domain in which each positive historical age and each specific group has to find its own, always
only relative system of goods and norms.
ACTIVITY
4
MODULE 2