Professional Documents
Culture Documents
E pf = (9)
ding to any location of any country. Also, it has the po- ⎛ n ⎞
2
tential to address a very large number of data for wind
and turbines.
⎜1 / n
⎜ ∑ Ui ⎟
⎟
⎝ i =1 ⎠
There are many researchers investigated the problems
of the wind energy in order to find the optimal solutions where,
by using various theoretical approaches [15-19]. −0.898
k = 3.957 E pf (10)
2. MATHEMATICAL FORMULATIONS OF WIND Usually, the data of wind speed are available in most
POWER cases on a height of 10m above the ground level. Since
the wind speed tends to increase with height in most
This section presents the complete mathematical formu- locations. The height of the hub in the energy generation
lations to determine the wind power density that used to systems is more than 10m, therefore it’s necessary to
measure the capacity of wind resources in specified site. estimate the wind speed at the range of elevations that
It can be found that the wind power density using the corresponding with the wind turbine which possible to
following formula [20], install in the selected site. In order to transfer the
1 anemometer height to the standard level or other desired
WPD = ρ V 3 (1) heights, it should be used the power law equation as
2
follows [24, 25].
where ρ (kg/m3) is the density and V (m/s) is the wind α
speed. The wind power density based on Weibull distri- ⎛z ⎞
bution can be calculated by [20], U 2 = U1 ⎜⎜ 2 ⎟⎟ (11)
⎝ z1 ⎠
1 ⎛ 3⎞
WPDw = ρ c 3 Γ ⎜1 + ⎟ (2) The scale factor c and form factor k of the Weibull
2 ⎝ k⎠ distribution will change as a function of height as the
following expressions [26],
n=
[0.37 − 0.088 ln (c(ho ))] (14)
of the electrical powers per unit time. The details that
needed to find the cost of the electrical power are: the
⎡ ⎛ h ⎞⎤ installation, running cost of the turbine and the lifetime
⎢1 − 0.088 ln⎜ 10 ⎟⎥
⎣ ⎝ ⎠⎦ of the wind turbine. It can be used the following
formula to obtain the total cost [29],
3. PERFORMANCE CHARACTERIZATION OF WIND Turbine &other cos t + ( Annual recurent cos ts + lifetime)
TURBINE Cost / kwh = (17)
AEP * Lifetime
Height Um S.D K C
Station WPD (w/m^3) WEI (kwh/m^2)
(m) (m/s) (m/s) (-) (m/s)
10 2.8544 0.99249 3.2269 3.1855 20.3533 178.3951
Nasiriyah 30 3.2243 0.1659 3.3544 3.5918 28.5941 250.6188
50 3.8141 0.17948 3.53 4.2382 45.9286 402.5379
10 2.9233 1.2174 2.6532 3.2825 25.4514 223.6052
AL-Hay 30 3.295 0.24456 2.7581 3.6961 35.2047 309.2455
50 3.8869 0.26363 2.9025 4.3531 55.4467 486.9568
10 3.0054 1.4348 2.2963 3.3745 30.301 265.3181
Basra 30 3.3809 0.33546 2.387 3.7962 41.4907 363.3137
50 3.9783 0.35994 2.512 4.4653 64.5347 565.1294
10 3.0004 1.5133 2.1413 3.38 34.1562 299.5101
Amara 30 3.373 0.36065 2.2259 3.8008 46.2474 405.5264
50 3.9657 0.38633 2.3425 4.4683 70.9133 621.783
Table 2. Wind turbine tool results
Turbine name Station AEP [kwh] per year CF (%) COE [c$/kwh]
Amara 478560.86 10.9186 6.2688
Basra 452368.81 10.321 6.6318
ATB Riva calzoni 500kw
Al-Hay 376271.46 8.5848 7.973
Nasiriyah 312160.97 7.1221 9.6104
Amara 277830.6 10.9186 10.7979
Basra 263729.53 6.0171 11.3753
Enercon3 500kw
Al-Hay 222466.93 5.0756 13.4851
Nasiriyah 187917.46 4.2874 15.9645
Table 3. Wind turbine tool results
Turbine name Station AEP [kwh] per year CF (%) COE [c$/kwh]
Amara 478560.86 10.9186 6.2688
Basra 452368.81 10.321 6.6318
ATB Riva calzoni 500kw
Al-Hay 376271.46 8.5848 7.973
Nasiriyah 312160.97 7.1221 9.6104
Amara 277830.6 10.9186 10.7979
Basra 263729.53 6.0171 11.3753
Enercon3 500kw
Al-Hay 222466.93 5.0756 13.4851
Nasiriyah 187917.46 4.2874 15.9645
Figure 5. Estimated Weibull parameter k at 50m hub high. Figure 6. Estimated Weibull parameter c (m/s) at 50 m hub
high.