Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2019-20 Lecture 5 - AMI 4105 DAM (Tilage Tool Design)
2019-20 Lecture 5 - AMI 4105 DAM (Tilage Tool Design)
1 9/25/2019
Tillage Tool Design
Mouldboard plough
2
DRAWN DISC PLOUGH
3
PTO DRIVEN DISC PLOUGH
4
DISC HARROW
5
ROTARY TILLER
6
TILLAGE TOOL DESIGN: MOULD BOARD PLOUGH
8 9/25/2019
Effect of Soil Type on Tillage Tool Design
9 9/25/2019
Effect of Soil Type on Tillage Tool Design
10 9/25/2019
Effect of Soil Condition on Tillage Tool Design
❑ Soil condition can be defined in terms of the moisture
content and degree of compaction of the soil.
✓ Soils with low moisture content (dry soil) have higher
specific draft because of excessive soil reaction forces;
therefore, tillage in dry soils requires excessive power.
▪ Tillage in dry soil also accelerates wear of cutting edges.
▪ Increase in moisture content reduces specific draft.
✓ Highly compacted soils also have high specific draft.
▪ For the given soil conditions, the magnitude of
soil reaction forces is minimized by controlling
the tool shape.
11 9/25/2019
Forces acting on a Tillage Tool
❑ A tillage implement moving at a constant speed is subjected to
three main forces that must be in equilibrium.
1. Force of gravity acting upon the implement (W).
2. Force acting between the implement and the tractor (P).
This is the pull of the power unit upon the implement
3. Draft force due to soil forces acting upon the implement:
(i) Useful soil forces (R): Forces a tool must overcome in
cutting, lifting, breaking (pulverizing) and turning soil.
(ii) Parasitic soil forces (Q): Forces due to friction and
rolling resistance that act upon stabilizing parts
such as landside and share of a plough or upon
supporting wheels.
12 9/25/2019
Forces acting on a Mouldboard Plough Bottom
✓ The pull of the
power unit (P)
must overcome the
draft force (D) and
implement weight
(W).
W ✓ Resultant of forces
subjected on the
tillage tool in
operation
constitutes the
resultant tractor
pull acting parallel
to the line of travel.
13 9/25/2019
Draft, D
❑ Draft force (D) is equivalent to the horizontal component
of the pull (P) that is parallel to the line/direction of travel
of the implement. Draft is force required to pull a tillage
tool through the soil.
▪ Where,
D = Draft, N
P = Pull of plough, N
θ = Angle between line of pull and horizontal, degrees
❑ The draft force is located at the point called the hitch where the
tool is attached to the power unit (tractor or draft animals).
14 9/25/2019
Total Draft Required by a Single Plough Bottom
❑ First, calculate the cross-sectional area of the cut soil slice
(Cross − sec tional Area of Furrow Slice) = (Width of plough bottom )
(Depth of ploughing)
15 9/25/2019
Total Draft Required by a Plough with Multiple Plough
Bottoms
16 9/25/2019
Power Requirement of a Tillage Tool
17 9/25/2019
Example: Calculation of Draft of a Mouldboard Plough
18 9/25/2019
Example: Calculation of Draft of a Mouldboard Plough
19 9/25/2019
Review on the three Tractor Power Ratings
1. Brake Horsepower (BHP): This is the maximum power a
tractor’s engine can develop; it is measured at the flywheel.
Not all of the brake horsepower is available to do work.
2. Power take-off (PTO) Horsepower: This is the stationary
power measured at the power take-off shaft and it is about
80% of the brake horsepower. This is a very useful quantity of
power.
3. Drawbar Horsepower (DBHP): This is a measure
of the pulling power of the engine by way of tires,
wheels, or tracks. As a percentage of the PTO
horsepower, the drawbar power varies depending on
soil surface characteristics and type of tractor.
20 9/25/2019
Estimation of Drawbar Horsepower of a Tractor (1)
❑ Depending on soil surface characteristics and type of tractor, Drawbar
power and PTO power can be estimated using values in the table below:
▪ If PTO power is known, available drawbar horsepower is estimated
by multiplying PTO power by appropriate value not in parentheses.
▪ If drawbar power is known, tractor PTO power is estimated by
multiplying drawbar power by appropriate value in parentheses.
21 9/25/2019
22 9/25/2019
Estimation of Drawbar Horsepower of a Tractor (2)
❑ Note:
▪ For a given tractor type, drawbar horsepower (as a
percentage of the PTO power) decreases as the strength
of the contact surface decreases with a maximum for
concrete and a minimum for tilled soil.
23 9/25/2019
Drawbar Horse Power (DBHP)
24 9/25/2019
Typical Draft and Drawbar Power for different tillage tools
in different soil types
25 9/25/2019
Typical Operation Speeds for Different Implements
✓ Optimum field speed varies
according to the type of
tillage being done.
26 9/25/2019
COMPONENTS OF A TYPICAL TILLAGE IMPLEMENT
27 9/25/2019
EXAMPLE: MOULDBOARD PLOUGH
SN Part Function
1 Share This is the soil cutting component
2 Mouldboard This component inverts the cut soil (i.e. it pick-ups,
positions and deposits the soil)
3 Landside This component stabilizes the implement
4 Frog Holds the share, mould board and landside together
29 9/25/2019
❑ The width of an implement (wi) can be calculated
from the following formula :
30 9/25/2019
SUPPORT SYSTEMS OF A MOULDBOARD PLOUGH
32 9/25/2019
HITCHES
❑ Dimensions of three-point hitches are standardized by American
Society of Agricultural Engineers (ASAE)/American Society of
Agricultural and Biological Engineers (ASABE).
33 9/25/2019
HITCHES
❑ Fully mounted implements are attached to the tractor by upper
link and the two lower links so that the implement can be
carried entirely by the tractor.
❑ Semi-mounted implements are attached to the tractor by only
the two lower links of the three-point hitch and the ground
provides part of the implement support.
✓ A semi-mounted plough is supported at the front by the
tractor’s hitch and at the rear by the plough’s furrow
transport wheel.
❑ Drawn implements are attached to the tractor
by the drawbar hitch and the implement is
supported by its own transport wheels.
34 9/25/2019
References
1. Ajit K. Srivastava, Caroll E. Goering, Roger P. Rohbach, and
Dennis R. Buckmaster, 2006. Engineering Principles of
Agricultural Machinery, ASABE.
2. Ibrahmi A., Bentaher H., Hbaieb M., Maalej A., and Mouazen
A.M., 2015. Study the effect of tool geometry and operational
conditions on mouldboard plough forces and energy requirement:
Part 1. Finite element simulation. Computers and Electronics in
Agriculture, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2015.08.006
35 9/25/2019