Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Objective:
To study the magnetic hysteresis loop of a ring shaped iron with massive and laminated cores.
Theory
Magnetism
It has been experimentally established that all substances have magnetic properties. Therefore,
the strength of the magnetic interaction between the points varies depending on the environment
in which they are located. This means that the induction of the magnetic field created by electric
currents in a substance is different from the induction of the magnetic field created by the same
currents in a vacuum. The physical quantity showing how many times the induction of the
magnetic field B in a homogeneous medium differs in modulus from the induction B0 of the
magnetic field in a vacuum is called magnetic permeability
B
μ=
B0
Substances that can be strongly magnetized in a magnetic field are called ferromagnets. The
magnetic permeability of ferromagnets in the order of magnitude lies in the range of 10 2 -105 .
The group of ferromagnets includes four chemical elements: iron, nickel, cobalt, gadolinium. Of
these, iron has the greatest magnetic permeability. Therefore, this whole group was called
ferromagnets.
Ferromagnetism
Hysteresis loop
Experimental
Procedure:
Figure 1.
As it shown in the Fig 1., the sensors, a power supplier, a commutator were connected. The solid
coil set-up was placed a bit far from the computer to prevent influences of the magnetic fields on
the equipment and sensors. The tip of Axis Magnetic Field sensor (MFS) was placed between
top and main iron core with a distance holder paper. Cobra SMART sense High Current sensor
was connected with coils. Both of the sensors worked with Bluetooth. MeasureApp was
downloaded and applied for showing detected results by sensors. Massive iron core and
laminated iron cores were examined. The field strength is calculated with the formula:
In
H=
L
By applying the following: solid iron core: n/L = 2586 in 1/m, laminated iron core: n/L = 2459 in
1/m. We are able to plot the magnetic field strength H as a function of induction B.
Results
200
150
100
50
H, 1/m
0
-10000 -8000 -6000 -4000 -2000 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000
-50
-100
-150
-200
B, mT
150
100
50
H, 1/m
0
-10000 -8000 -6000 -4000 -2000 0 2000 4000 6000
-50
-100
-150
-200
B, mT
Conclusion
To conclude, a comparison of two hysteresis graphs provides an information that massive iron
core coercivity and remanence values are higher that laminated core one. The values of
coercivity and remanence for both iron cores are slightly different than expected values. The
fluctuations, errors may occur due to various reasons: presence of another external magnetic
field, technical issues, etc.
Hall effect in metals
Objective:
To study the Hall effect in thin zinc and copper and find Hall coefficient
Theory
When a conductor plate or a semiconductor is placed in a magnetic field at 90 °to the direction of
the magnetic flux lines, electrons will move along the crossbar of the plate under the influence of
the Lorentz force. Their direction depends on the direction in which the current strength and the
magnetic flux lines go. In other words, the Hall effect is a special case of the action of the
Lorentz force, that is, the action of a magnetic field on a charged particle.
The Hall effect is used to study the characteristics of semiconductors. It can be used to calculate
the number of charge carriers per unit volume, as well as their mobility. This effect served as the
foundation for the development of Hall sensors. This equipment measures the strength of the
magnetic field. Such sensors are actively used to build motors with a tracking drive. In them,
they act as a feedback sensor. They measure the angle of rotation of the motor shaft.
Experimental
1
I, A
0
-20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20
-1
-2
-3
𝑈𝐻, 𝜇𝑉
25∗10−6∗1.16∗10−6 −11 3
RH= −3
=2.27∗10 m / As
160∗10 ∗8
1.2
1
f(x) = 0 x + 0.15 0.8
0.6
0.4
B, mT
0.2
0
-200 -150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150 200
-0.2
-0.4
-0.6
-0.8
𝑈𝐻, 𝜇𝑉
25∗10−6∗2.51∗10−6 −11 3
RH= −3
=3.39∗10 m / As
154.3∗10 ∗12
2) Copper
1.2
1
f(x) = − 0.07 x + 0.13 0.8
0.6
0.4
I, A
0.2
0
-15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15
-0.2
-0.4
-0.6
-0.8
𝑈𝐻, 𝜇𝑉
18∗10−6∗(−0.59∗10−6 )
RH= −3
=6.23∗10−12 m3 / As
169,7∗10 ∗10,05
0
B, mT
-2
-3
-4
𝑈𝐻, 𝜇𝑉
Conclusion
In conclusion, in the experiment was successfully conducted. The given two samples were
studied and compared. The graphs were plotted and other needed components were calculated.
Although, the Hall coefficient values were not same as expected values. For example, expected
value for copper the Hall coefficient is R H =−4.31∗10−11 m 3 / As, what we obtained from UH – B
m3
relation graph is 3.18∗10−11 .
As