DESIGN OF PUMP WELL FOR COIMBATORE ZONE III & ZONE VII - PART 2 PUMPING STATION

S.No Description Value Unit

INPUT
A Design will be for ultimate rate of pumping
B Ultimate Peak rate of pumping to give velocity >or = 1.2 m/s = 0.014 m3/s
C ID of connecting pipe from grit well to pump well = 0.200 m
D Nominal head loss at inlet / exit of connecting pipe = 0.025 m
E Head loss in connecting pipe = 0.015 m
F Invert level of connecting pipe at grit well = 430.114 m
G d/D in connecting pipe = 0.650
H Number of starts permissible for VSSM pumpsets per hour = 6.000 start
I Effective liquid depth = 0.750 m
J No of pump wells = 1 no
K Submergence required for pump = 0.750 m
OUTPUT
L Pumping cycle time (60mins/H) = 10.000 mins
M Effective storage Capacity required (L*60*B/4.00) = 2.123 m3
M1 Storage Capacity considered = 2.123 m3
N Diameter of pump well (max(M,M1)/(J * I * 0.785))^0.5 = 2.000 m say
O Invert level of connecting pipe at pump well (F-E) = 430.099 m
P MWL interconnecting pipe at pump well (O+(G*C)) = 430.229 m
Q MWL in pump well (O - 0.10m) = 429.999 m
R LWL in pump well (Q-I) = 429.249
S Floor level of pump well (R-K) = 428.499 m
T Peak duty pump to start when WL rises to (Q) = 429.999 m
U Peak /Low duty pump to stop when WL falls to ( R) = 429.249 m
V Detention period at average flow 0.785 x N2 x J x (Q-S)/(DWF Ult.) = 16.64 mins
W Depth of Well = 4.266

1 of 5
 ECONOMICAL DESIGN OF PUMPING MAIN FROM COIMBATORE ZONE III & ZONE VII - PART 2

Sl No DESCRIPTION VALUE Material Diameter Cost in RS

INPUT: DI 100 1,353,782
1 Daily flow for the year 2010 (MLD) 0.31 DI 150 1,207,915
2 Daily flow for the year 2025 (MLD) 0.35 DI 200 1,520,425
3 Daily flow for the year 2040 (MLD) 0.41
Optimisation of Pumping Main
4 Average flow : 2010 - 2025 (MLD) 0.33
5 Average flow : 2025 - 2040 (MLD) 0.38 1,600,000

6 Peak flow : 2025 (MLD) 1.06

7 Peak flow : 2040 (MLD) 1.22
1,400,000
8 Half Peak flow: 2025 (MLD) 0.53
9 Half Peak flow: 2040 (MLD) 0.61
50% Percentage of average daily flow during 2010 - 2025that 1,200,000
10 0.2
will be pumped at peak rate (MLD)
50% Percentage of average daily flow during 2025 - 2040 that

Cost (Rs)
11 0.2 1,000,000
will be pumped at peak rate (MLD)
12 Length of Pumping main in m 500.0
13 Coefficient of friction for pipe CR in Modified HW formula 0.85 800,000

14 Specific gravity of liquid 1.01

15 Efficiency of the pumpset (%) 60
600,000
16 Cost of pumpset per BHP (Rs.) 17100
17 Peak Pump 2010- 2025 1W + 1S
18 Peak Pump 2025 - 2040 1W + 1S 400,000

19 Electrical charges per kilowatt hour in Rs. 4.50

20 Rate of interest for annuity charges 6%
200,000
21 Static Head 4.74
22 No of years from present to intermediate 15.00
23 No of years from intermediate to ultimate year 15.00 0
100 150 200
24 Capitalised cost factor 0.1030
Diameter (mm)
25 Equivalent cost factor 0.4173
26 Diameter of Pipe (mm) / Class of pipe (K 9) 100 150 200
27 Material of the Pipe DI DI DI

Intermediate Ultimate Intermediate Ultimate Intermediate Ultimate

28 Stage
2010 - 2025 2025- 2040 2010 - 2025 2025- 2040 2010 - 2025 2025- 2040

29 Internal Diameter of Pipe in m 0.10 0.10 0.15 0.15 0.20 0.20

30 Length of pumping main in m 500 500 500 500 500 500
31 Cost of Pumping main (in Rs.) per m length 924 1300 1818
PEAK FLOW CONDITION
Discharge
32 Q Peak in lps 12.33 14.16 12.33 14.16 12.33 14.16
Velocity
33 Peak flow velocity (m/s) 1.57 1.80 0.70 0.80 0.39 0.45
34 Adjust the pump flow to achieve velocity greater or equal to 1.2m/s 12.33 14.16 21.20 21.20 37.68 37.68
35 Peak flow velocity after adjusting the pump flow (m/s) 1.57 1.80 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20
Peak rate pumping
36 Hydraulic gradient (1 in 1000) 30.51 39.20 11.58 11.58 8.22 8.22
37 Frictional loss with allowance for specials(10%) in m 16.78 21.56 6.37 6.37 4.52 4.52
38 Residual Head in m 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
39 Static head in m 4.74 4.74 4.74 4.74 4.74 4.74
40 Station losses in m 1.68 2.16 0.64 0.64 0.45 0.45
41 Total head in m 24.20 29.46 12.74 12.74 10.71 10.71
Break Horse Power (BHP) at 60 % Efficiency
42 Peak rate pump 6.63 9.27 6.00 6.00 8.97 8.97
HALF PEAK FLOW CONDITION
Discharge
43 q Half Peak in lps 6.16 7.08 6.16 7.08 6.16 7.08
Velocity
44 Half Peak flow velocity (m/s) 0.79 0.90 0.35 0.40 0.20 0.23
45 Adjust the pump flow to give velocity greater or equal to 0.6m/s 6.16 7.08 10.60 10.60 18.84 18.84
46 Half Peak flow velocity after adjusting the flow (m/s) 0.79 0.90 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60
Peak rate pumping
47 Hydraulic gradient (1 in 1000) 8.70 11.18 3.30 3.30 2.34 2.34
48 Frictional loss with allowance for specials(10%) in m 4.79 6.15 1.82 1.82 1.29 1.29
49 Residual Head in m 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
50 Static head in m 4.74 4.74 4.74 4.74 4.74 4.74
2 of 5
 ECONOMICAL DESIGN OF PUMPING MAIN FROM COIMBATORE ZONE III & ZONE VII - PART 2

51 Station losses in m 0.48 0.61 0.18 0.18 0.13 0.13

52 Total head in m 11.01 12.50 7.74 7.74 7.16 7.16
Break Horse Power (BHP) at 60 % Efficiency
53 Half Peak rate pump 1.51 1.97 1.82 1.82 3.00 3.00
Average hours of pumping during Int / Ult stage
54 Peak rate pump (Say) 3.72 3.74 2.16 2.50 1.22 1.41
55 Half Peak rate pump 7.45 7.48 4.33 5.00 2.44 2.81
Annual Energy Consumption in KWH / Year
56 Annual energy consumption for Peak rate pumps 6,720 9,441 3,539 4,085 2,975 3,434
57 Annual energy consumption for Half Peak rate pumps 3,056 4,008 2,149 2,480 1,988 2,294
Annual electricity charges at Rs. 4.50 per KWH in Rs.
58 Annual Energy cost for Peak flow pump 30,238 42,484 15,923 18,380 13,387 15,452
59 Annual Energy cost for Half Peak flow pump 13,751 18,034 9,668 11,160 8,945 10,325
60 Total Energy cost 43,989 60,519 25,592 29,541 22,332 25,777
61 Capitalised cost in Rs. 427,230 587,774 248,554 286,905 216,890 250,356
62 Equivalent cost in 2010 427,230 245,258 248,554 119,716 216,890 104,465
63 Total Capitalised cost in RS. 672,487 368,269 321,355
64 Pumping main cost 462,000 650,000 909,000
65 Cost of pumps 139,137 192,102 133,811 133,811 204,669 204,669
66 Equivalent Cost in 2010 139,137 80,157 133,811 55,835 204,669 85,401
67 Total Capitalised cost in RS. 219,294 189,645 290,070
68 Grand Total of cost in Rs. 1,353,782 1,207,915 1,520,425
Conclusion :Using 100 mm DI K-9 pipe will be Optimal / economical when compared with 150mm & 200mm DI K-9 pipe and hence it is adopted

3 of 5
 DESIGN OF PUMP FOR COIMBATORE ZONE III & ZONE VII - PART 2

S.No Description Value Unit

1 Peak inflow to SPS = 12.33 lps

2 Low rate inflow to SPS = 6.16 lps
Coefficient of friction for pipe "CR" in Modified HW formula for DI
3 = 0.85
pipes cement mortar lined
4 Specific gravity of sewage = 1.01 say
5 Length of Pumping Main = 500.00 m
6 Diameter of Pumping main = 0.150 m
Intermediate Period (2010 - 2025)
Peak Duty Pump 1 x 21.2 1W + 1S
7 Discharge to achieve velocity of 1.2 m/s = 21.20 lps
8 Slope required = 11.58 per 1000 m
9 Discharge Level = 433.99
10 Static Head (Discharge level - Pump well LWL) = 4.74 m
11 Frictional Losses including 10 % extra for specials etc = 6.37 m
12 Residual head+Station losses = 1.64 m (say)
13 Total Pumping head when pump well is at LWL = 13.00 m
14 Efficiency of Pump = 60 %
15 Pump motor rating = 6 BHP
Low Duty Pump
16 Discharge to achieve velocity of 0.6 m/s = 10.60 lps
17 Slope required = 3.30 per 1000 m
18 Discharge Level = 433.99
19 Static Head (Discharge level - Pump well LWL) = 4.74 m
20 Frictional Losses including 10 % extra for specials etc = 1.82 m
21 Residual Head+Station losses = 1.182 m (say)
22 Total Pumping head when pump well is at LWL = 8.00 m
23 Efficiency of Pump = 60 %
24 Pump motor rating = 2 BHP
Ultimate Period (2025-2040)
Peak Duty Pump 1 x 21.2 1W + 1S
25 Discharge to achieve velocity of 1.2 m/s = 21.20 lps
26 Slope required = 11.58 per 1000 m
27 Discharge Level = 433.99
28 Static Head (Discharge level - Pump well LWL) = 4.74 m
29 Frictional Losses including 10 % extra for specials etc = 6.37 m
30 Residual Head+Station losses = 1.637 m (say)
31 Total Pumping head when pump well is at LWL = 13.00 m
32 Efficiency of Pump = 60 %
33 Pump motor rating = 6 BHP
Low Duty Pump
34 Discharge to achieve velocity of 0.6 m/s = 10.60 lps
35 Slope required = 3.30 per 1000 m
36 Discharge Level as = 433.99
37 Static Head (Discharge level - Pump well LWL) = 4.74 m
38 Frictional Losses including 10 % extra for specials etc = 1.8 m
39 Residual Head+Station losses = 1.182 m (say)
40 Total Pumping head when pump well is at LWL = 8.00 m
Pumping head when pump well is at MWL is not materially different.
41
Hence ignored.

4 of 5
 DESIGN OF PUMP FOR COIMBATORE ZONE III & ZONE VII - PART 2
42 Efficiency of Pump = 60 %
43 Pump motor rating = 2 BHP

5 of 5