DESIGN OF PUMP WELL FOR COIMBATORE ZONE III & ZONE VII - PART 10 PUMPING STATION

S.No Description Value Unit

INPUT
A Design will be for ultimate rate of pumping
B Ultimate Peak rate of pumping to give velocity >or = 1.2 m/s = 0.057 m3/s
C ID of connecting pipe from grit well to pump well = 0.400 m
D Nominal head loss at inlet / exit of connecting pipe = 0.025 m
E Head loss in connecting pipe = 0.015 m
F Invert level of connecting pipe at grit well = 391.250 m
G d/D in connecting pipe = 0.650
H Number of starts permissible for VSSM pumpsets per hour = 6.000 start
I Effective liquid depth = 1.750 m
J No of pump wells = 1 no
K Submergence required for pump = 0.750 m
OUTPUT
L Pumping cycle time (60mins/H) = 10.000 mins
M Effective storage Capacity required (L*60*B/4.00) = 8.484 m3
M1 Storage Capacity considered = 8.484 m3
N Diameter of pump well (max(M,M1)/(J * I * 0.785))^0.5 = 2.500 m say
O Invert level of connecting pipe at pump well (F-E) = 391.235 m
P MWL interconnecting pipe at pump well (O+(G*C)) = 391.495 m
Q MWL in pump well (O - 0.10m) = 391.135 m
R LWL in pump well (Q-I) = 389.385
S Floor level of pump well (R-K) = 388.635 m
T Peak duty pump to start when WL rises to (Q) = 391.135 m
U Peak /Low duty pump to stop when WL falls to ( R) = 389.385 m
V Detention period at average flow 0.785 x N2 x J x (Q-S)/(DWF Ult.) = 10.84 mins
W Depth of Well = 5.375

1 of 5
 ECONOMICAL DESIGN OF PUMPING MAIN FROM COIMBATORE ZONE III & ZONE VII - PART 10

Sl No DESCRIPTION VALUE Material Diameter Cost in RS

INPUT: DI 200 4,517,272
1 Daily flow for the year 2010 (MLD) 1.22 DI 250 4,082,463
2 Daily flow for the year 2025 (MLD) 1.42 DI 300 4,677,179
3 Daily flow for the year 2040 (MLD) 1.63
Optimisation of Pumping Main
4 Average flow : 2010 - 2025 (MLD) 1.32
5 Average flow : 2025 - 2040 (MLD) 1.52 4,800,000

6 Peak flow : 2025 (MLD) 4.26

7 Peak flow : 2040 (MLD) 4.89
8 Half Peak flow: 2025 (MLD) 2.13 4,600,000
9 Half Peak flow: 2040 (MLD) 2.44
50% Percentage of average daily flow during 2010 - 2025that
10 0.7
will be pumped at peak rate (MLD)
4,400,000
50% Percentage of average daily flow during 2025 - 2040 that

Cost (Rs)
11 0.8
will be pumped at peak rate (MLD)
12 Length of Pumping main in m 800.0
13 Coefficient of friction for pipe CR in Modified HW formula 0.85 4,200,000

14 Specific gravity of liquid 1.01

15 Efficiency of the pumpset (%) 60
16 Cost of pumpset per BHP (Rs.) 17100 4,000,000
17 Peak Pump 2010- 2025 1W + 1S
18 Peak Pump 2025 - 2040 1W + 1S
19 Electrical charges per kilowatt hour in Rs. 4.50
3,800,000
20 Rate of interest for annuity charges 6%
21 Static Head 6.07
22 No of years from present to intermediate 15.00
3,600,000
23 No of years from intermediate to ultimate year 15.00 200 250 300
24 Capitalised cost factor 0.1030
Diameter (mm)
25 Equivalent cost factor 0.4173
26 Diameter of Pipe (mm) / Class of pipe (K 9) 200 250 300
27 Material of the Pipe DI DI DI

Intermediate Ultimate Intermediate Ultimate Intermediate Ultimate

28 Stage
2010 - 2025 2025- 2040 2010 - 2025 2025- 2040 2010 - 2025 2025- 2040

29 Internal Diameter of Pipe in m 0.20 0.20 0.25 0.25 0.30 0.30

30 Length of pumping main in m 800 800 800 800 800 800
31 Cost of Pumping main (in Rs.) per m length 1818 2433 3085
PEAK FLOW CONDITION
Discharge
32 Q Peak in lps 49.33 56.56 49.33 56.56 49.33 56.56
Velocity
33 Peak flow velocity (m/s) 1.57 1.80 1.01 1.15 0.70 0.80
34 Adjust the pump flow to achieve velocity greater or equal to 1.2m/s 49.33 56.56 58.88 58.88 84.78 84.78
35 Peak flow velocity after adjusting the pump flow (m/s) 1.57 1.80 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20
Peak rate pumping
36 Hydraulic gradient (1 in 1000) 13.39 17.15 6.30 6.30 5.07 5.07
37 Frictional loss with allowance for specials(10%) in m 11.78 15.09 5.55 5.55 4.47 4.47
38 Residual Head in m 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
39 Static head in m 6.07 6.07 6.07 6.07 6.07 6.07
40 Station losses in m 1.18 1.51 0.55 0.55 0.45 0.45
41 Total head in m 20.02 23.66 13.17 13.17 11.98 11.98
Break Horse Power (BHP) at 60 % Efficiency
42 Peak rate pump 21.95 29.74 17.23 17.23 22.56 22.56
HALF PEAK FLOW CONDITION
Discharge
43 q Half Peak in lps 24.67 28.28 24.67 28.28 24.67 28.28
Velocity
44 Half Peak flow velocity (m/s) 0.79 0.90 0.50 0.58 0.35 0.40
45 Adjust the pump flow to give velocity greater or equal to 0.6m/s 24.67 28.28 29.44 29.44 42.39 42.39
46 Half Peak flow velocity after adjusting the flow (m/s) 0.79 0.90 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60
Peak rate pumping
47 Hydraulic gradient (1 in 1000) 3.82 4.89 1.80 1.80 1.45 1.45
48 Frictional loss with allowance for specials(10%) in m 3.36 4.30 1.58 1.58 1.27 1.27
49 Residual Head in m 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
50 Static head in m 6.07 6.07 6.07 6.07 6.07 6.07
2 of 5
 ECONOMICAL DESIGN OF PUMPING MAIN FROM COIMBATORE ZONE III & ZONE VII - PART 10

51 Station losses in m 0.34 0.43 0.16 0.16 0.13 0.13

52 Total head in m 10.76 11.80 8.81 8.81 8.47 8.47
Break Horse Power (BHP) at 60 % Efficiency
53 Half Peak rate pump 5.90 7.41 5.76 5.76 7.97 7.97
Average hours of pumping during Int / Ult stage
54 Peak rate pump (Say) 3.72 3.74 3.11 3.60 2.16 2.50
55 Half Peak rate pump 7.43 7.49 6.23 7.19 4.33 5.00
Annual Energy Consumption in KWH / Year
56 Annual energy consumption for Peak rate pumps 22,218 30,321 14,610 16,872 13,289 15,347
57 Annual energy consumption for Half Peak rate pumps 11,940 15,119 9,770 11,283 9,393 10,848
Annual electricity charges at Rs. 4.50 per KWH in Rs.
58 Annual Energy cost for Peak flow pump 99,981 136,445 65,743 75,926 59,801 69,063
59 Annual Energy cost for Half Peak flow pump 53,730 68,034 43,965 50,775 42,271 48,818
60 Total Energy cost 153,711 204,480 109,708 126,701 102,071 117,881
61 Capitalised cost in Rs. 1,492,881 1,985,957 1,065,514 1,230,549 991,343 1,144,889
62 Equivalent cost in 2010 1,492,881 828,671 1,065,514 513,465 991,343 477,722
63 Total Capitalised cost in RS. 2,321,552 1,578,979 1,469,065
64 Pumping main cost 1,454,400 1,946,400 2,468,000
65 Cost of pumps 476,225 635,318 393,070 393,070 522,213 522,213
66 Equivalent Cost in 2010 476,225 265,096 393,070 164,014 522,213 217,901
67 Total Capitalised cost in RS. 741,320 557,084 740,114
68 Grand Total of cost in Rs. 4,517,272 4,082,463 4,677,179
Conclusion :Using 250 mm DI K-9 pipe will be Optimal / economical when compared with 200mm & 300mm DI K-9 pipe and hence it is adopted

3 of 5
 DESIGN OF PUMP FOR COIMBATORE ZONE III & ZONE VII - PART 10

S.No Description Value Unit

1 Peak inflow to SPS = 49.33 lps

2 Low rate inflow to SPS = 24.67 lps
Coefficient of friction for pipe "CR" in Modified HW formula for DI
3 = 0.85
pipes cement mortar lined
4 Specific gravity of sewage = 1.01 say
5 Length of Pumping Main = 800.00 m
6 Diameter of Pumping main = 0.250 m
Intermediate Period (2010 - 2025)
Peak Duty Pump 1 x 58.88 1W + 1S
7 Discharge to achieve velocity of 1.2 m/s = 58.88 lps
8 Slope required = 6.30 per 1000 m
9 Discharge Level = 395.45
10 Static Head (Discharge level - Pump well LWL) = 6.07 m
11 Frictional Losses including 10 % extra for specials etc = 5.55 m
12 Residual head+Station losses = 1.55 m (say)
13 Total Pumping head when pump well is at LWL = 14.00 m
14 Efficiency of Pump = 60 %
15 Pump motor rating = 18 BHP
Low Duty Pump
16 Discharge to achieve velocity of 0.6 m/s = 29.44 lps
17 Slope required = 1.80 per 1000 m
18 Discharge Level = 395.45
19 Static Head (Discharge level - Pump well LWL) = 6.07 m
20 Frictional Losses including 10 % extra for specials etc = 1.58 m
21 Residual Head+Station losses = 1.158 m (say)
22 Total Pumping head when pump well is at LWL = 9.00 m
23 Efficiency of Pump = 60 %
24 Pump motor rating = 6 BHP
Ultimate Period (2025-2040)
Peak Duty Pump 1 x 58.88 1W + 1S
25 Discharge to achieve velocity of 1.2 m/s = 58.88 lps
26 Slope required = 6.30 per 1000 m
27 Discharge Level = 395.45
28 Static Head (Discharge level - Pump well LWL) = 6.07 m
29 Frictional Losses including 10 % extra for specials etc = 5.55 m
30 Residual Head+Station losses = 1.555 m (say)
31 Total Pumping head when pump well is at LWL = 14.00 m
32 Efficiency of Pump = 60 %
33 Pump motor rating = 18 BHP
Low Duty Pump
34 Discharge to achieve velocity of 0.6 m/s = 29.44 lps
35 Slope required = 1.80 per 1000 m
36 Discharge Level as = 395.45
37 Static Head (Discharge level - Pump well LWL) = 6.07 m
38 Frictional Losses including 10 % extra for specials etc = 1.6 m
39 Residual Head+Station losses = 1.158 m (say)
40 Total Pumping head when pump well is at LWL = 9.00 m
Pumping head when pump well is at MWL is not materially different.
41
Hence ignored.

4 of 5
 DESIGN OF PUMP FOR COIMBATORE ZONE III & ZONE VII - PART 10
42 Efficiency of Pump = 60 %
43 Pump motor rating = 6 BHP

5 of 5