The document summarizes a group's criticism of the film "The Pursuit of Happiness". It notes that the group's discussion of elements like characters, plot, setting were incomplete or lacking in detail. However, the organization and development of the criticism's story flow using introduction, interpretation, evaluation and conclusion was sufficient. The language style was good, but some grammatical errors were present. The criticism also failed to compare the film's actors or adaptions to other works.
The document summarizes a group's criticism of the film "The Pursuit of Happiness". It notes that the group's discussion of elements like characters, plot, setting were incomplete or lacking in detail. However, the organization and development of the criticism's story flow using introduction, interpretation, evaluation and conclusion was sufficient. The language style was good, but some grammatical errors were present. The criticism also failed to compare the film's actors or adaptions to other works.
The document summarizes a group's criticism of the film "The Pursuit of Happiness". It notes that the group's discussion of elements like characters, plot, setting were incomplete or lacking in detail. However, the organization and development of the criticism's story flow using introduction, interpretation, evaluation and conclusion was sufficient. The language style was good, but some grammatical errors were present. The criticism also failed to compare the film's actors or adaptions to other works.
Zakiyah A320180268 Miftah Al Fitri A320180270 Dewi Oktaviani A320180272 Muthi’ah Nurul I A320180279
Criticizing Group 8
Title of film: The Pursuit of Happiness
1. Scope and content
The discussion in criticizing is incomplete, for example the elements being criticized have not been discussed in full and in detail. The explanation of the characters and the plot is lacking in detail, the setting of the place, time and atmosphere is not available. So scope and content needs guidance. 2. Organization and development of story flow They use orientation, interpretation, evaluation, and conclusion to criticize and arrange it in a text. So the organization and development of story flow is sufficient 3. Language style The language style is good 4. Grammatical correctness The grammar used is quite good and easy to understand, but there are some typos in the text. 5. There is no criticism about the comparison between the actors in different films or the comparison between the film and the novel