You are on page 1of 59

Sidney Innerebner, PhD, PE, CWP

Indigo Water Group, LLC


Clarifier Basics
 Clarifiers have both hydraulic capacity and solids
handling capacity

 Use State Point Analysis to predict performance


Secondary Clarifier Capacity
 Hydraulic capacity
 Detention Time
 Surface Overflow Rate
 Weir Loading Rate

 Pulling down is GRAVITY


 Pushing up is CURRENT
(surface overflow rate)
Surface Overflow Rate
Average, Peak,
gpd/sf gpd/sf
Conventional
400 - 700 1000 – 1600
Activated Sludge
Extended Aeration 200 - 400 600 - 800

SOR = Influent Flow to Clarifier


Clarifier Surface Area
4
Source: Metcalf and Eddy 4th Edition (2003) – pg 687
Weir Loading Rate
Peak, gpd/lf
WWTPs less than 1 mgd 20,000
WWTPs greater than 1 mgd 30,000

WLR = Influent Flow to Clarifier


Linear Feet of Weir

5
Source: Recommended Standards for Wastewater Facilities (2004) pg 70-4
6
Solids Loading Rate to Clarifier
Average, Peak,
lb/sf*hr lb/sf*hr
Conventional
19.2 – 28.8 38.4
Activated Sludge
Extended Aeration 4.8 – 24.0 33.6

SLR = (QINF + QRAS)(MLSS, mg/L)(8.34)


Clarifier Surface Area
7
Source: Metcalf and Eddy 4th Edition (2003) – pg 687
State Point Analysis
 Use State Point Analysis to predict performance
 Mathematical model of clarifier
 Uses settling data – Sludge Volume Index (SVI)
 Some limitations
State Point Analysis
 Actual or Estimated Settling Characteristics (SVI)
 Mixed Liquor Suspended Solids Concentration
 Clarifier Surface Area
 Influent Flow
 Return Activated Sludge (RAS) Flow
40
State Point X-Axis
Solids Flux (lb/ft2d) 35

30

25

MLSS and
20
RAS/WAS
15
Concentration

10

0
0 5 10 15

Solids Concentration (g/L)


EJWahlberg, April 1996

10
40
State Point Y-Axis
Solids Flux (lb/ft2d) 35

30

Solids Loading
25
Rate or Flux
20

15

10

0
0 5 10 15

Solids Concentration (g/L)


EJWahlberg, April 1996

11
40
The State Point
Solids Flux (lb/ft2d) 35

30

State Point
25

20 (x,y) coordinates
15
x = SLR, lb/ft2*d = 14
y = MLSS, g/L = 3.5
10

0
0 5 10 15

Solids Concentration (g/L)


EJWahlberg, April 1996 12
40
Overflow Line
Solids Flux (lb/ft2d) 35

30

25
Overflow line
20 slope is equal
to surface
15
overflow rate
10 (SOR)
5

0
0 5 10 15

Solids Concentration (g/L)


EJWahlberg, April 1996

13
40
Overflow Line
Solids Flux (lb/ft2d) 35

30

25
Qinfluent = Higher
20
Steeper Slope
15

10

0
0 5 10 15

Solids Concentration (g/L)


EJWahlberg, April 1996 14
40
Overflow Line
Solids Flux (lb/ft2d) 35

30

25
Qinfluent = Lower
Flatter Slope
20

15

10

0
0 5 10 15

Solids Concentration (g/L)


EJWahlberg, April 1996 15
40
Underflow Line
35
Solids
Loading
Solids Flux (lb/ft2d)
30 Rate
25

20

15

10

0
0 5 10 15

Solids Concentration (g/L)


EJWahlberg, April 1996 16
40
Underflow Line
Solids Flux (lb/ft2d) 35

30

25

20

15 Expected
RAS/WAS
10
Conc.
5

0
0 5 10 15

Solids Concentration (g/L)


EJWahlberg, April 1996 17
40
Underflow Line
Solids Flux (lb/ft2d) 35

30

25
Slope is the
20 Solids Underflow
Rate - SUR
15

10

0
0 5 10 15

Solids Concentration (g/L)


EJWahlberg, April 1996 18
40
Underflow Line
Solids Flux (lb/ft2d) 35

30

25

QRAS = Higher
20
Steeper Slope
15 Slope = Underflow Rate
10

0
0 5 10 15

Solids Concentration (g/L)


EJWahlberg, April 1996 19
40
Underflow Line
Higher Flux
Solids Flux (lb/ft2d) 35

30

25

20

Lower RAS/WAS
15
Concentration
10

0
0 5 10 15

Solids Concentration (g/L)


EJWahlberg, April 1996 20
40
Underflow Line
35
Lower Flux
Solids Flux (lb/ft2d)
30

25

20

Higher RAS/WAS
15
Concentration
10

0
0 5 10 15

Solids Concentration (g/L)


EJWahlberg, April 1996 21
40
Underflow Line
Solids Flux (lb/ft2d) 35

30

25

20
Placement depends on the
solids concentration
15
entering the clarifier.
10

0
0 5 10 15

Solids Concentration (g/L)


EJWahlberg, April 1996 22
40
Underflow Line
Solids Flux (lb/ft2d) 35

30

25

20
Higher MLSS moves line up,
15 but slope stays the same.

10

0
0 5 10 15

Solids Concentration (g/L)


EJWahlberg, April 1996 23
40
Underflow Line
Solids Flux (lb/ft2d) 35

30

25

20 Lower MLSS moves


15
the line down.

10

0
0 5 10 15

Solids Concentration (g/L)


EJWahlberg, April 1996 24
40
Settling Curve
Solids Flux (lb/ft2d) 35

30

25
Flux Curve
20 built from
SVI or other
15
settling data
10

0
0 5 10 15

Solids Concentration (g/L)


EJWahlberg, April 1996

25
Solids Flux Theory
 Particles cannot move relative to one another
 Hindered settling
 Interface forms
 Interface subsides at a constant velocity
 Velocity depends on
 Concentration of solids (volume fraction)
 Settling characteristics
40
Settling Curve
Solids Flux (lb/ft2d) 35

30

LOW SVI =
25
Big Curve
20

More
15
Clarifier
10 Capacity
5

0
0 5 10 15

Solids Concentration (g/L)


EJWahlberg, April 1996

27
40
Settling Curve
Solids Flux (lb/ft2d) 35

30

BIG SVI =
25
Small Curve
20

Less
15
Clarifier
10 Capacity
5

0
0 5 10 15

Solids Concentration (g/L)


EJWahlberg, April 1996 28
Bowling Balls versus Feathers
Concept Applies to Floc Too

Dense, Round Floc Filaments = Feathers!


Poor Settling
Reduced Treatment Capacity
40
Clarification Success!
Solids Flux (lb/ft2d) 35

30

State Point
25

20 The State Point must


be within the Flux
15
Curve for
10 clarification to be
possible.
5

0
0 5 10 15

Solids Concentration (g/L)


EJWahlberg, April 1996 31
40
State Point Analysis
Solids Flux (lb/ft2d) 35

30

25

20 When State Point is outside the


settling curve, clarifier has a
15 clarification failure. It can’t
settle the incoming solids.
10

0
0 5 10 15

Solids Concentration (g/L)


EJWahlberg, April 1996 32
Causes of Clarification Failure
 MLSS Concentration too High
 Influent Flows too High
 Poor Settling Characteristics
Using State Point to Set RAS Rate
 Underloaded Condition – blanket going down
 Overloaded Condition – blanket going up
 Critically Loaded Condition – stable blanket

 RAS should be as LOW as possible while:


 Not building a blanket
 Preventing denitrification in the blanket
40
Adjusting RAS Flow
Solids Flux (lb/ft2d) 35

30

25

20 Thickening Failure
15

10

0
0 5 10 15

Solids Concentration (g/L)


EJWahlberg, April 1996 35
40
Adjusting RAS Flow
Solids Flux (lb/ft2d) 35

30

25

20

Over Pumping RAS


15

10

0
0 5 10 15

Solids Concentration (g/L)


EJWahlberg, April 1996 36
40
Adjusting RAS Flow
Solids Flux (lb/ft2d) 35

30

25

20
Critically Loaded
15

10

0
0 5 10 15

Solids Concentration (g/L)


EJWahlberg, April 1996 37
40
Adjusting RAS Flow
Solids Flux (lb/ft2d) 35

30

25
Thickening Failure

20
Critically Loaded

15 Over Pumping RAS


10

0
0 5 10 15

Solids Concentration (g/L)


EJWahlberg, April 1996 38
What Can be Controlled
 MLSS Concentration (WAS Rate)
 RAS Rate
 Number of Clarifiers On-Line
 SVI (did somebody say polymer?)
Grand Island Examples
 Three clarifiers
 100 foot diameter each
 Side water depths of 9 ft (#1 and 2), 12.5 ft (#3)
 Average influent flow = 8 mgd
 Typical RAS flow = 40% of influent
 SVI = 120 mL/g
 MLSS = 3000 mg/L
 RAS = 9,500 mg/L

 Find the surface area of one clarifier


 Input conditions and find the State Point
Solids in Effluent (Cloudy)
 Ashing –small ash-like particles on surface of clarifier
 Start of denitrification
 High grease content
 Pin Floc – small dense particles of floc
 Old sludge breaking down
 Straggler Floc – Light fluffy sludge particles
 Young sludge, low mixed liquor

 How do you know?????

43
Clumping

44
Sludge Clumping

45
Ashing

46
Straggler Floc

47
Denitrification or Hydraulics?
 Look for bubbles
 Behind the rake arm
 At the clarifier edges
 During peak loading

 Did sludge go down and come back up?


 Possible denitrification
 Did it never go down in the first place?
 Straggler floc
 Pin floc
48
49
50
Rising Sludge Behind Rake Arm

51
Solids went under
the scum baffle and
came back up.
Good indication of
denitrification.

52
My sludge won’t settle!
 A modification to your settleometer test can tell you if
the problem is in the aeration basin (biology) or in the
clarifier (operations)

 Thank you Eric, don’t call me doctor, Wahlberg!


Testing Procedure
 Collect a grab sample of
MLSS
 At the same time, get a
grab of secondary
clarifier effluent
 Run the settleometer test
as usual
 Analyze supernatant
AND clarifier samples
for TSS
Interpreting the Results
 You should have two TSS results
 Turbidity works well for this test too.

 If the TSS for the settleometer test and the clarifier


effluent are about equal: IT IS A BIOLOGY ISSUE

 If the TSS for the settleometer is much better than the


clarifier effluent: IT IS A CLARIFIER ISSUE
Biology Versus Clarifier
Biology Issues Clarifier Issues

 Air on/off cycles  Carrying big blankets


 Denitrification in the
 Filaments
blanket
 Low DO
 Sludge in clarifier too
 High VFA long (no DO in here!)
 Nutrient limitations  Hydraulic surge
 MCRT too low  Something wrong with
 MCRT too high collection mechanism
Sidney Innerebner, PhD, PE, CWP
Indigo Water Group, LLC

You might also like