Professional Documents
Culture Documents
* ﺃﺳﺘﺎﺫ ﻣﺴﺎﻋﺪ ﲟﺮﻛﺰ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺎﺕ ،ﻭﻳﺸﻐﻞ ﺣﺎﻟﻴﺎ ﻣﻨﺼﺐ ﻧﺎﺋﺐ ﻋﻤﻴﺪ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺎﺕ ﻟﺸﺆﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﻄﻼﺏ ،ﺍﳉﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ
ﺍﻟﻌﺎﳌﻴﺔ ﲟﺎﻟﻴﺰﻳﺎ ،ﺍﻟﱪﻳﺪ ﺍﻹﻟﻜﺘﺮﻭﱐ salihtingari@iium.edu.my :ﺃﻭ salihtingari2003@yahoo.com
ﻡ2013 / ﻫ1434 . ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﻼﺛﻮﻥ. ﻠﺪ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻊ ﻋﺸﺮﺍﻟﺘﺠﺪﻳﺪ ـــ ﺍ 152
between the plural and the dual is to combine and conjoin, yet it differs
from it in terms of quantity. The plural has two forms: sound plural and
broken plural. Of the findings arrived at in this study is the soundness of
classical categorization nouns into singular, dual and plural and the
suitability of the plural (together with its varieties) for both fewness and
multitude according to the context. The use of fewness plural in place of
multitude plural and vice-versa is a matter of allegory.
Key words: Numbers, singular, plural, dual, sound plural, broken plural..
Abstrak
Kajian ini bertujuan untuk menerangkan kaedah mengunkap nombor dalam
bahasa Arab dengan menggunakan kaedah deskriptif dan induktif. Ia
menunjukkan ada asas yang mendalam di kalangan orang Arab kuno tentang
urutan tunggal (mufrad), dwi (muthanna) dan jamak (jam’) dengan jenis
yang berbeza. Satu aspek kekayaan bahasa Arab ialah ia dapat menyatakan
jamak dengan mengungkapkan kedudukan tunggal dan meletakan yang
kedua atau dwi antara tunggal dan jamak, walaupun dwi juga boleh
menandakan tunggal. Ia juga menunjukkan bahawa salah satu ciri yang sama
antara jamak dan dwi ialah dengan menggabung dan mengumpulkan,
walaupun ia berbeza daripada segi kuantiti. Jamak mempunyai dua bentuk:
jamak sekata dan jamak tak sekata. Dapatan kajian menunjukan bahawa
pengkelasan klasik terhadap nama-nama kepada tunggal, dwi dan jamak
adalah betul, dan kesesuaian bentuk jamak (beserta dengan jenis-jenisnya)
untuk jumlah yang sedikit dan juga banyak mengikut konteksnya.
Penggunaan bentuk jamak bagi jumlah sedikit di kedudukan jamak yang
banyak dan sebaliknya termasuk dalam aspek simbolik.
Kata Kunci: Nombor-nombor, tunggal, dwi, jamak sekata dan jamak tak
sekata.
ﺘﻤﻬﻴﺩ
ﻏﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻓﻌﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺮ،ﺔﺔ ﺍﳌﻌﻘﱠﺪﺓ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻈﻮﺍﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﻮﻳﺪﻌﻳ
ﻭﲨﻌﺎﹰ ﺇﻻ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺭﻯﺀ ﳚﺪ ﺧﺮﻭﻗﺎﺕٍ ﻛﺜﲑﺓﹰ، ﻭﻣﺜﲎ،ﻌﺒﲑ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻻﺳﻢ ﻣﻔﺮﺩﺍﹰﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﺃﻧﻮﺍﻉ ﻟﻠﺘ
ﻭﻳﺰﺩﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺭﻯﺀ ﺣﲑﺓﹰ. ﺃﻭ ﺑﺎﳉﻤﻊ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳌﻔﺮﺩ،ﺮ ﺑﺎﳌﻔﺮﺩ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳉﻤﻊﻌﺒ ﻓﻘﺪ ﻳ،ﳍﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻋﺪﺓ
، ﲤﻴﻴﺰﻫﺎ ﲨﻊ ﳎﺮﻭﺭ ﺑﺎﻹﺿﺎﻓﺔ10-3 ﻓﺎﻷﻋﺪﺍﺩ ﻣﻦ،ﺇﺫﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺎﺭﻥ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﻭﲤﻴﻴﺰﻩ
ﺎ ﲤﻴﻴﺰﻫﺎ ﻣﻔﺮﺩ ﻭﻣﻀﺎﻋﻔﺎ100 ﻭﺍﻷﻋﺪﺍﺩ ﻣﻦ، ﲤﻴﻴﺰﻫﺎﻣﻔﺮﺩ ﻣﻨﺼﻮﺏ99-11 ﻭﺍﻷﻋﺪﺍﺩ ﻣﻦ
، ﻓﻀﻼﹰ ﻋﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﳚﺪ ﺍﳌﺘﺄﻣﻞ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﻟﻨﺤﺎﺓ ﻳﺘﺤﺪﺛﻮﻥ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﹼﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﺜﺮﺓ ﰲ ﺍﳉﻤﻊ.ﳎﺮﻭﺭ
ﻭﻣﻊ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻬﺎﺩ ﱂ ﺗﺼﻤﺪ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪﻫﻢ ﺇﺫ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺍﺟﺘﻬﺪﻭﺍ ﰲ ﻭﺿﻊ ﺿﻮﺍﺑﻂ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ
.ﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﻣﻘﻮﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﱠﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﺜﺮﺓﺔ ﺗ ﻭﺷﻌﺮﻳ،ﺔ ﻧﺼﻮﺹ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﻗﺮﺁﻧﻴﺕﺟِﺪﻭ
153 ﺻﺎﱀ ﳏﺠﻮﺏ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻘﺎﺭﻱ -ﻣﻨﻬﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺒﲑ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ
ﺍﻧﻄﻼﻗﺎﹰ ﳑﺎ ﺗﻘﺪﻡ ﺭﺃﻯ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻠﻘﻲ ﺍﻟﻀﻮﺀ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ
ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﳌﻨﻬﺞ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻔﻲ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻘﺮﺍﺋﻲ ﻟﻺﺟﺎﺑﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﺆﺍﻝ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﻟﻠﺒﺤﺚ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻱ ﻣﺪﻯ
ﻭﻓﱢﻘﹶﺖِ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺒﲑ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ؟ ﻭﻳﻬﺪﻑ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺇﱃ ﺗﻮﺿﻴﺢ ﻣﺪﻯ ﺳﻼﻣﺔ
ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻌﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻭﺿﻌﻪ ﺍﻟﻘﹸﺪﺍﻣﻰ ﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ،ﻓﻀﻼﹰ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﳌﻘﻮﻻﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ
ﺃﺭﺍﺩﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﻴﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻌﻴﺪ ﺑﺈﺛﺎﺭﺓ ﺗﺴﺎﺅﻻﺕ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻣﺎﻭﻗﻔﻮﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﻮﺹ ﺍﻟﱵ
ﲣﺎﻟﻒ ﻣﺎ ﻭﺿﻌﻪ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺍﻣﻰ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺩ–ﺃﻳﻀﺎﹰ -ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺁﺭﺍﺀ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﺸﺮﻗﲔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺳﻌﺖ ﺇﱃ
ﻭﺳﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﺨﻠﻒ ،ﻻ ﻟﺸﻲﺀ ﺇﻻ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﺍﺣﺘﻔﺎﻇﻬﺎ ﺑﺼﻴﻐﺔ ﺍﳌﺜﲎ.
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺍﺷﺘﻤﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﺃﻗﺴﺎﻡ ﺃﻭﳍﺎ ﻟﻠﻤﻔﺮﺩ ،ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﺎ ﻟﻠﻤﺜﲎ ،ﻭﺛﺎﻟﺜﻬﺎ
ﻟﻠﺠﻤﻊ ،ﰒ ﺃﻋﻘﺒﻨﺎ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ،ﻭﺍﳌﺮﺍﺟﻊ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺪﻧﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ .
ﺍﻟﻤﻔﺭﺩ -1
ﺍﻧﻄﻠﻖ ﺍﻟﻨﺤﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﹸﺪﺍﻣﻰ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻜﺮﺓ ﺃﺳﺒﻘﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﻔﺮﺩ ﻟﻠﺠﻤﻊ ،ﻗﺎﻝ ﺳﻴﺒﻮﻳﻪ" :ﺍﻋﻠﹶﻢ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪ ﺃﺷﺪ
ﲤﻜﻨﺎﹰ؛ ﻷﻥﹼ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪ ﺃﻭﻝ" 1،ﻟﺬﺍ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺗﻘﺴﻴﻤﻬﻢ ﻟﻼﺳﻢ ﺑﺪﺃﻭﺍ ﺑﺎﳌﻔﺮﺩ ،ﰒ ﺍﳌﺜﻨﻰ ،ﻭﺃﺧﲑﺍﹰ ﺍﳉﻤﻊ.
ﱂ ﳜﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﻟﻨﺤﺎﺓ ﺣﻮﻝ ﺩِﻻﻟﺔ ﺍﳌﻔﺮﺩ ،ﺇﺫ ﺣﺪﻭﻩ ﺑﺄﻧﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺩﻝﱠ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺍﺣﺪٍ ﺃﻭ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ،
2
ﻣﺜﻞ :ﺭﺟﻞ ﻭﺍﻣﺮﺃﺓ ،ﺃﻭ ﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻣﺜﲎ ،ﻭﻻ ﳎﻤﻮﻋﺎ ،ﻭﻻ ﻣﻠﺤﻘﺎﹰ ﻤﺎ.
ﻭﳜﺘﺮﻡ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻷﻟﻔﺎﻅ ﺑﺼﻴﻐﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻟﻠﻤﻔﺮﺩ ﻭﺍﳉﻤﻊ .ﻭﻗﺪ
ﻋﻘﺪ ﻟﻪ ﺳﻴﺒﻮﻳﻪ ﺑﺎﺑﺎﹰ ﺑﻌﻨﻮﺍﻥ" :ﻫﺬﺍ ﺑﺎﺏ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺍﺳﻢ ﻳﻘﻊ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳉﻤﻴﻊ ﱂ ﻳﻜﺴﺮ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ
ﻭﺍﺣﺪﻩ ،ﻭﻟﻜﻨﻪ ﲟﻨﺰﻟﺔ ﻗﹶﻮﻡ ﻭﻧﻔﹶﺮ ﻭﺯﻭﺩ ،ﺇﻻﱠ ﺃﻥ ﻟﻔﻈﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻟﻔﻆ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﻩ 3،"...ﻭﻗﺪ ﺍﺻﻄﻠﺢ
1
ﺍﻧﻈﺮ :ﺳﻴﺒﻮﻳﻪ ،ﺃﺑﻮ ﺑﺸﺮ ﻋﻤﺮﻭ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺜﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﻦ ﻗﻨﱪ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﲑ ﺑﺴﻴﺒﻮﻳﻪ )ﺕ180ﻫ( ،ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ،ﲢﻘﻴﻖ :ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﺴﻼﻡ ﻫﺎﺭﻭﻥ
)ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮﺓ :ﻣﻜﺘﺒﺔ ﺍﳋﺎﳒﻲ ،ﻁ1402 ،2ﻫ1982/ﻡ( ،ﺝ ،1ﺹ .22ﻭﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻷﻧﺒﺎﺭﻱ ،ﺃﺳﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ،ﺹ 48ﻭ .49ﻭﺍﺑﻦ
ﺟﲏ ،ﻋﻠﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﺜﻨﻴﺔ ،ﲢﻘﻴﻖ :ﺻﺒﻴﺢ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﻴﻤﻲ )ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮﺓ :ﻣﻜﺘﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺎﻓﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻨﻴﺔ ،ﺩ .ﻁ1411 ،ﻫ1992/ﻡ( ،ﺹ.52
2ﺍﳊﻤﻼﻭِﻱ ،ﺃﲪﺪ ،ﺷﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻑ ﰲ ﻓﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﺮﻑ ،ﲢﻘﻴﻖ :ﻣﺼﻄﻔﻰ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﺰﻳﺰ )ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮﺓ :ﺩ.ﻥ ،.ﺩ.ﻁ،.
1418ﻫ1998/ﻡ( ،ﺹ.52
3
ﺳﻴﺒﻮﻳﻪ ،ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ،ﺝ ،3ﺹ.624
ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺪﻳﺪ ـــ ﺍﻠﺪ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻊ ﻋﺸﺮ .ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﻼﺛﻮﻥ1434 .ﻫ 2013 /ﻡ 154
ﺍﻟﻨﺤﺎﺓ ﺍﳌﺘﺄﺧﺮﻭﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﺴﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺳﻢ ﺍﳉﻤﻊ ،ﻭﻭﺭﺩﺕ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺃﻟﻔﺎﻅ ﻛﺜﲑﺓﹲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﱘ
ﻣﺜﻞ :ﺇﺑﻞ ،ﻭﺭﻫﻂ ،ﻭﻗﹶﻮﻡ .ﻭﺍﳌﻔﺮﺩﺓ ﺍﻷﺧﲑﺓ ﻭﺭﺩﺕ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﱘ ﰲ ﺛﻼﺙ ﻭﲦﺎﻧﲔ
ﻭﺛﻼﲦﺎﺋﺔ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ،ﻭﰲ ﻛﻞﱢ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﺟﺎﺀﺕ ﺑﺼﻴﻐﺔ ﺍﳌﻔﺮﺩ ،ﺇﻻ ﺃﺎ ﺩﻟﹼﺖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳉﻤﻊ،
﴿¼ ½ ¾ ¿ Ã Â Á À ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺷﺄﻥ ﻛﻞﱢ ﺃﲰﺎﺀ ﺍﳉﻤﻮﻉ ،ﻗﺎﻝ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ:
) ﴾Äﺍﳌﺎﺋﺪﺓ.(102 :
ﻓﺎﺳﻢ ﺍﳉﻤﻊ ﻳﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﻣﻊ ﺍﳌﻔﺮﺩ ﰲ ﺷﻜﻠﻪ ،ﻭﺃﻧﻪ ﻳﺼﻐﺮ ﺗﺼﻐﲑ ﺍﳌﻔﺮﺩ ،ﺃﻱ ﻳﺼﻐﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﻟﻔﻈﻪ ﳓﻮ :ﺭﻛﺐ :ﺭﻛﹶﻴﺐ .ﻭﻳﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﻣﻊ ﺍﳉﻤﻊ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ ،ﻓﻜﻠﻤﺔ )ﻗﹶﻮﻡ( ﻻ ﺗﺪﻝﱡ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺭﺟﻞ ﺃﻭ ﺭﺟﻠﹶﲔ ،ﺑﻞ ﺗﺪﻝﱡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﻓﻤﺎ ﻓﻮﻕ .ﻭﺍﳌﻔﺮﺩ ﻭﺍﺳﻢ ﺍﳉﻤﻊ ﻭﺇﻥ ﺗﺸﺎﺑﻬﺎ ﰲ
1
ﺣﺎﻟﺔٍ ﺃﻭ ﺣﺎﻟﺘﲔ ،ﻓﺈﻧﻬﻤﺎ ﻳﻔﺘﺮﻗﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻋﺪﺓ ﻭﺟﻮﻩٍ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﺘﻀﺢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺍﻵﰐ:
1
ﺍﻧﻈﺮ :ﺳﻴﺒﻮﻳﻪ ،ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ،ﺝ ،3ﺹ626-624؛ ﻭﺍﺑﻦ ﻳﻌﻴﺶ ،ﻣﻮﻓﻖ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﻳﻌﻴﺶ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺑﻦ ﻳﻌﻴﺶ )643ﻫ(،
ﺷﺮﺡ ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ )ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮﺓ :ﺍﳌﻄﺒﻌﺔ ﺍﳌﻨﲑﻳﺔ ،ﺩ.ﻁ ،.ﺩ.ﺕ( ،ﺝ ،5ﺹ77؛ ﺍﻟﺮﺿﻲ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺮﺍﺑﺎﺫﻱ ،ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﳏﻤﺪ
ﺍﳊﺴﻦ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺮﺍﺑﺎﺫﻱ )ﺕ686ﻫ( ،ﺷﺮﺡ ﺷﺎﻓﻴﺔ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺐ ،ﲢﻘﻴﻖ :ﳏﻤﺪ ﻧﻮﺭ ﻭﳏﻤﺪ ﺍﻟﺰﻓﺰﺍﻑ ﻭﳏﻤﺪ ﳏﻲ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ
)ﺑﲑﻭﺕ :ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ،ﺩ.ﻁ1402 ،.ﻫ1982/ﻡ( ،ﺝ ،2ﺹ.204-201
155 ﺻﺎﱀ ﳏﺠﻮﺏ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻘﺎﺭﻱ -ﻣﻨﻬﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺒﲑ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ
ﺍﳌﻔﺮﺩ ﻳﻮﺻﻒ ﺑﺼﻔﺔٍ ﻣﻔﺮﺩﺓ ﺗﻄﺎﺑﻘﻪ 2ـ ﺍﺳﻢ ﺍﳉﻤﻊ ﻳﻮﺻﻒ ﺑﺎﳌﻔﺮﺩ ﻭﺍﳉﻤﻊ .ﻗﺎﻝ 2ـ
1
﴿6 5 4 3 2 ﺗﺬﻛﲑﺍ ﻭﺗﺄﻧﻴﺜﹰﺎ .ﻗﺎﻝ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ s r ﴿ :ﺗﻌﺎﱃ:
) ﴾utﺍﻟﺘﻐﺎﺑﻦ .(15:ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺟﻼﻟﻪ) ﴾8 27 :ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎﺀ .(102 :ﻭﻗﺎﻝ:
﴿) ﴾ È Ç Æ Åﺍﻟﺸﻌﺮﺍﺀ.(54 : ﴿} ~ ﴾ )ﺍﳊﺎﻗﺔ.(22 :
3ـ ﺍﳌﻔﺮﺩ ﻻ ﻳﺆﻧﺚ ﻟﻪ ﺍﻟﻔﻌﻞ ،ﺇﻻ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ 3ـ ﺍﺳﻢ ﺍﳉﻤﻊ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻟﺐ ﻳﺆﻧﺚ ﻟﻪ ﺍﻟﻔﻌﻞ،
﴿ ; : 9ﻭﻗﺪ ﻳﺬﻛﱠﺮ .ﻗﺎﻝ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ2 1 0 /﴿ : ﻣﺆﻧﺜﹰﺎ .ﻗﺎﻝ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ:
) ﴾ 3ﺍﻷﻋﺮﺍﻑ .(38 :ﻭﻗﺎﻝ® ¬ « ﴿ : <﴾ )ﺍﻟﺰﻟﺰﻟﺔ.(1 :
¯ ) ﴾ ± °ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺺ.(76 :
ﻳﺘﻀﺢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻖ ﺃﻥﱠ ﻫﻨﺎﻟﻚ ﺑﻮﻧﺎ ﺷﺎﺳﻌﺎﹰ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﻔﺮﺩ ،ﻭﺍﺳﻢ ﺍﳉﻤﻊ ،ﺍﻷﻣﺮ
ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺆﻛﹼﺪ ﺳﻼﻣﺔ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺮﺭﻩ ﺍﻟﻨﺤﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﹸﺪﺍﻣﻰ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﳌﻔﺮﺩ ﺳﺎﺑﻖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﺜﲎ ﻭﺍﳉﻤﻊ ،ﻭﻫﻲ
ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﺗﺘﻤﺎﺷﻰ ﻭﻣﻨﻄﻖ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ،ﻓﺎﳌﻔﺮﺩ ﻳﺄﰐ ﺃﻭﻻﹰ ،ﰒ ﻳﺘﺤﺮﻙ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻟﻠﻤﺜﲎ ﺃﻭ ﺍﳉﻤﻊ ﺑﺰﻳﺎﺩﺓ،
ﺃﻭ ﻧﻘﺺ ،ﺃﻭ ﺗﻐﻴﲑ ﰲ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺎﺕ ...ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻭﺟِﺪﺕ ﺃﻟﻔﺎﻅﹲ ﻻ ﲣﻀﻊ ﳍﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻋﺪﺓ ،ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﺃﻣﺮ
ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ،ﻷﻥﱠ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺔ ﺗﺼﺎﻍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻜﹶﺜﹾﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻟﺒﺔ ﻻ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺸﻮﺍﺫ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻣﺮ ﻣﻼﺣﻆﹲ ﰲ
ﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻈﱠﻮﺍﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﻮﻳﺔ .ﻓﻔﻲ ﲨﻊ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺴﲑ ﻣﺜﻼﹰ :ﺍﻷﺻﻞ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺎﺕ ﺃﻥ ﻻ ﺗﻜﺴﺮ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ
ﻟﺴﺒﺒﲔ :ﺃﻭﳍﻤﺎ :ﻣﺸﺎﺘﻬﺎ ﻟﻠﻔﻌﻞ ،ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﻤﺎ :ﻋﻤﻠﻬﺎ ﻋﻤﻞ ﺍﻟﻔﻌﻞ .ﻭﻟﻌﻠﻬﻢ ﺍﺳﺘﻐﻨﻮﺍ ﻋﻦ
ﺗﻜﺴﲑﻫﺎ ﲜﻤﻊ ﺍﻟﺴﻼﻣﺔ ،ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﺴﺮﻭﺍ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺎﺕ؛ ﻷﺎ ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ ﺗﻘﻮﻡ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ
3
ﺍﳌﻮﺻﻮﻑ ﻓﻜﺴﺮﻭﺍ )ﺷﻴﺦ( ﻋﻠﻰ )ﺷِﻴﺨﺔ( ،ﻭ)ﺻﻌﺐ( ﻋﻠﻰ )ﺻِﻌﺎﺏ(.
ﻭﳑﺎ ﻳﺪﻝﱡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﺳﻮﺥ ﻓﻜﺮﺓ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﳌﻔﺮﺩ ﺃﻭﻻﹰ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻨﺤﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﹸﺪﺍﻣﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺇﻋﺮﺍﺑﻪ ﺃﻱ
ﺍﳌﻔﺮﺩ ﻳﺘﻢ ﺑﺎﳊﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﺑﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺇﻋﺮﺍﺏ ﺍﳌﺜﲎ ،ﻭﲨﻊ ﺍﻟﺴﻼﻣﺔ ﺑﺎﳊﺮﻭﻑ .ﻭﻫﻲ ﻣﺎ ﺃﻃﻠﻘﻮﺍ
ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﺳﻢ "ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻣﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻋﻴﺔ" 1،ﳑﺎ ﻳﺪﻝﱡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﳌﺜﲎ ،ﻭﺍﳉﻤﻊ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﺘﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﻟﻴﺘﺎﻥ
ﻟﻠﻤﻔﺮﺩ .ﻭﺃﺳﺒﻘﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﻔﺮﺩ ﺗﻨﺴﺠﻢ ﻣﻊ ﻗﻮﻟﺘﻬﻢ :ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﳌﻌﲎ ﺗﺘﻄﻠﱠﺐ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺒﲎ .ﻭﻫﺬﺍ
2
ﻣﺘﺤﻘﱠﻖ ﰲ ﺍﳉﻤﻊ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﱂ ،ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻏﲑ ﻣﻄﱠﺮﺩ ﰲ ﲨﻊ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺴﲑ.
ﺃﻣﺎ ﻗﻮﻝ ﻛﺎﺭﻝ ﺑﺮﻭﻛﻠﻤﺎﻥ" :ﻭﻗﺪ ﻧﺸﺄ ﺍﳉﻤﻊ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺎﺕ ﺍﳍﻨﺪﻭ ﺃﻭﺭﺑﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻔﺮﺩ ﻫﻮ
ﺍﺳﻢ ﺍﳉﻤﻊ ،ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻧﺸﺄﺕ ﺍﳉﻤﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻣﻴﺔ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻔﺮﺩ" 3.ﻓﻬﻮ ﻗﻴﺎﺱ
ﻭﻗﻊ ﰲ ﻏﲑ ﻣﻮﺿﻌﻪ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺻﺪﻕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺎﺕ ﺍﳍﻨﺪﻭ ﺃﻭﺭﺑﻴﺔ ،ﻓﻼ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺟﺮﻩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺎﺕ
ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻣﻴﺔ ،ﻭﺧﺎﺻﺔ ﺍﻟﻠﹼﻐﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺟﺮﺕ ﺍﻟﻜﹶﺜﹾﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻟﺒﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻔﺮﺩﺍﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﺗﺼﻮﺭﻩ
ﳓﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺏ ﻟﺘﻘﺴﻴﻢ ﺍﻻﺳﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴﺚ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻔﺮﺩ ،ﻭﻣﺜﲎ ،ﻭﲨﻊ.
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺫﹶﻛﹶﺮ ﺑﺮﺟﺸﺘﺮﺍﺳﺮ ) (Bergstrasserﺃﻥﱠ ﺃﺻﻞ ﲨﻊ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺴﲑ ﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﺃﲰﺎﻩ ﺑﺎﺳﻢ
ﺍﳉﻤﻠﺔ ) (Collectiveﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﺍﳌﻔﺮﺩ ﺑﺄﺻﻞ ﻟﻪ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺭﺃﻱ ﻳﻌﻮﺯﻩ ﺍﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ 4.ﻭﻣﻦ ﻋﺠﺐ ﺃﻥﱠ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺃﺧﺬ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺜﲔ ﺍﶈﺪﺛﲔ ،ﻭﻟﻜﻲ ﻳﺪﻋﻢ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﻃﻔﻖ ﻳﺒﺤﺚ ﻋﻦ ﺃﺩﻟﱠﺔ ﻟﻪ
ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ..." :ﻭﺗﻘﻮﺩﻧﺎ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳌﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﰲ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﱂ ﺗﻜﻦ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺻﻴﻎ
ﺍﳉﻤﻊ ،ﻭﺃﻭﺯﺍﻧﻪ ﻗﺪ ﻭﺟﺪﺕ ،ﺃﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺮﺕ ﺑﻌﺪ ،ﻭﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﳌﻌﲎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﻮ ﻭﺣﺪﻩ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺭﻕ ﺑﲔ
ﺍﻟﻠﻔﻆ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺼﺢ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻔﺮﺩﺍﹰ ﻣﺮﺓﹰ ،ﻭﲨﻌﺎﹰ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ" 5.ﻭﻣﺎ ﻗﺎﻟﺘﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺜﺔ ﻳﻌﺪ
ﺿﺮﺑﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺨﻤﲔ ﻭﺍﻟﻈﱠﻦ ،ﻭﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﻈﻦ ﻻ ﻳﻐﲏ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳊﻖ.
1ﺍﺑﻦ ﻫﺸﺎﻡ ،ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﲨﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺑﻦ ﻳﻮﺳﻒ ،ﺍﺑﻦ ﻫﺸﺎﻡ ﺍﻷﻧﺼﺎﺭﻱ ،ﻗﻄﺮ ﺍﻟﻨﺪﻯ ﻭﺑﻞ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﻯ ،ﲢﻘﻴﻖ :ﻃﻪ ﳏﻤﺪ
ﺍﻟﺰﻳﲏ ﻭﳏﻤﺪ ﺧﻔﺎﺟﻲ )ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮﺓ :ﻣﻄﺒﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺐ ،ﺩ .ﺕ( ،ﺹ.49
2ﻋﺒﺎﺩﺓ ،ﳏﻤﺪ ﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ،ﺃﲰﺎﺀ ﺍﳉﻤﻮﻉ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﱘ ،ﻣﻨﺸﺄﺓ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺭﻑ )ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ :ﺩ .ﻁ1408 ،ﻫ1988/ﻡ( ،ﺹ.5
3
ﺍﻧﻈﺮ :ﺑﺮﻭﻛﻠﻤﺎﻥ ،ﻛﺎﺭﻝ ،ﻓﻘﻪ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻣﻴﺔ ،ﺗﺮﲨﺔ :ﺭﻣﻀﺎﻥ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺍﺏ ،ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺽ )ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺽ:
1397ﻫ1977/ﻡ( ،ﺹ .96ﻭﻋﺒﺎﺩﺓ ،ﳏﻤﺪ ﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﻋﺒﺎﺩﺓ ،ﺃﲰﺎﺀ ﺍﳉﻤﻮﻉ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﱘ )ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ :ﻣﻨﺸﺄﺓ
ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺭﻑ ،ﺩ.ﻁ1408 ،.ﻫ1988/ﻡ( ،ﺹ.31
4ﺑﺮﺟﺸﺘﺮﺍﺳﺮ ،ﺍﻟﺘﻄﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﻨﺤﻮﻱ ﻟﻠﻐﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ،ﺗﺮﲨﺔ :ﺭﻣﻀﺎﻥ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺍﺏ ،ﻣﻜﺘﺒﺔ ﺍﳋﺎﳒﻲ ،ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮﺓ ،ﺩ.ﻁ،.
1402ﻫ1982/ﻡ ،ﺹ.107-106
5
ﺑﺎﻛﻴﺰﺓ ،ﺭﻓﻴﻖ ،ﺍﳉﻤﻮﻉ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﻣﻊ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﺭﻧﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻣﻴﺔ )ﺑﻐﺪﺍﺩ :ﺍﻷﺩﻳﺐ ﺍﻟﺒﻐﺪﺍﺩﻳﺔ ،ﺩ.ﻁ ،.ﺩ.ﺕ ،(.ﺹ ،8ﻭ. 9
157 ﺻﺎﱀ ﳏﺠﻮﺏ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻘﺎﺭﻱ -ﻣﻨﻬﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺒﲑ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ
ﻭﻧﺆﻳﺪ ﻣﺎ ﺫﻫﺐ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻣﺮﺍﺋﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺏ ﻗﺪ ﺍﻫﺘﺪﺕ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻟﻔﺎﻅ ﳎﻤﻮﻋ ٍﺔ
ﳊﺎﺟﺘﻬﻢ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻔﻜﱢﺮﻭﺍ ﰲ ﻣﻔﺮﺩﺍﺎ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻻ ﻳﻌﺘﱪ ﺧﺮﻗﹰﺎ ﻟﻄﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﻠﹼﻐﺔ .ﻓﺎﻟﻠﹼﻐﺔ
1
ﻣﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺇﻻ ﻭﺳﻴﻠﺔﹲ ﻟﻠﺘﻌﺒﲑ ﻋﻦ ﺣﺎﺟﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻃﻘﲔ ﺎ.
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺍﺿﻄﺮﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺏ ﺇﱃ ﳐﺎﻟﻔﺔ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻮﺍﺿﻌﻮﺍ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ،ﻓﺠﺎﺀﻭﺍ ﺑﺘﻌﺎﺑﲑ ﻣﻘﻠﻮﺑﺔ
ﻛﺎﻟﺘﻌﺒﲑ ﺑﺎﳌﻔﺮﺩ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳉﻤﻊ .ﻭﻭﻓﻘﺎﹰ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺟﺎﺀﺕ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺁﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺬﻛﺮ ﺍﳊﻜﻴﻢ .ﻗﺎﻝ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ:
﴿ ) ﴾ ~ } | { z y x w v uﺍﻟﻔﺮﻗﺎﻥ،(74 :
ﻓﻜﻠﻤﺔ )ﺇﻣﺎﻣﺎ( ﻣﻔﺮﺩﺓ ،ﻭﺍﳌﺮﺍﺩ ﺍﳉﻤﻊ .ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻨﺤﺎﺓ :ﺇﻥﹼ ﺍﳌﺴﻮﻍ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﳌﻔﺮﺩ ﺟﻨﺲ
ﻳﻄﻠﻖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺔ ،ﻭﺍﳉﻤﻊ ﳎﺎﺯﺍﹰ ،ﺃﻭ ﻷﻧﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺻﻞ ﻣﺼﺪﺭ 2.ﻭﻣﺎ ﻗﻴﻞ ﰲ
"ﺇﻣﺎﻣﺎ" ﻳﻨﺴﺤﺐ ﻋﻠﻰ "ﻃﻔﻼﹰ" ﰲ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ) ﴾ ¢ ¡ ﴿ :ﺍﳊﺞ.(5 :
ﻭﺃﻫﻞ ﻛﻞﱢ ﺻﻨﻌﺔٍ ﻳﻠﺘﻤﺴﻮﻥ ﲣﺮﳚﺎﹰ ﻳﺘﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﻭﺻﻨﻌﺘﻬﻢ ،ﻓﺎﻟﺘﺨﺮﳚﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻘﺔ
ﲣﺮﳚﺎﺕ ﳓﻮﻳﺔ .ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﻴﻮﻥ ﻓﻘﺎﻟﻮﺍ :ﺇﻥﱠ ﺍﻟﺴﺮ ﰲ ﺇﻓﺮﺍﺩ "ﺇﻣﺎﻣﺎﹰ" ﻫﻮ ﺍﲢﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻳﺔ
ﻭﺍﳍﺪﻑ ،ﻭﺍﳉﻤﻊ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺼﺮﺍﻁ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻻ ﻳﻘﺒﻞ ﺗﻌﺪﺩﺍﹰ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻌﺒﲑ ﺑـ)ﻃﻔﻼﹰ( ﻟﺸﺪﺓ
ﺗﺸﺎﺑﻪ ﺍﻷﻃﻔﺎﻝ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺣﺎﺳﻴﺲ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻮﺍﻃﻒ ،ﻭﺍﳌﻴﻮﻝ ،ﻛﺄﻧﻬﻢ ﺻﻮﺭﺓﹲ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓﹲ ﻓﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺒﲑ
ﺑﺎﳌﻔﺮﺩ ﺃﻧﺴﺐ 3.ﻭﻛﻞﱡ ﻣﺎ ﻗﻴﻞ ﻻ ﻳﻌﺪﻭ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺳﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﻭﺷﺠﺎﻋﺘﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﺪ
ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺟﲏ ،ﻭﻻ ﻳﻌﺪ ﺧﺮﻗﹰﺎ ﻟﻄﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺔ؛ ﻷﻥ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻤﺎﻝ ﺍﳌﻔﺮﺩ ﺑﺎﻟﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺫﹸﻛِﺮﺕ
ﺁﻧﻔﺎﹰ ﻻ ﻳﻮﺟﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﲨﻌﺎﹰ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﺔ.
ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻮﻻﺕ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﺘﺒﺪﻻﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻌﺘﺮﻱ ﻓﺼﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻄﺎﺏ ﺍﳉﻤﻊ ﺑﻠﻔﻆ
ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪ ،ﻭﺧﻄﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪ ﺑﻠﻔﻆ ﺍﳉﻤﻊ ،ﺇﺿﺎﻓﺔﹰ ﺇﱃ ﻇﻮﺍﻫﺮ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ،ﺩﻓﻌﺖ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﶈﺪﺛﲔ
1ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻣﺮﺍﺋﻲ ،ﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ،ﻣﻦ ﺳﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ )ﺑﲑﻭﺕ :ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﳉﻴﻞ ،ﻁ1414 ،1ﻫ1994/ﻡ( ،ﺹ.198
2ﺃﺑﻮ ﺣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻷﻧﺪﻟﺴﻲ ،ﺗﻔﺴﲑ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺮ ﺍﶈﻴﻂ ،ﲢﻘﻴﻖ :ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻋﺎﺩﻝ ﺃﲪﺪ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻋﻠﻲ ﳏﻤﺪ )ﺑﲑﻭﺕ :ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺐ
ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ،ﻁ1413 ،1ﻫ1993/ﻡ( ،ﺝ ،6ﺹ.474
3ﳏﻤﺪ ،ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﳉﻮﺍﺩ ،ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺑﻼﻏﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺴﺠﻊ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺎﺻﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻧﻴﺔ )ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮﺓ :ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻷﺭﻗﻢ ،ﺩ.ﻁ،.
1413ﻫ1993/ﻡ( ،ﺹ 198ﻭ.199
ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺪﻳﺪ ـــ ﺍﻠﺪ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻊ ﻋﺸﺮ .ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﻼﺛﻮﻥ1434 .ﻫ 2013 /ﻡ 158
ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻫﻨﺎﻟﻚ ﻋﻼﻗﺔ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻴﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻹﻓﺮﺍﺩ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺜﻨﻴﺔ ،ﻭﺍﳉﻤﻊ ،ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ،
1
ﻭﺍﻷﻋﺪﺍﺩ ﻭﺍﻷﺭﻗﺎﻡ ﺍﳊﺴﺎﺑﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔٍ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ.
ﻋﻠﻤﺎﹰ ﺑﺄﻧﻬﻢ ﺍﺗﻔﻘﻮﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻓﺼﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﳉﻨﺲ ﺃﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﺎﺋﻞ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻖ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻠﻲ ،ﻭﺫﻛﺮﻭﺍ
ﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻻ ﻳﺴﺘﻄﻴﻊ ﺃﻥ ﳚﺪ ﻣﱪﺭﺍ ﻣﻌﻘﻮﻻﹰ ﻟﺘﺬﻛﲑ ﺍﻟﻘﻤﺮ ﻭﺗﺄﻧﻴﺚ ﺍﻟﺸﻤﺲ ،ﻣﺜﻼﹰ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺔ
ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ .2.ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻠﻤﺘﺎﻥ ﻧﻔﺴﻬﻤﺎ ﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﻘﻤﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﻤﺲ ﳒﺪﳘﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻧﺴﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴﺚ
ﺍﳉﻨﺲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻜﺲ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﲤﺎﻣﺎﹰ ،ﻓﺎﻟﻘﻤﺮ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﺆﻧﺚ ) (la luneﺑﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﺸﻤﺲ
ﻟﻔﻆ ﻣﺬﻛﱠﺮ ) (le soleilﺑﻞ ﺇﻥ ﺍﳌﺴﻤﻰ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﻳﻄﻠﻖ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﲰﺎﻥ ﻓﻜﻠﻤﺔ
)ﻛﺮﺍﺳﺔ( ،ﻭ)ﺩﻓﺘﺮ( ﳘﺎ ﺍﲰﺎﻥ ﻟﺸﻲﺀٍ ﻭﺍﺣﺪٍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺮﻏﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺍﳉﻨﺲ.
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺃﲨﻞ ﻓﻨﺪﺭﻳﺲ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﻋﻨﺪﻣﺎ ﻗﺎﻝ" :ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﻴﻴﺰ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻷﺟﻨﺎﺱ ﺍﻟﻨﺤﻮﻳﺔ ﻻ ﻳﻘﻮﻡ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺷﻲﺀٍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻞ" 3.ﻭﺍﳊﻖ ﺃﻥﹼ ﺃﺑﺎ ﺣﻴﺎﻥ ﺳﺒﻘﻪ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﺫ ﻗﺎﻝ ﲨﻠﺔ" :ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺔ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻷﻣﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﻮﺿﻌﻴﺔ ﻻ ﲤﻨﻄﻖ ﻭﻻ ﺗﻌﻠﱠﻞ" 4.ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻹﲨﺎﻉ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻴﺔ ﻓﺼﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﳉﻨﺲ ﺃﻭ
ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻉ ،ﻳﻘﺎﺑﻠﻪ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﰲ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻴﺔ ،ﺃﻭ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻴﺔ ﻓﺼﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺫﹸﻛِﺮ ﺁﻧﻔﺎﹰ.
ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﻳﺆﻣﻨﻮﻥ ﺑﻌﺪﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺭﺍﺑﻂٍ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻲ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺍﳊﺴﺎﰊ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ
ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﻮﻱ ،5ﺣﺠﺘﻬﻢ ﻗﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻷﺳﺎﻟﻴﺐ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺪﻝﱡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳉﻤﺎﻋﺔ ﻗﺪ
ﺗﺴﺘﻌﻤﻞ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺔ ﻣﻔﺮﺩﺓ ،ﻭﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺍﻟﻨﺤﻮﻱ ﻳﺒﺪﺃ ﺑﺎﳌﻔﺮﺩ ،ﰒ ﺍﳌﺜﲎ ،ﰒ ﲢﺸﺪ ﲨﻴﻊ
1ﺍﻧﻈﺮ :ﺃﻧﻴﺲ ،ﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ،ﻣﻦ ﺃﺳﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺔ )ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮﺓ :ﺍﻷﳒﻠﻮ ﺍﳌﺼﺮﻳﺔ ،ﻁ1405 ،2ﻫ1985/ﻡ( ،ﺹ .158-152ﺣﺴﺎﻥ،
ﲤﺎﻡ ،ﻣﻨﺎﻫﺞ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺔ )ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮﺓ :ﺍﻷﳒﻠﻮ ﺍﳌﺼﺮﻳﺔ ،ﺩ .ﻁ1410 ،ﻫ1995/ﻡ( ،ﺹ.220-218
2
ﺍﻧﻈﺮ :ﺃﻧﻴﺲ ،ﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ،ﻣﻦ ﺃﺳﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺔ ،ﺹ .159ﻭﺣﺴﺎﻥ ،ﲤﺎﻡ ،ﻣﻨﺎﻫﺞ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺔ )ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮﺓ :ﺍﻷﳒﻠﻮ
ﺍﳌﺼﺮﻳﺔ ،ﺩ.ﻁ1410 ،.ﻫ1990/ﻡ( ،ﺹ.215
3
ﻳﺎﻗﻮﺕ ،ﺃﲪﺪ ﺳﻠﻴﻤﺎﻥ ،ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺎﺑﻠﻲ :ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺗﻄﺒﻴﻘﻴﺔ )ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﻳﺔ :ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﺍﳉﺎﻣﻌﻴﺔ ،ﺩ.ﻁ،.
1409ﻫ1989/ﻡ( ،ﺹ.123
4ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ،ﺯﻳﻦ ،ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺓ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻐﻨﺎﺀ ﰲ ﻗﻀﺎﻳﺎ ﺍﻟﻨﺤﻮ ﻭﺍﻟﺼﺮﻑ )ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ :ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﺍﳉﺎﻣﻌﻴﺔ ،ﺩ.ﻁ،.
1416ﻫ1996/ﻡ( ،ﺹ.230
5ﻳﻘﺼﺪ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺍﳊﺴﺎﰊ 1ﻭ 2ﻭ ... 3ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﻮﻱ ﻓﻬﻮ ﺍﳌﻔﺮﺩ ﻭﺍﳌﺜﲎ ﻭﺍﳉﻤﻊ.
159 ﺻﺎﱀ ﳏﺠﻮﺏ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻘﺎﺭﻱ -ﻣﻨﻬﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺒﲑ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ
ﺍﻷﻋﺪﺍﺩ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﰲ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻭﻫﻲ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﺔ ﺍﳉﻤﻊ ،ﻭﻻﺣﻈﻮﺍ ﺃﻥ ﺃﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ
1
ﻣﺜﻨﺎﺓ ،ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻗﺪ ﺗﺴﺘﻌﻤﻞ ﻣﻔﺮﺩﺓ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﳌﺘﻨﱯ:
ﺑﺄﻧﲏ ﺧﲑ ﻣـﻦ ﺗـﺴﻌﻰ ﺑِـﻪ ﻗﹶـﺪﻡ ﺳﻴﻌﻠﻢ ﺍﳉﻤﻊ ﳑـﻦ ﺿـﻢ ﳎﻠِـﺴﻨﺎ
ﻭﰲ ﳎﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺮ ﺃﻳﻀﺎﹰ ،ﳜﺎﻃﺐ ﺍﳌﻔﺮﺩ ﲞﻄﺎﺏ ﺍﻻﺛﻨﲔ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﻣﺮﺉ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺲ:
2
ﺑﺴِﻘﻂِ ﺍﻟﻠﱢﻮﻯ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺪﺧﻮﻝِ ﻓﹶﺤﻮﻣـﻞِ ﻗِﻔﹶﺎ ﻧﺒﻚِ ﻣِﻦ ﺫﻛﺮﻯ ﺣﺒﻴﺐٍ ﻭﻣﻨـﺰِﻝِ
ﻭﻣﻦ ﺃﻛﱪ ﺍﻟﻈﻮﺍﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻟﻔﺘﺖ ﻧﻈﺮﻫﻢ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺓ ﲤﻴﻴﺰ ﺍﻷﻋﺪﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺘﺨﺬ ﺃﺷﻜﺎ ﹰﻻ
ﳐﺘﻠﻔﺔ ،ﻓﺎﻷﻋﺪﺍﺩ ﻣﻦ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﺇﱃ ﻋﺸﺮﺓ ) (10-3ﲤﻴﻴﺰﻫﺎ ﲨﻊ ﳎﺮﻭﺭ ﺑﺎﻹﺿﺎﻓﺔ .ﻗﺎﻝ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ:
﴿ ) ﴾ ã â á ßÞ Ý Ü Û Ú Ù Ø × Ö Õﺍﻟﺒﻘﺮﺓ .(196 :ﻭﺍﻷﻋﺪﺍﺩ
﴿µ ´ ³ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺣﺪ ﻋﺸﺮ ﺇﱃ ﺗﺴﻌﺔٍ ﻭﺗﺴﻌﲔ ﲤﻴﻴﺰﻫﺎ ﻣﻔﺮﺩ ﻣﻨﺼﻮﺏ .ﻗﺎﻝ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ:
¶ ¸ ) ﴾ Â Á À ¿ ¾ ½ ¼ » º ¹ﻳﻮﺳﻒ .(4 :ﺃﻣﺎ
ﻭﻣﻀﺎﻋﻔﺎﻤﺎ ،ﻓﺘﻤﻴﻴﺰﻫﺎ ﻣﻔﺮﺩ ﳎﺮﻭﺭ ﺑﺎﻹﺿﺎﻓﺔ .ﻗﺎﻝ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ/ . - ﴿ : ﺍﳌﺌﺔ ﻭﺍﻷﻟﻒ
) .﴾ 2 1 0ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭ (3 :ﻓﻠﻮ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﲦﺔ ﻋﻼﻗﺔﹲ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻴﺔ ﻟﹶﻤﻴﺰﺕ ﺍﻷﻋﺪﺍﺩ ﻣﻦ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﺇﱃ
ﻋﺸﺮﺓ ) (10-3ﺑﺎﳌﻔﺮﺩ ،ﻭﻣﻴﺰﺕ ﺍﳌﺌﺔ ﻭﻣﻀﺎﻋﻔﺎﺎ ) (... 1000 ،100ﺑﺎﳉﻤﻊ.
ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻄﺎﺋﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺆﻣﻦ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺍﳊﺴﺎﰊ ﻣﻄﺎﺑﻖ ﲤﺎﻣﺎﹰ ﻟﻠﻌﺪﺩ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﻮﻱ ،ﻭﺃﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻓﺮﻕ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ،
ﻓﺤﺠﺘﻬﻢ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪ ﰲ ﺍﳊﺴﺎﺏ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺔ ،ﻭﺍﻻﺛﻨﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺍﳊﺴﺎﺏ ﳘﺎ ﺍﻻﺛﻨﺎﻥ
ﰲ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺔ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺜﻼﺛﺔ ﰲ ﺍﳊﺴﺎﺏ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺛﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺔ ،ﻻ ﻓﺮﻕ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ،ﻭﻗﺎﻟﻮﺍ :ﻛﻞﱡ ﻣﺎ ﻭﺭﺩ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺔ
3
ﻣﻦ ﺃﺳﺎﻟﻴﺐ ﳎﻤﻮﻋﺔ ،ﻭﺗﺴﺘﻌﻤﻞ ﻟﻠﻤﻔﺮﺩ ،ﻓﻬﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺍﺎﺯ.
ﻭﻳﺒﺪﻭ ﺃﻥ ﺭﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﻄﺎﺋﻔﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻞ ﺑﻌﺪﻡ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﻮﻱ ،ﻭﺃﻥﱠ ﻓﻜﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺴﻴﻢ
1ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻌﻲ ،ﻳﻮﺳﻒ ،ﺍﻟﺼﺒﺢ ﺍﳌﻨﱯ ﻋﻦ ﺣﻴﺜﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﹾﻤﺘﻨﺒِﻲﺀ ،ﲢﻘﻴﻖ :ﻣﺼﻄﻔﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﻘﺎ ﻭﳏﻤﺪ ﺍﻟﺸﺘﺎ ﻭﻋﺒﺪﻩ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ )ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮﺓ:
ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺭﻑ ،ﻁ1414 ،3ﻫ1994/ﻡ( ،ﺹ.89
2ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺯﱐ ،ﺃﺑﻮ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺍﳊﺴﲔ ،ﺷﺮﺡ ﺍﳌﻌﻠﻘﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﻊ )ﺑﲑﻭﺕ :ﻣﻜﺘﺒﺔ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺭﻑ ،ﻁ1400 ،4ﻫ1980/ﻡ( ،ﺹ.15
3
ﻳﺎﻗﻮﺕ ،ﺃﲪﺪ ،ﰲ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺎﺑﻠﻲ ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺗﻄﺒﻴﻘﻴﺔ ،ﺹ.125-123
ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺪﻳﺪ ـــ ﺍﻠﺪ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻊ ﻋﺸﺮ .ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﻼﺛﻮﻥ1434 .ﻫ 2013 /ﻡ 160
ﺇﱃ ﻣﻔﺮﺩ ﻭﻣﺜﲎ ﻭﲨﻊ ﻓﻜﺮﺓ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﻃﻴﺔ ﻟﻐﻮﻳﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻗﺼﻰ ﺣﺪ ،ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺍﺏ؛ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺔ ﻣﻦ
ﺣﻴﺚ ﻫﻲ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﻻ ﳛﺘﻤﻞ ﻣﻘﻮﻻﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻞ ﻭﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ،ﻓﻠﻤﺎﺫﺍ ﺃﻧﺜﺖ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﻣﻌﻈﻢ
ﺃﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺟﺴﻢ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ،ﺑﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺫﻛﱠﺮﺕ ﻋﻀﻮ ﺍﻷﻧﻮﺛﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳌﺮﺃﺓ ،ﺑﻞ ﺃﻃﻠﻘﺘﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻞ
﴿¤ ﺃﻳﻀﺎﹰ .ﻗﺎﻝ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ) ﴾ # " ! ﴿ :ﺍﻷﻧﺒﻴﺎﺀ .(91 :ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ:
) ﴾ ¦ ¥ﺍﻷﺣﺰﺍﺏ.(35 :
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺣﺎﻭﻝ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﻮﻳﻮﻥ ﻗﺪﳝﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﻋﻦ ﻣﻼﺫٍ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻲ ﻟﻠﺠﻨﺲ ،ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻉ ﻓﻘﺎﻟﻮﺍ :ﺇﻥ
ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺏ ﺧﺼﺖ ﻛﻞﹼ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻗﻮﻱ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﺬﻛﲑ 1،ﻭﻫﻲ ﻣﻘﻮﻟﺔ ﻻ ﺗﺼﻤﺪ ﺃﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﺪ ﻃﻮﻳﻼﹰ،
ﻷﻥﱠ ﻫﻨﺎﻟﻚ ﺃﻟﻔﺎﻇﺎﹰ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﻣﺆﻧﺜﺔ ،ﻭﻫﻲ ﺗﺪﻝﱡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ،ﻣﺜﻞ :ﺍﻟﺼﺎﻋﻘﺔ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺎﺭﻋﺔ،
ﻭﺍﳊﺎﻗﱠﺔ .ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺒﺎﻃﻴﺔ ﺗﺒﺪﻭ ﻭﺍﺿﺤﺔ ﲤﺎﻣﺎﹰ ﰲ ﻓﺼﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ،ﻻﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﺑﲔ
ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﻭﺍﳌﻌﺪﻭﺩ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺃﺷﺮﻧﺎ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﺳﺎﺑﻘﺎﹰ ،ﻭﻧﻼﺣﻆ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﻟﻄﻼﺏ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻃﻘﲔ ﺑﻐﲑ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ
ﻳﺨﻄﺌﻮﻥ ﻛﺜﲑﺍ ﰲ ﲤﻴﻴﺰ ﺍﻷﻋﺪﺍﺩ ﻓﻴﻨﺘﺠﻮﻥ ﺟﻤﻼﹰ ﻣﺜﻞ :ﻋﻨﺪﻱ ﺃﹶﻟﻒ) ﺃﻗﻼﻡ( ،ﻭﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﹶﺼﻞِ
ﺃﺣﺪ ﻋﺸﺮ) ﻃﻼﺏ( .ﻓﺄﻏﻠﺐ ﺍﻟﻈﻦ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺩﻓﻌﻬﻢ ﺇﱃ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻖ ﻭﺍﺳﺘﺨﺪﺍﻡ
ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻞ ،ﻓﻤﺎ ﺩﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩﺍﻥ ﺃﻟﻒ ،ﻭﺃﺣﺪ ﻋﺸﺮ ﻳﺪﻻﹼﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻜﹶﺜﹾﺮﺓ ،ﻓﻴﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ
ﻣﻌﺪﻭﺩﳘﺎ ،ﻭﻓﹶﺎﺗﻬﻢ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺔ ﻻ ﺗﻌﺮﻑ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻖ.
ﻭﻛﻴﻒ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﺩﺍﺓ ﺑﺎﳌﻨﻄﻘﻴﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﻮﻱ ﻭﺍﳊﺴﺎﰊ ،ﻭﰲ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺔ ﺃﲰﺎﺀٌ ﺩﺍﻟﱠﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺗﻌﺎﱃÃ Â ﴿ : ﺍﳉﻤﻊ ﻭﻻ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﳍﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻟﻔﻈﻬﺎ ﻣﺜﻞ :ﻗﹶﻮﻡ ،ﻭﺭﻫﻂ ،ﻭﺇﺑﻞ ،ﻭﺭﻛﹾﺐ؟ ﻗﺎﻝ
) ﴾Å Äﺍﻟﺸﻌﺮﺍﺀ ،(105 :ﻭﻳﻼﺣﻆ ﰲ ﻛﺜﲑٍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺍﻛﻴﺐ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﻮﻳﺔ ﻭﺻﻒ ﺍﳉﻤﻊ
ﺑﺎﳌﻔﺮﺩ .ﻗﺎﻝ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ) ﴾` _^ ] \[ Z Y﴿ :ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻗﺎﻥ.(38 :
2
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﻋﻤﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻦ ﺣﻄﺎﻥ:
1ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻷﻧﺒﺎﺭﻱ ،ﺍﻟﺒﻠﻐﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻕ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﺬﻛﺮ ﻭﺍﳌﺆﻧﺚ ،ﲢﻘﻴﻖ :ﺭﻣﻀﺎﻥ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺍﺏ )ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮﺓ :ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺐ ﺍﳌﺼﺮﻳﺔ،
ﺩ.ﻁ1398 ،.ﻫ1970/ﻡ( ،ﺹ.63
2ﺍﳌﱪﺩ ،ﺃﺑﻮ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺱ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻳﺰﻳﺪ ﺍﳌﱪﺩ ،ﺍﻟﻜﺎﻣﻞ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺔ ﻭﺍﻷﺩﺏ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺤﻮ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺼﺮﻳﻒ ،ﲢﻘﻴﻖ :ﳏﻤﺪ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻞ
ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻴﺪ ﺷﺤﺎﺗﺔ )ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮﺓ :ﺩﺍﺭ ﻀﺔ ﻣﺼﺮ ،ﺩ.ﻁ ،ﺩ .ﺕ( ،ﺝ ،3ﺹ .170ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻐﺪﺍﺩﻱ ،ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺩﺭ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻤﺮ
161 ﺻﺎﱀ ﳏﺠﻮﺏ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻘﺎﺭﻱ -ﻣﻨﻬﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺒﲑ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ
ﻓﺎﻋﺬِﺭ ﺃﺧﺎﻙ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺯِﻧﺒﺎﻉٍ ﻓﺈﻥﱠ ﻟﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺋﺒﺎﺕِ ﺧﻄﹸﻮﺑﺎ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺃﻟﹾﻮﺍ ِﻥ
ﻭﳑﺎ ﻗﺮﺭﻩ ﺍﻟﻨﺤﺎﺓ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﳉﻤﻊ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﱂ ﻳﺪﻝﱡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻘِﻠﱠﺔ ،1ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺻﻴﻎ ﲨﻊ ﺍﻟﻘِﻠﱠﺔ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺴﲑ ،ﺃﻣﺎ ﺻﻴﻎ ﲨﻊ ﺍﻟﻜﹶﺜﹾﺮﺓ ﻓﺘﺪﻝﱡ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻭﺍﺿﺢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﲰﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻜﹶﺜﹾﺮﺓ 2.ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ
ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻋﺪﺓ ﲣﺎﻟﻔﻬﺎ ﻧﺼﻮﺹ ﻛﺜﲑﺓﹲ ﳑﺎ ﻳﺪﻋﻢ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﻌﺪﻡ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﻮﻱ .ﻗﺎﻝ ﺗﻌﺎﱃr ﴿ :
ﻭﻭﺍﺿﺢ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻭﺻﻒ ﲨﻊ ﺍﻟﻜﹶﺜﹾﺮﺓ )ﻫﻤﻮﻡ( ﲜﻤﻊ ﺍﻟﻘِﻠﱠﺔ )ﻃﺎﺭﻗﺎﺕ( .ﻭﻣﻬﻤﺎ ﺃﺟﻬ ﺪ
ﺃﻧﺼﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺘﻄﺎﺑﻖ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﻮﻱ ﻭﺍﳊﺴﺎﰊ ﺃﻧﻔﺴﻬﻢ ﰲ ﺗﻠﻤﺲ ﻣﱪﺭﺍﺕٍ ﺗﺪﻋﻢ ﻭﺟﻬﺔﹶ
4
ﻧﻈﺮﻫﻢ ،ﻓﻠﻦ ﻳﺴﺘﻄﻴﻌﻮﺍ ﺇﺑﻄﺎﻝ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻠﲔ ﺑﻌﺪﻡ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻘﻴﺔ ﰲ ﻓﺼﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ.
2ـ ﺍﳌﺜﲎ
ﺍﳌﺜﲎ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﺘﺜﻨﻴﺔ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺓﹲ ﻟﻐﻮﻳﺔ ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺖ ﺎ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺑﲔ ﺳﺎﺋﺮ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻣﻴﺔ،
ﺍﻟﺒﻐﺪﺍﺩﻱ ،ﺧﺰﺍﻧﺔ ﺍﻷﺩﺏ ﻭﻟﺐ ﻟﺒﺎﺏ ﻟﺴﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺏ ،ﲢﻘﻴﻖ :ﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﺴﻼﻡ ﻫﺎﺭﻭﻥ )ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮﺓ :ﻣﻜﺘﺒﺔ ﺍﳋﺎﳒﻲ ،ﻁ،1
1404ﻫ1984/ﻡ( ،ﺝ ،5ﺹ.357
1ﺳﻴﺒﻮﻳﻪ ،ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ،ﺝ ،3ﺹ .578ﻭﺍﺑﻦ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ،ﺍﻟﻜﺎﻓﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻴﺔ ،ﺝ ،2ﺹ.252
2ﺍﺑﻦ ﻳﻌﻴﺶ ،ﺷﺮﺡ ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ ،ﺝ ،5ﺹ.10
3ﺍﻟﺮﺿﻲ ،ﺷﺮﺡ ﺷﺎﻓﻴﺔ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺐ ،ﺝ ،2ﺹ.297
4ﺃﻧﻴﺲ ،ﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ،ﻣﻦ ﺃﺳﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺔ ،ﺹ.158
ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺪﻳﺪ ـــ ﺍﻠﺪ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻊ ﻋﺸﺮ .ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﻼﺛﻮﻥ1434 .ﻫ 2013 /ﻡ 162
ﻓﻘﺪ ﻧﻘﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﻮﻃﻲ ﰲ ﻣﺰﻫﺮﻩ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﳉﻮﻳﲏ ،ﻗﻮﻟﻪ" :ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﻟﺘﺜﻨﻴﺔ ﻭﺿِﻊ ﻟﻔﻈﻬﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ
ﺍﳉﻤﻊ ﳌﺴﻴﺲ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺔ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ،ﻭﳍﺬﺍ ﱂ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﰲ ﺳﺎﺋﺮ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺎﺕ ﺗﺜﻨﻴﺔ ،ﻭﺍﳉﻤﻊ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﰲ ﻛﻞﹼ
ﻟﻐﺔ" ،1ﻓﻬﻲ ﺇﻥﹾ ﻭﺟِﺪﺕ ﰲ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻣﻴﺔ ﻓﻨﺎﺩﺭﺓﹲ ،ﳒﺪﻫﺎ ﰲ ﺃﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ،ﺃﻭ ﺑﻌﺾ
ﺍﻷﺩﻭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺘﺄﻟﱠﻒ ﻣﻦ ﺷﻘﱠﲔ ﻛﺎﳌﻘﺺ 2.ﻭﻟﻜﻨﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻌﻤﺎﻝ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ
ﻟﺸﻴﻮﻋﻬﺎ ﻓﻴﻤﻦ ﻳﻌﻘﻞ ،ﻭﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻻ ﻳﻌﻘﻞ ،ﻭﰲ ﺍﳌﺬﻛﱠﺮ ﻭﺍﳌﺆﻧﺚ .ﻭﺗﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﺜﻨﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ
ﻟﻠﺠﻤﻊ ،ﻷﻧﻬﺎ ﺿﻢ ﺍﺳﻢٍ ﺇﱃ ﺍﺳﻢ ﻣﺜﻠﻪ ،ﻭﺗﻔﺘﺮﻕ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳉﻤﻊ ﺑﺄﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺮﺕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﺛﻨﲔ ،ﻓﻬﻲ
ﺃﺧﺺ ،ﻭﺍﳉﻤﻊ ﺃﻋﻢ.3
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺣﺪ ﺳﻴﺒﻮﻳﻪ ﺍﻟﺘﺜﻨﻴﺔ ﺑﻘﻮﻟﻪ" :ﺍﻋﻠﻢ ﺃﻧﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺛﻨﻴﺖ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪ ﳊﻘﺘﻪ ﺯﺍﺋﺪﺗﺎﻥ ،ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ
ﺣﺮﻑ ﺍﳌﺪ ﻭﺍﻟﻠﱢﲔ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺣﺮﻑ ﺍﻹﻋﺮﺍﺏ ﻏﲑ ﻣﺘﺤﺮﻙ ،ﻭﻻ ﻣﻨﻮﻥ ،ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﻓﻊ ﺃﻟﻔﺎﹰ...
ﻭﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺮ ﻳﺎﺀً ﻣﻔﺘﻮﺣﺎﹰ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺒﻠﻬﺎ ...ﻭﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﺐ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ 4."...ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺰﳐﺸﺮﻱ
ﻓﻌﺮﻓﻬﺎ ﺑﻘﻮﻟﻪ" :ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﳊﻘﺖ ﺁﺧﺮﻩ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺗﺎﻥ :ﺃﻟﻒ ﻭﻳﺎﺀ ﻣﻔﺘﻮﺡ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺒﻠﻬﺎ ﻭﻧﻮﻥ ﻣﻜﺴﻮﺭﺓ؛
ﻟﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﹰ ﻟﻀﻢ ﻭﺍﺣﺪٍ ،ﺇﱃ ﻭﺍﺣﺪٍ ﻭﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ﻋﻮﺿﺎ ﳑﺎ ﻣﻨﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻨﻮﻳﻦ
6
ﺍﻟﺜﺎﺑﺘﲔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪ" 5.ﻭﺃﺿﺎﻑ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﻮﻃﻲ ﳌﺎ ﺳﺒﻖ " ...ﺑﺰﻳﺎﺩﺓٍ ﰲ ﺁﺧﺮﻩ ﺻﺎﱀٍ ﻟﻠﺘﺠﺮﻳﺪ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ".
﴿¿ Ã Â Á À ﻳﺘﻀﺢ ﳑﺎ ﺳﺒﻖ ﺃﻥﹼ ﺍﳌﺜﲎ ﻳﺮﻓﻊ ﺑﺎﻷﻟﻒ .ﻗﺎﻝ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ:
) ﴾ Æ Å Äﺍﳌﺎﺋﺪﺓ .(23 :ﻭﻳﻨﺼﺐ ﻭﳚﺮ ﺑﺎﻟﻴﺎﺀ .ﻗﺎﻝ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ﴾ a ` _ ^ ﴿ :
)ﺍﻟﺒﻘﺮﺓ .(282 :ﻭﻗﺎﻝ) ﴾ Ä Ã Â Á ﴿ :ﺍﻟﻜﻬﻒ .(33 :ﺃﻣﺎ ﻟﺰﻭﻡ ﺍﻷﻟﻒ ﻟﻠﻤﺜﻨﻰ ﰲ
ﺍﻷﺣﻮﺍﻝ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺛﺔ ﻓﻠﻐﺔ ﻧﺴِﺒﺖ ﻟﻜﻨﺎﻧﺔ ،ﻭﺑﲏ ﺍﳊﺎﺭﺙ ﺑﻦ ﻛﻌﺐ ،ﻭﻗﺒﺎﺋﻞ ﺃﹸﺧﺮ 1 ،ﻭﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﺧﺮﺟﺖ
ﺍﻵﻳﺔ ،ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﺮﺍﺀﺓ ﺣﻔﺺ ﻋﻦ ﻋﺎﺻﻢ) ﴾... Â Á À ¿﴿ :ﻃﻪ.(63 :
ﻭﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﱘ ﻻ ﻳﻌﲏ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﻟﺘﺜﻨﻴﺔ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺓﹲ ﻟﻐﻮﻳﺔ ﺣﺪﻳﺜﺔ ﻧﺴﺒﻴﺎ ،ﱂ ﺗﻜﻦ
ﻣﺴﺘﻘﺮﺓ ﺣﱴ ﻧﺰﻭﻝ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﱘ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺜﲔ 2.ﻏﺎﻳﺔ ﻣﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻫﻲ ﻟﻐﺔ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻧﻄﻖ ﺎ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﱘ ،ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻧﺰﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﺒﻌﺔ ﺃﺣﺮﻑٍ ـ ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺭﺟﺢ ﺍﻷﻗﻮﺍﻝ ـ
3
ﻗﻴﻞ ﺇﻥﱠ ﺍﳌﻘﺼﻮﺩ ﺎ ﳍﺠﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺏ .ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﻟﻐﺔ ﻟﺰﻭﻡ ﺍﻷﻟﻒ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻫﻮﺑﺮ ﺍﳊﺎﺭﺛﻲ:
ﺩﻋﺘﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻫﺎﺑِﻲ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺍﺏ ﻋﻘِﻴﻢِ ﺗﺰﻭﺩ ﻣﻨﺎ ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺃﺫﻧﺎﻩ ﻃﻌﻨﺔﹰ
ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ )ﺃﺫﻧﻴﻪ(؛ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻣﻀﺎﻑ.
ﻭﻟﹸﻐﺔ ﻟﺰﻭﻡ ﺍﻷﻟﻒ ﻟﻠﻤﺜﻨﻰ ﻻ ﺗﻌﺪ ﳊﻨﺎ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺯﻋﻢ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﻨﺤﺎﺓ ،ﻷﻥﱠ ﲬﺴﺔﹰ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﺀ
ﺍﻟﺴﺒﻌﺔ ﻗﺮﺃﻭﺍ ﺎ ،ﻭﻫﻢ :ﻧﺎﻓﻊ ،ﻭﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺎﻣﺮ ،ﻭﲪﺰﺓ ،ﻭﻋﺎﺻﻢ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻜﺴﺎﺋﻲ .ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ
ﺍﳌﻨﺴﻮﺏ ﺇﱃ ﻋﺜﻤﺎﻥ " :ﺇﻥﱠ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺼﺤﻒ ﳊﻨﺎﹰ ،ﻭﺳﺘﻘﻴﻤﻪ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺏ ﺑﺄﻟﺴﻨﺘﻬﺎ" ،ﻓﻘﺪ ﺭﺃﻯ
ﺃﺣﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺜﲔ ﺑﺄﻧﻪ ﺧﱪ ﺑﺎﻃﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺟﻮﻩٍ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ:
ﺃ ـ ﺇﻥﱠ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺏ ﺗﻜﺮﻩ ﺍﻟﻠﱠﺤﻦ ،ﻓﻜﻴﻒ ﻳﻘﺮﻭﻧﻪ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﷲ؟
ﺏ ـ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺏ ﺳﺘﻘﻴﻤﻪ ﺑﺄﻟﺴﻨﺘﻬﺎ ﻏﲑ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ؛ ﻷﻥﱠ ﺍﳌﺼﺤﻒ ﻳﻘﻒ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ
4
ﺍﻟﻌﺮﰊ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺠﻤﻲ.
ﺃﺿﻒ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺎ ﺳﺒﻖ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻮﻝ ﲰﻰ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻦ ﺿﻼﻻﹰ ﺃﻱ ﺍﳓﺮﺍﻓﺎﹰ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻷﺻﻞ ،ﻓﻘﺪ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﻟﺮﺟﻞٍ ﳊﹶﻦ» :ﺃﹶﺭﺷِﺪﻭﺍ ﺃﹶﺧﺎﻛﹸﻢ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻗﹶﺪ ﺿﻞﱠ« 1.ﻭﺍﻷﺻﻞ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺜﲎ ﺍﻟﻌﻄﻒ ﺑﺎﻟﻮﺍﻭ،
ﻓﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﻷﺻﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﺎﻝ :ﺟﺎﺀﱐ ﳏﻤﺪ ﻭﳏﻤﺪ ،ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺭﺃﻭﺍ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻃﻮﻻﹰ ،ﻓﺠﻌﻠﻮﺍ ﺻﻴﻐﺔ ﺍﳌﺜﲎ
ﻋﻮﺿﺎﹰ ﻋﻦ ﺿﻢ ﺍﻻﺳﻢ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻻﺳﻢ ،ﻓﺤﺼﻞ ﺍﳌﻌﲎ ﻣﻊ ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻠﻔﻆ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺮﺏ ﺗﻜﺮﻩ
ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺮﺍﺭ ،ﻗﻴﻞ ﻟﻌﻤﺮ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻭﻓﺎﺓ ﺃﰊ ﺑﻜﺮ ﻳﺎ ﺧﻠﻴﻔﺔﹶ ﺧﻠﻴﻔﺔِ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ؛ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ" :ﻫﺬﺍ
2
ﺃﻣﺮ ﻳﻄﻮﻝ ،ﺃﻧﺘﻢ ﺍﳌﺆﻣﻨﻮﻥ ،ﻭﳓﻦ ﺃﻣﺮﺍﺅﻛﹸﻢ" ،ﻓﺨﻮﻃِﺐ ﺑﺄﻣﲑ ﺍﳌﺆﻣﻨﲔ.
ﻭﻗﺪ ﻳﻔﻜﱡﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﺜﻨﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﻻﺿﻄﺮﺍﺭ ،ﻭﻳﻌﺪِﻟﻮﻥ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺮﺍﺭ .ﻗﺎﻝ ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭ
3
ﺑﻦ ﻣﺮﺛﺪ ﺍﻷﺳﺪﻱ:
ﻓﺄﺭﺓﹶ ﻣـﺴﻚٍ ﺫﹸﺑِﺤـﺖ ﰲ ﺳـﻚ ﻛــﺄﻥﱠ ﺑــﲔ ﻓﻜﱢﻬــﺎ ﻭﺍﻟﻔــﻚ
ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﺑﲔ ﻓﻜﱠﻴﻬﺎ.
ﻭﻣﺎ ﻻ ﻳﻘﺒﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺮﻳﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻠﻤﺎﺕ ﻻ ﻳﺪﺧﻞ ﰲ ﺣﺪ ﺍﳌﺜﲎ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻠﺤﻖ ﺑﻪ ﰲ
﴿X W V U T S R Q ﺇﻋﺮﺍﺑﻪ ،ﻣﺜﻞ :ﺍﺛﻨﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﺛﻨﺘﺎﻥ .ﻗﺎﻝ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ:
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺗﻌﺎﱃK J ﴿ : ) ﴾ _ ^ ] \ [ Z Yﺍﳌﺎﺋﺪﺓ،(106 :
﴿! " ' & % $ ) ﴾ N M Lﺍﳌﺎﺋﺪﺓ ،(12 :ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ:
( ) ﴾ )ﺍﻷﻧﻌﺎﻡ ،(143 :ﻭﻛﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻻ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻭﻟﻜﻨﻪ ﺟﺎﺀ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﳌﺜﲎ،
ﻣﺜﻞ) :ﻛِﻼﹶ ،ﻭﻛِﻠﺘﺎ( ﺑﺸﺮﻁ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻀﺎﻓﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻀﻤﺮ ،ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﲢﻘﱠﻖ ﻓﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻁ ﺃﻋﺮِﺑﺎ
﴿r q p n m l k j i h g ﺇﻋﺮﺍﺏ ﺍﳌﺜﲎ .ﻗﺎﻝ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ:
) ﴾ v u t sﺍﻹﺳﺮﺍﺀ.(23 :
1ﺍﳊﺎﻛﻢ ،ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺍﻟﻨﻴﺴﺎﺑﻮﺭﻱ ،ﺍﳌﺴﺘﺪﺭﻙ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺤﲔ ،ﲢﻘﻴﻖ :ﻣﺼﻄﻔﻰ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺩﺭ )ﺑﲑﻭﺕ :ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺐ
ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ،ﻁ1410 ،1ﻫ1990/ﻡ( ،ﺝ ،2ﺹ ،477ﺣﺪﻳﺚ ﺭﻗﻢ 3643؛ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺟﲏ ،ﺃﺑﻮ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺢ ﻋﺜﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﻦ ﺟﲏ )ﺕ392ﻫ(،
ﺍﳋﺼﺎﺋﺺ ،ﲢﻘﻴﻖ :ﳏﻤﺪ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺍﻟﻨﺠﺎﺭ )ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮﺓ :ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﰊ ،ﺩ.ﻁ1372 ،.ﻫ1952/ﻡ( ،ﺝ ،3ﺹ.246
2ﺍﳉﺮﺟﺎﱐ ،ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮ ﺍﳉﺮﺟﺎﱐ ،ﺍﳌﻘﺘﺼﺪ ﰲ ﺷﺮﺡ ﺍﻹﻳﻀﺎﺡ ،ﲢﻘﻴﻖ :ﻛﺎﻇﻢ ﲝﺮ ﺍﳌﺮﺟﺎﻥ ،ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺎﻓﺔ ،ﺑﻐﺪﺍﺩ،
ﺩ.ﻁ1402 ،.ﻫ1982/ﻡ ،ﺝ ،1ﺹ 183ﻭ.184
3ﺍﳌﺼﺪﺭ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ.
165 ﺻﺎﱀ ﳏﺠﻮﺏ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻘﺎﺭﻱ -ﻣﻨﻬﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺒﲑ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺯﺩﻕ:
ﻗﺪ ﺃﻗﻠﹶﻌﺎ ﻭﻛـﻼ ﺃﻧﻔﹶﻴﻬِﻤـﺎ ﺭﺍﰊ ﻛﻼﳘﺎ ﺣﲔ ﺟﺪ ﺍﳉﺮﻱ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤـﺎ
ﻓـ)ﻛﻼﳘﺎ( ﻣﺒﺘﺪﺃ ﻣﺮﻓﻮﻉ ﺑﺎﻷﻟﻒ .ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺭﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﺒﺼﺮﻳﲔ ،ﻭﻳﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﻜﻮﻓﻴﻮﻥ ﺇﻋﺮﺍﺑﻬﺎ
1
ﺇﻋﺮﺍﺏ ﺍﳌﺜﲎ ﻣﻊ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﻭﻣﻀﻤﺮ.
ﺸﺭﻭﻁ ﺍﻟﺘﱠﺜﻨﻴﺔ
2
ﺃ ـ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻔﺮﺩﺍﹰ ﻓﻼ ﻳﺜﲎ ﺍﳌﺜﲎ ،ﻭﻻ ﺍﳉﻤﻊ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﱂ ،ﺃﻣﺎ ﲨﻊ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺴﲑ ﻓﻼ ﻳﺜﻨـﻰ
3
ﺇﻻ ﰲ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺓ ،ﺃﻭ ﻧﺎﺩﺭِ ﻛﻼﻡٍ ﻣﻨﻌﺎ ﻟﻠﺘﻨﺎﻗﺾ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ ،ﻗﺎﻝ ﻋﻤﺮﻭ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺪﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﱯ:
ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺮﻕِ ﰲ ﺍﳍﹶﻴﺠﺎ ،ﺟﻤﺎﻟﹶﻴﻦِ ﻷﺻﺒﺢ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻡ ﺃﻭﺑﺎﺩﺍﹰ ﻭﱂ ﳚﺪﻭﺍ
﴿< ; ... ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﺑﺘﺜﻨﻴﺔ ﺍﺳﻢ ﺍﳉﻤﻊ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻗﻮﻝﹲ ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﺑﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﻵﻳﺔ:
= ﴾ )ﺍﻷﻧﻔﺎﻝ.(41 :
ﺏ ـ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻌﺮﺑﺎﹰ ،ﻓﻼ ﻳﺜﲎ ﺍﳌﺒﲏ ،ﺃﻣﺎ ﺫﺍﻥ ،ﻭﺗﺎﻥ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻠﺬﺍﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﻠﱠﺘﺎﻥِ ،ﻓﺼِﻴﻎﹲ
ﻭﺿِﻌﺖ ﻟﻠﻤﺜﲎ ،ﻭﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺜﲎ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﻲ ،ﻭﺇﻧﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻣﻠﺤﻘﺔ ﺑﻪ.
ﺝ ـ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻏﲑ ﻣﺮﻛﱠﺐٍ ﻓﻼ ﻳﺜﻨﻰ ﺍﳌﺮﻛﱠﺐ ﺍﻹﺳﻨﺎﺩﻱ ﻣﺜﻞ :ﻓﺘﺢ ﺍﷲ ،ﻓﺈﻥﹾ ﺃﺭﺩﻧﺎ
ﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﺜﻨﻴﺔ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺫﺍﻙ ﻋﻦ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ )ﺫﻭ( ﻧﻘﻮﻝ :ﺟﺎﺀ ﺫﹶﻭﺍﹶ ﻓﺘﺢ ﺍﷲُ .ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ
ﺍﳌﺮﻛﱠﺐ ﺍﳌﺰﺟﻲ .ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﳌﺮﻛﱠﺐ ﺍﻹﺿﺎﰲﱡ ﻓﻴﺜﻨﻰ ﺻﺪﺭﻩ ،ﺟﺎﺀ ﻋﺒﺪﺍ ﺍﷲ.
ﺩ ـ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﻞﱞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻔﺮﺩﻳﻦ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺩ ﺗﺜﻨِﻴﺘﻬﻤﺎ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻘﹰﺎ ﻟﻶﺧﺮ ﰲ ﺍﳊﺮﻭﻑ ﻭﺍﳊﺮﻛﺎﺕ،
ﻓﻼ ﻳﺜﻨﻰ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻔﺎﻥ ﺇﻻ ﻋﻦ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﻟﺘﻐﻠﻴﺐ ،ﳓﻮ :ﺍﻟﻌﻤﺮﺍﻥِ ﻟﻠﺨﻠﻴﻔﺘﲔ ﺃﰊ ﺑﻜﺮ ﻭﻋﻤﺮ.
ﻫ ـ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﻞﱞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻔﺮﺩﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻘﺎﹰ ﻟﻶﺧﺮ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻌﲎ ﻓﻼ ﻳﺜﲎ ﻟﻔﻈﺎﻥ ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻛﺎﻥ
ﰲ ﺍﻟﻠﱠﻔﻆ ﳐﺘﻠﻔﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻌﲎ ،ﻣﺜﻞ :ﻋﲔ ،ﻟﻠﺒﺎﺻﺮﺓ ،ﻭﺍﳉﺎﺳﻮﺱ.
ﻭ ـ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻪ ﺛﺎﻥٍ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﻓﻼ ﻳﺜﲎ ﻣﺎ ﻻ ﺛﺎﱐ ﻟﻪ ﻣﺜﻞ :ﺍﻟﺸﻤﺲ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻤﺮ،
1
ﻭﻗﻮﳍﻢ :ﺍﻟﻘﻤﺮﺍﻥ ،ﻣﻦ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺘﻐﻠﻴﺐ .ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺯﺩﻕ:
ﻟﻨﺎﹶ ﻗﹶﻤﺮﺍﻫﺎ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺠﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻄﱡﻮﺍﻟِـﻊ ﺃﺧﺬﻧﺎ ﺑﺄﹶﻓﺎﻕِ ﺍﻟـﺴﻤﺎﺀِ ﻋﻠـﻴﻜﹸﻢ
ﺃﺭﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﺸﻤﺲ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻤﺮ ،ﻓﻐﻠﱠﺐ ﺍﻟﻘﻤﺮ.
ﻭﻣﺎ ﻭﺭﺩ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻠﻤﺎﺕٍ ﱂ ﺗﺘﻮﺍﻓﺮ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻭﻁ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻘﺔ ،ﻓﻬﻮ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻣﺜﲎ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﻴﺎ.
﴿! ﻣﺜﻞ :ﺯﻭﺝ ،ﻭﺷﻔﹾﻊ ،ﻓﻬﻲ ﺩﺍﻟﹼﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﺜﲎ ﺩﻻﻟﺔﹰ ﻣﻌﻨﻮﻳﺔ ﻻ ﳓﻮﻳﺔ .ﻗﺎﻝ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ:
﴿& " ) ﴾ , + * ) ( ' & % $ #ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎﺀ ،(1 :ﻭﻗﺎﻝ:
'ِ﴾ )ﺍﻟﻔﺠﺮ .(3 :ﻭﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﺎ ﺃﻭﺭﺩﻩ ﺍﶈﱯ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻟﻔﺎﻅٍ ﻣﺜﻨﺎﺓٍ ﻻ ﻣﻔﺮﺩ ﳍﺎ ﻣﻦ
ﻟﻔﻈﻬﺎ ،ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﳍﺎ ﻣﻔﺮﺩ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻫﺎ ،ﻣﺜﻞ :ﺍﻟﺒﺼﺮﺗﺎﻥ )ﺍﻟﺒﺼﺮﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻮﻓﺔ( ،ﻭﺍﻷﺳﻮﺩﺍﻥ
)ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺮ ﻭﺍﳌﺎﺀ( ،ﰲ ﺣﺪﻳﺚ ﻋﺎﺋﺸﺔ" :ﻟﻘﺪ ﺭﺃﻳﺘﻨﺎ ﻭﻣﺎ ﻟﻨﺎ ﻃﻌﺎﻡ ﺇﻻ ﺍﻷﺳﻮﺩﺍﻥ".2
ﻭﺍﻷﺻﻴﻼﻥ )ﺍﻟﻐﺪﺍﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺸﻲ ،(ﻭﰲ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭﻱ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻮﻉ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ
3
ﺍﷲ » :ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻌﺎﻥ ﺑِﺎﳋِﻴﺎﺭِ ﻣﺎ ﻟﹶﻢ ﻳﺘﻔﺮﻗﺎ« ،ﻭﺍﳌﺮﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺋﻊ ﻭﺍﳌﺸﺘﺮﻱ.
1
ﺍﻟﺰﺟﺎﺟﻲ ﺑﻘﻮﻟﻪ" :ﻓﺎﳌﻘﻴﺲ ﰲ ﻛﻞﱢ ﺷﻴﺌﹶﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺷﻴﺌﹶﲔِ ﺗﺜﻨﻴﺘﻬﻤﺎ ﲨﻊ."...
ﻭﳔﺘﻢ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳌﺜﲎ ﺑﺎﻟﺮﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﺸﺮﻗﲔ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺖ )(Meillet
ﻭﻓﻨﺪﺭﻳﺲ ) (Vendryesﺑﺄﻥ ﺍﳌﺜﲎ ﺩﻟﻴﻞﹲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﲣﻠﱡﻒ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﲢﺘﻔﻆ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺨﻠﺺ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞﹸ
ﺍﻟﺮﻗﻲ ﻭﺍﳊﻀﺎﺭﺓ! ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ـ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﺎﻝ 2ﻳﺎﻗﻮﺕ ـ ﺑﻌﻴﺪ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺍﺏ ﻭﻻ ﳛﻤﻞ ﺃﻱ ﺩﻟﻴﻞٍ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺻﺤﺘﻪ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﻻ ﻋﻼﻗﺔ ﻟﻪ ﺑﻄﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺔ ،ﻭﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺎﺕ ﺗﺮﻓﺾ ﻫﺬﺍ
ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻉ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺣﻜﺎﻡ .ﻭﻛﻴﻒ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳌﺜﲎ ﺩﻟﻴﻞﹶ ﲣﻠﱡﻒ؟ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﹰ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻭﺟﻮﺩﻩ ﻳﺪﻝﱡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﻌﺪ
ﻧﻈﺮ ،ﻭﻣﺮﺍﻋﺎﺓٍ ﻟﻄﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ،ﻓﺎﻻﻧﻄﻼﻕ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻔﺮﺩ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳉﻤﻊ ﻣﺒﺎﺷﺮﺓﹰ ﻳﺘﺮﻙ ﻓﺠﻮﺓﹰ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ،
ﻓﺎﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﺍﺳﺘﻄﺎﻋﺖ ﺳﺪ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻔﺠﻮﺓ ﺑﺼﻴﻐﺔ ﺍﳌﺜﲎ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺘﻤﻴﺰ ﻋﻦ ﺻﻴﻐﺔ ﺍﳉﻤﻊ ،ﻓﺎﳌﺜﲎ ﻭﺇﻥ
ﻛﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺻﻞ ﲨﻌﺎﹰ ،ﻷﻧﻪ ﺿﻢ ﺷﻲﺀٍ ﺇﱃ ﺷﻲﺀٍ ،ﺇﻻ ﺃﻥ ﺩﻻﻟﺘﻪ ﺃﻗﻞﹼ ﻣﻦ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﺍﳉﻤﻊ ،ﳑﺎ
ﺳﻮﻍ ﺇﻓﺮﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﺼﻴﻐﺔ ﻣﻨﻔﺼﻠﺔٍ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳉﻤﻊ.
ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻧﻈﺮﻧﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻗﻀﺖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺻﻴﻐﺔ ﺍﳌﺜﲎ ،ﻓﺈﻧﻨﺎ ﳒﺪﻫﺎ ﳉﺄﺕ ﺇﱃ ﻭﺳﺎﺋﻂﹶ
ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻟﻠﺘﻌﺒﲑ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳌﺜﲎ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺇﺿﺎﻓﺔ ﻛﻠﻤﺔٍ ﻣﻌﻴﻨﺔ ﻟﻠﺪﻻﻟﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﺜﻨﻴﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳊﺎﻝ ﰲ
ﺍﻹﳒﻠﻴﺰﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻀﻴﻒ ﻛﻠﻤﺔ twoﻣﺜﻞ ،two boys :ﺃﻭ ﺗﺴﺘﺨﺪﻡ ﻛﻠﻤﺔ ﻣﻨﻔﺼﻠﺔ ﻣﺜﻞ:
coupleﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺪﻝﱡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﺛﻨﲔ ﺃﻭ ﺯﻭﺝ couple of boys .ﺃﻭ ﻛﻠﻤﺔ ،both boys ،both
ﻭﻳﺴﺘﺨﺪﻣﻮﻥ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﻛﻠﻤﺔ .pair of shoes ،pair
ﻭﻟﻮ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﻟﺘﺨﻠﻲ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺜﻨﻴﺔ ﺩﻟﻴﻞﹲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺮﻗﻲ ﻭﺍﳊﻀﺎﺭﺓ ،ﻟﻨﺒﺬ ﺍﻷﺳﻠﻮﺏ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﱐ
ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﺘﺜﻨﻴﺔ ،ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺃﻭﺭﺩﻫﺎ ﻻ ﺑﻠﻐﺔ ﻗﺮﻳﺶ ﻓﺤﺴﺐ ،ﺑﻞ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻟﻐﺔ
ﺑﻠﺤﺎﺭﺙ .ﻭﰲ ﻗﺮﺍﺀﺓ ﺣﻔﺺ ﻋﻦ ﻋﺎﺻﻢ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ)﴾ Â Á À ﴿ :ﻃﻪ.(63 :
ﳔﻠﺺ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻛﻞﱡ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺎﻟﻪ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﺸﺮﻗﻮﻥ ﺻﺎﳊﺎﹰ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻐﻴﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺒﺪﻝ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻌﺘﺮﻱ
ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺎﺕ ﺃﻣﺮ ﻻ ﻧﻨﻜﺮﻩ ،ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻀﺮﻭﺭﻱ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺴﺮﻱ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻐﲑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺎﺕ،
1ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺼﻔﻮﺭ ،ﻋﻠﻲ ﺑﻦ ﻣﺆﻣﻦ ،ﺷﺮﺡ ﺟﻤﻞ ﺍﻟﺰﺟﺎﺟﻲ ،ﲢﻘﻴﻖ :ﻓﻮﺍﺯ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺎﺭ )ﺑﲑﻭﺕ :ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ،ﻁ،1
1419ﻫ1998/ﻡ( ،ﺝ ،3ﺹ.27
2ﻃﺤﺎﻥ ،ﺭﳝﻮﻥ ﻃﺤﺎﻥ ،ﺍﻷﻟﺴﻨﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ )ﺑﲑﻭﺕ :ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻠﺒﻨﺎﱐ ،ﺩ .ﻁ1401 ،ﻫ1981/ﻡ( ،ﺹ.133
169 ﺻﺎﱀ ﳏﺠﻮﺏ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻘﺎﺭﻱ -ﻣﻨﻬﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺒﲑ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ
ﻭﻟﻠﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﻣﻴﺰﺓﹲ ﲤﻴﺰﻫﺎ ﻋﻦ ﻛﺜﲑٍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺎﺕ ،ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﱘ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺪﻫﺶ
ﺣﻘﺎ ،ﺃﻧﻨﺎ ﻧﻼﺣﻆ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﻟﻠﻬﺠﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺭﺟﺔ ـ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ ـ ﺃﺧﺬﺕ ﺗﺘﻄﻮﺭ ﳓﻮ ﻟﻐﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﱘ،1
ﻭﺻﺪﻕ ﺍﳊﻖ ﻋﺰ ﻭﺟﻞﱠ) ﴾ m l k j i h g﴿ :ﺍﳊﺠﺮ.(9 :
3ـ ﺍﻟﺠﻤﻊ
ﺍﳉﻤﻊ ﻫﻮ ﺿﻢ ﺍﻟﺸﻲﺀ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻟﻠﺘﻌﺒﲑ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳉﻤﻴﻊ ﺑﻠﻔﻆٍ ﻭﺍﺣﺪٍ ﺑﺸﺮﻁ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ
ﺍﻷﻟﻔﺎﻅ ﻭﺍﳌﻌﺎﱐ ،ﺑﻘﺼﺪ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺼﺎﺭ .ﻭﺍﳉﻤﻊ ﺷﺮﻳﻚ ﺍﳌﺜﻨﻰ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﳉﻤﻊ ﻭﺍﻟﻀﻢ،
ﻭﻳﻔﺘﺮﻕ ﻋﻨﻪ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻤﻴﺔ 2.ﻓﺈﻥﹾ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﳌﺜﲎ ﻳﺪﻝﱡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﺛﻨﲔ ﺃﻭ ﺍﺛﻨﺘﲔ ،ﻓﺎﳉﻤﻊ ﻣﺎ
ﻳﺪﻝﱡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺛﻨﲔ ،ﺃﻭ ﺍﺛﻨﺘﲔ .ﻭﺍﳉﻤﻊ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﻧﻮﻋﺎﻥ:
1ـ ﺍﳉﻤﻊ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺢ :ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﺳﻠِﻢ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻐﻴﲑ ،ﻭﻳﺴﻤﻰ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺍﳉﻤﻊ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﺜﻨﻴﺔ ﻟﺴﻼﻣﺔ ﺻﺪﺭﻩ ،ﻭﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎﹰ ﺍﳉﻤﻊ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﱂ.
2ـ ﲨﻊ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺴﲑ :ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺪﻝﱡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺛﻨﲔ ﺃﻭ ﺍﺛﹾﻨﺘﲔِ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻼﺀ ﻭﻏﲑﻫﻢ،
ﻣﻊ ﺗﻐﻴﲑٍ ﰲ ﺻﻴﻐﺘﻪ.
1ﻣﻦ ﳏﺎﺿﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﻷﺳﺘﺎﺫ ﻳﻮﺳﻒ ﺍﳋﻠﻴﻔﺔ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺑﻜﺮ ﺃﻟﻘﺎﻫﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻃﻠﺒﺔ ﺍﳌﺎﺟﺴﺘﲑ ﲟﻌﻬﺪ ﺍﳋﺮﻃﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﱄ ﺩﻓﻌﺔ 1982ﻡ
)ﻏﲑ ﻣﻄﺒﻮﻋﺔ(.
2ﺍﺑﻦ ﻳﻌﻴﺶ ،ﺷﺮﺡ ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ ،ﺝ ،5ﺹ.2
ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺪﻳﺪ ـــ ﺍﻠﺪ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻊ ﻋﺸﺮ .ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﻼﺛﻮﻥ1434 .ﻫ 2013 /ﻡ 170
ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ ﺣﺮﻑ ﺍﻹﻋﺮﺍﺏ ﳐﺘﻠﻒ ﻓﻴﻬﻤﺎ" 1.ﻭﱂ ﳜﺮﺝ ﻋﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺰﳐﺸﺮﻱ ..." :ﻓﺎﻟﺬﻱ
2
ﺑﺎﻟﻮﺍﻭ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻮﻥ ﳌﻦ ﻳﻌﻠﻢ ﰲ ﺻﻔﺎﺗﻪ ﻭﺃﻋﻼﻣﻪ ﻛﺎﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﻭﺍﻟﺰﻳﺪِﻳﻦ ."...
ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻳﻌﻴﺶ ﻓﻔﺼﻞ ﻣﺎ ﺃﲨﻠﻪ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻘﺎﻥ ﺑﻘﻮﻟﻪ" :ﻣﺎ ﺳﻠِﻢ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻐﻴﲑ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ
ﺗﺄﰐ ﺑﻠﻔﻈﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﺗﻐﻴﲑ ،ﰒ ﺗﺰﻳﺪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓﹰ ﺗﺪﻝﱡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳉﻤﻊ ﻛﻤﺎ ﹸﻓﻌِﻞ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﺜﻨﻴﺔ...
3
ﻭﺭﲟﺎ ﻗﺎﻟﻮﺍ :ﲨﻊ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺠﺎﺀَﻳﻦ؛ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺮﺓ ﺑﺎﻟﻮﺍﻭ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻮﻥ ،ﻭﻣﺮﺓ ﺑﺎﻟﻴﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻮﻥ".
ﻧﺴﺘﻨﺘﺞ ﳑﺎ ﺳﺒﻖ:
1ـ ﺇﻥ ﲨﻊ ﺍﳌﺬﻛﺮ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﱂ ﺻِﻨﻮ ﺍﻟﺘﺜﻨﻴﺔ ﻛﻼﳘﺎ ﻳﺪﻝﱡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳉﻤﻊ ﺑﻼﺣﻘﺔٍ ،ﻭﲨﻊ
ﺍﳌﺬﻛﺮﺍﻟﺴﺎﱂ ﺗﻠﺤﻘﻪ ﻭﺍﻭ ﻭﻧﻮﻥﹲ ﰲ ﺣﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﻓﻊ ،ﻣﺜﻞ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ﴾ # " ! ﴿ :
BA )ﺍﳌﺆﻣﻨﻮﻥ .(1 :ﻭﻳﺎﺀ ﻭﻧﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺣﺎﻟﺘﻲ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﺐ ﻭﺍﳉﺮ .ﻗﺎﻝ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ...﴿ :
﴿ï î í ì ) ﴾ F E D Cﻳﻮﻧﺲ ،(99 :ﻭﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﺟﻞ ﺟﻼﻟﻪ:
) ﴾ õ ô ó ò ñ ðﺍﻷﻧﻌﺎﻡ.(27 :
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﻣﺼﻄﻔﻰ ﻋﻦ ﻻﺣﻘﺔ ﲨﻊ ﺍﳌﺬﻛﺮ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﱂ" :ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﻀﻤﺔ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻋﻠﹶﻢ ﺍﻟﺮﻓﻊ،
ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺍﻭ ﺇﺷﺒﺎﻉ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻜﺴﺮﺓ ﻋﻠﹶﻢ ﺍﳉﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﻴﺎﺀ ﺇﺷﺒﺎﻉ4."...ﻭﺍﻷﺳﺘﺎﺫ ﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺃﺭﺍﺩ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺴﻬﻞ،
ﻭﻟﻜﻨﻪ ﻋﻘﱠﺪ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻻ ﻳﺪﺭﻱ ،ﻓﺄﻳﻬﻤﺎ ﺃﻳﺴﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺘﻌﻠﱢﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﺤﻮ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻨﺤﺎﺓ:
ﻳﺮﻓﻊ ﺑﺎﻟﻮﺍﻭ ﺃﻡ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﺑﺎﻟﻀﻤﺔ ،ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻭ ﻓﻠﻺﺷﺒﺎﻉ؟ ﻻ ﺷﻚ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﺃﺳﻬﻞ ﻭﺃﻳﺴﺮ،
ﻭﻳﺘﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﻭﻣﺎ ﻳﺪﻋﻮ ﻟﻪ ﺍﳌﻨﻬﺞ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻔﻲ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺻﻒ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺗﺄﻭﻳﻼﺕٍ ﺃﻭ
ﺍﻓﺘﺮﺍﺿﺎﺕ .ﺃﻣﺎ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﺼﺒﻮﺭ ﺷﺎﻫﲔ 5ﻓﻘﺪ ﺃﻛﱠﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻋﻼﻣﺔ ﺍﳉﻤﻊ ﺍﳌﺮﻓﻮﻉ ﻫﻲ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﺔ
ﺿﻤﺔ ﻃﻮﻳﻠﺔﹲ ﻭﻧﻮﻥ ،ﻭﻋﻼﻣﺔ ﺍﳉﻤﻊ ﺍﳌﻨﺼﻮﺏ ﺃﻭ ﺍﺮﻭﺭ ﻫﻲ :ﻛﺴﺮﺓ ﻃﻮﻳﻠﺔ ﻭﻧﻮﻥ ،ﻭﻣﺎ ﻗﺎﻟﻪ
ﱂ ﳜﺮﺝ ﻋﻤﺎ ﻗﺮﺭﻩ ﺍﻟﻨﺤﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﹸﺪﺍﻣﻰ؛ ﻷﻥﹼ ﺇﺷﺒﺎﻉ ﺍﻟﻀﻤﺔ ﻳﻮﻟِﺪ ﻭﺍﻭﺍﹰ ،ﻭﺇﺷﺒﺎﻉ ﺍﻟﻜﺴﺮﺓ ﻳﻮﻟِﺪ
ﻳﺎﺀً ،ﻭﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻘﹸﺪﺍﻣﻰ ﻳﺘﻤﺎﺷﻰ ﻣﻊ ﺍﳌﻨﻬﺞ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻔﻲ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺮﻓﺾ ﺍﻟﺘﺄﻭﻳﻼﺕ ﻭﺍﻻﻓﺘﺮﺍﺿﺎﺕ،
ﻭﻳﺘﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﻮﻳﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺄﻧﻬﺎ ﻫﻲ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺻﻞ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻛﺬﺍ.
2ـ ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻭ ﻭﺍﻟﻴﺎﺀ ﳘﺎ ﺣﺮﻓﺎ ﺍﻹﻋﺮﺍﺏ 1ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﺃﻱ ﺳﻴﺒﻮﻳﻪ ،ﺑﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻳﺮﻯ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺍﳊﺴﻦ
ﺍﻷﺧﻔﺶ ،ﻭﺃﺑﻮ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺱ ﺍﳌﱪﺩ ﺃﻤﺎ ﻳﺪﻻﱡﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻹﻋﺮﺍﺏ ﻓﻘﻂ 2.ﻭﺭﺃﻱ ﺳﻴﺒﻮﻳﻪ ﻳﻨﺴﺠﻢ ﻣﻊ
ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻗﺎﻡ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻨﺤﻮ ،ﻣﺜﻞ :ﻧﻈﺮﻳﺔ ﺍﻷﺻﻞ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺮﻉ ،ﻓﻬﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﳌﻘﺮﺭﺓ ﻋﻨﺪ
ﺍﻟﻨﺤﺎﺓ .ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻫﺸﺎﻡ" :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﳑﺎ ﺧﺮﺝ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻷﺻﻞ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺮﻉ ،ﺍﳌﺜﲎ
ﻛـ)ﺍﻟﺰﻳﺪﺍﻥ( ...ﻭﲨﻊ ﺍﳌﺬﻛﺮ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﱂ ﻛـ)ﺍﻟﺰﻳﺪﻭﻥ( ...ﺃﻣﺎ ﲨﻊ ﺍﳌﺬﻛﺮ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﱂ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻳﺮﻓﻊ
3
ﺑﺎﻟﻮﺍﻭ ،ﻭﻳﺠﺮ ﻭﻳﻨﺼﺐ ﺑﺎﻟﻴﺎﺀ."...
3ـ ﺇﻥﱠ ﻻﺣﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺜﻨﻴﺔ ﻣﻔﺘﻮﺡ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺒﻠﻬﺎ ،ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻥ ﻓﻬﻲ ﻣﻜﺴﻮﺭﺓ ،ﻭﲨﻊ ﺍﳌﺬﻛﺮ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﱂ
ﻻﺣِﻘﹶﺘﻪ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺒﻠﻬﺎ ﻣﻀﻤﻮﻣﺎﹰ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻭﺍﻭﺍﹰ ،ﻭﻣﻜﺴﻮﺭﺓﹰ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻳﺎﺀ ،ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻥ ﻓﻬﻲ
ﻣﻔﺘﻮﺣﺔ ،ﻭﲢﺬﻑ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻹﺿﺎﻓﺔ .ﻗﺎﻝ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ) ﴾ p o ...﴿ :ﺍﳊﺞ.(35 :
4ـ ﻭﺗﻨﺴﺤﺐ ﺷﺮﻭﻁ ﺍﻟﺘﺜﻨﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺫﹸﻛِﺮﺕ ﺳﺎﺑﻘﹰﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﲨﻊ ﺍﳌﺬﻛﺮ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﱂ ،ﻭﻳﻀﺎﻑ
ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﺷﺮﻃﺎﻥ:
ﺃ ـ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﹶﻤﺎﹰ ﻟﻌﺎﻗﻞ.
ﺏ ـ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺻﻔﺔﹰ ﻟﻌﺎﻗﻞ.
4
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺍﺷﺘﺮﻃﻮﺍ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﹶﻢ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺄﰐ:
1ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﺃﻱ ﺳﻴﺒﻮﻳﻪ ﺗﺼﲑ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻭ ﻭﺍﻟﻴﺎﺀ ﻣﻦ ﲤﺎﻡ ﺻﻴﻐﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻭﺿﻌﺖ ﳌﻌﲎ ﺍﳉﻤﻊ ﻓﺼﺎﺭﺕ ﲟﱰﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺀ ﰲ )ﻗﺎﺋﻤﺔ(
ﻓﻜﻤﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺀ ﺣﺮﻑ ﺍﻹﻋﺮﺍﺏ ﰲ )ﻗﺎﺋﻤﺔ( ،ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻭ ﻭﺍﻟﻴﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺍﳉﻤﻊ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﱂ ،ﺃﻣﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﺃﻱ ﺍﻷﺧﻔﺶ ﻭﺍﳌﱪﺩ ﻓﻬﻤﺎ
ﻟﻴﺲ ﻣﻦ ﲤﺎﻡ ﺻﻴﻐﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻤﺔ ،ﳌﺰﻳﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺼﻴﻞ ﺍﻧﻈﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻷﻧﺒﺎﺭﻱ ،ﺍﻹﻧﺼﺎﻑ ،ﺝ ،1ﺹ.35-33
2ﺍﺑﻦ ﻳﻌﻴﺶ ،ﺷﺮﺡ ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ ،ﺝ ،5ﺹ 139ﻭ.140
3ﺍﺑﻦ ﻫﺸﺎﻡ ،ﻗﻄﺮ ﺍﻟﻨﺪﻯ ﻭﺑﻞﱡ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﻯ ،ﺹ 57ﻭ.58
4ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺼﻔﻮﺭ ،ﻋﻠﻲ ﺑﻦ ﻣﺆﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻭﻑ ﺑﺎﺑﻦ ﻋﺼﻔﻮﺭ ،ﺍﳌﻘﺮﺏ ،ﲢﻘﻴﻖ :ﺃﲪﺪ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﺴﺘﺎﺭ ﻭﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺍﳉﺒﻮﺭﻱ )ﺑﻐﺪﺍﺩ:
ﻣﻄﺒﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱐ ،ﺩ .ﻁ1388 ،ﻫ1971/ﻡ( ،ﺹ.403
ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺪﻳﺪ ـــ ﺍﻠﺪ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻊ ﻋﺸﺮ .ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﻼﺛﻮﻥ1434 .ﻫ 2013 /ﻡ 172
1ﺍﳌﺮﻛﺐ ﺍﻹﺳﻨﺎﺩﻱ ﻳﺜﲎ ﻋﻦ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ )ﺫﻭ( ﺟﺎﺀ ﺫﻭﺍ ﺍﳊﻖ .ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﺰﺟﻲ ،ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻹﺿﺎﰲ ﻓﻴﺜﲎ ﺃﻭﻟﻪ ،ﺟﺎﺀ ﻋﺒﺪﺍ ﺍﷲ.
2ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺼﻔﻮﺭ ،ﺍﳌﻘﺮﺏ ،ﺹ.403
3
ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻷﻧﺒﺎﺭﻱ ،ﺃﺳﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ،ﺹ.57
173 ﺻﺎﱀ ﳏﺠﻮﺏ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻘﺎﺭﻱ -ﻣﻨﻬﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺒﲑ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ
1ـ ﺍﳌﺮﻛﱠﺐ :ﺍﳌﺮﻛﺐ ﺍﻹﺳﻨﺎﺩﻱ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑٍ ،ﺇﺫ ﺍﺗﻔﻖ ﺍﳉﻤﻴﻊ ﻋﻠﻰ ﲨﻌﻪ ﲨﻌﺎﹰ
ﻏﲑ ﻣﺒﺎﺷﺮ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺎﻻﺳﺘﻌﺎﻧﺔ ﺑﻜﻠﻤﺔ )ﺫﹶﻭﻭ( ،ﺃﻭ )ﺫﹶﻭِﻱ( ،ﻭﻟﻜﻨﻬﻢ ﺍﺧﺘﻠﻔﻮﺍ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺮﻛﺐ ﺍﳌﺰﺟﻲ،
ﻭﺍﻹﺿﺎﰲ ،ﻓﻔﻲ ﺍﳌﺰﺟﻲ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ :ﻳﺠﻤﻊ ﺍﳉﺰﺀﺍﻥ ،ﳓﻮ :ﺳﻴﺒﻮﻳﻪ ـ ﺳﻴﺒﻮﻳﻬﻮﻥ .ﺑﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻳﺮﻯ
ﺁﺧﺮﻭﻥ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺠﻤﻊ ﺍﳉﺰﺀُ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻓﻘﻂ )ﺳِﻴﺒﻮﻥ( .ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﳌﺮﻛﺐ ﺍﻹﺿﺎﰲﱡ ﻓﺄﺷﻬﺮ ﻗﻮﻝٍ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺠﻤﻊ
ﺟﺰﺃﻩ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻓﻘﻂ ،ﻓﻨﻘﻮﻝ :ﻋﺒﺪﻭ ﺍﷲ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﻋﺠﺐٍ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﻟﻜﻮﻓﻴﲔ ﺃﺟﺎﺯﻭﺍ ﲨﻊ ﺍﳉﺰﺀﻳﻦ .ﳑﺎ ﲪﻞ
3
ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺩﺍﱐ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ :ﻻ ﺃﻇﻦ ﺃﺣﺪﺍﹰ ﳚﺘﺮﺉ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ﰲ ﳓﻮ :ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺇﳕﺎ ﺍﷲ ﺇﻟﻪ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ.
2ـ ﺍﻷﻋﻼﻡ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻮﻣﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﺎﺀ ﻣﺜﻞ :ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻳﺔ ،ﻭﲪﺰﺓ ،ﻭﻃﻠﺤﺔ ،ﻓﺎﻟﺒﺼﺮﻳﻮﻥ ﻻ ﳚﻤﻌﻮﺎ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﻤﻊ ،ﺑﻞ ﳚﻤﻌﻮﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﲨﻊ ﺍﳌﺆﻧﺚ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﱂ ،ﻣﻌﺘﻤﺪﻳﻦ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻋﺮ
4
ﻋﺒﻴﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺑﻦ ﻗﻴﺲ ﺍﻟﺮﻗﻴﺎﺕ:
ﺭﺣِــﻢ ﺍﷲُ ﺃﻋﻈﹸﻤــﺎﹰ ﺩﻓﹶﻨﻮﻫــﺎ ﺑِﺴِﺠِﺴﺘﺎﻥﹶ ﻃﹶﻠﺤـﺔﹶ ﺍﻟﻄﱠﻠﹾﺤـﺎﺕِ
ﻭﺧﺎﻟﹶﻔﹶﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﻜﻮﻓﻴﻮﻥ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻁ ،ﻓﺠﻮﺯﻭﺍ ﲨﻊ ﺫﻱ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺀ ،ﺑﺎﻟﻮﺍﻭ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻮﻥ ﻣﻄﻠﻘﹰﺎ؛
ﻓﻘﺎﻟﻮﺍ ﰲ ﻃﻠﺤﺔ ﻭﲪﺰﺓ :ﻃﻠﹾﺤﻮﻥ ﻭﲪﺰﻭﻥ .ﻭﻗﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺪﻭﺍ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﻉ ﻓﻘﻮﳍﻢ
ﰲ )ﻋﻼﻧﻴﺔ( ﻟﻠﺮﺟﻞ ﺍﳌﺸﻬﻮﺭ )ﻋﻼﻧِﻴﻮﻥ( ﻭﰲ )ﺭﺑﻌﺔ() ،ﺭﺑﻌﻮﻥ( .ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﻗﻮﻝ
ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻟِﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮ ﺇﱃ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺃﻭ ﻟﻔﻆ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻤﺔ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺩﻭﻥ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻫﺎ؟ ﻓﻬﻲ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺍﻣﺖ ﺗﺪﻝﱡ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﻣﺬﻛﺮ ،ﻓﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳝﻨﻊ ﲨﻌﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻮﺍﻭ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻮﻥ؟ ﺃﺿﻒ ﺇﱃ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺀ ﲢﺬﻑ ﻣﻊ ﲨﻊ ﺍﳌﺆﻧﺚ
ﺍﻟﺴﺎﱂ )ﺍﻟﻄﱠﻠﺤﺎﺕ( ،ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺬﻛﺮ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﱂ ﻓﻨﻘﻮﻝ :ﻃﻠﺤﻮﻥ ،ﲪﻼﹰ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﺆﻧﺚ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﱂ.
3ـ ﺃﻣﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺎﺕ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺍﺧﺘﻠﻔﻮﺍ ﰲ ﲨﻊ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺯﻥ )ﺃﻓﻌﻞ ﻓﹶﻌﻼﺀ( ﻭ)ﻓﻌﻼﻥﹶ
ﻓﹶﻌﻠﹶﻰ( ﳝﻨﻊ ﺍﻟﺒﺼﺮﻳﻮﻥ ﲨﻊ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻮﺯﻧﲔ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻘﹶﲔ ﺑﺎﻟﻮﺍﻭ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻮﻥ .ﺑﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺃﺟﺎﺯ
ﺍﻟﻜﻮﻓﻴﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ .ﻗﺎﻝ ﺣﻜﻴﻢ ﺍﻷﻋﻮﺭ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻴﺎﺵ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﱯ:
ﻓﻤﺎ ﻭﺟﺪﺕ ﺑﻨـﺎﺕ ﺑـﲏ ﻧِـﺰﺍﺭ ﺣﻼﺋــﻞ ﺃﲪﺮﻳﻨــﺎ ﻭﺃﺳــﻮﺩِﻳﻨﺎﹶ
ﻭﺍﻟﺸﺎﻫﺪ ﰲ) :ﺃﺳﻮﺩﻳﻨﺎ ﻭﺃﺣﻤﺮِﻳﻨﺎ( ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﲨﻊ ﺷﺎﺫﱞ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺼﺮﻳﲔ .ﻭﺃﺟﺎﺯ ﺍﺑﻦ
3
ﻛﻴﺴﺎﻥ )ﺃﲪﺮﻭﻥ( ﻭ)ﺳﻜﺮﺍﻧﻮﻥ( ،ﻣﺴﺘﺪﻻ ﺑﺎﻟﺒﻴﺖ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻖ.
1ﺍﻧﻈﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﺳﻴﺪﻩ ،ﺃﺑﻮ ﺍﳊﺴﻦ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺑﻦ ﺇﲰﺎﻋﻴﻞ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻭﻑ ﺑﺎﺑﻦ ﺳﻴﺪﻩ ،ﺍﳌﺨﺼﺺ )ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮﺓ :ﺍﳌﻄﺒﻌﺔ ﺍﻷﻣﲑﻳﺔ ﺑﺒﻮﻻﻕ،
ﺩ .ﻁ1321 ،ﻫ1904/ﻡ( ،ﺝ ،15ﺹ .79ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻴﻮﻃﻲ ،ﳘﻊ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﻣﻊ ،ﺝ ،1ﺹ.151
2ﺣﺴﻦ ،ﻋﺒﺎﺱ ،ﺍﻟﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﰲ )ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮﺓ :ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺭﻑ ،ﻁ1392 ،4ﻫ1973/ﻡ( ،ﺝ ،1ﺹ) 143ﺍﳍﺎﻣﺶ(.
3
ﺍﻧﻈﺮ :ﺍﻟﺮﺿﻲ ،ﺷﺮﺡ ﻛﺎﻓﻴﺔ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺐ ،ﺝ ،2ﺹ .187ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻴﻮﻃﻲ ،ﳘﻊ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﻣﻊ ،ﺝ ،1ﺹ.152ﻭﻟﻠﺮﺃﻱ
ﺍﻟﻜﻮﰲ ﻭﺟﺎﻫﺘﻪ ﻟﻮﺭﻭﺩ ﺗﺄﻧﻴﺚ )ﻓﻌﻼﻥ( ﺑﺎﻟﺘﺎﺀ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻟﻐﺔ ﺑﲏ ﺃﺳﺪ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻟﻐﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻟﻐﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺏ ﻣﺼﻴﺐ ﰲ ﻧﻄﻘﻪ،
ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﻟﹼﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﻟﻮﺍﻥ ﻻﺃﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﳍﺎ ﻗﻮﻝ ﻏﲑ ﻣﻘﺒﻮﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺇﻃﻼﻗﻪ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺃﻭﺭﺩ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻄﺎﻉ ﰲ
ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﺃﻓﻌﺎﻻﹰ ﳍﺎ .ﺍﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻄﺎﻉ ،ﺃﺑﻮ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺑﻦ ﺟﻌﻔﺮ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻭﻑ ﺑﺎﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻄﺎﻉ ،ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻷﻓﻌﺎﻝ )ﺑﲑﻭﺕ :ﻋﺎﱂ
ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺐ ،ﻁ1403 ،1ﻫ1983/ﻡ( ،ﺝ ،1ﺹ.21
175 ﺻﺎﱀ ﳏﺠﻮﺏ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻘﺎﺭﻱ -ﻣﻨﻬﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺒﲑ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ
1
ﻭﺍﻋﺘﱪﻭﻫﺎ ﻣﻠﺤﻘﺔ ﺑﻪ ،ﻭﻳﻘﺘﺼﺮ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﻉ ،ﻭﻫﻲ:
ﺃﻭﻻﹰ :ﺍﻷﲰﺎﺀ
ﺃ ـ ﺃﲰﺎﺀ ﺍﳉﻤﻮﻉ ،ﻣﺜﻞ) :ﺃﻫﻞ ،ﺃﻫﻠﻮﻥ( .ﻗﺎﻝ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ) ﴾ D C B ﴿ :ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺢ:
.(11ﻭ)ﺫﻭﻭ ،ﺃﻭﻟﻮﺍ( .ﻗﺎﻝ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ) ﴾ Ç Æ Å Ä Ã ﴿ :ﺍﻟﺒﻘﺮﺓ :ﺍ .(269
ﺏ ـ ﻛﻠﻤﺎﺕ ﳍﺎ ﻣﻌﲎ ﺍﳉﻤﻊ ،ﻭﻻ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﳍﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻟﻔﻈﻬﺎ ،ﺃﻭ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻫﺎ ،ﻣﺜﻞ :ﺃﻟﻔﺎﻅ
^_`a ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻮﺩ ﻣﻦ ﻋﺸﺮﻳﻦ ﺇﱃ ﺗﺴﻌﲔ )20ـ .(90ﻗﺎﻝ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ...﴿ :
) ﴾ j i h g f e d c bﺍﻷﻧﻔﺎﻝ.(65 :
ﺝ ـ ﺃﲰﺎﺀ ﺳﻤﻲ ﺎ ﻏﲑ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻗﻞ ﳐﺘﻮﻣﺔ ﺑﻼﺣﻘﺔ ﲨﻊ ﺍﳌﺬﻛﺮ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﱂ ﻣﺜﻞ :ﻋﻠﻴﻮﻥ.
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ) ﴾ r q p o﴿ :ﺍﳌﻄﻔﻔﲔ.(19 :
ﺩ ـ ﻛﻠﻤﺎﺕ ﺗﻜﺴﺮﺕ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﳌﻔﺮﺩ ،ﻭﺟﻤِﻌﺖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺠﺎﺀﻳﻦ ،ﻣﺜﻞ :ﺍﻟﺒﻨﻮﻥ.
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ) ﴾ % $ # " !﴿ :ﺍﻟﻜﻬﻒ.(46 :
ﺖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺠﺎﺀﻳﻦ
ﻫ ـ ﻛﻠﻤﺎﺕ ﺣﺬِﻓﹶﺖ ﻻﻣﻬﺎ ﻭﻋﻮﺽ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺘﺄﻧﻴﺚ ،ﻭﺟﻤِﻌ
©« ª ﴿¦ § ¨ ﻣﺜﻞ :ﺳِﻨﻮﻥ ،ﻭﻋِﺰﻭﻥ ،ﻭﻋِﻀﻮﻥ .ﻗﺎﻝ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ:
¬ ® ﴾ )ﺍﻟﻜﻬﻒ .(25 :ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺟﻞ ﺟﻼﻟﻪ) ﴾ Ù Ø × Ö Õ ﴿ :ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺭﺝ:
،(37ﻭﻗﺎﻝ) ﴾ $ # " !﴿ :ﺍﳊﺠﺮ.(91 :
1ﺍﻟﺮﺿﻲ ،ﺷﺮﺡ ﻛﺎﻓﻴﺔ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺐ ،ﺝ ،2ﺹ .184ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻴﻮﻃﻲ ،ﳘﻊ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﻣﻊ ،ﺝ ،1ﺹ.153
2ﺳﻴﺒﻮﻳﻪ ،ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ،ﺝ ،3ﺹ.578
ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺪﻳﺪ ـــ ﺍﻠﺪ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻊ ﻋﺸﺮ .ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﻼﺛﻮﻥ1434 .ﻫ 2013 /ﻡ 176
ﻭﺃﺳﻴﺎﻓﹸﻨﺎ ﻳﻘﻄﹸﺮﻥﹶ ﻣﻦ ﳒﺪﺓٍ ﺩﻣـﺎ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺍﳉﹶﻔﹶﻨﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻐﺮ ﻳﻠﻤﻌﻦ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻀﺤﻰ
ﻗﺎﻟﻮﺍ :ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺖ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺪﺡ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :ﻟﻨﺎ ﺍﳉِﻔﹶﺎﻥ ،ﻣﻮﺿﻊ )ﺍﳉﹶﻔﹶﻨﺎﺕ(،
ﻭﺳﻴﻮﻓﹸﻨﺎ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ )ﺃﹶﺳﻴﺎﻓﹸﻨﺎ(.
ﻭﱂ ﻳﺴﻠﻢ ﺭﺃﻱ ﺳﻴﺒﻮﻳﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﺪ ،ﻭﺃﻭﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻌﺮﺽ ﻟﻪ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺧﺮﻭﻑ ﻗﺎﺋﻼﹰ:
"ﻭﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮ ﺃﻤﺎ ﳌﻄﻠﻖ ﺍﳉﻤﻊ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻘِﻠﱠﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﹶﺜﹾﺮﺓ 2."....ﻭﻳﺒﺪﻭ ﺃﻥ ﺭﺃﻱ ﺍﺑﻦ
ﺧﺮﻭﻑ ﺃﻗﺮﺏ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺍﺏ؛ ﻷﻥ ﻛﺜﲑﺍﹰ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﻮﺹ ﺍﻟﻨﺜﺮﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﻌﺮﻳﺔ ﺗﺆﻳﺪ ﻣﺎ ﺫﻫﺐ
ﺇﻟﻴﻪ .ﻭﻻ ﺣﺠﺔ ﳌﻦ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﺇﻥ ﻣﺸﺎﺔ ﺍﳉﻤﻊ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﻟﻠﺘﺜﻨﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺳﻼﻣﺔ ﺍﳌﻔﺮﺩ ﺃﺩﺧﻠﺘﻪ ﰲ
ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻘِﻠﱠﺔ ،ﻷﻥ ﻣﺸﺎﺔ ﺷﻲﺀٍ ﻟﺸﻲﺀٍ ﻟﻔﻈﺎﹰ ﻻ ﻳﻘﺘﻀﻲ ﻣﺸﺎﺘﻪ ﻟﻪ ﻣﻌﲎ.
3
ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺸﻬﺎﺩ ﺑﺒﻴﺖ ﺣﺴﺎﻥ ﻓﻘﺪ ﻧﻘﺪﻭﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺘﲔ:
1ـ ﻷﻥﱠ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺑﻐﺔ ـ ﺇﻥﹾ ﺻﺢ ـ ﻗﻠﱠﻠﺖ ﺟِﻔﹶﺎﻧﻚ ﻭﺳﻴﻮﻓﹶﻚ ،ﻓﻴﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞﹲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥﱠ
ﺍﻤﻮﻉ ﺑﺎﻷﻟﻒ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺎﺀ ﻳﺼﺪﻕ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻘِﻠﱠﺔ ،ﻻ ﲨﻊ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﺑﻘِﺴﻤﻴﻪ.
﴿s r ﺇﻥﱠ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺏ ﻗﺪ ﺗﺴﺘﻌﻤﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﻴﻞﹶ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑ .ﻗﺎﻝ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ: 2ـ
{ z y x w v u t
|}~ ¡£¢
®¬«ª ©¨§¦¥ ¤
¯ ) ﴾ ± °ﺍﻷﺣﺰﺍﺏ .(35 :ﻓﺎﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺑﻨﻴﺔ ﻳﺮﺍﺩ ﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﻴﻞﹸ ﻗﻮﻝﹲ
ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻻ ﻳﻘﺎﻝ .ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﺟﻞﱠ ﺟﻼﻟﻪ) ﴾ µ ´ ³ ² ...﴿ :ﺳﺒﺄ .(37 :ﻷ ﱠﻥ
ﺍﳌﻮﱃ ﺟﻞﱠ ﻭﻋﻼ ،ﻻ ﻳﻌِﺪ ﺑﺄﻥﱠ ﰲ ﺍﳉﻨﺔ ﻏﺮﻓﺎﺕ ﻳﺴﲑﺓ ،ﻭﺇﻧﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺍﻹﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﻋﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺇﻢ ﻳﻔﺮﻭﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺜﱢﻘﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳋﻔﱠﺔ ،ﻓﻤﻊ ﺍﳌﻘﺼﻮﺭ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺇﳊﺎﻗﻪ ﺑﻼﺣﻘﺔ ﲨﻊ ﺍﳌﺬﻛﺮ
ﻳﻨﺘﺞ ﻋﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﺭﺑﻊ ﺣﺮﻛﺎﺕٍ ﻗﺼﺎﺭ ،ﺃﻭ ﺣﺮﻛﺘﺎﻥ ﻃﻮﻳﻠﺘﺎﻥ ،ﻓﻴﺨﻔﱠﻒ ﻣﻦ ﻃﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺤﺔ
ﻟﺘﺼﺒﺢ ﻗﺼﲑﺓ ﻣﺜﻞ :ﻣﺼﻄﹶﻔﹶﻰ ﻣﺼﻄﹶﻔﹶﻮﻥﹶ .ﺃﻣﺎ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻻﺳﻢ ﺍﳌﻨﻘﻮﺹ ﻓﺈﻥﱠ ﺇﳊﺎﻕ ﻻﺣﻘﺔ
ﺍﳉﻤﻊ ﺍﳌﺬﻛﺮ )ﻭﻥ( ﻳﻨﺘﺞ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺣﺮﻛﺎﺕٍ ﻣﺘﻨﺎﻓﺮﺓ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻷﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻀﻴﻘﺔ )ﺍﻟﻜﺴﺮﺓ(،
ﻭﺍﳋﻠﻔﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻀﻴﻘﺔ )ﺍﻟﻀﻤﺔ( ﻓﺘﺴﻘﻂ ﺍﻟﻜﺴﺮﺓ ﻣﺜﻞ :ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺿِﻲ ﺍﻟﻘﹶﺎﺿﻮﻥ 1.ﻭﻣﺎ ﺣﺪﺙ ﰲ
ﺍﻻﺳﻢ ﺍﳌﻘﺼﻮﺭ ﻭﺍﳌﻨﻘﻮﺹ ﻫﻮ ﲢﻮﻝﹲ ﻷﺳﺒﺎﺏٍ ﺻﻮﺗﻴﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻭﺍﺿﺢ ،ﻓﺎﻟﺘﺠﺎﻧﺲ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﰐ
ﺃﻣﺮ ﻣﻄﻠﻮﺏ ﰲ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺎﺕ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﺃﺻﻞﹲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﳌﻘﺮﺭﺓ ،ﻓﻨﺠﺪﻫﻢ
ﻳﺴﻜﱢﻨﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ ﰲ )ﻓﹸﻌﻞ( ﲨﻌﺎﹰ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻋﻴﻨﻪ ﻭﺍﻭﺍﹰ ﻣﺜﻞ :ﻋﻮﻥ ﰲ ﲨﻊ ﻋﻮﺍﻥ ﻛﺮﺍﻫﻴﺔ
ﻟﻠﻮﺍﻭ ﺑﲔ ﺿﻤﺘﲔ ،2ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺴﺒﺐ ﺛﻘﻼﹰ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻠﺴﺎﻥ.
ﺏ ـ ﲨﻊ ﺍﳌﺆﻧﺚ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﱂ
ﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺪﻝﱡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺛﻨﺘﲔ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓٍ ﰲ ﺁﺧﺮﻩ ﺃﻏﻨﺖ ﻋﻦ ﻋﻄﻒ ﺍﳌﻔﺮﺩﺍﺕ
ﺍﳌﺘﻤﺎﺛﻠﺔ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻌﲎ ﻭﺍﳊﺮﻭﻑ ﻭﺍﳊﺮﻛﺎﺕ ،ﻭﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺰﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻷﻟﻒ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺁﺧﺮﻩ .ﻭﻫﻮ
3
ﻋﺎﻡ ﻻ ﻳﻘﺘﺼﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻋﻼﻡ ﺍﳌﺆﻧﺜﺎﺕ ،ﻭﻳﻨﻘﺎﺱ ﰲ ﻛﻞﱟ ﳑﺎ ﻳﺄﰐ:
1ـ ﻣﺎ ﺧﺘِﻢ ﺑﻌﻼﻣﺔ ﺗﺄﻧﻴﺚ ﻣﻄﻠﻘﺎﹰ ،ﳌﺬﻛﺮ ﺃﻭ ﻣﺆﻧﺚ ،ﻣﺜﻞ :ﻓﺎﻃﻤﺔ ﻓﺎﻃﻤﺎﺕ ،ﻭﺳﻠﹾﻤﻰ
ﺳﻠﹾﻤﻴﺎﺕ ،ﻭﺯﻫﺮﺍﺀ ﺯﻫﺮﺍﻭﺍﺕ .ﻭﻳﺴﺘﺜﲎ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ )ﺃﻓﻌﻞ ﻓﹶﻌﻼﺀ( ،ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺼﺮﻳﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺧﻼﻑ ﺍﻟﻜﻮﻓﻴﲔ .4ﻭﻳﺴﺘﺜﲎ ﳑﺎ ﺧﺘِﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﺎﺀ :ﺍﻣﺮﺃﺓ ،ﻭﺃﹶﻣﺔ ،ﻭﺷﻔﹶﺔ ،ﻭﺷﺎﺓ ،ﻭﺃﹸﻣﺔ ،ﻭﻣِﻠﱠﺔ.5
2ـ ﻣﺼﻐﺮ ﻣﺎ ﻻ ﻳﻌﻘﻞ ﻣﺜﻞ :ﺩِﺭﻫﻢ ﺩﺭﺍﻫﻢ )ﺩﺭﻳﻬِﻢ ﺩﺭﻳﻬِﻤﺎﺕ(.
3ـ ﻛﻞﱡ ﻋﻠﹶﻢ ﳌﺆﻧﺚ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﻲ ،ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻋﻼﻣﺔ ﺗﺄﻧﻴﺚ ،ﻣﺜﻞ :ﺯﻳﻨﺐ ﺯﻳﻨﺒﺎﺕ.
ﺝ ـ ﺠﻤﻊ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺴﻴﺭ
ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻔﻪ
ﲨﻊ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺴﲑ ﺳﻤﻲ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﺸﺒﻴﻪ ﺑﺘﻜﺴﲑ ﺍﻵﻧِﻴﺔ ،ﻷﻥ ﺗﻜﺴﲑﻫﺎ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺇﺯﺍﻟﺔ
ﺍﻟﺘﺌﺎﻡ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺋﻬﺎ 1.ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻌﲎ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﻮﻱ ﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﻧﻠﺤﻈﻪ ﰲ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﺍﻟﻨﺤﺎﺓ ﳉﻤﻊ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺴﲑ ﺇ ﹾﺫ
ﺣﺪﻭﻩ ﺑﻘﻮﳍﻢ :ﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﺩﻝﱠ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺛﻨﲔ ﺃﻭ ﺍﺛﻨﺘﲔ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻋﺎﻡ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻼﺀ ﻭﻏﲑﻫﻢ،
ﻣﻊ ﺗﻐﻴﲑٍ ﰲ ﺻﻴﻐﺘﻪ 2.ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻐﻴﲑ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳛﺪﺙ ﰲ ﺻﻴﻐﺘﻪ ﻳﻨﻘﺴﻢ ﺇﱃ ﺳﺘﺔ ﺃﻗﺴﺎﻡٍ ﻭﻫﻲ:
﴿v u t s r 1ـ ﺗﻐﻴﲑ ﺑﺰﻳﺎﺩﺓٍ ،ﻣﺜﻞ :ﺻِﻨﻮ ،ﺻِﻨﻮﺍﻥ .ﻗﺎﻝ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ:
) ﴾ y x wﺍﻟﺮﻋﺪ.(4 :
2ـ ﺗﻐﻴﲑ ﺑﻨﻘﺺٍ ﰲ ﺣﺮﻭﻑ ﺍﳌﻔﺮﺩ ،ﻭﺗﻐﻴﲑ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺸﻜﻞ ﻣﺜﻞ :ﻏﹸﺮﻓﺔ ،ﻏﹸﺮﻑ .ﻗﺎﻝ
ﺗﻌﺎﱃ) ﴾ ¿ ¾ ½ ¼ » º ¹ ¸ ¶﴿ :ﺍﻟﺰﻣﺮ.(20 :
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺯﻋﻢ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﳌﹸﺤﺪﺛﲔ 3ﺃﻥﱠ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻀﺮﺏ ،ﳝﻜﻦ ﺇﺩﺧﺎﻟﹸﻪ ﲢﺖ ﺍﺳﻢ ﺍﳉﻨﺲ ﺍﳉﻤﻌﻲ،
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺮﻏﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻳﻔﺘﺮﻕ ﻋﻦ ﺍﺳﻢ ﺍﳉﻨﺲ ﺑﺄﻧﻪ ﻳﻘﺒﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﺄﻧﻴﺚ .ﻧﻘﻮﻝ :ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﻑ ،ﻓﺨﻠﻮ
4
ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺼﻴﻐﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺀ ﻻ ﻳﺪﺧﻠﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺍﺳﻢ ﺍﳉﻨﺲ ﺍﳉﻤﻌﻲ.
﴿Ð Ï Î ﺗﻐﻴﲑ ﺑﺎﻟﺸﻜﻞ ﻓﻘﻂ ،ﻣﺜﻞ :ﺳﻘﻒ ،ﺳﻘﹸﻒ .ﻗﺎﻝ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ: 3ـ
{ | } ~ ¡ ﴾ )ﺍﻟﻄﻮﺭ.(24 :
ﻭﱂ ﻧﺸﺮ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺘﻐﻴﲑ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﺭ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺃﺷﺎﺭ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺳﻴﺒﻮﻳﻪ ﺑﻘﻮﻟﻪ" :ﻭﻗﺪ ﻛﹸﺴﺮ ﺣﺮﻑ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ
)ﻓﹸﻌﻞ( ﻛﻤﺎ ﻛﹸﺴﺮ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ )ﻓﹶﻌﻞﹲ( ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻗﻮﻟﻚ ﻟﻠﻮﺍﺣﺪ :ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻔﹸﻠﻚ ﻓﺘﺬﻛﱢﺮ ،ﻭﻟﻠﺠﻤﻴﻊ :ﻫﻲ
ﺍﻟﻔﹸﻠﹾﻚ 1."...ﻓﻬﻮ ﻳﺮﻯ ﺃﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺻﻴﻐﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻔﺮﺩ ﻭﺍﳉﻤﻊ ،ﻓﻴﻘﺪﺭ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺯﻭﺍﻝ
ﺣﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﻔﺮﺩ ،ﻭﺇﺑﺪﺍﳍﺎ ﲝﺮﻛﺎﺕٍ ﺗﺪﻝﱡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳉﻤﻊ .ﻭﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻹﺷﺎﺭﺓ ﺇﱃ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻐﻴﲑ ﻣﺮﺩﻩ ﺇﱃ
ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻐﻴﲑ ﻣﺒﲏ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻓﺘﺮﺍﺿﺎﺕ ،ﻭﺍﳌﻨﻬﺞ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻔﻲ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺴﲑ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﻳﺮﻓﺾ
ﺍﻻﻓﺘﺮﺍﺿﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺄﻭﻳﻼﺕ ،ﻭﻳﺘﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﻮﻳﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺏ ﻳﺒﺪﻭ ﺃﻥﱠ
ﺍﻟﺮﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺫﻫﺐ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﰲ "ﺍﻟﺘﺴﻬﻴﻞ" ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻞ :ﺑﺄﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻤﺎﺕ ﻣﺜﻞ :ﻓﹸﻠﹾﻚ ،ﻭﻫِﺠﺎﻥ
ﻭﺩِﻻﹶﺹ ...ﺃﲰﺎﺀُ ﲨﻮﻉٍ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﺋﺐ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ،ﻷﻥﱠ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﻐﻨﺎﺀً ﻋﻦ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮ
2
ﺍﻟﺘﻐﻴﲑ ،ﻭﻋﻠﻴﻪ ،ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻻﺷﺘﺮﺍﻙ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﻔﺮﺩ ﻭﺍﺳﻢ ﺍﳉﻤﻊ ،ﻻ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﻔﺮﺩ ﻭﺍﳉﻤﻊ.
ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﱂ ﺗﺘﻢ ﺍﻹﺷﺎﺭﺓ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺘﻐﻴﲑ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﺭ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻹﺷﺎﺭﺓ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺎ ﺃﲰﻮﻩ )ﺍﻟﻘﺴﻤﺔ
ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻠﻴﺔ( 3 ،ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻌﻘﻮﻟﻴﺔﹰ ،ﺇﺫ ﱂ ﻳﻮﺭﺩﻭﺍ ﻟﻪ ﻣﺜﺎﻻﹰ .ﳔﻠﺺ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥﱠ ﲨﻊ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺴﲑ ﻫﻮ
ﲨﻊ ﻻ ﻳﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﺈﺿﺎﻓﺔ ﻻﺣﻘﺔ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻔﺮﺩﻩ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳊﺎﻝ ﰲ ﺍﳉﻤﻊ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺢ ،ﺑﻞ ﻳﺘﻢ
4
ﺑﺘﻐﻴﲑٍ ﺃﻭ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺃﻭ ﻧﻘﺼﺎﻥ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﳊﺮﻑ ﺃﻭ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ.
ﺍﻟﻘِﻠﱠﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﹶﺜﹾﺮﺓ
ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻐﻴﲑ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﰲ ﲨﻊ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺴﲑ ﺃﺩﻯ ﺇﱃ ﻧﺸﻮﺀ ﺻﻴﻎٍ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﻗﺴﻤﻬﺎ
ﺍﻟﻨﺤﺎﺓ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺴﻤﲔ :ﺃ ـ ﺻﻴﻎ ﻟﻠﻘِﻠﱠﺔ .ﺏ ـ ﺻﻴﻎ ﻟﻠﻜﹶﺜﹾﺮﺓ.
ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﲪﻠﻬﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺴﻴﻢ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﻷﻋﺪﺍﺩ ﻏﲑ ﻣﺘﻨﺎﻫﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﹶﺜﹾﺮﺓ ،ﻓﺎﺳﺘﺤﺎﻝ
ﻣﻌﻬﺎ ﻭﺿﻊ ﻣﺜﺎﻝٍ ﻟﻜﻞﱢ ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭٍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﻤﻊ ،ﻓﻜﺎﻥ ﺃﻳﺴﺮ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻕ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﻴﻞ
ﻭﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑ ،ﻓﻮﺿﻌﻮﺍ ـ ﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﻨﺤﺎﺓ ـ ﺻِﻴﻐﺎ ﻟﻠﻘﻠﱠﺔ ،ﻭﺻﻴﻐﺎ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻟﻠﻜﺜﺮﺓ 1.ﻭﻗﺎﻟﻮﺍ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺍﳉﻤﻊ
ﺍﻟﺴﺎﱂ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﺩﺍﻝﱞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻘِﻠﱠﺔ ﻭﺳﺒﻖ ﺃﻥ ﺭﺟﺤﻨﺎ ﺭﺃﻱ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺧﺮﻭﻑ ﰲ ﺻﻼﺣﻴﺔ
2
ﺍﳉﻤﻊ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﱂ ﻟﻠﻘﻠﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﹶﺜﹾﺮﺓ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺮﻳﻨﺔ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﱵ ﲢﺪﺩ ﺫﻟﻚ.
ﺍﶈﺪﺛﲔ .ﻭﺃﻭﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺛﺎﺭ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻛﺔ ﺿﺪ ﻣﻘﻮﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻘِﻠﱠﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﹶﺜﹾﺮﺓ ﻫﻮ ﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺃﻧﻴﺲ ـ ﺭﲪﻪ ﺍﷲ ـ
"ﺇﻥﱠ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﻟﹶﺘﻔﺮﻕ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳉﻤﻮﻉ ﻓﺘﺠﻌﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﻴﻎ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻔﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﻘِﻠﱠﺔ ،ﻭﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻔﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﻜﹶﺜﹾﺮﺓ
ﺣﺴﺐ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻨﺤﺎﺓ ...ﻧﺮﻯ ﻛﻞﹼ ﻫﺬﺍ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﺤﺎﺓ ،ﻭﳕﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﻭﺭ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻙ ﰲ
﴿³ ² ﺻِﺤﺘِﻪ ،ﺃﻭ ﻣﻄﺎﺑﻘﺘﻪ ﻟﻸﺳﻠﻮﺏ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﰊ ،ﻓﺎﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﱘ ،ﻣﻠﻲﺀ ﺑﺄﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺍﻵﻳﺎﺕ:
´ ) ﴾ µﺳﺒﺄ.(37 :ﻭﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ) ﴾ L K ﴿ :ﺍﻟﺒﻘﺮﺓ .(228 :ﳑﺎ ﻳﱪﻫِﻦ ﻋﻠﻰ
1
ﺃﻥ ﻓﻜﺮﺓ ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺹ ﺍﻟﻘِﻠﱠﺔ ﺑﺼﻴﻎٍ ،ﱂ ﺗﻜﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻈﻮﺍﻫﺮ ﺍﳌﻠﺰﻣﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ."...
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺿﻌﻒ ﺷﻮﻗﻲ ﺿﻴﻒ ﺃﻗﻮﺍﻝ ﺍﻟﻨﺤﺎﺓ ﻗﺎﺋﻼﹰ :ﺑﺄﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻣﺮﺟﺢ ﻳﺴﻮﻍ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﺎﻝ ﺇﺎ
ﺗﺴﺘﻌﻤﻞ ﺗﺎﺭﺓﹰ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻤﺎﻻﹰ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﻴﺎ ،ﻭﺗﺎﺭﺓﹰ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻤﺎﻻﹰ ﳎﺎﺯﻳﺎ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺍﻷﻟﻒ ﻭﺍﻟﻼﻡ
ﻟﻼﺳﺘﻐﺮﺍﻕ ،ﻭﺇﺿﺎﻓﺔ ﺻﻴﻎِ ﺍﻟﻘِﻠﱠﺔ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺪﻝﱡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻜﹶﺜﹾﺮﺓ ﳚﻌﻠﻬﺎ ﺩﺍﻟﱠﺔﹰ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ،ﻗﻮﻝﹲ
ﺿﻌﻴﻒ ،ﻭﺧﻼﺻﺔ ﺭﺃﻳﻪ ﺃﻥ ﲨﻊ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺴﲑ ﺻﺎﱀﹲ ﻟﻠﺪﻻﻟﺔ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻘِﻠﱠﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﹶﺜﹾﺮﺓ،
2
ﻣﺴﺘﺪﻻﹰ ﺑﺘﺒﺎﺩﻝ ﺍﻟﺼﻴﻎ ﰲ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺁﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺬﻛﺮ ﺍﳊﻜﻴﻢ.
ﰒ ﺃﺩﱃ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﻮﺡ ﺑﺪﻟﹾﻮِﻩ ﻓﺄﺑﺎﻥ ﺑﺄﻥﹼ ﻗﻀﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻘِﻠﱠﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﹶﺜﹾﺮﺓ ﳝﻜﻦ ﻫﺪﻣﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺳﺎﺳﻬﺎ
ﻣﺴﺘﺪﻻﹰ ﲟﺎ ﺭﺁﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻨﺎﻭﺏٍ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺼﻴﻎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﱘ 3.ﻭﺟﺎﺀ ﻣِﻦ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻫﺆﻻﺀ ﺷﻮﻗﻲ
ﺍﻟﻨﺠﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺃﺑﺪﻯ ﺣﻴﺮﺗﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻣﺮﻳﻦ :ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﲢﺪﺩ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﻘِﻠﱠﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﹶﺜﹾﺮﺓ ،ﻭﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻟﻐﻮﻱ
ﻳﺮﻓﻀﻬﺎ .ﻭﺧﺮﺝ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﺎﻗﺾ ﺑﺮﻓﺾ ﻓﻜﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘِﻠﱠﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﹶﺜﹾﺮﺓ ﻣﻌﺘﻤﺪﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺩﻟﱠﺔٍ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ:
ﺇﻥﱠ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﱘ ﺃﻟﻔﺎﻇﺎﹰ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﺇﱃ ﻋﺸﺮﺓ ،ﻭﺍﳌﻌﺪﻭﺩ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﲨﻊ ﻛﺜﺮﺓ ،ﻭﻋﺪﻡ
ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺻﻴﻐﺘﲔ ﻟﻜﻞ ﺍﺳﻢٍ ﺇﺣﺪﺍﳘﺎ ﻟﻠﻘِﻠﱠﺔ ﻭﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ﻟﻠﻜﹶﺜﹾﺮﺓ ﻳﻨﻔﻲ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺳﺎﺳﻬﺎ ،ﺇﺫﺍ
ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﳍﺪﻑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺴﻴﻢ ﻟﻠﻘِﻠﱠﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﹶﺜﹾﺮﺓ ﲢﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﻴﻞ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑ ،ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﺗﻘﺴﻴﻢ
ﻭﺭﺩﺕ ﺻﻴﻐﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ،ﻓﺎﻻﺳﺘﻌﻤﺎﻝ ﻟﻠﻘﻠﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﺜﺮﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻴﺼﻞ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺎﻕ ﳌﺰﻳﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺼﻴﻞ ﺭﺍﺟﻊ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻘﺎﺭﻯ ،ﻣﺮﺟﻊ
ﺳﺎﺑﻖ ،ﺹ 55ﻭ.56
1ﺃﻧﻴﺲ ،ﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ،ﻣﻦ ﺃﺳﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺔ ،ﺹ.154-152
2ﺿﻴﻒ ،ﺷﻮﻗﻲ ،ﺗﻴﺴﲑﺍﺕ ﻟﻐﻮﻳﺔ )ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮﺓ :ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺭﻑ ،ﺩ .ﻁ1410 ،ﻫ1990/ﻡ( ،ﺹ 62ﻭ.63
3ﺃﺑﻮ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﻮﺡ ،ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﺼﺮﻑ ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺻﺮﻓﻴﺔ ،ﺹ.153-150
ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺪﻳﺪ ـــ ﺍﻠﺪ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻊ ﻋﺸﺮ .ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﻼﺛﻮﻥ1434 .ﻫ 2013 /ﻡ 184
ﻓﺎﻗﺪ ﻟﻠﺪﻻﻟﺔ ﻷﻥﱠ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺃﺣﺪ ﻋﺸﺮ ﻳﺘﺴﺎﻭﻯ ﻣﻊ ﺃﻟﻒ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻨﺎﻭﺏ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺼﻴﻎ ﺍﺗﻜﺎﻻﹰ ﻋﻠﻰ
1
ﺍﻟﻘﺮﻳﻨﺔ ﺃﻛﱪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞٍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺿﻌﻒ ﻓﻜﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘِﻠﱠﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﹶﺜﹾﺮﺓ.
ﺍﻟﺭ ﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻵﺭﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺒﻘﺔ
ﻳﻼﺣﻆ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﺮﺿﲔ ﺃﺭﺍﺩﻭﺍ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺼِﻠﻮﺍ ﺇﱃ ﻫﺪﻓِﻬﻢ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺪﻡ ﻣﻘﻮﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻘِﻠﱠﺔ
ﻭﺍﻟﻜﹶﺜﹾﺮﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺳﺎﺳﻬﺎ ،ﻣﺘﻨﺎﺳﲔ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﳌﻘﻮﻟﺔ ﻣﺒﻨﻴﺔﹲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺳﺎﺳﲔ ،ﻭﳘﺎ:
1ـ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻠﻜﻠﻤﺔ ﺻﻴﻐﺔﹲ ﺧﺎﺻﺔﹲ ﺑﻜﻞ ﲨﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﻤﻌﲔ ،ﺃﻣﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﳍﺎ ﺇﻻ
2
ﺻﻴﻐﺔﹲ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓﹲ ،ﻓﺈﻧﻬﺎ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﺗﺴﺘﻌﻤﻞ ﻟﻠﻘﻠﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﹶﺜﹾﺮﺓ.
2ـ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻻﺳﻢ ﺛﻼﺛﻴﺎ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻏﲑ ﺛﻼﺛﻲ ﻓﺎﻟﺼﻴﻐﺔ ﺻﺎﳊﺔﹲ ﻟﻠﻘﻠﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﹶﺜﹾﺮﺓ،
? @DCBA ﻣﺜﻞ :ﻣﺴﺠِﺪ ،ﻣﺴﺎﺟِﺪ .ﻗﺎﻝ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ...﴿ :
) ﴾ H G F Eﺍﳊﺞ:
.(40
ﻭﺍﻧﺒﺜﻖ ﻋﻦ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻃﹶﲔ ﺷﺮﻁﹲ ﺛﺎﻟﺚﹲ ﺧﺎﺹ ﲜﻤﻊ ﺍﻟﻘِﻠﱠﺔ ،ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﳊﻘﻪ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﺑﺎﻷﻟﻒ
ﻭﺍﻟﻼﻡ ،ﺃﻭ ﺍﻹﺿﺎﻓﺔ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺻﺎﳊﺎﹰ ﻟﻠﻜﺜﺮﺓ ﺑﺎﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﳉﻨﺲ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻐﺮﺍﻕ 3.ﻭﻗﺪ ﻭﺻﻒ ﺿﻴﻒ ﻫﺬﺍ
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻁ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴﻞ ﺑﺄﻧﻪ ﻭﺍﻩٍ .ﻭﺍﳊﻖ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻁ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴﻞ ﻻ ﻏﺒﺎﺭ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ،ﺑﻞ ﻳﺘﻤﺎﺷﻰ ﻣﻊ
ﺍﳌﻨﻬﺞ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻔﻲ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻨﺎﺩِﻱ ﲟﻌﺎﳉﺔ ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﻮﻳﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺳﺎﺱ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻈﱠﻮﺍﻫﺮ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ،
ﻓﺘﺨﺮﻳﺞ ﺍﻟﻨﺤﺎﺓ ﻟﺘﻨﺎﻭﺏ ﺻﻴﻎ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺴﲑ ﺃﻣﺎﻛﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮ ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﲔ ﻟﻐﻮﻳﺔ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻣﺴﻠﻚ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ
ﺃﻥ ﳛﺴﺐ ﳍﻢ ﻻ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ،ﻓﺎﻟﻠﱡﻐﺔ ﻣﻨﻈﻮﻣﺔﹲ ﻣﺘﻼﲪﺔﹸ ﺍﻷﻃﺮﺍﻑ ،ﻟﻮ ﺧﺼﺖ ﻛﻞﱡ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺓٍ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺑﻘﺎﻧﻮﻥ
ﲟﻨﺄﻯ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻈﱠﻮﺍﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﻮﻳﺔ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ،ﻟﻘﺎﺩ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﹶﻚ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﺎﻗﺾ ﻭﺍﻻﺿﻄﺮﺍﺏ .ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺤﺎﺓ ﻗﺮﺭﻭﺍ
ﺃﻥ ﺩﺧﻮﻝ )ﺍﻟـ( ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻤﺔ ﻳﻔﻴﺪ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻐﺮﺍﻕ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﻃﺒﻘﻮﻩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺻﻴﻎ ﺍﻟﻘِﻠﱠﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ
ﺍﻗﺘﺮﺍﺎ ﺑـ)ﺃﻟـ( ،ﻓﺄﻳﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻮﻫﻦ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻭﺻﻒ ﺑﻪ ﺿﻴﻒ ﲣﺮﻳﺞ ﺍﻟﻨﺤﺎﺓ؟
1ﺍﻟﻨﺠﺎﺭ ،ﺷﻮﻗﻲ ،ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﻟﻐﻮﻳﺔ )ﺟﺪﺓ :ﻣﻄﺒﻮﻋﺎﺕ ﺎﻣﺔ ،ﻁ1404 ،1ﻫ1984/ﻡ( ،ﺹ.130-123
2ﺍﻟﺼﺒﺎﻥ ،ﺣﺎﺷﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﺒﺎﻥ ،ﺝ ،4ﺹ 120ﻭ.121
3ﺍﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻘﺎﺭﻯ ،ﲨﻊ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺴﲑ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﱘ ،ﺹ.63
185 ﺻﺎﱀ ﳏﺠﻮﺏ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻘﺎﺭﻱ -ﻣﻨﻬﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺒﲑ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ
ﻧﻨﺘﻘﻞ ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﶈﺪﺛﲔ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺻﻴﻎ ﺍﻟﻘِﻠﱠﺔ ﻳﻨﻮﺏ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺑﻌﺾ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺬﱢﻛﺮ ﺍﳊﻜﻴﻢ،
ﻭﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺏ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻗﻮﻝﹲ ﻏﲑ ﻣﻨﻜﹶﺮ ،ﻭﻟﻜﻨﻪ ﱂ ﻳﻐِﺐ ﻋﻦ ﺫﻫﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺤﺎﺓ ،ﺑﻞ ﺃﺷﺎﺭﻭﺍ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ
ﺻﺮﺍﺣﺔ .ﺃﺿﻒ ﺇﱃ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﺎﻭﺏ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﻗﹸﺐ ﻻ ﻳﻌﺪ ﺧﺮﻭﺟﺎﹰ ﻋﻦ ﺳﻨﻦ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺔ
1
ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺤﻔِﻞﹸ ﺑﺎﺎﺯ ،ﺑﻞ ﻳﻌﺪ ﺍﺎﺯ ﻭﺳﻴﻠﺔﹰ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺳﺎﺋﻞ ﺗﻨﻤﻴﺔ ﻭﺇﺛﺮﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ.
ﻭﻛﻞ ﻣﺎ ﺫﻛﺮﻭﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻟﻔﺎﻅٍ ﻭﺭﺩﺕ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﱘ ﻭﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺏ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ
ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻬﺎﹰ ﻣﻘﺒﻮﻻﹰ ﻳﻘﺒﻠﻪ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻞ ﻭﺍﳌﻨﻄﻖ ،ﻭﻗﻮﺍﻧﲔ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ.
ﺃﻣﺎ ﻣﺎ ﺫﻫﺐ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻨﺠﺎﺭ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺴﻴﻢ ﺇﱃ ﻗﻠﱠﺔ ﻭﻛﺜﺮﺓ ﻳﻔﺘﻘﺪ ﻟﻠﺪﻻﻟﺔ ،ﻷﻧﻪ ﻳﺴﺎﻭﻱ
ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩﻳﻦ ﺃﺣﺪ ﻋﺸﺮ ﻭﺃﻟﻒ ﻣﺜﻼﹰ 2،ﻓﻬﻮ ﻗﻮﻝ ﻳﺘﻨﺎﰱ ﻣﻊ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﳋﻔﱠﺔ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﲡﻨﺢ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ
ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺎﺕ ،ﻓﺎﳉﻨﻮﺡ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﺨﻒ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺪﻭﻝ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﺜﻘﹶﻞ ـ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﺪ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﺑﻦ
ﺟﲏ ـ ﺃﺻﻞﹲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ 3.ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳋﻔﱠﺔ ﻭﺍﻻﺧﺘﺼﺎﺭ ﺑﻨِﻲ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺍﳉﻤﻊ ،ﻭﺍﻷﻋﺪﺍﺩ ﻏﲑ
ﻣﺘﻨﺎﻫﻴﺔ ،ﻓﻤﻦ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﺤﻴﻞ ﺃﻥﹾ ﳔﺺ ﻛﻞﹼ ﻋﺪﺩٍ ﺑﺪﻻﻟﺔٍ ﻣﻌﻴﻨﺔ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﲪﻞ ﺍﻟﻨﺤﺎﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﻴﻞ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑ ﺑﺼﻴﻐﺘﲔ ،ﻭﺻﻨﻴﻌﻬﻢ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻳﻨﺴﺠﻢ ﻣﻊ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﳋﻔﱠﺔ
ﻭﺍﻻﺧﺘﺼﺎﺭ .ﻭﻻ ﺃﺩﺭﻱ ﻟِﻢ ﺃﻧﻜﺮ ﺍﻟﻨﺠﺎﺭ ﺩﻭﺭ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺎﻕ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﺋﻦ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﻴﻴﺰ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻷﺷﻜﺎﻝ
ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﻮﻳﺔ؟ 4ﻋﻠﻤﺎ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺍﳌﺒﲎ ﺍﻟﺼﺮﰲﱠ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪ ﻳﺼﻠﺢ ﻷﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻌﲎ ،ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻀﻴﻖ
ﻣﺪﻯ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﺗﺴﺎﻉ ﻫﻮ ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﺋﻦ ﺍﳌﻮﺟﻮﺩﺓ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﺺ ،ﻓﺒﻮﺍﺳﻄﺘﻬﺎ ﻧﺴﺘﻄﻴﻊ
5
ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻮﻝ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﻌﲎ ﺍﳌﻘﺼﻮﺩ.
ﻭﻧﺴﺘﻄﻴﻊ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩﺍﹰ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﺳﺒﻖ ،ﺃﻥ ﳒﻬﺮ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺇﻥﱠ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﲨﻊ ﻗﻠﱠﺔ ﻭﲨﻊ ﻛﺜﺮﺓ،
ﻭﺃﻥﱠ ﲨﻊ ﺍﻟﻘِﻠﱠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺛﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻌﺸﺮﺓ ،ﻭﺃﻥﱠ ﲨﻊ ﺍﻟﻜﹶﺜﹾﺮﺓ ﻳﺒﺪﺃ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﺸﺮﺓ ،ﻭﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻤﺎﻝ
ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻟﻠﻜﻠﻤﺔ ﲨﻊ ﻗﻠﺔ ،ﻭﲨﻊ ﻛﺜﺮﺓ ﻫﻮ ﻣِﻦ ﻗﹶﺒﻴﻞ ﺍﺎﺯ.
ﺨﹶﺎﺘِﻤﺔ
ﻓﺎﻟﺘﺜﻨﻴﻪ، ﻭﲨﻊ، ﻭﻣﺜﲎ،ﻓﱢﻖ ﺍﻟﻨﺤﺎﺓ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺫﻫﺒﻮﺍ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻘﺴﻴﻢ ﺍﻻﺳﻢ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻔﺮﺩﻟﻘﺪ ﻭ
ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺜﻨﻴﺔ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﺳﺎﺑﻘﺔ ﻟﻠﺠﻤﻊ،ﺪﻑ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺼﺎﺭ ﻨﻦ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﱵﻭﺍﳉﻤﻊ ﺟﺎﺀﺍ ﻭﻓﻖ ﺳ
:ﻭﻗﺪ ﺗﻮﺻﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺇﱃ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ. ﺔ ﻭﳍﺎ ﻇﻬﻮﺭ ﺑﺎﺭﺯ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴ،ﻭﻫﻲ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﻳﺔ
. ﻭﲨﻊ، ﻭﻣﺜﲎ، ﰲ ﺗﻘﺴﻴﻢ ﺍﻻﺳﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴﺚ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻔﺮﺩ ﺳﻼﻣﺔ ﻣﻨﻬﺞ ﺍﻟﻘﹸﺪﺍﻣﻰ-1
.ﺔ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﻗﻴﻬﺎ ﻻﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳓﻄﺎﻃﻬﺎ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺯﻋﻢ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﺸﺮﻗﻮﻥ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﳌﺜﲏ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴ-2
.ﻴﺎﻕ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺮﺩ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺻﻼﺣﻴﺔ ﺍﳉﻤﻊ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﱂ ﺑﻨﻮﻋﻴﻪ ﻟﻠﻘﻠﻴﻞ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑ ﻭﻓﻘﺎﹰ ﻟﻠﺴ-3
References: :ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻊ
AbË ×ayyÉn, MuÍammad ibn YËsuf, TafsÊr al-BaÍr al-MuÍÊÏ, MajmËÑat min al-
MuÍaqqiqÊn (Beirut: DÉr al-Kutub al-ÑIlmiyyah,, 1st edition 1413/1993).
AbË al-FutËÍ, MuÍammad AbË al-FutËÍ, ÑIlm al-Øarf (Cairo: DÉr al-MaÑÉrif, 1406/1986).
Al-×amlÉwÊ, AÍmad, ShadhÉ al-ÑArf fÊ Fann al-Øarf, ed. MusÏafÉ ÑAbd al-AzÊz (Cairo: no
publisher information, 1418/1998)
Al-BadÊÑÊ, YËsuf, al-ØubÍ al-MunbÊ an ×aithiyyat al-MutanabbiÒ, ed. MusÏafÉ al-SaqÉ,
MuÍammad al-ShaÏÉ and ÑAbduh ZiyÉdah (Cairo: DÉr al-MaÑÉrif, 3rd edition,
1414/1994).
Al-BaghdadÊ, ÑAbd al-QÉdir bin ÑUmar, KhizÉnat al-Adab wa Lubb LubÉb LisÉn al-ÑArab,
ed. ÑAbd al-SalÉm HÉrËn (Cairo: Maktabat al-KhÉnjÊ, 1st edition, 1403/1983).
Al-BukhÉrÊ, MuÍammad bin IsmÉ‘Êl, al-JÉmi‘ al-ØaÍÊÍ (ØaÍÊÍ al- BukhÉrÊ), ed. MusÏafÉ DÊb al-
BughÉ (Beirut: DÉr Ibnu KathÊr, 3rd edition, 1987).
Al-JurjanÊ, ÑAbd al-QÉhir AbË ÑAlÊ al-×asan bin AÍmad, al-MuqtaÎid fÊ SharÍ al-ÔÌÉÍ, ed.
KÉÐim BaÍr al-MarjÉn (Baghdad: WizÉrat al-ThaqÉfah, 1402/1982).
Al-KhuÌarÊ, MuÍammad al-DimyÉÏÊ al-ShÉfiÑÊ, ×Éshiyat al-KhuÌarÊ ÑalÉ SharÍ Ibn ÑAqÊl ÑalÉ
Alfiyyat Ibn MÉlik (Cairo: MaÏbaÑat al-×alabÊ, 1359/1940).
Al-Mubarrid, AbË al-ÑAbbas MuÍammad bin YazÊd, al-KÉmil fÊ al-Lughah wa al-Adab wa
al-NaÍw wa al-TaÎrÊf, ed. MuÍammad AbË al-FaÌl and al-Sayyid ShaÍÍÉtah
(Cairo: DÉr NahÌat MiÎr, no date).,
Al-MuÍibbÊ, MuÍammad AmÊn FaÌl AllÉh, JanÉ al-Jannatayn fÊ TamyÊz NawÑay al-
Muthannayayn (Beirut: DÉr al-ÓfÉq al-JadÊdah, 1st edition, 1401/1981).
Al-NajjÉr, ShawqÊ, MushkilÉt Lughawiyyah (Jeddah: MatbËÑÉt TihÉmah, 1st edition,
1404/1984).
Al-ØabbÉn, MuÍammad bin AlÊ, ×Éshiyat al-ØabbÉn ÑalÉ al-AshmËnÊ li Alfiyyat Ibn MÉlik
(Beirut: DÉr al-Fikr, 1374/1900).
187 ﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺒﲑ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﻣﻨﻬﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴ- ﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻘﺎﺭﻱﺻﺎﱀ ﳏﺠﻮﺏ ﳏﻤ
Al-RaÌÊ al-IstarabÉdhÊ, MuÍammad al-×asan, SharÍ Shafiyat Ibn al-×Éjib, ed. MuÍammad NËr,
MuÍammad al-ZafzÉf and MuÍammad MuÍyÊ al-DÊn (Beirut: DÉr al-Kutub al-ÑIlmiyyah,
1402/1982).
Al-SuyËÏÊ, JalÉl al-DÊn ÑAbd al-RaÍmÉn, HamÑ al-HawÉmiÑ fÊ SharÍ JamÑ al-JawÉmiÑ, ed.
AÍmad Shams al-DÊn (Beirut: DÉr al-Kutub al-ÑIlmiyyah, 1st edition, 1418/1998).
Al-ZawzanÊ, AbË ÑAbd AllÉh al-Husayn, Min SaÑat al-ÑArabiyyah (Beirut: DÉr al-JÊl, 1st
edition, 1414/1994).
Al-ZawzanÊ, AbË ÑAbd AllÉh al-Husayn, SharÍ al-MuÑallaqÉt al-SabÑ (Beirut: Maktabat al-
MaÑÉrif, 1400/1980).
AnÊs, IbrÉhÊm, Min AsrÉr al-Lughah al-ÑArabiyyah (Cairo: al-AnjlË al-MiÎriyyah, 2nd edition,
1405/1985).
Bergsträsser, Gotthelf, al-TaÏawwur al-NaÍwÊ li al-Lughah al-ÑArabiyyah, translation:
RamaÌÉn ÑAbd al-TawwÉb (Cairo: Maktabat al-KhÉnjÊ, 1402/1982).
Brockelmann, Carl, Fiqh al-LughÉt al-SÉmiyyah, translation: RamaÌÉn ÑAbd al-TawwÉb
(Riyadh: JÉmiat al-RiyÉÌ, 1397/1977).
Eltingari, Salih Mahgoub Mohamed, "JamÑ al-TaksÊr fÊ al-QurÒÉn al-KarÊm: DirÉsah
Øarfiyyah wa NaÍwiyyah wa DilÉliyyah", unpublished Ph. D thesis, IIUM, 2003.
×asan, ÑAbbÉs, al-NaÍw al-WÉfÊ (Cairo: DÉr al-MaÑÉrif, 4th edition, 1392/1973).
×assÉn, TamÉm, ManÉhij al-BaÍth fÊ al-Lughah (Cairo: AnjlË al-MiÎriyyah, 1410/1990).
Ibn al-AnbÉrÊ, KamÉl al-DÊn AbË al-BarakÉt ÑAbd al-RaÍmÉn bin MuÍammad bin AbÊ
SaÑÊd, AsrÉr al-ÑArabiyyah, ed. MuÍammad Bahjat al-BayÏÉr (Damascus: al-
MajmaÑ al-ÑIlmÊ, no date).
Ibn al-AnbÉrÊ, KamÉl al-DÊn AbË al-BarakÉt ÑAbd al-RaÍmÉn bin MuÍammad bin AbÊ
SaÑÊd, al-Bulghah fÊ al-Farq bayna al-Mudhakkar wa al-MuÒannath, ed. RamaÌÉn
ÑAbd al-TawwÉb (Cairo: DÉr al-Kutub al-MiÎriyyah, 1398/1970).
Ibn al-QaÏÏÉÑ, AbË al-QÉsim ÑAlÊ bin JaÑfar al-SaÑdÊ, KitÉb al-AfÑÉl (Beirut: ÑAlam al-Kutub, 1st
edition, 1403/1983).
Ibn al-ShajarÊ, AbË al-SaÑÉadat Hibat AllÉh al-×asanÊ, AmÉlÊ, ed. MaÍmËd MuÍammad al-
ÙanÉjÊ (Cairo: Maktabat al-KhanjÊ, 1413/1992).
Ibn HishÉm, AbË MuÍammad ÑAbd AllÉh JamÉl al-DÊn al-AnÎÉrÊ, Qatar al-NadÉ wa Ball
al-ØadÉ, ed. ÙÉhÉ MuÍammad al-ZaynÊ & MuÍammad ÑAbd al-MunÑim KhafÉjÊ
(Cairo: DÉr al-ShaÑb, no date).
Ibn JinnÊ, AbË al-FatÍ ÑUthmÉn, al-KhaÎÉÒiÎ, ed. MuÍammad ÑAlÊ al-NajjÉr (Cairo: DÉr al-
KitÉb al-ÑArabÊ, 1372/1952).
Ibn MÉlik, JamÉl al-DÊn MuÍammad bin MÉlik, Sharh al-KÉfiyah al-ShÉfiyah, ed. ÑAlÊ
MuÍammad MuaÑwwad & Ódil AÍmad (Beirut: DÉr al-Kutub al-ÑIlmiyyah, 1st
edition, 1420/2000).
Ibn ÑAqÊl, BahÉÒ al-DÊn ÑAbd AllÉh, SharÍ Ibn ÑAqÊl ÑalÉ Alfiyyat Ibn MÉlik (Beirut: DÉr al-
Fikr, 1414/1994).
Ibn ÑUÎfËr, ÑAlÊ bin MuÒmin, al-Muqarrab, ed. AÍmad ÑAbd al-SattÉr al-JubbËrÊ, ÑAbd
(Baghdad: MaÏbaÑat al-ÑÓnÊ, 1388/1971).
Ibn ÑUÎfËr, ÑAlÊ bin MuÒmin, ÑIlal al-Tathniyah, ed. ØubÍ al-TamÊmÊ (Cairo: Maktabat al-
ThaqÉfah al-DÊniyyah, 1413/1992).
Ibn Sayyidah, AbË al-×asan ÑAlÊ bin IsmÉÑÊl, al-MukhaÎÎiÎ (Cairo: al-MaÏbaÑah al-
ﻡ2013 / ﻫ1434 . ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﻼﺛﻮﻥ. ﻠﺪ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻊ ﻋﺸﺮﺍﻟﺘﺠﺪﻳﺪ ـــ ﺍ 188