The document discusses two road signages. The first warns that an area is accident-prone, while the second states that crossing is prohibited because someone died there. The second signage is likely more persuasive as it references a death. Guidelines for appropriate text media appear to be followed as the messages are clear, readable, and understandable.
The document discusses two road signages. The first warns that an area is accident-prone, while the second states that crossing is prohibited because someone died there. The second signage is likely more persuasive as it references a death. Guidelines for appropriate text media appear to be followed as the messages are clear, readable, and understandable.
The document discusses two road signages. The first warns that an area is accident-prone, while the second states that crossing is prohibited because someone died there. The second signage is likely more persuasive as it references a death. Guidelines for appropriate text media appear to be followed as the messages are clear, readable, and understandable.
- The signages are telling that people are not allowed to cross because it is an accident prone area. 2. What are their similarities and differences? - Those two signages both tells the danger thatmight occur when passing on the said place. In the first signage, it tells that there is pathway for people and it will be dangerous for them to pass. While in the second signage, there is a pathway but people are not allowed to cross because someone was died in there and it’s a sign that danger may occur on the said place. 3. Which signages do you think may the public easily persuaded to follow? Why? - The second signages maybe because, if people reads that someone died in there, they will not cross in that area. 4. Do you think the guidelines in producing appropriate text media is being applied in the following signages above? Why? - Yes, Because the text clearly stated the message, also it is readable and easy to understand.