Professional Documents
Culture Documents
7/4/2013
Design (Proportioning) of Shallow Foundation:
Types
Factors to be considered for depth of
foundation
Spread footing design
Depth of Footings
4
Dr. Hussein M. Al.Khuzaie; halkhuzaie@yahoo.co.uk
(b) Possible settlement of "existing" footing because of loss of lateral
support of soil wedge beneath existing footing.
b) generally for
cohesive soil;
17
Dr. Hussein M. Al.Khuzaie; halkhuzaie@yahoo.co.uk
D = dead loads, or related internal moments and forces,
E = load effects of earthquake, or related internal
moments and forces,
F = loads due to weight and pressures of fluids with well-
defined densities and controllable maximum heights, or
related internal moments and forces
H = loads due to weight and pressure of soil, water in
soil, or other materials, or related internal moments and
forces,
L = live loads, or related internal moments and forces,
Lr = roof live load, or related internal moments and forces
R = rain load, or related internal moments and forces,
S = snow load, or related internal moments and forces,
T = cumulative effect of temperature, creep, shrinkage,
differential settlement, and
shrinkage-compensating concrete,
W = wind load, or related internal moments and forces
18
Dr. Hussein M. Al.Khuzaie; halkhuzaie@yahoo.co.uk
Moment Requirements
The ultimate concrete strength f′c in USD is reduced for workmanship
and other uncertainties
by use of () factors (Art 9.3) as follows:
Table: (S-1)
Concrete strain at ultimate stress is taken as 0.003 according to Art. 10.3.2, and the
yield strength fy of reinforcing steel is limited to 550 MPa (80 ksi) per Art. 9.4.
The most popular grade of reinforcing steel in current use has fy = 400 MPa
(Grade 400 or 60 ksi).
Dr. Hussein M. Al.Khuzaie; halkhuzaie@yahoo.co.uk 19
The maximum factored moment in an isolated footing is
determined by passing a vertical plane through the footing at the
critical sections shown in Fig (S-1).
(15-1)
*Table ratios shown are 0.75 pb for ensuring a tensile rebar failure per ACI Art. 10.3.3.
!Values are slightly approximate for Fps units.
Shear often governs the design of spread footings. The ACI Code
allows shear to be computed as:
26
Dr. Hussein M. Al.Khuzaie; halkhuzaie@yahoo.co.uk
Shear strength of a footing supported on soil or
rock in the vicinity of the supported member
(column or wall) must be determined for the
more severe of the two conditions stated in
11.11. Both wide-beam action (11.11.1.1) and
two-way action (11.11.1.2) must be checked to
determine the required footing depth.
28
Dr. Hussein M. Al.Khuzaie; halkhuzaie@yahoo.co.uk
Two-way Shear (Punching Shear)
Eq. (11-31) accounts for the effect of , which is the ratio of the
long side to the short side of the column, concentrated load, or
reaction area.
31
Dr. Hussein M. Al.Khuzaie; halkhuzaie@yahoo.co.uk
the shear strength equations may be summarized as follows:
32
Dr. Hussein M. Al.Khuzaie; halkhuzaie@yahoo.co.uk
33
Dr. Hussein M. Al.Khuzaie; halkhuzaie@yahoo.co.uk
Wall footing:
support walls that may be either bearing or nonbearing walls
Spread footings are usually designed to use 3 ksi < f'c < 4 ksi,
whereas modern structural members frequently use concrete
between the range of 4 ksi < f'c < 8 ksi. A higher concrete strength
helps reduction the member’s size. However, the footing’s design
is govern by the bearing capacity and settlement. That means that
the strength of the soil might be limiting factor, and a higher
concrete strength would not be relevant.
Where a footing must carry a load greater than 500 kips, an f'c =
5 ksi might be justified.
Since flexural stresses are usually small, a grade 40 steel would
usually be adequate. The most common grade used for
construction is Grade 60 steel, which is almost universally used in
the world today.
55
Dr. Hussein M. Al.Khuzaie; halkhuzaie@yahoo.co.uk
The typical details of a spread footing, as sketched for drafting.
The standard thicknesses T are given in English Units as
multiples of 3": 12", 15", 18"..., etc. A high precision in specifying
the depth of excavation Df is unnecessary. ACI code specifies
that at least 3 inches of concrete cover must be included from
ground contact, which takes into consideration irregularities in
the excavation and corrosion factors.
56
Dr. Hussein M. Al.Khuzaie; halkhuzaie@yahoo.co.uk
Design Criteria.
57
Dr. Hussein M. Al.Khuzaie; halkhuzaie@yahoo.co.uk
Design Steps.
60
Dr. Hussein M. Al.Khuzaie; halkhuzaie@yahoo.co.uk
qavg = Q / A = 1600 kN / 10 m2 = 160 kPa
qmax = 130[1 + 6(0.5)] = 217 kPa < 200 x 1.33 = 266 kPa
4d2 + 2(b + c) d – BL qo / vc = 0
65
Dr. Hussein M. Al.Khuzaie; halkhuzaie@yahoo.co.uk
Step 5. Compute the required longitudinal flexural steel area As.
67
Dr. Hussein M. Al.Khuzaie; halkhuzaie@yahoo.co.uk
Dr. Hussein M. Al.Khuzaie; halkhuzaie@yahoo.co.uk 68
Dr. Hussein M. Al.Khuzaie; halkhuzaie@yahoo.co.uk 69
Dr. Hussein M. Al.Khuzaie; halkhuzaie@yahoo.co.uk 70
Foundation Engineering
Combined Footings
2/5/2013
- Rectangular Footings.
- Trapezoidal Footings.
- Cantilever or Strap Footings
72
Dr. Hussein M. Al.Khuzaie; halkhuzaie@yahoo.co.uk
This photo shows an
example of combined
footings used in a heavy
industrial plant, where
the machinery
loads place very large
loads upon relatively
confined space.
The use of combined
footings helps spread
out the loads out to the
adjacent footings in
order to minimize
stresses in
the footings and reduce
the differential
settlement between
them.
92
Dr. Hussein M. Al.Khuzaie; halkhuzaie@yahoo.co.uk
Dr. Hussein M. Al.Khuzaie; halkhuzaie@yahoo.co.uk 93
Dr. Hussein M. Al.Khuzaie; halkhuzaie@yahoo.co.uk 94
95
Dr. Hussein M. Al.Khuzaie; halkhuzaie@yahoo.co.uk
96
Dr. Hussein M. Al.Khuzaie; halkhuzaie@yahoo.co.uk
Dr. Hussein M. Al.Khuzaie; halkhuzaie@yahoo.co.uk 97
98
Dr. Hussein M. Al.Khuzaie; halkhuzaie@yahoo.co.uk
Dr. Hussein M. Al.Khuzaie; halkhuzaie@yahoo.co.uk 99
100
Dr. Hussein M. Al.Khuzaie; halkhuzaie@yahoo.co.uk
Dr. Hussein M. Al.Khuzaie; halkhuzaie@yahoo.co.uk 101
Foundation Engineering
108
Dr. Hussein M. Al.Khuzaie; halkhuzaie@yahoo.co.uk
Types of Mat foundations
111
Dr. Hussein M. Al.Khuzaie; halkhuzaie@yahoo.co.uk
Dr. Hussein M. Al.Khuzaie;
halkhuzaie@yahoo.co.uk 112
Analysis of Rigid Mats
The analysis of a mat by assuming that it is rigid simplifies the soil
pressures to either a uniform condition or varying linearly. This is
attained by not permitting R (the resultant force) to fall outside the
kern of the mat. Hence, the corner stress is,
113
Dr. Hussein M. Al.Khuzaie; halkhuzaie@yahoo.co.uk
Analysis and Design Procedure for Rigid Mats
114
Dr. Hussein M. Al.Khuzaie; halkhuzaie@yahoo.co.uk
Analysis and Design Procedure for Rigid Mats
115
Dr. Hussein M. Al.Khuzaie; halkhuzaie@yahoo.co.uk
Dr. Hussein M. Al.Khuzaie;
halkhuzaie@yahoo.co.uk 116
Example
Using the Independent
Strip Method, analyze
and design the 16.5 m
by 21.5 m mat shown
in the figure.
122
Dr. Hussein M. Al.Khuzaie; halkhuzaie@yahoo.co.uk
Dr. Hussein M. Al.Khuzaie; halkhuzaie@yahoo.co.uk
123
Dr. Hussein M. Al.Khuzaie;
halkhuzaie@yahoo.co.uk 124
Solution