RS Pile Fesability Report

Raising star Pile Feasibility Report
FEASIBILITY REPORT
RAISING STAR MOBILE
INDUSTRIAL RCC BUILDING
K&K CONSULTANTS
Architects & Consultants
K&K CONSULTANTS i
Instructions
This document is a feasibility report, on the Comparisons of the cost for the 600mm dia pile at
9m,15m and 20m depth for the footing as per design requirement.
Document Purpose
The purpose of the feasibility report is to present the project parameters and define the potential
solutions to the defined problem, need, or opportunity. Having brainstormed a variety of potential
solutions, the Consultants expands on each of these potential solutions, providing sufficient detail,
including very high-level costing information, to permit the contractor to recommend to the
approving authority all of the viable potential solutions that should be further analyzed in the next
phase. Project constraints and limitations of expenditure are among the various factors that will
determine viability.
This feasibility report is a document that assesses potential solutions to arrive net cost of
foundation for the footings with the piles at various depths required as per the structural design of
the structure, and determines which of these depth piles are viable for further analysis.
K&K CONSULTANTS ii
Table of Contents
Instructions .................................................................................................................................... ii
Authority Signatures .................................................................................................................... iii
1 Executive Summary ..........................................................................................................5
2 Problem Statement ............................................................................................................5
3 Project Business Requirement..........................................................................................5
4 Assessment of Options.......................................................................................................6
5 Risk Assessment of Viable Options ..................................................................................7
6 Recommended Options for Further Analysis .................................................................8
List of Appendices
Appendix 1 – References..................................................................................................................9
Appendix 2 – Glossary ...................................................................................................................10
K&K CONSULTANTS iv
Raising Star Feasibility Report
1 Executive Summary
The Geotechnical Investigations Results Carried Out by Ehyeh Consultancy Services authorized
by the M/s. K&K Consultants, For the Proposed Construction of (G+3) Factory Building at
Sriperumbudur, 602105 for The Raising Star Mobile.
The Standard Penetration Testing for 20 boreholes was drilled at the site up to a maximum depth
of 10.5m, 20.0m & 25.0m below existing ground level.
Based on the borehole information and laboratory test results in addition to the nature of
structure, the pile foundation is recommended for the proposed structure.
Bedrock was not encountered up to a maximum explored depth. Hence, bored Piles shall be
adopted for the proposed structures. The Pile capacities of the bored piles are worked out
considering a depth of 20 m, 15 m and 9 m below ground level as the top of pile level. Estimation
of Pile capacities are given below with reference to the boreholes drilled at site.
PILE CAPACITY CALCULATIONS
Pile Depth (m) Pile Diameter Allowable Pile Lateral load Uplift
(mm) Load Capacity bearing Resistance(kN)
(kN) capacity(kN)
20 600 1590 135.15 770
15 600 1170 99.45 520
9 600 550 46.75 230
2 Problem Statement
The project expenditure depends on the various constrains like quantity of material, execution
machineries requirement and manpower requirement etc.,
The total numbers of piles required for the structure and the pile cap sizes varies to the each of the
depth as the pile at higher depth gives high load carrying capacity and vice versa. The number of
piles depends on the design load of column. As per the design requirement of structure the
adequate numbers of piles and pile caps are arrived for each of the above-mentioned depth of the
pile based on its capacity and compared for its costing to find out the best viable option.
3 Project Design Requirement
PILE GROUPING
The group efficiency shall be worked out based on number of Piles in a group. Piles shall have a
maximum spacing of 2.5 times diameter centre to centre or minimum 1.5 times diameter as clear
spacing in order to mobilise frictional resistance, which is a key factor in achieving better Pile
capacities. Larger spacing is always preferable, in case of bored piles.
K&K CONSULTANTS 5
PILE GROUP EFFICENCY

Pile group efficiency will depend on the pattern of arrangement of piles and number of piles in a
group. An efficiency of about 60 to 70% shall be considered for the on-site soil condition, in
general. However, it shall be decided based on pile load tests. Sequence of casting of Piles shall
be such that the adjacent Piles do not get affected during Pile drilling. Tremmie concrete shall be
carried out in order to minimise segregation. Water-cement ratio shall also be controlled in order
not to be affected by water, existing inside the Pile boring. Gradual pull out of Pile casing is
necessary, to avoid necking of Piles.
UPLIFT CAPACITY
Uplift capacity of piles shall be considered as 50% of the ultimate frictional capacity of Piles.
PILE TESTING The group efficiency shall be worked out based on number of Piles in a group.
However, Pile load tests are recommended to observe the performance of the Piles and to re-
confirm the theoretical Pile capacities. Load tests to be carried out after a minimum period of 1
week after driving of Pile. minimum 2.5 times the service load on test Piles. A minimum of two
pile load test can be conducted for this project.
FOUNDATION CONSIDERATIONS
A PCC (Plain Cement Concrete) layer of 20cm thickness is recommended below the pile cap /
foundation. Any over excavation in the foundation trenches should be re-filled by plain concrete
and any disturbed and loose materials found in the foundation trenches should be removed before
placement of P.C.C.
4 Assessment of Options
Option 1
20m Notes / Comments
Description of Option 600mm dia pile at 20m depth

Option Evaluation Criteria
Alignment with Desired Business Numbers of piles and sizes of pile caps are lesser than other options. So,
Objectives the execution is faster and shuttering quantity for pile cap required is less
leads to advantage in commercial part.
Technical Fit to Target At 20m the better soil stiffness available as per bore hole data. And the
Enterprise design pile grouping for 20m pile gives more efficiency and execution ease.
Costs Rs 180704177.41
Cost Benefit Rs 7892122.93 less than option 2, Rs 156918849.95 less than option 3
Potential Risks that impact the As since there is a differential soil stratum at overall plot of site, in some
ability to Deliver Desired location the drilling encountered at 9m during test pile execution hence
Business Outcomes high-speed motor equipment shall be used for the drilling the pile.
Rationale for Rejection or for Due to lesser cost and more structural integrity this option is the most
Recommending further Analysis recommended option that suits the proposed structure at this soil
condition.
Overall Viability Most viable.
K&K CONSULTANTS 6
Option 2
15m Notes / Comments

Alignment with Desired Business Numbers of piles and sizes of pile caps are lesser than options 3 but more
Objectives than option 1. Overall pile running meter is less compared to option 1
saves the cost of pile, but cost of pile cap is higher than option 1.
Technical Fit to Target All the design requirements are satisfied with the 15m deep pile but the
Enterprise design more numbers of piles at single pile group is not a viable option for
execution.
Costs Rs 188596300.34
Cost Benefit Rs 149026727.02 less than option 3
Potential Risks that impact the As since there is a differential soil stratum at overall plot of site, in some
ability to Deliver Desired location the drilling encountered at 9m during test pile execution hence
Business Outcomes high-speed motor equipment shall be used for the drilling the pile.
Rationale for Rejection or for Due to higher cost than option 1 and more numbers of pile shall have
Recommending further Analysis more pile chipping work leads to time delay of work this option is a
rejection option that is not suitable to the proposed structure at this soil
condition.
Overall Viability least viable.
Option 3
9m Notes / Comments

Alignment with Desired Business Numbers of piles and sizes of pile caps are higher than other options.
Objectives
Technical Fit to Target More numbers of piles lead to difficulty of pile cap arrangement. All the
Enterprise design material quantity is more than other options
Costs Rs 337623027.36
Cost Benefit nil
Potential Risks that impact the Material requirement and man power requirement is more and leads to
ability to Deliver Desired heavy delay in project with huge loss
Business Outcomes
Rationale for Rejection or for Due to higher cost than other options and more numbers of pile and
Recommending further Analysis huge area of pile cap work shall have more pile chipping work and
shuttering work leads to time delay of work, so this option is a rejection
option that is not suitable to the proposed structure at this soil condition.
Overall Viability Not viable.
5 Risk Assessment of Viable Options
Compared to the above three options the option 1 with 600mm dia pile at 20m is the most viable
option based on both cost and structural integrity of the project. When it comes to 20m the
drilling of pile is going to more challenging job as it has been already encountered during the
execution of test pile. So better supervision with more experienced pile vendor shall be appointed
to execute such crucial job, the vendor should have high speed drilling machines to drill at this
soil strata. This shall be confirmed by the contractor.
K&K CONSULTANTS 7
6 Recommended Options for Further Analysis
Based on the techno-commercial analysis the best recommended option of pile is 600mm dia pile
at 20m depth. On the client’s satisfaction the contractor shall confirm the consultant to do further
analysis on the option 1 (pile at 20m depth) to conclude the design.
K&K CONSULTANTS 8
Appendix 1 – References
No. Reference Document Name

1 Pile Load calculation design at 20m
4 Pile and pile cap layout drawing for 20m pile
7 Cost analysis pile.
8 Cost analysis pile cap
9 Cost analysis summary
K&K CONSULTANTS 9
Appendix 2 – Glossary
Term Definition
Dia Diameter
m meter
KN Kilonewton
K&K CONSULTANTS 10
Project (G+2) Factory Building
Client M/s . K&K Consultants
Site Sriperumbudur
DESIGN OF PILE FOUNDATION(Refer:BH-01)
1.0 Type of Installation of Pile Bored Cast in Situ

1.1 Geometrical Data
Assumed Diameter of pile(D) : 600.00 mm
Length of Pile : 20.00 m
1.2 Design of Pile for Vertical Compression
1.2.1 Computation of Skin Resistance:
Layer-I
Type of Strata : Clay
Length of strata,lc 7.00
Average SPT of the strata,N : 27
3
Bulk Density of the strata, γ : 16.24 kN/m
2
Undrained Shear Strength (Cu) : 32.50 kN/m
2
Adhesion, σ : 2.00 kN/m
Skin Resistance of the pile,qs : 857.22 kN
(q :σ*Cu*pi*d*Ic)
1.2.1.1 Layer-II
Type of Strata : Sand
Average SPT of the strata,N : 53.00
3
Angle of Shearing Resistance - Limited to a Maximum of : 32.00 Deg
tan phi 0.62
Top of Strata : 7.00 m
Bottom of Strata : 20.00 m
Average Thickness of Strata,Ic : 13.00 m
2
Effective overburden pressure at the middle of the strata,σ middle : 95.68 kN/m
Coef. Earth Pressure at Rest 1.00
(qs: σ *k*tanф *pi()*d*Ic)
1.2.2 Computation of End Bearing Resistance:

Type of Bearing Strata : sand
Dia of pile : 0.60 m
2
Cross-Sectional Area of pile,Ap : 0.2826 m
R.L of bottom of pile : 20.00
Minimum SPT-value of the Bearing Strata : 50.00
Bearing Capacity Factor(Nq) : 36.70
2
Effecitve Over Burden Pressure at the bottom of pile (q) : 160.00 kN/m
Ultimate End Bearing Resistance (Qp) : 1659.43 kN
(Qp=Ap*Nc*qu)
1.3.0 Ultimate Load Carrying Capacity (Qs+Qp) : 3980.04 kN
Safe Load Carrying Capacity (Qsafe =Qu/2.5) : 1592.0 kN
say 1590 kN
Lateral Load Bearing Capacity 135.15 kN
Ultimate uplift resistance 2320.61 kN

Safe Uplift resistance 773.54 kN
Say 770 kN
Site Sriperumbudur

Layer-I
3
2
2
(q :σ*Cu*pi*d*Ic)
1.2.1.1 Layer-II
3
tan phi 0.62
2

2
2
(Qp=Ap*Nc*qu)
say 1170 kN

Say 520 kN
Site Sriperumbudur

Layer-I
3
2
2
(q :σ*Cu*pi*d*Ic)
1.2.1.1 Layer-II
3
tan phi 0.62
2

2
2
(Qp=Ap*Nc*qu)
say 550 kN

Say 230 kN
PC15
PC3 PC4 PC4 PC8 PC4 PC4 PC3

PC8 PC8 PC8
PC6 PC13 PC6 PC13 PC13 PC13 PC6 PC6
PC1 PC12
PC3 PC3 PC3 PC3 PC3
PC6 PC9 PC9 PC5

PC7 PC7 PC7 PC2 PC7 PC2 PC2 PC2 PC2 PC1 PC10 PC7
PC5 PC9
PC1 PC1 PC1 PC1 PC10 PC1 PC1 PC1 PC1 PC10 PC1 PC12 PC11
PC14
PC5 PC9
PC14
PC5 PC9
PC14
PC6 PC9 PC7 PC5

PC7 PC7 PC2 PC1 PC1 PC1 PC7 PC7 PC10 PC1 PC1 PC10
PC3 PC3 PC3 PC3 PC3 PC3
PC4 PC4
PC3 PC1 PC8 PC4 PC4 PC8 PC8 PC4 PC4 PC12 PC3
PC13 PC5 PC5 PC6 PC6 PC5 PC5 PC6 PC6
SL.NO FOOTING NO OF PILES PILE L B D TOP RFT BOT RFT SIDE FACE RFT SHEAR LINKS GROUP
NAME DIA
SL.NO FOOTING NO OF PILES PILE L B D TOP RFT BOT RFT SIDE FACE RFT SHEAR LINKS GROUP
NAME DIA
PANSEN ENGINEERING INDIA PVT LTD
PROJECT:FACTORY BUILDING PROJECT LOCATION:SRIPERUMBATUR.
CLIENT NAME: M/s.RAISING STAR MOBILES Date: 08-11-2021.
COSTING FOR 20.00 RM PILE

Rate Not
S.no Activity Description Unit Qty Cost Not Including Tax
Including Tax
Pile Hydralic drilling (Including Machineries,Diesel
1 R.M 13680.00 889 1,21,61,520.00
cost,Etc)
2 Pile M35 Concrete (Tremic concreting) Cu.m 3867.93 12765 4,93,74,112.09
3 Demolition of pile top layer (Manual) Nos 684.00 1967 13,45,428.00
4 Pile Reinforcement rebar Including Labour cost Tonne 367.45 150972 5,54,75,151.02
5 Cover block (Lumpsum) Nos 41.6 -
TOTAL 11,83,56,211.11
Rate Not
Including Tax

1 R.M 11925.00 889 1,06,01,325.00
cost,Etc)
TOTAL 10,35,63,296.33

Rate Not
Including Tax
1 R.M 13950.00 889 1,24,01,550.00
cost,Etc)
TOTAL 12,23,69,056.46
COSTING FOR 20.00 RM PILE & PILECAP
Rate Not
Including Tax

1 R.M 889 -
cost,Etc)
2 Pilecap M35 Concrete (Tremic concreting) Cu.m 2300.04 12765 2,93,60,010.60
3 Demolition of pile top layer (Manual) Nos 1967 -
4 Pilecap Reinforcement rebar Including Labour cost Tonne 218.50 150972 3,29,87,955.69
TOTAL 6,23,47,966.29
COSTING FOR 15.00 RM PILECAP

Rate Not
Including Tax
1 R.M 889 -
cost,Etc)
TOTAL 8,50,33,004.00
COSTING FOR 9.00 RM PILECAP

Rate Not
Including Tax
1 R.M 889 -
cost,Etc)
TOTAL 21,52,53,970.89
PILECAP
S.NO DESCRIPTION PILE AMOUNT TOTAL AMOUNT
AMOUNT
1 COSTING FOR 20.00 RM PILE & PILECAP 11,83,56,211.11 6,23,47,966.29 18,07,04,177.41
2 COSTING FOR 15.00 RM PILE &PILECAP 10,35,63,296.33 8,50,33,004.00 18,85,96,300.34
3 COSTING FOR 9.00 RM PILE & PILECAP 12,23,69,056.46 21,52,53,970.89 33,76,23,027.36

RS Pile Fesability Report

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

RS Pile Fesability Report

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Raising star Pile Feasibility Report

INDUSTRIAL RCC BUILDING

3 Project Design Requirement

PILE GROUP EFFICENCY

Description of Option 600mm dia pile at 20m depth

Description of Option 600mm dia pile at 15m depth

Description of Option 600mm dia pile at 9m depth

5 Risk Assessment of Viable Options

6 Recommended Options for Further Analysis

No. Reference Document Name

4 Pile and pile cap layout drawing for 20m pile

5 Pile and pile cap layout drawing for 15m pile

6 Pile and pile cap layout drawing for 9m pile

7 Cost analysis pile.

8 Cost analysis pile cap

9 Cost analysis summary

DESIGN OF PILE FOUNDATION(Refer:BH-01)

1.0 Type of Installation of Pile Bored Cast in Situ

1.2.2 Computation of End Bearing Resistance:

Lateral Load Bearing Capacity 135.15 kN

Ultimate uplift resistance 2320.61 kN

DESIGN OF PILE FOUNDATION(Refer:BH-01)

1.0 Type of Installation of Pile Bored Cast in Situ

1.2.2 Computation of End Bearing Resistance:

Lateral Load Bearing Capacity 99.45 kN

Ultimate uplift resistance 1569.53 kN

DESIGN OF PILE FOUNDATION(Refer:BH-02)

1.0 Type of Installation of Pile Bored Cast in Situ

1.2.2 Computation of End Bearing Resistance:

Lateral Load Bearing Capacity 46.75 kN

Ultimate uplift resistance 584.16 kN

PC3 PC4 PC4 PC8 PC4 PC4 PC3

PC6 PC9 PC9 PC5

PC6 PC9 PC7 PC5

COSTING FOR 20.00 RM PILE

3 Demolition of pile top layer (Manual) Nos 684.00 1967 13,45,428.00

5 Cover block (Lumpsum) Nos 41.6 -

COSTING FOR 15.00 RM PILE

Pile Hydralic drilling (Including Machineries,Diesel

2 Pile M35 Concrete (Tremic concreting) Cu.m 3371.71 12765 4,30,39,933.24

3 Demolition of pile top layer (Manual) Nos 795.00 1967 15,63,765.00

5 Cover block (Lumpsum) Nos 41.6 -

COSTING FOR 9.00 RM PILE

3 Demolition of pile top layer (Manual) Nos 1550.00 1967 30,48,850.00

5 Cover block (Lumpsum) Nos 41.6 -

Pile Hydralic drilling (Including Machineries,Diesel

2 Pilecap M35 Concrete (Tremic concreting) Cu.m 2300.04 12765 2,93,60,010.60

3 Demolition of pile top layer (Manual) Nos 1967 -

5 Cover block (Lumpsum) Nos 41.6 -

COSTING FOR 15.00 RM PILECAP

3 Demolition of pile top layer (Manual) Nos 1967 -

5 Cover block (Lumpsum) Nos 41.6 -

COSTING FOR 9.00 RM PILECAP

3 Demolition of pile top layer (Manual) Nos 1967 -

5 Cover block (Lumpsum) Nos 41.6 -

2 COSTING FOR 15.00 RM PILE &PILECAP 10,35,63,296.33 8,50,33,004.00 18,85,96,300.34

3 COSTING FOR 9.00 RM PILE & PILECAP 12,23,69,056.46 21,52,53,970.89 33,76,23,027.36

You might also like