You are on page 1of 4

The Low Incidence of Colorectal Cancer

in a ‘High-Risk” Population:
Its Correlation with Dietary Habits

PAUL ROZEN, MD, SHLOMO M. HELLERSTEIN, MD, AND CRYSTAL HORWITZ,’ PHD

In Israel, the incidence of colorectal cancer is highest in European-American-born Jews, although this
incidence is lower than that found in European-born Jews living in the United States. A significantly
lower-than-expected incidence was found in a specific kibbutz established by immigrants of European
origin. Matched population samples from this kibbutz and the city of Tel Aviv revealed significant
differences in dietary habits. The kibbutz members ate more unavailable carbohydrate and ascorbic acid
and had a higher dietary polyunsaturated to saturated fat (P/S)ratio than the city dwellers. Both groups
ate more crude fiber, less saturated fat, and less beef than has been reported from America and European
countries. This kibbutz diet seems to have prevented large bowel cancer, parallels the “prudent” diet
of Wynder, and possibly indicates the feasibility of colorectal cancer prevention.
Cancer 482692-2695, 1981.

T HE HIGH A N D , I N SOME CASES, rising incidence of


colorectal cancer in many countries having a west-
ern European-American lifestyle has led to a concerted
this malignancy compared with those coming from Asia
or Africa.I2 Tel Aviv has a high incidence of colorectal
cancer because of its large proportion of elderly im-
search for its possible causes. I n addition to genetic migrants from Europe or America.” However, when
influences, in most cases it is believed that environ- we extended the screening program (to be reported else-
mental factors, especially dietary, play a dominant where) to a nearby kibbutz (communal farm) composed
role.’.* Most of these studies, as to be expected, have of a similar population, we were surprised by its low
been retrospective and have pointed out the possible incidence of colorectal cancer. It became apparent, that
roles of ch~lesterol,~ fat,4 meat,’ fiber,6 and vitamins’ for the last 20 years, the kibbutz members have kept
as causative or protective agents. However, few inves- to a low-animal-fat, high-residue diet in an attempt to
tigators in this field have proposed preventive dietary prevent arteriosclerotic heart disease. This provided a
recommendation^.^*^.^ unique opportunity to compare the dietary habits and
Within a program for the early detection of large colorectal cancer rates in these two populations.
bowel tumors, we have deliberately sought populations
assumed to be at high risk because of their demographic Patients and Methods
or epidemiologic characteristics.”*” One such group is
the European or American-born immigrant to Israel The kibbutz is situated on the coastal plain, a 20-
who has approximately 2% times the risk of developing minute drive from Tel Aviv. It was founded 51 years
ago, mainly by Eastern European and German-born
From the Departments of Gastroenterology and *Dietetics, Mu- immigrants. The population ( 1600 residents, including
nicipal-Governmental Medical Center, Ichilov Hospital and the Tel 990 full members) has remained stable for the last 20
Aviv University Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv, Israel. years. They have a mixed economy based on agricul-
Supported by the Israel Cancer Fund (Canada) and the Israel Can-
cer Association. ture, light industry, and tourism. Their standard of liv-
Address for reprints: P. Rozen, MD, Ichilov Hospital, Weizmann ing is comparable to that of an urban middle-class fam-
Street, Tel Aviv, Israel. ily, as determined by on-site inspection and comparison
The authors thank the members, medical staff and Head Nurse,
Hava Givoni, of Kibbutz Givat Brenner for their cooperation; N. of their per capita income with national figures.
Levin of the Ministry of Health, Jerusalem and M. Modan of the C.
Sheba Medical Center for their assistance in analyzing the data; Dr.
D. Schottenfeld, New York, for reviewing the manuscript. The dietary Large Bowel Cancer Rate
data on the Tel Aviv residents are part of a larger unpublished survey
by Drs. Gilat and Horwitz on dietary factors in gallstone disease. In the kibbutz population, the large bowel cancer rate
Accepted for publication November 8, 1980. was ascertained by reviewing the medical records at the

0008-543)3/81/ I21 5/2692 $0.70 0 American Cancer Society

2692
No. 12 COLORECTAL
CANCERAND DIETARYHABITS . Rozen et al. 2693

TABLEI . Characteristics of the Tel Aviv and Kibbutz by the National Water Carrier; its contents are uniform
Population Samples
throughout central Israel.
Tel Aviv Kibbutz The dietary habits of 88 Tel Aviv residents, matched
~~~ ~

as closely as possible to the kibbutz group by age, sex,


Number 88 75
Males %! 48.9 46.7
social level, years in Israel, and country of birth, were
Age (years) (mean f SD) 55.8 f 10.7 58.3 f 10.4 ascertained by the same team of dieticians using the
Years in Israel same interview technique. They were chosen at random
(mean f SD) 36.3 f 14.4 40.2 t 9.5
Years in Kibbutz
from the hospital staff and outpatients, excluding those
(mean f S D ) - 36.8 f 10.2 with chronic gastrointestinal disorders or those keeping
European or American to any special diet. To prevent any bias by the inter-
origin, 95 I00 86.3
Weight, kg (mean f SD) 70.6 f 11.9 66.1 k 10.3 viewer~,’~ they were told that the project concerned
Height (cm) (mean f S D ) 165.3 ? 7.3 162.8 i 7.5 gallbladder disease.

Data Analysis
on-site clinic and adjacent hospital. The expected num-
ber of colorectal cancer cases was calculated according The dietary constituents were evaluated by a com-
to the mean age, sex, and ethnic-specific incidence rates puter program using local and international tables for
in Israel for the period 1967-1974.’* food values.I6-’* The accuracy of this technique was
confirmed by hand calculation of random individual
samples. Statistical tests used included the chi-square
Dietary Habits
test with the “Yates’ correction,” and the separate vari-
The diet of 75 kibbutz members was ascertained by ance estimate t test. Statistical comparison of the ob-
personal interview. A dietician trained in performing served number of colorectal cancer patients to the ex-
field-surveys reviewed the food intake, habits, and idio- pected number was based on Poisson 95% confidence
syncrasies of this group by the frequency questionnaire limits.
method.I3 Every tenth member appearing on an alpha-
betical list of adults over the age of 40 years was in- Results
terviewed. It should be noted that there is a central
kitchen and dining hall where the members eat standard During the last 20 years, only two cases of colorectal
fare. Eating light meals in the living quarters is also cancer has occurred among the kibbutz members. The
possible, and this was taken into account. The daily per number of cases expected during the same period, had
capita consumption of foodstuffs of the kibbutz mem- the incidence resembled that of the total Israeli popu-
bers was also calculated by using their central pur- lation of European-American origin adjusted for age
chasing records for the years 1972- 1973, 1978- I979. and sex, was 6.5. The observed number of cases, 2, was
This allowed us to detect changes in dietary habits, to significantly lower than the expected, P = 0.04.
confirm the results of the dietary survey, and to compare The characteristics of the two compared populations,
them with national figures.I4Drinking water is provided kibbutz members and Tel Aviv controls, are given in
Table 1. There are no significant differences between
the two groups. The Tel Aviv controls were heavier than
TABLE
2. Daily Per Capita Intake of Nutrients Where No the kibbutz members but also taller, and thus the rel-
Significant Differences were Found*
ative body weight (RBW) was the same.
Tel Aviv Kibbutz The dietary survey results are summarized in Tables
2 and 3. no significant differences were found between
Energy, cals 21 18.2 f 554.7 2209 t 1022.9
Total fat (8) 89.8 ? 31 93.8 t 44.8 the two sample groups in daily caloric, total fat, avail-
Monounsaturated able carbohydrate, tryptophan, sodium, cholesterol, and
fatty acids (g) 31.8 f 12.5 32 t 12 monosaturated fatty acid intake. The Tel Aviv residents
Cholesterol (mg) 415.3 f 206.1 433.9 +- 240.8
Carbohydrate (g) ate more protein, and their nicotinamide intake was
(available) 232.1 f 75 254.3 f 155.8 larger, in both cases P = 0.05. The source of calories
Protein (g) 91.9 t 20.4 84.6 ? 24.7 for the Tel Aviv residents was from protein 1890, fat
N icotinamide
(mg) 20.8 f 7.6 18.6 2 5.2 38% and carbohydrates 44%. The equivalent values for
Tryptophan (mg) 1043.5 f 236.5 1004.3 t 309 the kibbutz group were 16%, 38%, and 4690, respec-
Sodium ( m g ) t 2517.8 f 2505.1 2700.3 rt 2292.6 tively.
* Values expressed as mean rt SD. More poultry than beef was eaten by both the kibbutz
t Excluding added salt. members and the Tel Aviv residents and also by the
2694 CANCERDecember 15 1981 Vol. 48

3.
TABLE Daily Per Capita Intake of Nutrients Where Significant Differences were Found*

Tel Aviv Kibbutz Significance


Carbohydrate (g)
(unavailable) 6.8 * 2.9 9.6 1- 4.0 P < 0.01
Saturated fat (g) 32.4 1- 13.3 27.7 rt 13.4 P < 0.05
Polyunsaturated fat (8) 19.6 rt 9.9 26.0 ? 11.4 P < 0.01
P / S ratio 0.7 rt 0.4 1.0 rt 0.4 P < 0.01
Ascorbic acid (mg) 93.5 k 52.6 214.2 1- 114.2 P < 0.01
Carotene ( p g ) 1334.3 * 819.7 1980.8 * 895.9 P < 0.01
Retinol ( p g ) 538.5 rt 258.4 333.4 rt 186.0 P < 0.01
Thiamine (mg) 0.79 1- 0.19 1.22 1- 0.44 P < 0.01
RiboRavin (mg) 1.371- 0.42 1.65 1- 0.6 P < 0.01
Iron (mg) 11.9 & 3.2 15.1 ? 4.6 P < 0.01
Potassium (mg) 2320.7 f 616.6 3453.7 rt 964.2 P < 0.01
Magnesium (mg) 207.0 f 65.1 262.8 1- 93.5 P < 0.01
Calcium (mg) 707.8 +_ 341.0 862.1 f 382.0 P = 0.01
* Values expressed as mean f SD.

nation. The survey showed that the mean daily con- analyzed. 197920-24In most cases, conclusions were drawn
sumption of cooked poultry was 53 g, beef 41 g, and from experimental ~ t u d i e s ~epidemiologic
.~, studies of
fish 14 g by each of the kibbutz group. The equivalent national food habits,25retrospective dietary analyses of
Tel Aviv figures were 86 g, 39 g, and 8 g. A published colon cancer comparison of dietary habits
national sample for 1975- 1976 showed a daily per cap- of selected groups within a geographic area,**and rural-
ita consumption of 57 g of poultry, 42 g of beef, and urban and migrant studies.4,15*25,29,30 Those who believe
17 g of fish.I4 Interestingly, for the same period, the that specific dietary factors are related to the etiology
calculated (from purchasing records) daily per capita of colon cancer have frequently found it difficult to
consumption of all the kibbutz residents was 79 g of prove their point. ‘
Some are willing to propose
3,496,20.2333

cooked poultry, 27 g of beef, and 16 g of fish. The dif- a preventive diet, while others feel that changing na-
ference between these and the dietary survey figures are tional habits is difficult and unjustified considering the
explained by the fact that the children are offered present state of k n ~ w l e d g e . ’ ~ , ~ ~ , ~ ~ * ~ ’ * ~ *
mainly poultry while the adults are given a choice of In the United States, Jews of European origin are at
beef or poultry. an increased risk of developing colon cancer.33In Israel,
Markedly significant differences between the two however, similar Jews of European-American origin
groups were found in the daily intake of the following have only a “medium” incidence of large bowel cancer
nutrients: the kibbutz members had a greater intake of compared with the rest of the world.I2 This has been
unavailable carbohydrates (“crude fiber”), potassium, correlated with Israeli dietary habits, namely total di-
magnesium, calcium, iron, carotene, thiamine, ribofla- etary fat,“ cholesterol intake,3 and indirectly with crude
vin, ascorbic acid, polyunsaturated fats, and a greater fiber c o n ~ u m p t i o nOur
. ~ ~ dietary survey, from both the
P/S ratio, while the Tel Aviv residents had a higher Tel Aviv and kibbutz populations, demonstrate that
intake of retinol and saturated fats. they eat less beef, cholesterol, saturated fat (and have
The per capita daily food consumption of both groups a better P/S ratio), and more crude fiber than has been
was compared with present and previously published quoted for the American and other population^.'^^+^ In
national and calculated kibbutz figures.14 There was a fact, the intake of meat and fat were even lower 25-30
tendency in the kibbutz, over a period of seven years, years ago because of food shortages and rationing.14
to eat more meat and poultry (a 17% rise) and more Poultry is the main source of animal protein and has
fruit and vegetables (a 25% rise). Intake of other food- not been a food associated, so far, with the etiology of
stuffs showed little change. National figures for beef bowel cancer.22
and poultry intake were virtually identical to those The kibbutz we have examined is unique in that the
found in a survey seven years before, though fish con- population has kept to a uniform diet for an extensive
sumption had fallen by 25%. period of time and has a low incidence of colon cancer.
Their diet is significantly richer in fiber, vitamins, and
minerals due to a higher intake of fruit and vegetables
Discussion
than the Tel Aviv controls. On the other hand, both
The etiology of large bowel cancer has been the sub- groups had a similar caloric, total fat, and protein in-
ject of many recent review^.'^,'^ The etiologic impor- take. This almost laboratory-model state reemphasizes
tance of various dietary factors has been extensively the importance of unavailable carbohydrate (“fiber”)
No. 12 CANCER
COLORECTAL HABITS
AND DIETARY . Rozen et al. 2695

in prevention of colorectal cancer. The opposite, a low- 1 1. Rozen P, Fireman Z, Terdiman R, Hellerstein SM, Rattan J,
fiber diet, was shown by Modan et al. to be common Gilat T. Selective screening for colorectal tumors in the Tel-Aviv area.
2. Relevance of the epidemiology and family history. Cuncer 1981;
in a retrospective analysis of Israeli patients with large 47x191-195.
bowel cancer.34 The protective value of other factors 12. Waterhouse JAH, Muir CS, Correa P, Powell J. Cancer in-
cidence in five continents; vol 3. Lyon: IARC Scientific Publications,
such as ascorbic acid’” or fresh vegetables*’ may also 1976~496-498.
play a part. The etiologic dietary agents are most likely 13. Burke BS. The dietary history as a tool in research. J Am Diet
multifactorial, and the total amount and balance be- ASSOC1947; 23:1041 - 1046.
14. Bavly S, Poznanski R, Kaufmann N. Levels of nutrition in
tween them provides the environmental milieu influ- Israel 1975/76. Jerusalem: Ministry of Education and Culture, Col-
encing carcinogenesis.6 At the present state of knowl- lege of Nutrition and Home Economics, 1980.
edge, these factors seem to include a high caloric intake, 15. Schottenfeld D, Haas JF. Epidemiology of colorectal cancer.
In: Lipkin M, Good RA, eds. Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer. New
high fat, high-protein ( ? beef); low fresh fruit, low veg- York: Plenum, 1978:207-240.
etable (? fiber, ? vitamins) diet. It may well be that a 16. Guggenheim Y, Kaufmann N, Reshef A. Food composition
diet, similar to the “prudent” diet recommended by tables. Publication of the Ministries of Health and Culture, Govern-
, ~ been unwittingly tried out in this kibbutz
W ~ n d e rhas ment School of Home Economics and Nutrition, Romema, Jerusalem,
1980.
population and has proven its worth as far as colon 17. Feeley RM, Criner PE, Watt BK. Cholesterol content of foods.
cancer is concerned. However, further observations on J Am Diet Assoc 1972; 61:134-148.
larger populations are needed before final conclusions 18. Narayana Rao M, Polacchi W. Food composition table for use
in East Asia. Part 2. National Institute of Arthritis, Metabolism, and
can be deduced about its place in colorectal cancer pre- Digestive Diseases; National Institutes of Health, Department of
vent ion. Health, Education, and Welfare, Bethesda, Maryland. 1972:298-301.
19. Hill MJ. Carcinogenesis of Gastrointestinal cancer. In: Rozen
ADDENDUM P, Eidelman S, Gilat T, eds. Gastrointestinal Cancer: Advances in
Basic Research. Basel: S. Karger, 1979:I - 16.
Advances in the understanding of dietary fiber and improved food 20. Hill MJ. Colon cancer: A disease of fibre depletion or of a
tables (Paul AA, Southgate DAT, McCance, and Widdowsons: The dietary excess? Digestion 1974; 11:289-306.
composition of foods. London: HMSO, 1978.) have allowed us to 21. Hill MJ. Bacteria and the etiology of colonic cancer. Cancer
recalculate the total dietary fiber, “unavailable carbohydrate.” The 1974; 34:815-818.
mean ? SD daily intake of total dietary fiber was 23.6 ? 9.1 g in 22. Howell MA. Diet as an etiological factor in the development
the kibbutz group, and only 18.7 * 5.8 g in the Tel-Aviv residents, of cancers of the colon and rectum. J Chron Dis 1975; 28:67-80.
P < 0.01. 23. Bingham S, Williams DRR, Cole TJ, James WPT. Dietary
fibre and regional large-bowel cancer mortality in Britain. Br J Cancer
REFERENCES 1979; 40r456-463.
24. Gori GB. Dietary and nutritional implications in the multifac-
I . Bjelke E. Epidemiologic studies of cancer of the stomach, colon, torial etiology of certain prevalent human cancers. Cancer 1979;
and rectum; with special emphasis on the role of diet. Scand J Gas- 43:2151-2161.
troenterol (Suppl) 1974; 9:l-235.
2. Kassira E, Parent L, Vahouny G. Colon cancer. An epidemio- 25. Jensen OM, Maclennan R. Dietary factors and colorectal can-
logical survey. A m J Dig Dis 1976; 21:205-214. cer in Scandinavia. Israel J Med Sci 1979; 15:329-334.
3. Liu K, Moss D, Persky V, Stamler J, Garside D, Soltero I. 26. Modan B, Barell V, Lubin F, Modan M. Dietary factors and
Dietary cholesterol, fat, and fibre, and colon cancer mortality. An cancer in Israel. Cancer Res 1975; 35:3503-3506.
analysis of international data. Lancet 1979; 2:782-785. 27. Graham S, Dayal H, Swanson M, Mittleman A, Wilkinson G.
4. Wynder EL. The epidemiology of large bowel cancer. Cancer Diet in the epidemiology of cancer of the colon and rectum. J Nut/
Res 1975; 35:3388-3394. Cancer Inst 1978; 61:709-714.
5. Reddy BS. Nutrition and colon cancer. In: Draper HH, ed. 28. Phillips RL. Role of life-style and dietary habits in risk of
Advances in Nutritional Research, vol 2. New York: Plenum, cancer among Seventh-Day Adventists. Cuncer Res 1975; 35:3513-
1979:199-218. 3523.
6. Walker ARP, Burkitt DP. Colon cancer-hypotheses of cau- 29. Correa P, Haenszel W. The epidemiology of large-bowel can-
sation, dietary prophylaxis, and future research. Am J Dig Dis 1976; cer. In: Klein G, Weinhouse S, eds. Adv Cancer Res 1978; 26:l-141.
21:910-917. 30. Stemmermann GN, Mandel M, Mower HF. Colon cancer: its
7. Wattenberg LW. Effects of dietary constituents on the metab- precursors and companions in Hawaii Japanese. Nail Cancer Inst
olism of chemical carcinogens. Cancer Res 1975; 35:3326-3331. Monogr 1979; 53:175-179.
8 . Wynder EL, Reddy BS. Colon cancer prevention. Today’s chal-
31. Hegsted DM. Summary of the conference on nutrition in the
lenge to biomedical scientists and clinical investigators. Cancer 1977;
causation of cancer. Cancer Res 1975; 35:3541-3543.
40:2565-257 I .
9. Hayes JR, Campbell TC. Nutrition as a modifier of chemical 32. Graham S, Haenszel W, Bock FG, Lyon JL. Need to pursue
carcinogenesis. In: Slaga TJ, ed. Carcinogenesis, vol 5 . Modifiers of new leads in the epidemiology of colorectal cancer. J Nut/ Cancer
Chemical Carcinogenesis. New York: Raven Press, 1980:207-241. Inst 1979; 63379-881.
10. Rozen P, Fireman Z, Terdiman R, Hellerstein SM, Rattan J, 33. Greenwald P, Korns RF, Nasca PC, Wolfgang PE. Cancer in
Gilat T. Selective screening for colorectal tumors in the Tel-Aviv area. United States Jews. Cancer Res 1975; 35:3507-35 12.
Technique and initial results. In: Winawer SJ, Sherlock P, Schotten- 34. Modan B, Barell V, Lubin F, Modan M, Greenberg RA, Gra-
feld D, eds. Colorectal Cancer: Prevention, Epidemiology, and Screen- ham S. Low fibre intake as an etiological factor in cancer of the colon.
ing. New York: Raven Press, 1980:275-283. J Nut1 Cancer Inst 1975; 55:15-18.

You might also like