Dear Sir/Ma'am,

I am writing this letter in regards to replacement of library in to a supermarket.

To begin with, when I was reading a newspaper this morning, suddenly I came up
with the headline about this matter, and I went into shock after reading that
article.
As my friends and I go to the library every day to accumulate knowledge from
books and magazines and if this is closed where would we go as there is no other
library near to my vicinity/propinquity? due to closure of library we cannot go
over there. To let you know,the other library is located far away from our area,
and to go over there our cost for transport will increase. Also, we do not need a
supermarket here because there are two markets, which are already available for
local residence where we can buy food, drinks, clothes and daily house
equipment. Our daily routine will be interrupted with this plan.
Library is paramount for almost all people since it not only provides an access to
books for all age groups, but also free computers give us an opportunity to search
data online. As it is located in the middle of the town and suitable for people from
every suburb, it should not be demolished.
I would appreciate if you could look into the situation and leave it at the same
location considering its advantages to the society.
Yours faithfully,
Devender
Housing is essential for people. Some argue that the government should offer
free housing for people who cannot afford it. Do you agree or disagree with this
statement?
House is a paramount part of human life, as it provides safe place to live. A
number of people concede that local government should provide accommodation
to people who cannot afford to buy by their own funds. I am strongly agreed with
this statement but at some occasion human take benefits from this.(it was only
agree/disagree) This essay will outline what authorities ought to do to aid poor
society.
To commence with, in this contemporary society houses’ prices are
unprecedented, and hardly half percent of the population can afford to get new
homes or old ones. To justify, in the past time communities were very supportive
to their loved ones, as they used to give them who were not rich, however, that
is not the case today since the modern generation is more self- centred.. In this
case government role is very crucial, they have to set the rates according to the
status. For example, for rich society house prices must be same, as they have
sufficient funds, however, for society who cannot buy should get free of charge.
(contradicting example)
On the other hand, there would be so many bad repercussions if local
government start giving accommodation for no cost. It would seriously affect the
economy due to lack of funds to support a country. Although people can get
tremendous/ plethora of/ umpteen benefits from free house, it will make them
dependent on local authorities. For instance, in India, Delhi government provided
free shelters to people who do not had work or were disabled, however, these
people started asking money from local people for entertainment.
In conclusion, not only free home can give people a safe location to live but also
their kids do not have to spend day and night on the streets. Some time it can be
devastating for country, if they invest on housing.