Professional Documents
Culture Documents
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
3.0 Introduction
Research methodology defines what the activity of research is, how to proceed,’
measure progress and what constitutes success. It forms the framework which
specifies the type of information to be collected and the source of data and data
collection.
The various areas that were examined in this chapter are as follows:
Research design
Population of the study
Sample technique
Sample size determination
Validity and Reliability of the Research Instrument
Operational Measures of the Variables
Data collection technique
Data analysis technique
3.1 Research Design
The research design is the method and plan used to collect data and test
relationship between the variable hypothesized (Baridam, 2001). In other words, it
has, been considered as a “blue print” for research, da1ing with at list four
problems: what question to study, what data are relevant, what data to collect and
how to analyze the result.
For the purpose of this study, a cross sectional survey design, a sub set of quasi
experimental research field survey of some selected insurance companies in Rivers
state.
Basically the population of this work encompasses the top managers, HODs and
employees of this selected insurances companies in Nigeria. These insurance
companies and their branches were chosen because of their closeness to the
researchers location.
N
n = 1+ N ¿ ¿
where,
N
n = 1+ N ¿ ¿
103
n = 1+ ¿ ¿
103
n = 1+(103 x 0.0025)
103
n = 1+ 0.2575
103
n = 1.2575
n = 81
Therefore the sample size of the study is 81 which consist of managers, HODs and
employees
The research used two sources of data in carrying out this research namely: the
primary source and the secondary source.
Questionnaires
Personal observation
Interview
The secondary source of data used in order to support findings includes textbooks,
journals, internet, newspapers etc.
3.6 Instrument for Data Collection
The instrument for data collection was a questionnaire. The questionnaire was
divided into two sections, A & B. Section A was used to gather demographic
information of the respondents, while section B was further divided into parts, 1,
2 ,3,4 & 5 Each sections was assigned a five response options of strongly agree
(SA), agree (A), Neutral (N), strongly disagreed (SD), and disagree (D) with a
corresponding value of 5,4, 3, 2 and 1.
To ascertain that the instrument was reliable, that is, able to consistently elicit the
same information from the respondents, the researcher adopted the test re-test
technique. 15 copies of the questionnaire were administered to 15 respondents not
participating in the study. The instrument was re-administered to the same
respondents within an interval of two weeks. The responses (results) of the first
and second tests were collated and subjected to a reliability test using the Pearson
Product Moment Correlation Analysis. The result obtained yielded a reliability
index of 0.8, using a cronbach alpha indicating high reliability of the research
instruments.
The major variables for the study are internal audit techniques measured by size of
the internal audit, qualification of the internal audit and quality of audit work.
While fraud management is measured by fraud prevention and fraud investigation.
The data obtained from a study may or may not be in numerical or quantitative
form, that is, in the form of numbers. If they are not in numerical form, then we
can still carry out qualitative analysis based on experience of the individual. On the
other hand, if they arc in numerical form, we start, by working out some
descriptive statistics to summarize the pattern of findings.
The data analysis techniques used in this study includes the Pearson correlation
method coefficient (rho) was used to test the stated hypotheses at a 95% (0.05)
level of significance. The rationale for this decision was due to the fact that the
researcher seeks to examine the relationship between internal audit techniques and
fraud management.