You are on page 1of 4

Mountain Research and Development Vol 27 No 1 February 2007: 11–14

The Sajama National Park in Bolivia Dirk Hoffmann

A Model for Cooperation Among State and Local Authorities and the
Indigenous Population 11

Sajama National Park in Bolivia’s Cordillera tude of about 4000 m—Mount Sajama plays
Occidental is not only the country’s oldest a key role in traditional indigenous mytholo-
national park; it also contains Bolivia’s high- gy, as well as in the formation of the pres-
est mountain, ice-capped Nevado Sajama, ent-day identity of local communities. The
at 6542 m. Created in 1939 by presidential latter factor is largely due to a new policy
decree with the primary objective of protect- and to multiple activities launched by the
ing native keñua ( Polylepis tarapacana) Bolivian national parks authority (Servicio
forests, the Sajama National Park, later rati- Nacional de Áreas Protegidas, SERNAP) dur-
fied by national law, had neither formal ing the past decade. As an initial result,
administration nor park rangers until 1995. local perception of Sajama National Park as
Towering over the barren lands of the Alti- an “imposition from above” has given way to
plano—Bolivia’s highland plateau, at an alti- referring to the park as “our protected area.”

Nature conservation and opment, putting the country at the fore-


sustainable development front of environmental politics in the “Sajama, for his works and
southern hemisphere. One of the Law’s deeds, gained himself the
Open keñua forests form a vast belt articles calls for the creation of a national
respect and tender recogni-
around the Sajama Volcano (Figure 1) at park system and park administration,
altitudes between 4300 and 5200 m, and which was put into full effect in 1998 with tion of the whole people,
are considered to be the highest forests in the founding of the SERNAP. who made him their chief,
the world. Until Bolivian President Busch Throughout the 1990s and the early calling him with much
created Sajama National Park in 1939 to 21st century, new national parks were respect: Doctor Sajama.”
halt indiscriminate use of keñua, the declared, and in many older ones, such as (José Mendoza Villca,
forests had been cut on a large scale to Sajama NP, an administration was put in
produce charcoal, which was used in the place for the first time in 1995. Following Andean Mountain Tales)
mines of the Bolivian Altiplano, as well as standard top-down approaches, local
to fuel the train connecting the mines acceptance of these national parks was
with the Chilean ports. Nowadays local generally non-existent. This was the situa-
inhabitants use small quantities of keñua tion in Sajama NP when, around the turn
for cooking under special permits from of the century, SERNAP tried to tackle
the park authorities. existing problems in the management of
Relatively small—at somewhat more its parks by elaborating principles and
than 100,000 ha—and with an indigenous policies for managing the national park
Aymara population of about 1700 within system and putting in practice its motto of
its limits, Sajama National Park lies in an “parks with people.” Compared to older
otherwise poor and abandoned region conservation practices, SERNAP’s philoso-
where people earned a livelihood from phy explicitly recognizes the existence of FIGURE 1 Nevado Sajama; in
the foreground, a typical
raising native llamas and alpacas for most traditional communities within its parks, wetland. (Photo by Dirk
of the 20th century, as agriculture is virtu- as well as these populations’ rights to Hoffmann)
ally impossible due to altitude and climat-
ic conditions (Figure 2). Only temporary
or permanent migration, and the smug-
gling of goods from neighboring Chile,
helped to alleviate endogenous poverty.

Development of a national policy for


protected areas
The Bolivian National Park System as such
has its origins in the 1992 UN Conference
on Environment and Development, which
provided the impulse for the Law on Envi-
ronment (1992) and the subsequent cre-
ation of the Ministry of Sustainable Devel-
Dirk Hoffmann

489500 499500 Cerro Anallajchi 519500 529500 539500 70°W 60°W


BRASIL
5583 m Cayruta
a ni
801500 10°S

801500
l
ngu
O KO R U R O M U N I C I PA L I T Y Cerro Huallcani

Tria
4294 m PERU
Cerro Llisa
Caripe 4708 m La Paz
12 4202 m BOLIVIA
Cerro Condoriri Jiskha Khasira Castilluma Citari Jahuira
Study area
5762 m i Tomarapi
Khellhua Khasira arap Chojña chuto
Tom

Pacific Ocean
Inca Ingenio Iru pata PA 20°S
Cerro Sunu Kkollu R

800500
800500

AG
Chiar Q’ota UA
Huaña Q’ota 4306 m Y
CHILE 0 N 300 km
Sora Pata Caripe C U R A H UA R A D E C A R A N G A S M U N I C I PA L I T Y ARGENTINA
Castilluma
Pisica Uma

Cuita
Casilla SAJAMA NATIONAL PARK ma Farm
Irupata Irupata alco
P
Nevado Pomerape
Juchusuma Nevado Sajama Sicuyani Tom Village
Juntuma Cerro Huisalla 6542 m arap Canta
Viacha Senkha
6222 m 5031 m i 3901 m
Sajama Main road

799500
799500

4242 m
Villa Rio
Lorumiri Caracollo Secondary road

Huaythaña
Sajama

Nevado Parinacota Suni Papel Municipal boundary

ria
Pampa

Suru
6330 m Plazuela Huichu Collo Cosapa Hiro Churo
4218 m Huerta Uma Muyta
Castilluma 3891 m International boundary
Umapalca Thola Pampa Llaytani
CHILE Pacollo EsqKala Kollo m asl National Park boundary
uilla

Cha
Espiritu Santo
ni River, perennial

798500
798500

llhu
6000 m
Lagunas 4126 m Kotaña

ani
Cerro Quisi Quisini Romero Kota Pasto Grande 5500 m River, non-perennial
Lago Hornuni
Chungara 5542 m Chajhualla Cayllachuru 5000 m Lake
Tambo Quemado T U R C O M U N I C I PA L I T Y Thola uta 4500 m Disclaimer: Municipal boundaries shown
N Ventilla
Saja

on this map are not legally binding. They

Cosa
0 5 10 km 4000 m only serve as orientation for the National
ma

Cerro Jitiri

pa
499500 509500 5019 m 519500 529500 539500 Park’s management plan.

FIGURE 2 Map of Sajama development; this is clearly stated in the 2 ment, and the local communities of Lagu-
National Park, showing the
villages and farms involved in
main objectives established: nas, Caripe, Sajama, and Cosapa districts.
consultations and projects. The main levels of cooperation and
(Map by Andreas Brodbeck, • To conserve the natural and cultural integration consist of the 3 “Ps”: planning,
based on data collected for the
Sajama NP Management Plan, heritage of the protected area and its participation, and projects. Planning, as a
courtesy of SERNAP) surroundings; and tool for coordination, aims at the integra-
• To contribute to socioeconomically tion of Sajama’s management plan into
sustainable development at local, the municipal development plan.
regional, and national levels.
a) Integrative planning process
The Strategic Agenda, as the expression of According to the law, all of Bolivia’s more
state policy concerning protected area than 300 local administrative and political
management, also defines the integration units, called municipios, must elaborate
of the administration of national parks and periodically update Municipal Devel-
within a broader political and administra- opment Plans (PDMs) with a 5-year hori-
tive context as one of its 6 strategic areas zon, as a means of promoting a strategic
of action. This clear state policy of “nei- approach to local development efforts.
ther islands nor impositions” as a guiding These plans commonly tend to neglect
principle is probably the most innovative environmental matters or policies regard-
feature and cornerstone of success in Saja- ing the use of natural resources.
ma National Park, and has helped gain On the other hand, article 28 of the
acceptance over the years for its concept General Ordinance for Protected Areas
of biodiversity conservation. defines management plans as “the funda-
mental instrument for planning and spatial
organization, which defines and supports
Sajama NP: a model of
administration and conservation of the pro-
implementation at the local level tected areas’ resources.” However, up until
At the center of this approach stands the the elaboration of the SERNAP guidelines
orientation of state-protected areas for the elaboration of management plans for
towards municipal governments and local protected areas, these “plans” often resem-
indigenous populations: active promotion bled biological encyclopedias and contained
of integrated planning processes, full par- very little in terms of tools and instruments
ticipation of all stakeholders, and the real- for the administration of the parks.
ization of joint projects. In the case of Par- In the case of Sajama NP, SERNAP,
que Nacional Sajama, this means the imple- assisted by German Development Coopera-
mentation of these policies for the tion’s MAPZA project (Manejo de Áreas Pro-
integration of Sajama National Park, the tegidas y Zonas de Amortiguación, Manage-
Curahuara de Carangas municipal govern- ment of Protected Areas and Buffer

Mountain Research and Development Vol 27 No 1 February 2007


Development

13

Zones), became involved in the elabora- aims primarily to offer livelihood alterna-
tion of Curahuara de Carangas PDM, tives—has also been designed as an instru-
which, as a result, contains a strategy for ment for fostering cooperation with the
livestock management and ecotourism, municipios. In many cases it is the main tool
addressing both the main economic activi- for ensuring tripartite technical assistance,
ties as well as future aspirations of its pop- often including international development
ulation regarding options for income gen- cooperation in the form of financing. The
eration. The elaboration of the Municipal main projects to mention in Sajama NP are
Development Plan took several months initiatives for the sustainable management
and included extensive periods of partici- of the parks’ vicuñas, as well as ecotourism
patory planning with each of the commu- potential. “The experiences generated in
nities involved. During this process, for the Sajama are used as inputs for the System of
first time, representatives of the municipal- Protected Areas as a whole,” explains
ity and the director of PNS related to each MAPZA project coordinator Jürgen Czer-
other in a structured way, overcoming wenka, “this is being reflected by SERNAP’s
established prejudices and getting to know policy and management strategies.” The
the interests of the other side little by lit- vicuña fiber, an accumulated 150 kg at pres-
tle, as well as administrative logistics and ent, still has to be stored, however, as regu-
procedures. As a result, the park’s manage- lations concerning the marketing of this
ment plan now contains elements of product, which comes from an endangered
Curahuara’s development strategy, while species, have not been drawn up yet.
the municipios’ strategic planning includes Up until a few years ago, climbers,
environmental and conservation issues. environmentalists and an occasional scien-
tist constituted the bulk of the quite
b) Participation of local stakeholders reduced number of visitors to the area.
With respect to the second “P,” participa- Tourist infrastructure was virtually non-
tion, apart from local populations’ participa- existent. Thus, the idea of providing a cer-
tion in both planning processes, SERNAP’s tain standard lodging became the key ele-
policy calls for the establishment of Manage- ment in fostering ecotourism in the Parque
ment Committees (Comités de Gestión) as an Nacional Sajama. In 2003 the Tomarapi eco-
instrument to guarantee the participation of lodge opened (Figure 3), now providing
all local stakeholders—municipal, regional, local food and lodging for between 2000
and traditional authorities, as well as com- and 3000 visitors a year. The lodge is cur-
munities—in the management of each of rently managed entirely by the villagers’
the country’s national parks. association formed for this purpose.
Sajama’s Management Committee
dates from 1995 and includes representa-
Lessons learned and the way
tives of each of the communities, the sub-
alcaldía (local administration’s decentral-
forward
ized office in Sajama village), the mayor of Due to the efforts undertaken, there has
FIGURE 3 Tomarapi eco-lodge.
Curahuara de Carangas, a representative been a clear shift in the local population’s (Photo by Dirk Hoffmann)
of the prefectural administration, and del-
egates from different NGOs active in the
area. Meetings are held at monthly inter-
vals, and also make it possible to discuss
other issues of importance to the local
population, such as health and education.
“We have come a long way,” says Franz
Guzmán, Sajama National Park’s director,
in terms of much-improved relations with
the local population.

c) Income-generating projects
The third pillar—joint projects for the sus-
tainable use of biodiversity resources, which
Dirk Hoffmann

FIGURE 4 Rómulo Alconz, mayor of


Curahuara de Carangas, addressing
the local population at the end of a
Management Committee meeting in
Sajama. (Photo by Dirk Hoffmann)

14

park today is seen as an opportunity for


(sustainable) development in the context
of a poor mountain region in a poor coun-
try in the heart of South America.
In the field of planning, as a result of
the success of past processes, efforts are
now underway to go a step further and
advance towards the formulation of a Plan
de Desarrollo Municipal Originario—an
indigenous municipal strategic develop-
ment plan. This first-of-its-kind experience
in Bolivia, taking up local Aymara identity
as the key to development, relies on deci-
sive support, both technical and financial,
from the National Parks Authority.
Probably the main lesson to be drawn
from Sajama NP is that it is possible to rec-
oncile development needs with conserva-
tion, and consequently change people’s
perspectives. If we examine what made
this possible, a mix of instruments is one
of the first things that becomes apparent,
as there is no one single magic element.
Furthermore, what is needed is a strategic
approach, a shared vision of the future,
long-term involvement, and dedication by
all actors involved.
FIGURE 5 Women outside a perception of the national park. “Don Some of the limitations of the experi-
Management Committee Franz has learned a lot,” was the villagers’ ence should be mentioned as well, as SER-
meeting. Unfortunately, only
few women have taken active recent verdict about park management NAP’s engagement does not by any means
part in such meetings to date, under the director, Franz Guzmán, pro- resolve all the region’s problems. Even
but this is changing little by nounced at the Management Committee under the most optimistic scenarios, also
little; in a year or two, these
women observing the meeting meeting this August. The most recent sur- in the future, a fair number of local peo-
from outside might be inside, veys show overwhelming support for the ple will have to migrate from this region
even speaking up. (Photo by
Dirk Hoffmann)
conservation approach adopted by the in order to assure a minimum livelihood.
National Parks Authority, SERNAP, even The experience of the Parque Nacional
though individual complaints about dam- Sajama is clearly a model for the National
age caused by pumas and foxes persist. Parks Administration, which aims at replica-
Nowadays the park is generally tion or adaptation in the other 20 NPs of
referred to as “our protected area” with a the Bolivian national park system, mainly
fair measure of pride (Figure 4). The Par- through the simultaneous approach of inte-
que Nacional Sajama is seen as representing grated planning procedures, common par-
potential for local development, be it at an ticipation mechanisms (“management com-
individual or communal level. This experi- mittees”), and joint projects. In fact, in a
AUTHOR
ence has had an enormous impact on self- number of protected areas throughout the
Dirk Hoffmann esteem and local identity (Figure 5). More- country, this process is already being imple-
BMI–Instituto Boliviano de la Montaña,
Casilla 3–12417, La Paz, Bolivia.
over, on the municipal level, the national mented with varying degrees of success.
dirk1964@gmx.net or bolivian-mountain-
institute@gmx.net
Dirk Hoffmann holds a degree in
Social Sciences and an MSc in Environ- FURTHER READING Ribera MO, Liberman M, editors. 2006. El uso de la Tier-
mental Protection. He is coordinator of ra y los Recursos de la Biodiversidad en las Áreas Protegi-
the BMI–Bolivian Mountain Institute, La Centro de Ecología y Pueblos Andinos, editors. 2003. Cuen- das de Bolivia. La Paz, Bolivia: SERNAP/GEF II.
Paz, and presently works for the Bolivian tos Andinos de Montaña. Oruro, Bolivia: Latinas Editores. SERNAP [Servicio Nacional de Áreas Protegidas], editor.
National Park Service (SERNAP), where Liberman M, Baied C, editors. 1997. Desarrollo Sostenible 2005. Agenda Estratégica de Gestión para el Desarrollo
he is responsible for local cooperation. de Ecosistemas de Montaña: Manejo de Areas Frágiles en del Sistema Nacional de Áreas Protegidas. La Paz,
His main areas of expertise are biodiver- los Andes. La Paz, Bolivia: Editorial Instituto de Ecología. Bolivia: SERNAP.
sity management, regional planning, cli- MDSP [Ministerio de Desarrollo Sostenible y Planifi- SERNAP [Servicio Nacional de Áreas Protegidas]. 2002.
mate change impact, and sustainable cación], editor. 2001. Estrategia Nacional de Conservación Memoria 1998–2002. Áreas Protegidas de Bolivia: Con-
development of mountain regions. y Uso Sostenible de la Biodiversidad. La Paz, Bolivia: MDSP. servando la biodiversidad. La Paz, Bolivia: SERNAP.

Mountain Research and Development Vol 27 No 1 February 2007

You might also like