Professional Documents
Culture Documents
If Ri, and G, are respectively the input resistance and the input
capacitance (including any stray capacitances at the On-Chip node)
of the converter, the input current is given by:
INTRODUCTION
Studied Capacitors
In order to validate the previous principle, eight test structures
have been used to characterize constant or biasing dependent
capacitances.
Calibration Step
During this step, the transmission gate is kept in the on-state and
a DC current is injected in the converter via the static input (Istat,).
-
- -
Figure 2: On-chip CurrentNoltage converter (with MOS transistor
dimensions WL).
vout (v) needed to reach the pseudo-static state, the slope of the input signal
is negative.
E I E l
00 0.5 1.o 1.5 Ii, (nA)
EXPERIMENTAL
49
vout (v)
The study of constant capacitances has been led on five metal -
polysilicon capacitors with different geometrical dimensions (test
2 structure 1 up to 5 in Table 1). Experimental results reported on
Table 2 correspond to more than one hundred measurements for
each capacitance. The average measured value (C,), typical
0 50 100 150 Ii,(nA)
variation from average value (AC,), scattering factor (-)ACx and
Figure 5: Experimental transfer characteristics (Voutvs. Ii,) of the W
cx
relative variation between measured and expected values
converter in the 1 and 100 nA range.
c x -c
( c e) are given for each test structure with:
,
Measurement Step
vdd2
'I
where n is the number of measurements and C,(i) the measured
value at round i.
i Cs
7
iCi,
converter -,-
CO,, i %ut
2,
* *
I I
-
* - L
I
1
I
Figure 6: Electrical diagram of the Test Structure during the 2 95.8 73.8 1.7 2.3 - 23
'
measurement step.
I
3 1.63 5.88 .14 2.38 I - 22.9
I
The transmission gate is kept in the off-state and the current is 4 5.48 4.23 .08 1.89 - 22.8
injected in the converter via the dynamic input (Idy.) and C, 5 167.45 129.1 3.3 2.56 - 22.9
(Figure 6). The pseudo-static value of Vout( when
dt
= 0 ) is 5 Table 2: Metal - Polysilicon capacitances.Comparison between
measured. Then, using the previously determined transfer expected (C,) and measured (C,) values.
characteristic, it leads to the determination of IO and C, = 4. On the one hand, this table allows us to conclude on the good
accuracy of the method (the scattering factor is very low). On the
other hand, the reduction of about 23 % between expected and
measured capacitances shows that up to now, interconnection
capacitances have not been very well characterized. This is
;
-5
particularly annoyingwhen processing post-layout simulations (the
electrical description of the circuit is extracted from the layout and
all parasitic elements are taken into account) of high frequency
0 100 200 Time(ps) Integrated Circuits.
vout (VI
In the followingsections,we first discuss accuracy and resolution.
Then, modelling of such a capacitance is proposed.
59
00 100 200 Time(p)
Figure 7: Input and output waveforms are reported versus time.
Discussion on Accuracy and Resolution
Measurement errors are due to three main error sources: the
matching error, the current control error and the slope
measurement error. These errors can be estimated in order to
conclude on the accuracy of the method.
On Figure 7, typical input and output waveforms are reported in
the case of a 6 fF metal - polysilicon capacitance with an input signal Matching error: if the output voltage (Vout)can be measured
slope of .1 V / p when the output is loaded with 10 pF - 10 M a
(probing system of an oscilloscope). Due to the sign of the current with an accuracy of &AV it comes AI, =2
% x AV, where is
dVmt a 0
133
the slope of the transfer characteristic at IO (input current transfer characteristic is equal to 1pA which corresponds to .01 fF
magnitude). Assuming that the voltage measurement accuracy is variation of the capacitance.
constant, this error is determined for each transfer characteristic.
As an example, Figure 8 reports the transfer characteristic in the 1 Due to the relative error magnitudes, the resolution is not a
limiting factor for this technique.
nA range and -
dvout - 1115 MQ is obtained.
dI0
Parameter Extraction
On Table 2, expected values have been determined using typical
parameters given by the foundry and the following model:
C, = Area x C, + Perimeter X C,
-.- where C, and C, are respectively capacitances per area unit
0.9 0.95 1.oo 1.05 I;, (d) (fF/pm2) and per perimeter unit (fF/pm).
Figure 8: Transfer characteristic of the converter at 1 nA input Based on our experiments, new parameters can be determined to
current. characterize Metal - Polysilicon capacitances. For each test
structure we report (Figure 9) the ratio C versus This
Current control error : AI2 is given by apparatus specifications Area Area .
and is related to IOand to the current source accuracy (+.6 % at 100 variation correspond to a straight line described by the following
nA with HP 4145B). relation:
The first two terms affect the current determination and the third C, = .0377 f .0014 fF/pm2
one the slope determination. It comes:
C, = . W 3 7 f .0055 fF/pm
Since an elementary device can be studied, this method is [5] B. Laquai, H. Richter and B. Hofflinger, “A new method and
particularly suitable for spatial scattering studies on a wafer and teststructure for easy determination of fento-Farad on-chip
statistical characterization of oxide thickness. Moreover, it is capacitances in a MOS process”,IEEE IntemationalConference on
particularly convenient to determine the reference capacitance Microelectronic Test Structures (ICMTS.92). San Diego. CA,
used in methods dedicated to biasing dependent capacitances [4]. USA, March 16-19, 1992, pp. 62-66.