Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Course Overview
This is the introductory course in strategic management. The course aims to help students
understand how strategy formulation and implementation enables firms to register and sustain
superior performance.
The course is divided into three modules. The first two modules of the course focus on Strategy
Development – how firms formulate effective strategies at the business and corporate level,
bringing in conceptual understanding of competitive and corporate strategies as well as analytical
techniques to support analysis and strategy formulation.
Business strategy deals with a particular line of business – either a single-business firm or a line
of business within a multi-business firm, and focuses on competitive forces in the industry,
business models, strategic positioning within the industry, as well as resources and capabilities
needed to compete effectively.
Corporate strategy typically deals with the management of scope of the firm – horizontal scope
(growth through diversification of products / services), vertical scope (forward integration,
backward integration), and geographic scope (domestic markets, multiple markets, global
markets). The vehicles for corporate growth in one or more of the three dimensions of scope can
be organic – through expansion of the scope of current businesses or entry into new businesses,
or inorganic – through mergers, acquisitions, alliances and so on. Thus, corporate strategy
focuses on the appropriate scope of the firm, how the corporate adds value to the various lines of
business and the appropriate strategies to compete successfully in multiple geographies.
The last module of the course focuses on Strategy Formulation and Implementation Process –
how firms go about managing the development and execution of strategy, how the key elements
involved in strategy execution (implementation) process influence the outcome, and how strategic
change unfolds. In this module we will explore strategy execution in depth, the various
dimensions of execution and how they are interlinked. We will also explore the symbiotic
relationship between strategy development and execution. Participants will learn that the process
of developing and implementing strategy is iterative and not necessarily sequential.
The viewpoint will be from the perspective of the CEO, who has responsibility for the long-term
sustenance and growth of the firm.
Page 1 of 9
Learning Objectives
Strategic analysis assumes that most resource and product markets are imperfect, providing firms
with the opportunity to generate above-normal profits. Opportunities emerge as industry
conditions change or are changed by innovating firms. Firms create competitive advantage by
understanding and responding to these opportunities through their strategies – effective strategies
implemented successfully lead to superior performance. Successful firms, be it a single business
or a corporate, are faced with the challenge of being able to sustain their performance against
competitive rivalry and changes in the environment. The first two modules explore these themes
in various ways, and seek to develop understanding of various conceptual frameworks and
analytical techniques that will help the participants to:
– Assess the structure of an industry and its influence on potential for profitability of firms in the
industry
– Assess a firm’s resources and organizational capabilities for their ability to generate
competitive advantage
– Develop a business strategy based on understanding of the industry / market, the resources /
capabilities of the firm and its competitive advantage
– Evaluate a firm’s diversification / conglomerate strategy
– Evaluate the need for vertical integration and how to succeed in it
– Evaluate a firm’s global strategy
Strategy execution is an art, and many CEOs and managers have made their name and fame in the
brilliance they showed in managing the implementation process in their enterprises. A great
strategy poorly implemented is a failed strategy. In comparison, a good strategy implemented
well, and adapted for the changing realities that unfold over time can lead to superior
performance outcomes. The last module of this course aims to anchor this understanding and
underlying concepts strongly in the participants’ thinking. More specifically, at the end of the
course, participants will be able to:
Pedagogy
Learning will primarily be facilitated through discussion of cases, as the concepts and techniques
in strategic management are best understood through practice. Participants have the responsibility
to prepare for the case prior to the session, and actively participate in the case discussion.
For the participants to derive the best learning experience from the sessions, prior preparation for
case discussions is essential and necessary. For each session, readings and cases have been
assigned. Prior to participating in the sessions, the students must go through the relevant readings
and the case and analyze the case with specific reference to the discussion questions. In analyzing
the case, the concepts in the relevant readings must be applied. As we progress through the
course, it would be useful to integrate the learning from prior sessions into the preparation. Some
of the discussion questions would require numerical estimates based on data provided in the case.
As part of the preparation, participants must carry out relevant numerical analysis and bring their
There is no right or wrong answer to any business situation or issue, as managers often work with
insufficient data and time. While it is often possible to judge the correctness of a decision with
hindsight, that is not the primary learning objective. Rather the objective is to inculcate in the
students the ability to analyze situations and arrive at conclusions that are most appropriate, given
the available information; the appropriateness being judged based on consistency of the line of
thought that leads to the conclusion. The students, in preparing for the case discussion, shall focus
their analysis on:
Discussions on the cases assigned for each of the sessions is expected to provide the participants
with the understanding and application of relevant conceptual frameworks and analytical
techniques. Active participation by the participants is essential for the case discussion to deliver
value in the classroom.
– Prepare well for the class (summarized points of view, based on case analysis and readings)
– Participate meaningfully in the class discussion (clear and concise articulation of one’s point of
view, without repeating / paraphrasing what someone else has said already)
– Understand differing points of view
– Synthesize learning from the discussion
Class participation gives participants the opportunity to practice and develop their ability to add
value to a discussion. So, prepare well and do not hesitate to participate in the class discussion.
Evaluation
Please note the following regarding class participation, group assignments, and group project:
Class Participation
Regularity in attending the sessions, preparing for the sessions before the class and active
participation in the learning experience are vital. Anyone in the class may be called
upon to contribute insights during the case discussion. If there is a dire and pressing
need to absent from a session, prior written permission (via email) is essential.
Group Assignments
PGP Office will form groups of five students each for the group assignments.
The groups will submit analyses of two cases - one before midterm and one after
midterm.
The cases to be analyzed will be announced in the class and due in the class
Group Project
Each group is expected to select one industry and a firm, listed on a stock exchange in
India, in that industry. The group will collect relevant information on that industry and the
firm and analyze the collected information using tools/concepts covered in the course.
You are required to submit the choice of your industry and firm before the fourth session
of the course. An interim report will become due before the thirteenth session. The due
date for submission of the final report will be announced later.
All groups will submit a power point presentation of their project findings before twenty
second (22nd) session. A few groups will be randomly selected by draw of lots to make
class presentations of 10 minutes each in the last two sessions.
Copying verbatim from web resources or other group’s submissions will be considered
plagiarism and severely penalized. You are expected to clearly cite your data sources
using footnotes or endnotes. Verbatim quotes of a sentence or more should be italicized
and put in double quotation marks.
Course Materials
Schedule of Topics
Module 1: Introduction
Readings:
– Martin, R.L. and Golsby-Smith, T. Management is Much More than a Science. Harvard
Business Review. September-October 2017
Case:
– Honda (A) (HBS Case 9-384-049)
– Honda (B) (HBS Case 9-384-050) – To be distributed in the class
Discussion questions: How do you rate Honda’s new product development process? Was
Honda’s entry into the US a good decision? Were US an attractive market for motorcycles?
Did Honda have the competence to match the technological prowess of its US counterparts?
Could Honda have done anything differently?
Readings:
– Porter, M. E. What is strategy? Harvard Business Review, 74(1), November-December 1996
– Collis D.J. and Rukstad M.G. Can you say what your strategy is? Harvard Business Review,
April 2008
– Collins, J.C. & Porras, J.I. Building Your Company’s Vision, Harvard Business Review,
September-October 1996
Case:
– Narayana Hrudayalaya Heart Hospital – Cardiac Care for the Poor (HBS Case 9-505-708)
Explore how the structural features of an industry influence the potential for profitability for
firms in the industry.
Readings:
– Porter, M. E. (2007) Understanding Industry Structure, HBS Note (9-707-493)
Case:
– Indian airline industry
Examine how industry economics shape the structural features of an industry and how firms
influence the industry structure to their advantage.
Case:
– Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in 2006 (HBS Case No. 9-706-447)
Readings:
– Grant, R.M. Cost Advantages and Differentiation: Pg. 223-259
– Ghemawat P. & Rivkin J.W. Competitive Advantage, Core Reading (HBR#8105), Jan 2014
Case:
– Matching Dell (HBS Case No. 9-799-158)
Discussion questions: Why is the profitability of the personal computer industry so low?
What accounts for Dell’s success in the personal computer industry? Estimate Dell’s
competitive advantage over rivals? How should rivals respond to challenge posed by Dell?
Readings:
– Heracleous, L. & Wirtz, J. Singapore Airlines’ Balancing Act. Harvard Business Review,
July-August 2010
Case:
– Tata Consultancy Services: Selling Certainty (HBS Case No. PG0-007)
Readings:
– Johnson, M.W., Christensen, C.M. & Kagermann, H. Reinventing Your Business Model.
Harvard Business Review, December 2008
– Note on the Value Chain: A Framework for Analyzing Firm Activities. WDI Publishing.
W90C02 (Dated: January 15, 2010)
Case:
– Health City Cayman Islands (HBS Case No. 9-714-510)
Discussion questions: Is NH business model in India appropriate for Cayman Islands? What
are the adaptations needed to the NH business model? Why are these adaptations needed?
Readings:
– Collis, D. J. & Montgomery, C. A. Competing on Resources. Harvard Business Review. Jul-
Aug 2008
Readings:
– Markides C.C. To Diversify or Not to Diversify. Harvard Business Review, 1997
– Capron L. and Mitchell W. Finding the Right Path., Harvard Business Review, 2010
Case:
– Newell Company: Corporate Strategy (HBS Case 9-799-139)
Discussion questions: Is Newell successful? What are Newell’s distinctive resources? What
are the challenges Newell faced in 1990s? What is Newell’s acquisition strategy? Does
Calphalon acquisition make sense?
Readings:
– Stuckey, J. & White, D. When and When Not to Vertically Integrate. Sloan Management
Review, 34(3), p.71-83. 1993
Case:
– The Walt Disney Company and Pixar Inc.: To Acquire or Not to Acquire? (HBS Case 9-709-
462)
Discussion questions: Should Disney acquire Pixar? What are the organizational challenges
that Disney would face in managing the combined entity? Should Disney and Pixar
renegotiate contract? What is the distribution fee that Disney should charge Pixar? Who
should hold ownership rights to movie titles: Disney or Pixar?
Readings:
– Ghemawat, P. Managing Differences: The Central Challenge of Global Strategy, Harvard
Business Review, Mar 2007
– Tallman S. & Fladmoe-Lindquist. Internationalization, Globalization, and Capability-Based
Strategy, California Management Review, 2002
Case:
– Philips Vs Matsushita: The Competitive Battle Continues (HBS Case 9-910-410)
Readings:
– Gompers, P.A. A note on strategic alliances (HBS Note 9-298-047)
Case:
– Corning Inc: A network of alliances (HBS Case 9-391-102)
Discussion questions: What are the criteria for evaluating the three proposals before the
management committee? Do the proposals meet these criteria? What are your specific
recommendations regarding the three proposals?
Readings:
– Nohria, N. Note on Organization Structure. HBS Background Note. 9-491-083, 1995
– Waterman Jr., R. H., Peters, T. J. & Phillips, J. R. Structure is Not Organization, Business
Horizons, Vol.23(3), pg.14-26, 1980
Case:
– Texas Instruments Incorporated (A) (HBS Case 9-306-065)
– Texas Instruments Incorporated (B) (HBS Case 9-306-065) (To be distributed in the class)
Discussion questions: What were the various businesses of Metals and Controls
Organization? How were these businesses organized? Was this organization appropriate?
Why? What problems was Metals and Controls Organization facing? Who would you hold
responsible for these problems?
Readings:
– Gavetti, G. Strategy Formulation and Inertia. HBS Note 9-705-468. 2005
Case:
– Time Life Inc. (A) (HBS Case 9-395-012)
Discussion questions: What challenges did John Fahey face in early 1992? What is your
evaluation of the steps he took? What has been accomplished and what remains to be done as of
January 1993?
Readings:
– Buchanan, L. & Connell A.O. A brief history of decision making. Harvard Business
Review. January 2006