The rubric provides criteria to evaluate student work on four dimensions: understanding of topic, cooperation, presentation, and weighting. For understanding of topic, the highest level demonstrates accurate factual information and a clear understanding, while lower levels show decreasing accuracy. For cooperation, the highest level involves accepting others' ideas and all members contributing, while lower levels include negative comments and one person doing all the work. For presentation, the top level shows confidence, is informative and engaging, while lower levels include stalling, lacking information, and being boring or hard to hear. Point values decrease from exceptional to attempted levels of performance.
The rubric provides criteria to evaluate student work on four dimensions: understanding of topic, cooperation, presentation, and weighting. For understanding of topic, the highest level demonstrates accurate factual information and a clear understanding, while lower levels show decreasing accuracy. For cooperation, the highest level involves accepting others' ideas and all members contributing, while lower levels include negative comments and one person doing all the work. For presentation, the top level shows confidence, is informative and engaging, while lower levels include stalling, lacking information, and being boring or hard to hear. Point values decrease from exceptional to attempted levels of performance.
The rubric provides criteria to evaluate student work on four dimensions: understanding of topic, cooperation, presentation, and weighting. For understanding of topic, the highest level demonstrates accurate factual information and a clear understanding, while lower levels show decreasing accuracy. For cooperation, the highest level involves accepting others' ideas and all members contributing, while lower levels include negative comments and one person doing all the work. For presentation, the top level shows confidence, is informative and engaging, while lower levels include stalling, lacking information, and being boring or hard to hear. Point values decrease from exceptional to attempted levels of performance.
W e CRITERIA i Exceptional Admirable Acceptable Attempted g h t
1. Factual 1. Factual 1. Factual 1. Information is
information is information information inaccurate 2 accurate is mostly is somewhat 2. Presentation is off Understanding 5 2. Indicates a accurate accurate topic of Topic p t clear 2. Good 2. Fair s understanding understandi understandi of topic ng of topic ng of topic 10pts 25pts 20pts 15pts 1. Accepts ideas 1. Accepts 1. Unwilling to 1. Group does not of others; able most ideas compromise work together 1 without 5 to 2. Few 2. One person does all negative p compromise comments; members the work t s 2. All members able to contribute Cooperation compromis contribute e 2. Some members contribute 15pts 5pts 12pts 10pts 1. Shows 1. Shows 1. Unsure of 1. Portrayal stalls confidence some responsibilit 2. Lacks information 2. Informative confidence y 3. Entertaining; 2. Presents 2. Somewhat 3. Audience bored engages some informative 4. Mumbles Presentation 1 audience information 3. Engages 0 4. Speaks loudly 3. Engages audience 5. Body language is p and clearly audience intermittentl lacking; t 5. Appropriate 4. Can be y s use of body heard 4. Hard to hear inappropriate language 5. Some use 5. Some of body movement language 5pts 10pts 8pts 6pts